Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (22)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = NeQuick2 model

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 4138 KB  
Article
An EOF-Based Global Plasmaspheric Electron Content Model and Its Potential Role in Vertical-Slant TEC Conversion
by Fengyang Long, Chengfa Gao, Yanfeng Dong and Zhenhao Xu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(11), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16111857 - 23 May 2024
Viewed by 1252
Abstract
Topside total electron content (TEC) data measured by COSMIC/FORMAT-3 during 2008 and 2016 were used to analyze and model the global plasmaspheric electron content (PEC) above 800 km with the help of the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis method, and the potential role [...] Read more.
Topside total electron content (TEC) data measured by COSMIC/FORMAT-3 during 2008 and 2016 were used to analyze and model the global plasmaspheric electron content (PEC) above 800 km with the help of the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis method, and the potential role of the proposed PEC model in helping Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) users derive accurate slant TEC (STEC) from existing high-precision vertical TEC (VTEC) products was validated. A uniform gridded PEC dataset was first obtained using the spherical harmonic regression method, and then, it was decomposed into EOF basis modes. The first four major EOF modes contributed more than 99% of the total variance. They captured the pronounced latitudinal gradient, longitudinal differences, hemispherical differences, diurnal and seasonal variations, and the solar activity dependency of global PEC. A second-layer EOF decomposition was conducted for the spatial pattern and amplitude coefficients of the first-layer EOF modes, and an empirical PEC model was constructed by fitting the second-layer basis functions related to latitude, longitude, local time, season, and solar flux. The PEC model was designed to be driven by whether solar proxy or parameters derived from the Klobuchar model meet the real-time requirements. The validation of the results demonstrated that the proposed PEC model could accurately simulate the major spatiotemporal patterns of global PEC, with a root-mean-square (RMS) error of 1.53 and 2.24 TECU, improvements of 40.70% and 51.74% compared with NeQuick2 model in 2009 and 2014, respectively. Finally, the proposed PEC model was applied to conduct a vertical-slant TEC conversion experiment with high-precision Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs) and dual-frequency carrier phase observables of more than 400 globally distributed GNSS sites. The results of the differential STEC (dSTEC) analysis demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed PEC model in aiding precise vertical-slant TEC conversion. It improved by 18.52% in dSTEC RMS on a global scale and performed better in 90.20% of the testing days compared with the commonly used single-layer mapping function. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 8647 KB  
Article
An Update of the NeQuick-Corr Topside Ionosphere Modeling Based on New Datasets
by Michael Pezzopane, Alessio Pignalberi, Marco Pietrella, Haris Haralambous, Fabricio Prol, Bruno Nava, Artem Smirnov and Chao Xiong
Atmosphere 2024, 15(4), 498; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15040498 - 18 Apr 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2237
Abstract
A new analytical formula for H0, one of the three parameters (H0, g, and r) on which the NeQuick model is based to describe the altitude profile of the electron density above the F2-layer peak height [...] Read more.
