Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (211)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = agroecosystems services

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 3121 KiB  
Article
Seasonal Changes in the Soil Microbiome on Chernozem Soil in Response to Tillage, Fertilization, and Cropping System
by Andrea Balla Kovács, Evelin Kármen Juhász, Áron Béni, Costa Gumisiriya, Magdolna Tállai, Anita Szabó, Ida Kincses, Tibor Novák, András Tamás and Rita Kremper
Agronomy 2025, 15(8), 1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081887 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Soil microbial communities are crucial for ecosystem services, soil fertility, and the resilience of agroecosystems. This study investigated how long-term (31 years) agronomic practices—tillage, NPK fertilization, and cropping system—along with measured environmental variables influence the microbial biomass and its community composition in Chernozem [...] Read more.
Soil microbial communities are crucial for ecosystem services, soil fertility, and the resilience of agroecosystems. This study investigated how long-term (31 years) agronomic practices—tillage, NPK fertilization, and cropping system—along with measured environmental variables influence the microbial biomass and its community composition in Chernozem soil under corn cultivation. The polyfactorial field experiment included three tillage treatments ((moldboard (MT), ripped (RT), strip (ST)), two fertilization regimes (NPK (N: 160; P: 26; K: 74 kg/ha), and unfertilized control) and two cropping systems (corn monoculture and corn–wheat biculture). The soil samples (0–30 cm) were collected in June and September 2023. Microbial biomass and community structure were quantified using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis, which allowed the estimation of total microbial biomass and community composition (arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, fungi, Gram-negative (GN) and Gram-positive (GP) bacteria, actinomycetes). Our results showed that microbial biomass increased from June to September, rising by 270% in unfertilized plots and by 135% in NPK-fertilized plots, due to higher soil moisture. Reduced tillage, especially ST, promoted significantly higher microbial biomass, with biomass reaching 290% and 182% of that in MT plots in June and September, respectively. MT had a higher ratio of bacteria-to-fungi compared to RT and ST, indicating a greater sensitivity of fungi to disturbance. NPK fertilization lowered soil pH by about one unit (to 4.1–4.8) and reduced microbial biomass—by 2% in June and 48% in September—compared to the control, with the particular suppression of AM fungi. The cropping system had a smaller overall effect on microbial biomass. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 2060 KiB  
Review
Integrated Management Practices Foster Soil Health, Productivity, and Agroecosystem Resilience
by Xiongwei Liang, Shaopeng Yu, Yongfu Ju, Yingning Wang and Dawei Yin
Agronomy 2025, 15(8), 1816; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081816 - 27 Jul 2025
Viewed by 450
Abstract
Sustainable farmland management is vital for global food security and for mitigating environmental degradation and climate change. While individual practices such as crop rotation and no-tillage are well-documented, this review synthesizes current evidence to illuminate the critical synergistic effects of integrating four key [...] Read more.
Sustainable farmland management is vital for global food security and for mitigating environmental degradation and climate change. While individual practices such as crop rotation and no-tillage are well-documented, this review synthesizes current evidence to illuminate the critical synergistic effects of integrating four key strategies: crop rotation, conservation tillage, organic amendments, and soil microbiome management. Crop rotation enhances nutrient cycling and disrupts pest cycles, while conservation tillage preserves soil structure, reduces erosion, and promotes carbon sequestration. Organic amendments replenish soil organic matter and stimulate biological activity, and a healthy soil microbiome boosts plant resilience to stress and enhances nutrient acquisition through key functional groups like arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMFs). Critically, the integration of these practices yields amplified benefits that far exceed their individual contributions. Integrated management systems not only significantly increase crop yields (by up to 15–30%) and soil organic carbon but also deliver profound global ecosystem services, with a potential to sequester 2.17 billion tons of CO2 and reduce soil erosion by 2.41 billion tons annually. Despite challenges such as initial yield variability, leveraging these synergies through precision agriculture represents the future direction for the field. This review concludes that a holistic, systems-level approach is essential for building regenerative and climate-resilient agroecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Tillage Methods to Improve the Yield and Quality of Crops)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 147691 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Landscape Patterns for Tea Plantation Agroecosystems: A Case Study of an Important Agricultural Heritage System in Enshi, China
by Jiaqian Wu, Chunyang Li and Tong Wang
Land 2025, 14(7), 1491; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071491 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 405
Abstract
The agroecosystems of tea plantations play a significant role in regional ecosystem services, with some recognized as Important Agricultural Heritage Systems. Despite notable progress in conserving these unique agricultural landscapes, systematic approaches to delineating the core conservation zone and establishing robust ecological networks [...] Read more.