A new analytical formula for H0, one of the three parameters (H0, g, and r) on which the NeQuick model is based to describe the altitude profile of the electron density above the F2-layer peak height hmF2, has recently been proposed. This new analytical representation of H0, called H0,corr, relies on numerical grids based on two different types of datasets. On one side, electron density observations by the Swarm satellites over Europe from December 2013 to September 2018, and on the other side, IRI UP (International Reference Ionosphere UPdate) maps over Europe of the critical frequency of the ordinary mode of propagation associated with the F2 layer, foF2, and hmF2, at 15 min cadence for the same period. The new NeQuick topside representation based on H0,corr, hereafter referred to as NeQuick-corr, improved the original NeQuick topside representation. This work updates the numerical grids of H0,corr by extending the underlying Swarm and IRI UP datasets until December 2021, thus allowing coverage of low solar activity levels, as well. Moreover, concerning Swarm, besides the original dataset, the calibrated one is considered, and corresponding grids of H0,corr calculated. At the same time, the role of g is investigated, by considering values different from the reference one, equal to 0.125, currently adopted. To understand what are the best H0,corr grids to be considered for the NeQuick-corr topside representation, vertical total electron content data for low, middle, and high latitudes, recorded from five low-Earth-orbit satellite missions (COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3, GRACE, METOP, TerraSAR-X, and Swarm) have been analyzed. The updated H0,corr grids based on the original Swarm dataset with a value for g = 0.15, and the updated H0,corr grids based on the calibrated Swarm dataset with a value for g = 0.14, are those for which the best results are obtained. The results show that the performance of the different NeQuick-corr models is reliable also for low latitudes, even though these are outside the spatial domain for which the H0,corr grids were obtained, and are dependent on solar activity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 12601 KB  
Article
Diabetic Macular Edema Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers Detected with EfficientNetV2B1 and ConvNeXt
by Corina Iuliana Suciu, Anca Marginean, Vlad-Ioan Suciu, George Adrian Muntean and Simona Delia Nicoară
Diagnostics 2024, 14(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010076 - 28 Dec 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2800
Abstract
(1) Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing challenge, both for patients and physicians, in order to control the impact on health and prevent complications. Millions of patients with diabetes require medical attention, which generates problems regarding the limited time for screening but [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a growing challenge, both for patients and physicians, in order to control the impact on health and prevent complications. Millions of patients with diabetes require medical attention, which generates problems regarding the limited time for screening but also addressability difficulties for consultation and management. As a result, screening programs for vision-threatening complications due to DM have to be more efficient in the future in order to cope with such a great healthcare burden. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a severe complication of DM that can be prevented if it is timely screened with the help of optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices. Newly developing state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can assist physicians in analyzing large datasets and flag potential risks. By using AI algorithms in order to process OCT images of large populations, the screening capacity and speed can be increased so that patients can be timely treated. This quick response gives the physicians a chance to intervene and prevent disability. (2) Methods: This study evaluated ConvNeXt and EfficientNet architectures in correctly identifying DME patterns on real-life OCT images for screening purposes. (3) Results: Firstly, we obtained models that differentiate between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and healthy scans with an accuracy of 0.98. Secondly, we obtained a model that can indicate the presence of edema, detachment of the subfoveolar neurosensory retina, and hyperreflective foci (HF) without using pixel level annotation. Lastly, we analyzed the extent to which the pretrained weights on natural images “understand” OCT scans. (4) Conclusions: Pretrained networks such as ConvNeXt or EfficientNet correctly identify features relevant to the differentiation between healthy retinas and DR, even though they were pretrained on natural images. Another important aspect of our research is that the differentiation between biomarkers and their localization can be obtained even without pixel-level annotation. The “three biomarkers model” is able to identify obvious subfoveal neurosensory detachments, retinal edema, and hyperreflective foci, as well as very small subfoveal detachments. In conclusion, our study points out the possible usefulness of AI-assisted diagnosis of DME for lowering healthcare costs, increasing the quality of life of patients with diabetes, and reducing the waiting time until an appropriate ophthalmological consultation and treatment can be performed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Eye Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3988 KB  
Article
A Multi-Parameter Empirical Fusion Model for Ionospheric TEC in China’s Region
by Jianghe Chen, Pan Xiong, Haochen Wu, Xuemin Zhang, Jiandi Feng and Ting Zhang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(23), 5445; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15235445 - 21 Nov 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2340
Abstract
This article takes the measured Total Electron Content (TEC) from the GPS points of the China Regional Crust Observation Network as the starting point to establish a regional ionospheric empirical model. The model’s performance is enhanced by considering solar flux and geomagnetic activity [...] Read more.
This article takes the measured Total Electron Content (TEC) from the GPS points of the China Regional Crust Observation Network as the starting point to establish a regional ionospheric empirical model. The model’s performance is enhanced by considering solar flux and geomagnetic activity data. The refinement function model of the ionospheric TEC diurnal variation component, seasonal variation component, and geomagnetic component is studied. Using the nonlinear least squares method to fit undetermined coefficients, MEFM-ITCR (Multi-parameter Empirical Fusion Model–Ionospheric TEC China Regional Model) is proposed to forecast the regional ionosphere TEC in China. The results show that the standard deviation of MEFM-ITCR residuals is 3.74TECU, and MEFM-ITCR fits the modeling dataset well. Analyses of geographic location variation, seasonal variation, and geomagnetic disturbance were carried out for MEFM-ITCR performance. The results indicate that in the Chinese region, MEFM-ITCR outperforms IRI2020 and NeQuick2 models in terms of forecast accuracy, linear correlation, and model precision for TEC measured using GPS points under different latitudes and longitudes, different seasons, and different geomagnetic disturbances. The empirical TEC model built for the Chinese region in this paper provides a new ionospheric delay correction method for GNSS single frequency users and is of great significance for establishing other new and improving existing ionospheric empirical models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 774 KB  
Proceeding Paper
Comparison of NeQuick G and Klobuchar Model Performances at Single-Frequency User Level
by Ulrich Ngayap, Claudia Paparini, Marco Porretta, Peter Buist, Knut Stanley Jacobsen, Michael Dähnn, Natalia Hanna, Dzana Halilovic, Anna Świątek and Paulina Gajdowska
Eng. Proc. 2023, 54(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/ENC2023-15475 - 29 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1607
Abstract
In this study, the NeQuick G and Klobuchar models are evaluated by monitoring performance issues related to ionosphere activity for single-frequency users. The effects of radio frequency (RF) signal propagation through the ionosphere may have a significant impact on satellite communication and navigation [...] Read more.
In this study, the NeQuick G and Klobuchar models are evaluated by monitoring performance issues related to ionosphere activity for single-frequency users. The effects of radio frequency (RF) signal propagation through the ionosphere may have a significant impact on satellite communication and navigation systems because of geomagnetic field geometry near the magnetic equator and in the proximity to the high- and low-latitude zones. An ongoing challenge is determining how accurate the ionospheric models employed by existing Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) are. This work investigates the patterns of total electron content (TEC) fluctuations over distinct zones from 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2022. Measurements are collected at station networks deployed worldwide. Firstly, monthly and seasonal variations of TECs are analysed. Secondly, the TEC ’availability’ parameter, as the percentage of time when the TEC error is compliant with the specification of the Galileo Single-Frequency Ionosphere Algorithm (’NeQuick G’ model), is introduced. The TEC error defines the difference between (a) the model TEC, obtained by either the NeQuick G or the Klobuchar model over a given station, and (b) the reference TEC, based on observations from networks of GNSS receivers. Finally, the position, velocity, and time (PVT), along with broadcast group delays (BGDs) are analysed and the PVT accuracy is compared between the NeQuick G and Klobuchar models. In 3.5 years, the seasonal behaviour of TEC shows maxima during the March and October equinox and minima during the June and December solstice. Moreover, an increase in the TEC values and the amount of TEC errors are visible as we are approaching the next solar maximum. Preliminary results show a larger associated positioning error using the Klobuchar than the NeQuick G model. However, the difference is zone-dependent, most evident in equatorial regions. This collaborative study of the GRC, NMA, TUW, and SRC was performed under the Framework Partnership Agreements (GSA/GRANT/04/2016). Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of European Navigation Conference ENC 2023)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 6036 KB  
Article
Characterizing Ionospheric Effects on GNSS Reflectometry at Grazing Angles from Space
by Mario Moreno, Maximilian Semmling, Georges Stienne, Mainul Hoque and Jens Wickert
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(20), 5049; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15205049 - 20 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2941
Abstract
Coherent observations in GNSS reflectometry are prominent in regions with smooth reflecting surfaces and at grazing elevation angles. However, within these lower elevation ranges, GNSS signals traverse a more extensive atmospheric path, and increased ionospheric effects (e.g., delay biases) are expected. These biases [...] Read more.