The agroecosystems of tea plantations play a significant role in regional ecosystem services, with some recognized as Important Agricultural Heritage Systems. Despite notable progress in conserving these unique agricultural landscapes, systematic approaches to delineating the core conservation zone and establishing robust ecological networks for agricultural heritage systems remain insufficient. This study employed the Enshi Yulu Tea Agricultural Heritage System as a case study, integrating the MaxEnt model, InVEST model, and circuit theory to quantitatively assess landscape connectivity and prioritize conservation efforts. The analysis delineated a core conservation zone of 718.04 km2 for tea plantations, identified 77 ecological corridors, and pinpointed 104 critical ecological nodes. The results indicate 43.96 km2 of synergistic areas between tea plantations and ecological sources, demonstrating that the agroecosystems of tea plantations provide higher ESs values compared to monoculture plantations and farmlands. In addition, an ecological optimization framework featuring a “four belts and four zones” spatial configuration was proposed, aimed at enhancing connectivity and promoting the sustainable development of tea plantation agricultural heritage. The proposed framework can provide evidence-based references for future policy formulation, and deliver actionable insights for land-use planning, habitat restoration, and infrastructure mitigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Landscape Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1088 KiB  
Article
Introducing Legumes into Wheat–Maize Rotation Complicates Soil Microbial Co-Occurrence Network and Reduces Soil Allelochemicals in Succeeding Wheat Season
by Yaqian Yan, Haiyang Jin, Fei Zheng, Xiwen Yang, Hang Song, Jiarui Wang, Baoting Fang, Hongjian Cheng, Xiangdong Li and Dexian He
Agriculture 2025, 15(12), 1307; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15121307 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 578
Abstract
Increasing species richness through rotation is considered a promising measure to enhance agroecosystem functions and services. However, the legacy effects of introducing legumes into a wheat–maize rotation in the North China Plain on soil microecology, especially the soil metabolome, in the succeeding wheat [...] Read more.
Increasing species richness through rotation is considered a promising measure to enhance agroecosystem functions and services. However, the legacy effects of introducing legumes into a wheat–maize rotation in the North China Plain on soil microecology, especially the soil metabolome, in the succeeding wheat season have not been elucidated. This study established three cropping systems: (1) a continuous winter wheat–summer maize rotation (M), (2) a winter wheat–summer peanut (summer maize) rotation (PM), and (3) a winter wheat–summer soybean (summer maize) rotation (SM). The soil physicochemical properties, microbial communities, and metabolomes were analyzed at the stage of the succeeding wheat crop. Introducing peanuts or soybeans into a wheat–maize rotation significantly reduced the soil bacterial abundance and increased the soil fungal Shannon index. This rotation adjustment had a substantial impact on the structure and taxa composition of the soil microbial community. Crop diversification increased the number of total edges, the average degree, and the average number of neighbors in the soil microbial co-occurrence network. Different crop rotations significantly affected the soil metabolic profiles in the positive and negative ion modes. Crop diversification significantly reduced the abundance of coumarin and coumaric acid in the soils. In conclusion, introducing peanuts or soybeans into a wheat–maize rotation could increase the soil fungal community diversity, change the soil microbial community structure and taxa composition, increase the complexity of the soil microbial ecological network, and reduce the abundance of soil allelochemicals. Our study demonstrated the continuity of the impact of crop rotation on soil ecology, and revealed the ecological advantages of crop diversification from the perspective of soil microbiology and metabolomics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Soils)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1707 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Different Almond Orchard Management Practices in Hyper-Arid Ecosystems on Soil Microbial Communities
by Itaii Applebaum, Gil Eshel, Tirza Doniger and Yosef Steinberger
Land 2025, 14(6), 1281; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061281 - 15 Jun 2025
Viewed by 400
Abstract
The use of service (cover) crops is widely practiced in soil agriculture due to their many benefits, including enhanced nutrient supply and improved soil health. Bacteria, as major decomposers of plant residues in the soil, play essential roles in nutrient cycling. This study [...] Read more.