Coherent observations in GNSS reflectometry are prominent in regions with smooth reflecting surfaces and at grazing elevation angles. However, within these lower elevation ranges, GNSS signals traverse a more extensive atmospheric path, and increased ionospheric effects (e.g., delay biases) are expected. These biases can be mitigated by employing dual-frequency receivers or models tailored for single-frequency receivers. In preparation for the single-frequency GNSS-R ESA “PRETTY” mission, this study aims to characterize ionospheric effects under variable parameter conditions: elevation angles in the grazing range (5° to 30°), latitude-dependent regions (north, tropic, south) and diurnal changes (day and nighttime). The investigation employs simulations using orbit data from Spire Global Inc.’s Lemur-2 CubeSat constellation at the solar minimum (F10.7 index at 75) on March, 2021. Changes towards higher solar activity are accounted for with an additional scenario (F10.7 index at 180) on March, 2023. The electron density associated with each reflection event is determined using the Neustrelitz Electron Density Model (NEDM2020) and the NeQuick 2 model. The results from periods of low solar activity reveal fluctuations of up to approximately 300 TECUs in slant total electron content, 19 m in relative ionospheric delay for the GPS L1 frequency, 2 Hz in Doppler shifts, and variations in the peak electron density height ranging from 215 to 330 km. Sea surface height uncertainty associated with ionospheric model-based corrections in group delay altimetric inversion can reach a standard deviation at the meter level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GNSS-R Earth Remote Sensing from SmallSats)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 2539 KB  
Article
A Design and Implementation Using an Innovative Deep-Learning Algorithm for Garbage Segregation
by Jenilasree Gunaseelan, Sujatha Sundaram and Bhuvaneswari Mariyappan
Sensors 2023, 23(18), 7963; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187963 - 18 Sep 2023
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 11772
Abstract
A startling shift in waste composition has been brought on by a dramatic change in lifestyle, the quick expansion of consumerism brought on by fierce competition among producers of consumer goods, and revolutionary advances in the packaging sector. The overflow or overspill of [...] Read more.
A startling shift in waste composition has been brought on by a dramatic change in lifestyle, the quick expansion of consumerism brought on by fierce competition among producers of consumer goods, and revolutionary advances in the packaging sector. The overflow or overspill of garbage from the bins causes poison to the soil, and the total obliteration of waste generated in the area or city is unknown. It is challenging to pinpoint with accuracy the specific sort of garbage waste; predictive image classification is lagging, and the existing approach takes longer to identify the specific garbage. To overcome this problem, image classification is carried out using a modified ResNeXt model. By adding a new block known as the “horizontal and vertical block,” the proposed ResNeXt architecture expands on the ResNet architecture. Each parallel branch of the block has its own unique collection of convolutional layers. Before moving on to the next layer, these branches are concatenated together. The block’s main goal is to expand the network’s capacity without considerably raising the number of parameters. ResNeXt is able to capture a wider variety of features in the input image by using parallel branches with various filter sizes, which improves performance on image classification. Some extra dense and dropout layers have been added to the standard ResNeXt model to improve performance. In order to increase the effectiveness of the network connections and decrease the total size of the model, the model is pruned to make it smaller. The overall architecture is trained and tested using garbage images. The convolution neural Network is connected with a modified ResNeXt that is trained using images of metal, trash, and biodegradable, and ResNet 50 is trained using images of non-biodegradable, glass, and hazardous images in a parallel way. An input image is fed to the architecture, and the image classification is achieved simultaneously to identify the exact garbage within a short time with an accuracy of 98%. The achieved results of the suggested method are demonstrated to be superior to those of the deep learning models already in use when compared to a variety of existing deep learning models. The proposed model is implemented into the hardware by designing a three-component smart bin system. It has three separate bins; it collects biodegradable, non-biodegradable, and hazardous waste separately. The smart bin has an ultrasonic sensor to detect the level of the bin, a poisonous gas sensor, a stepper motor to open the lid of the bin, a solar panel for battery storage, a Raspberry Pi camera, and a Raspberry Pi board. The levels of the bin are maintained in a centralized system for future analysis processes. The architecture used in the proposed smart bin properly disposes of the mixed garbage waste in an eco-friendly manner and recovers as much wealth as possible. It also reduces manpower, saves time, ensures proper collection of garbage from the bins, and helps attain a clean environment. The model boosts performance to predict waste generation and classify it with an increased 98.9% accuracy, which is more than the existing system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 12536 KB  
Article
Modeling the Topside Ionosphere Effective Scale Height through In Situ Electron Density Observations by Low-Earth-Orbit Satellites
by Alessio Pignalberi, Michael Pezzopane, Tommaso Alberti, Igino Coco, Giuseppe Consolini, Giulia D’Angelo, Paola De Michelis, Fabio Giannattasio, Bruno Nava, Mirko Piersanti and Roberta Tozzi
Universe 2023, 9(6), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9060280 - 9 Jun 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1840
Abstract
In this work, we aim to characterize the effective scale height at the ionosphere F2-layer peak (H0) by using in situ electron density (Ne) observations by Langmuir Probes (LPs) onboard the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES—01). CSES—01 is [...] Read more.