The use of service (cover) crops is widely practiced in soil agriculture due to their many benefits, including enhanced nutrient supply and improved soil health. Bacteria, as major decomposers of plant residues in the soil, play essential roles in nutrient cycling. This study examined the impact of various almond orchard management practices on the soil microbial community composition in a hyper-arid ecosystem. High-throughput sequencing was used to compare the microbial communities in two adjacent almond orchards managed with either organic (ORG) or regenerative agriculture (RA) practices, alongside an uncultivated (UC) site. Notably, little is known about the responses of soil bacterial communities in hyper-arid regions to intercrop mulch from service crops. This study may offer insights into the ecological limits of the benefits of service crops in promoting soil health under extreme conditions. Our findings demonstrate that RA management can alter soil organic carbon levels and reshape microbial communities by increasing overall bacterial abundance and enriching specific keystone taxa. These changes may have significant implications for nutrient cycling processes in hyper-arid agroecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2292 KiB  
Article
Fertilization Alters Indicator Species Serving as Bioindicators for Evaluating Agricultural Practices Related to Maize Grain Yield
by Guoqiang Li, Jiaqing Liu, Wenya Zhang, Jvshui Hu, Peng Shi and Gehong Wei
Microorganisms 2025, 13(6), 1384; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061384 - 13 Jun 2025
Viewed by 972
Abstract
Diversified agricultural practices reconfigure agroecosystem services by modifying fertilization, tillage intensities, and cropping patterns, altering soil properties and microbial assemblages. However, microbial communities, as critical bioindicators of soil health and productivity, respond to agricultural disturbances, and the effects of multiple practices on productivity-associated [...] Read more.
Diversified agricultural practices reconfigure agroecosystem services by modifying fertilization, tillage intensities, and cropping patterns, altering soil properties and microbial assemblages. However, microbial communities, as critical bioindicators of soil health and productivity, respond to agricultural disturbances, and the effects of multiple practices on productivity-associated indicator species require further validation. Using 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing, this study employed a field experiment to investigate the effects of agricultural practices on soil properties, maize productivity, and microbial communities under two fertilization treatments. Within each treatment, we assessed correlations between indicator species associated with cropping–tillage practices and soil productivity. Results showed that fertilization significantly altered soil properties, increased maize grain yield by 23.9%, and reshaped bacterial and fungal community structures, increasing bacterial richness by 23% but reducing fungal richness and Shannon index by 15% and 20%, respectively. Furthermore, cropping–tillage practices significantly affected microbial communities and grain yields in both fertilized and unfertilized treatments despite a slight influence on soil properties. Distinct sets of bacterial and fungal indicator species were identified for each fertilization treatment: unfertilized soils harbored 21 dominant bacterial indicator species (e.g., Bacillus, Rhizobium, Streptomyces) and 8 fungal indicators (e.g., Cryptococcus, Gibberella, Tetracladium); fertilized soils contained 24 dominant bacterial indicators (e.g., Fusobacterium, Clostridium, Lactobacillus) and 6 fungal indicators (e.g., Gibberella, Cladosporium, Mortierella). Notably, abundances of specific indicator genera (e.g., bacteria: Bacteroides, Gemmatirosa, Iamia, Lysobacter, Prevotella, Staphylococcus, Sutterella; fungi: Glomus, Fusicolla in unfertilized soil; bacteria: Dinghuibacter, Haliangium, Kribbella, Rhodomicrobium, Terrimonas; fungi: Pulvinula in fertilized soil) correlated positively with grain yields. These findings demonstrate that fertilization reshapes the composition of microbial indicator species significantly associated with maize productivity. Tailored microbial indicator assemblages specific to distinct fertilization strategies are therefore essential for evaluating crop productivity and assessing agricultural practice impacts. Consequently, monitoring these indicator species enables rapid assessment of soil fertility changes, offering guidance for fertilization management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Microbe Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 5316 KiB  
Article
Risk Assessment of Cryptojacking Attacks on Endpoint Systems: Threats to Sustainable Digital Agriculture
by Tetiana Babenko, Kateryna Kolesnikova, Maksym Panchenko, Olga Abramkina, Nikolay Kiktev, Yuliia Meish and Pavel Mazurchuk
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5426; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125426 - 12 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1033
Abstract
Digital agriculture has rapidly developed in the last decade in many countries where the share of agricultural production is a significant part of the total volume of gross production. Digital agroecosystems are developed using a variety of IT solutions, software and hardware tools, [...] Read more.
Digital agriculture has rapidly developed in the last decade in many countries where the share of agricultural production is a significant part of the total volume of gross production. Digital agroecosystems are developed using a variety of IT solutions, software and hardware tools, wired and wireless data transmission technologies, open source code, Open API, etc. A special place in agroecosystems is occupied by electronic payment technologies and blockchain technologies, which allow farmers and other agricultural enterprises to conduct commodity and monetary transactions with suppliers, creditors, and buyers of products. Such ecosystems contribute to the sustainable development of agriculture, agricultural engineering, and management of production and financial operations in the agricultural industry and related industries, as well as in other sectors of the economy of a number of countries. The introduction of crypto solutions in the agricultural sector is designed to create integrated platforms aimed at helping farmers manage supply lines or gain access to financial services. At the same time, there are risks of illegal use of computing power for cryptocurrency mining—cryptojacking. This article offers a thorough risk assessment of cryptojacking attacks on endpoint systems, focusing on identifying critical vulnerabilities within IT infrastructures and outlining practical preventive measures. The analysis examines key attack vectors—including compromised websites, infected applications, and supply chain infiltration—and explores how unauthorized cryptocurrency mining degrades system performance and endangers data security. The research methodology combines an evaluation of current cybersecurity trends, a review of specialized literature, and a controlled experiment simulating cryptojacking attacks. The findings highlight the importance of multi-layered protection mechanisms and ongoing system monitoring to detect malicious activities at an early stage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4420 KiB  
Article
Plant-Driven Effects of Wildflower Strips on Natural Enemy Biodiversity and Pest Suppression in an Agricultural Landscape in Hangzhou, China
by Wenhao Hu, Kang Ni, Yu Zhu, Shuyi Liu, Xuhua Shao, Zhenrong Yu, Luyu Wang, Rui Zhang, Meichun Duan and Wenhui Xu
Agronomy 2025, 15(6), 1286; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15061286 - 23 May 2025
Viewed by 551
Abstract
Agricultural intensification has led to biodiversity loss and compromised ecosystem services, necessitating sustainable pest management strategies. This study evaluates the efficacy of wildflower strips (WFS) in enhancing natural enemy communities and suppressing pest activity in rice-wheat rotation landscapes of eastern China. An experiment [...] Read more.
Agricultural intensification has led to biodiversity loss and compromised ecosystem services, necessitating sustainable pest management strategies. This study evaluates the efficacy of wildflower strips (WFS) in enhancing natural enemy communities and suppressing pest activity in rice-wheat rotation landscapes of eastern China. An experiment compared WFS (10-species mixtures) with natural grass strips (CK) across biodiversity, functional traits, and pest dynamics. WFS significantly increased parasitic wasp α-diversity (species richness: +195.5%, activity density: +362.0%) and suppressed pest (Armadillidium vulgare) populations by 68%, primarily through female-biased sex ratios and functional trait shifts. Key species like Lindenius mesopleuralis and Ectemnius continuus emerged as indicators of WFS habitats. Spider communities showed no β-diversity differentiation but exhibited functional guild shifts (e.g., web-building specialists). Plant community composition, particularly floral resource availability and phenological continuity, drove natural enemy assembly and pest regulation, outperforming the CK group in rare species conservation. Our findings highlight WFS as a precision tool for enhancing pest control through targeted plant selection and trait-mediated interactions. This study advances the understanding of habitat-driven pest regulation, providing a framework for optimizing ecological intensification in agroecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Biosystem and Biological Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1430 KiB  
Review
Exploring Microbial Ecosystem Services for Environmental Stress Amelioration: A Review
by Pradeep Semwal, Anand Dave, Juveriya Israr, Sankalp Misra, Manish Kumar and Diby Paul
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(10), 4515; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104515 - 9 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 878
Abstract
The increasing global population and intensifying resource limitations present a formidable challenge for sustainable crop production, especially in developing regions. This review explores the pivotal role of microbial ecosystem services in alleviating environmental stresses that impede agricultural productivity. Soil microbiota, particularly plant growth-promoting [...] Read more.