In this work, we aim to characterize the effective scale height at the ionosphere F2-layer peak (H0) by using in situ electron density (Ne) observations by Langmuir Probes (LPs) onboard the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES—01). CSES—01 is a sun-synchronous satellite orbiting at an altitude of ~500 km, with descending and ascending nodes at ~14:00 local time (LT) and ~02:00 LT, respectively. Calibrated CSES—01 LPs Ne observations for the years 2019–2021 provide information in the topside ionosphere, whereas the International Reference Ionosphere model (IRI) provides Ne values at the F2-layer peak altitude for the same time and geographical coordinates as CSES—01. CSES—01 and IRI Ne datasets are used as anchor points to infer H0 by assuming a linear scale height in the topside representation given by the NeQuick model. COSMIC/FORMOSAT—3 (COSMIC—1) radio occultation (RO) data are used to constrain the vertical gradient of the effective scale height in the topside ionosphere in the linear approximation. With the CSES—01 dataset, we studied the global behavior of H0 for daytime (~14:00 LT) and nighttime (~02:00 LT) conditions, different seasons, and low solar activity. Results from CSES—01 observations are compared with those obtained through Swarm B satellite Ne-calibrated measurements and validated against those from COSMIC—1 RO for similar diurnal, seasonal, and solar activity conditions. H0 values modeled by using CSES—01 and Swarm B-calibrated observations during daytime both agree with corresponding values obtained directly from COSMIC—1 RO profiles. Differently, H0 modeling for nighttime conditions deserves further investigation because values obtained from both CSES—01 and Swarm B-calibrated observations show remarkable and spatially localized differences compared to those obtained through COSMIC—1. Most of the H0 mismodeling for nighttime conditions can probably to be attributed to a sub-optimal spatial representation of the F2-layer peak density made by the underlying IRI model. For comparison, H0 values obtained with non-calibrated CSES—01 and Swarm B Ne observations are also calculated and discussed. The methodology developed in this study for the topside effective scale height modeling turns out to be applicable not only to CSES—01 satellite data but to any in situ Ne observation by low-Earth-orbit satellites orbiting in the topside ionosphere. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Space Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 7592 KB  
Article
Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains
by Yury V. Yasyukevich, Dmitry Zatolokin, Artem Padokhin, Ningbo Wang, Bruno Nava, Zishen Li, Yunbin Yuan, Anna Yasyukevich, Chuanfu Chen and Artem Vesnin
Sensors 2023, 23(10), 4773; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23104773 - 15 May 2023
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 3447
Abstract
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) provide a great data source about the ionosphere state. These data can be used for testing ionosphere models. We studied the performance of nine ionospheric models (Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC) both in [...] Read more.