The increasing global population and intensifying resource limitations present a formidable challenge for sustainable crop production, especially in developing regions. This review explores the pivotal role of microbial ecosystem services in alleviating environmental stresses that impede agricultural productivity. Soil microbiota, particularly plant growth-promoting microbes (PGPMs), are integral to soil health and fertility and plant resilience against both abiotic (drought, salinity, temperature extremes, heavy metals) and biotic (pathogen) stresses. These microorganisms employ a variety of direct and indirect mechanisms, including the modulation of phytohormones, nutrient solubilization, the production of stress-alleviating enzymes, and the synthesis of antimicrobial compounds, to enhance plant growth and mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Advances in microbial biotechnology have expanded the toolkit for harnessing beneficial microbes, enabling the development of microbial inoculants and consortia tailored for specific stress conditions. This review highlights the multifaceted contributions of soil microbes, such as improving nutrient uptake, promoting root development, facilitating pollutant degradation, and supporting carbon sequestration, all of which underpin ecosystem resilience and sustainable agricultural practices. Furthermore, the synergistic interactions between plant roots and rhizospheric microbes are emphasized as key drivers of soil structure enhancement and long-term productivity. By synthesizing current research on the mechanisms of microbe-mediated stress tolerance, this review underscores the potential of microbial interventions to bridge the gap between food security and environmental conservation. The integration of microbial solutions into agroecosystems offers a promising, eco-friendly strategy to revitalize soils, boost crop yields, and ensure agricultural sustainability in the face of mounting environmental challenges. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microorganisms in the Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2281 KiB  
Viewpoint
On the Ecological Compensation Standard of Cultivated Land Under the “Separation of Three Rights”: From the Perspective of Contract Rights
by Nan Wang, Kaisheng Long and Wenke Liu
Land 2025, 14(5), 1003; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14051003 - 6 May 2025
Viewed by 377
Abstract
Contracting farmers are the main entities in cultivated land protection. From the perspective of contractual rights, improving the ecological compensation standards for cultivated land under the “Separation of Three Rights” system helps coordinate interest relationships in ecological compensation and serves as the key [...] Read more.
Contracting farmers are the main entities in cultivated land protection. From the perspective of contractual rights, improving the ecological compensation standards for cultivated land under the “Separation of Three Rights” system helps coordinate interest relationships in ecological compensation and serves as the key to benefit distribution among multiple right-holders. Reasonable compensation to contracting farmers facilitates the dual consideration of food security and ecological safety in cultivated land. The study starts from the connotation of contractual rights, incorporates both opportunity cost losses and ecological values into compensation criteria based on the membership attributes of contractual rights and the nature of use rights. Employing the equivalent factor method, replacement cost method, and opportunity cost method, it calculates compensation standards for both transferred and non-transferred contracting farmers, using prefecture-level cities in Jiangsu Province as case examples. (1) Land-transferring contracted farmers: The compensation standard is calculated based on opportunity cost loss as the compensation basis. (2) Non-transferring contracted farmers: The compensation standard incorporates both opportunity cost losses and the ecological value generated through agricultural production. Research Findings: The average compensation standard for contracted farmland transfer in Jiangsu Province is 6275.79 CNY/hm2, primarily implemented through government compensation mechanisms. The average compensation standard for non-transferred contracted farmland in Jiangsu Province is 40,604 CNY/hm2, implemented through a government–market–community collaborative mechanism. The tiered compensation criteria, by accounting for differential contributions of farmland transfer participants and non-participants to agro-ecosystem services, effectively reconcile the dual imperatives of arable land preservation and livelihood enhancement for contracted farmers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1032 KiB  
Article
The Role of Forest Conversion and Agroecological Practices in Enhancing Ecosystem Services in Tropical Oxisols of the Amazon Basin
by Tancredo Souza, Gislaine dos Santos Nascimento, Diego Silva Batista, Agnne Mayara Oliveira Silva and Milton Cesar Costa Campos
Forests 2025, 16(5), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16050740 - 25 Apr 2025
Viewed by 472
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of agroecological practices—organic fertilization and biofertilization—in enhancing ecosystem services in agroforestry and pasture systems. A field experiment was conducted over three years, comparing these practices to a control treatment and a natural ecosystem as a reference. Soil chemical, [...] Read more.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of agroecological practices—organic fertilization and biofertilization—in enhancing ecosystem services in agroforestry and pasture systems. A field experiment was conducted over three years, comparing these practices to a control treatment and a natural ecosystem as a reference. Soil chemical, physical, and biological parameters were assessed, including soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial respiration, root density, and gene abundances of key microbial groups (Archaea, Bacteria, and Fungi). Organic fertilization resulted in a significant increase in SOC, phosphorus, microbial biomass, and root density, indicating improved soil structure and fertility. Biofertilization showed selective effects, promoting archaeal abundance but reducing bacterial and fungal diversity. Seasonal variation influenced nutrient cycling, with organic fertilization buffering against dry-season declines in microbial activity and nutrient availability. Aboveground dry biomass and litter deposition were highest in the natural ecosystem, followed by organic fertilization treatments in agroforestry and pasture systems. Despite improvements under agroecological management, the natural ecosystem consistently maintained superior soil quality and biological resilience. The findings highlight that organic inputs and diversified cropping systems enhance soil health but do not fully replicate the ecological benefits of undisturbed forests. In conclusion, agroecological practices provide viable alternatives to mitigate soil degradation and sustain ecosystem services in tropical Oxisols. Organic fertilization emerges as the most effective strategy, fostering long-term improvements in soil fertility and microbial dynamics. However, continued research is needed to optimize these practices for greater resilience and sustainability in Amazonian agroecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Metagenome of Tropical Soils)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3375 KiB  
Article
Cover Crops for Carbon Mitigation and Biodiversity Enhancement: A Case Study of an Olive Grove in Messinia, Greece
by Ioanna Michail, Christos Pantazis, Stavros Solomos, Michail Michailidis, Athanassios Molassiotis and Vasileios Gkisakis
Agriculture 2025, 15(8), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080898 - 21 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1223
Abstract
Land desertification is becoming increasingly significant for the Mediterranean basin, particularly due to the rising pressures on agricultural land. Regarding the olive grove sector, intensive farming methods can have detrimental effects on the provision of various agroecosystem services. Conversely, agroecological approaches, such as [...] Read more.
Land desertification is becoming increasingly significant for the Mediterranean basin, particularly due to the rising pressures on agricultural land. Regarding the olive grove sector, intensive farming methods can have detrimental effects on the provision of various agroecosystem services. Conversely, agroecological approaches, such as reduced tillage/no tillage and the use of cover crops, can help mitigate soil degradation and enhance soil arthropod biodiversity. Herein, an experiment was conducted in a hilly olive grove in southern Peloponnese, a key olive production area in Greece. Different soil treatments were implemented across nine plots (three plots per treatment), including the following: (i) the use of a cover crop mixture (Pisum sativum, Vicia faba, Hordeum vulgare), (ii) herbicide application, and (iii) spontaneous vegetation (control). A comprehensive survey was performed at the plot level for monitoring carbon sequestration and ground-dwelling arthropod diversity. The results indicated that cover crops had a positive impact on soil fertility and structure, leading to an increase in total biomass production per plot, while also contributing to the preservation of key soil arthropod populations when compared to treatments that resulted in bare soil. The findings from this in situ study are meant to be integrated into the frames of a long-term monitoring process in order to be used for climate change mitigation and biodiversity management models, enhancing the resilience and regeneration of degraded land. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Soils)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 845 KiB  
Review
Sustainable Warm-Climate Forage Legumes: Versatile Products and Services
by James P. Muir, José C. Batista Dubeux Junior, Mércia V. Ferreira dos Santos, Jamie L. Foster, Rinaldo L. Caraciolo Ferreira, Mário de Andrade Lira, Barbara Bellows, Edward Osei, Bir B. Singh and Jeff A. Brady
Grasses 2025, 4(2), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses4020016 - 18 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1436
Abstract
Forage legumes, besides their use as ruminant feed supplements, contribute to other agricultural, forestry and natural ecosystems’ sustainability around the world. Our objective in this summary is to emphasize that versatility in the face of biotic, abiotic and socio-economic variability is among the [...] Read more.