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) provide a great data source about the ionosphere state. These data can be used for testing ionosphere models. We studied the performance of nine ionospheric models (Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC) both in the total electron content (TEC) domain—i.e., how precise the models calculate TEC—and in the positioning error domain—i.e., how the models improve single frequency positioning. The whole data set covers 20 years (2000–2020) from 13 GNSS stations, but the main analysis involves data during 2014–2020 when calculations are available from all the models. We used single-frequency positioning without ionospheric correction and with correction via global ionospheric maps (IGSG) data as expected limits for errors. Improvements against noncorrected solution were as follows: GIM IGSG—22.0%, BDGIM—15.3%, NeQuick2—13.8%, GEMTEC, NeQuickG and IRI-2016—13.3%, Klobuchar—13.2%, IRI-2012—11.6%, IRI-Plas—8.0%, GLONASS—7.3%. TEC bias and mean absolute TEC errors for the models are as follows: GEMTEC—−0.3 and 2.4 TECU, BDGIM—−0.7 and 2.9 TECU, NeQuick2—−1.2 and 3.5 TECU, IRI-2012—−1.5 and 3.2 TECU, NeQuickG—−1.5 and 3.5 TECU, IRI-2016—−1.8 and 3.2 TECU, Klobuchar—1.2 and 4.9 TECU, GLONASS—−1.9 and 4.8 TECU, and IRI-Plas—3.1 and 4.2 TECU. While TEC and positioning domains differ, new-generation operational models (BDGIM and NeQuickG) could overperform or at least be at the same level as classical empirical models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in GNSS Positioning and GNSS Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 9317 KB  
Article
Neustrelitz Total Electron Content Model for Galileo Performance: A Position Domain Analysis
by Ciro Gioia, Antonio Angrisano and Salvatore Gaglione
Sensors 2023, 23(7), 3766; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23073766 - 6 Apr 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2516
Abstract
Ionospheric error is one of the largest errors affecting global navigation satellite system (GNSS) users in open-sky conditions. This error can be mitigated using different approaches including dual-frequency measurements and corrections from augmentation systems. Although the adoption of multi-frequency devices has increased in [...] Read more.
Ionospheric error is one of the largest errors affecting global navigation satellite system (GNSS) users in open-sky conditions. This error can be mitigated using different approaches including dual-frequency measurements and corrections from augmentation systems. Although the adoption of multi-frequency devices has increased in recent years, most GNSS devices are still single-frequency standalone receivers. For these devices, the most used approach to correct ionospheric delays is to rely on a model. Recently, the empirical model Neustrelitz Total Electron Content Model for Galileo (NTCM-G) has been proposed as an alternative to Klobuchar and NeQuick-G (currently adopted by GPS and Galileo, respectively). While the latter outperforms the Klobuchar model, it requires a significantly higher computational load, which can limit its exploitation in some market segments. NTCM-G has a performance close to that of NeQuick-G and it shares with Klobuchar the limited computation load; the adoption of this model is emerging as a trade-off between performance and complexity. The performance of the three algorithms is assessed in the position domain using data for different geomagnetic locations and different solar activities and their execution time is also analysed. From the test results, it has emerged that in low- and medium-solar-activity conditions, NTCM-G provides slightly better performance, while NeQuick-G has better performance with intense solar activity. The NTCM-G computational load is significantly lower with respect to that of NeQuick-G and is comparable with that of Klobuchar. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2136 KB  
Article
Analysis of GPS/EGNOS Positioning Quality Using Different Ionospheric Models in UAV Navigation
by Grzegorz Grunwald, Adam Ciećko, Tomasz Kozakiewicz and Kamil Krasuski
Sensors 2023, 23(3), 1112; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031112 - 18 Jan 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2914
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become very popular tools for geoinformation acquisition in recent years. They have also been applied in many other areas of life. Their navigation is highly dependent on global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). The European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service [...] Read more.
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become very popular tools for geoinformation acquisition in recent years. They have also been applied in many other areas of life. Their navigation is highly dependent on global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). The European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) is intended to support GNSSs during positioning, mainly for aeronautical applications. The research presented in this paper concerns the analysis of the positioning quality of a modified GPS/EGNOS algorithm. The calculations focus on the source of ionospheric delay data as well as on the aspect of smoothing code observations with phase measurements. The modifications to the algorithm concerned the application of different ionospheric models for position calculation. Consideration was given to the EGNOS ionospheric model, the Klobuchar model applied to the GPS system, the Klobuchar model applied to the BeiDou system, and the NeQuick model applied to the Galileo system. The effect of removing ionospherical corrections from GPS/EGNOS positioning on the results of the determination of positioning quality was also analysed. The results showed that the original EGNOS ionospheric model maintains the best accuracy results and a better correlation between horizontal and vertical results than the other models examined. The additional use of phase-smoothing of code observations resulted in maximum horizontal errors of approximately 1.3 m and vertical errors of approximately 2.2