Forage legumes, besides their use as ruminant feed supplements, contribute to other agricultural, forestry and natural ecosystems’ sustainability around the world. Our objective in this summary is to emphasize that versatility in the face of biotic, abiotic and socio-economic variability is among the most important traits that forage legumes contribute to sustaining human populations in those diverse ecosystems. Forage legumes could contribute even more to agroecosystems if we 1. consider ecosystem services as well as food, feed and fuel production; 2. more fully exploit what we already know about forage legumes’ multiple uses; and 3. focus greater attention and energy exploring and expanding versatility in currently used and novel versatile species. To draw attention to the importance of this versatility to sustainable grasslands, here we review multiple legumes’ roles as forage, bioenergy, pulses (legume seeds for human consumption), pharmaceuticals and cover crops as well as environmental services, in particular soil health, C sequestration and non-industrial organic N. The major points we single out as distinguishing sustainable versatile forage legumes include (1) multiple uses; (2) adaptation to a wide range of edaphoclimatic conditions; (3) flexible economic contributions; and (4) how genomics can harness greater legume versatility. We predict that, because of this versatility, forage legumes will become ever more important as climates change and human pressures on sustainable agro-environments intensify. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Forage in Sustainable Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2821 KiB  
Article
Ecosystem Service Values and Wheat Agroecosystem Management Types in a Semi-Arid Region, Iran
by Saeed Sharafi, Zahra Marzban and Deirdre Dragovich
Land 2025, 14(4), 865; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040865 - 15 Apr 2025
Viewed by 434
Abstract
Global demand for ecosystem services like food and clean water is increasing, and it is crucial to economically value these services for the purposes of environmental conservation, land-use planning, and the implementation of green taxes. Focusing on a monoculture wheat agroecosystem, the economic [...] Read more.
Global demand for ecosystem services like food and clean water is increasing, and it is crucial to economically value these services for the purposes of environmental conservation, land-use planning, and the implementation of green taxes. Focusing on a monoculture wheat agroecosystem, the economic value of ecosystem services and environmental damage from different farm management types is here compared with natural ecosystems in a semi-arid region in Iran during the 2019–2020 agricultural year. Using field survey data collected from 203 wheat farms with varying management practices, we estimated the economic value of six ecosystem services, along with three environmental damages. The net value of provisioning/regulating services less environmental disservices in wheat agroecosystems was highest for farms with a conservation management system, followed (in rank order) by intensive, traditional, organic, and industrial management types. Wheat agroecosystems recorded net values of 41.94% to 66.92% below those of natural ecosystems in the region. The findings show that converting natural ecosystems into wheat agroecosystems increases the value of provisioning services (food and forage) but also substantially increases environmental costs. These costs rose linearly with the value of increases in provisioning services. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1017 KiB  
Article
Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by the Primary Sector in Floodplains: A Study of Sardinia
by Brunella Arru, Roberto Furesi, Pietro Pulina, Antonietta Bardi and Fabio A. Madau
Sustainability 2025, 17(3), 857; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030857 - 22 Jan 2025
Viewed by 867
Abstract
Agriculture, livestock, and forestry are crucial in mitigating hydrogeological risks, such as floods, particularly severe in the Mediterranean region. Still, the ecosystem services (ESs) provided by these activities are often undervalued. However, to assign them an economic value and ensure their effective incorporation [...] Read more.
Agriculture, livestock, and forestry are crucial in mitigating hydrogeological risks, such as floods, particularly severe in the Mediterranean region. Still, the ecosystem services (ESs) provided by these activities are often undervalued. However, to assign them an economic value and ensure their effective incorporation into decision-making processes and territorial planning, they must first be recognized, appreciated, and deemed necessary by society. Despite several studies on ESs in the primary sector, research on agroecosystem flood regulation is limited, leaving key aspects unaddressed for decision-makers. No previous studies explicitly address the evaluation of ESs provided by agriculture, livestock, and forestry businesses in hydrogeological risky environments, especially in flood-prone areas. This study investigates the perception of the ESs provided by the above activities, focusing on those furnished in areas subject to hydrogeological instability. It also focuses on Sardinia (Italy), which is highly susceptible to hydrogeological instability. Through a quantitative survey of 270 residents and non-residents, the research provides evidence of society’s perception of the above ESs. Supporting ESs obtain greater appreciation in crop activities, particularly concerning the preservation of pollinating insects, soil fertility, biodiversity, and water quality. Among the regulatory Ess, appreciation is most prominent in fire risk management and flood risk regulation. Similar arguments can be made for livestock activities. Forestry activities are perceived as key players in managing flood risk, landslide risk, soil erosion, and climate change. The Multiple Correspondence Analysis indicates that appreciating one ES often leads to the recognition of others. Additionally, a set of Logit Regressions showed that while age and gender do not influence ESs perception, education level and awareness of climate change-related emergencies play a significant role. Those findings support more informed decision-making and fostering sustainable practices in areas at risk of hydrogeological disasters and lead to several important implications for practitioners, academics, and policymakers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop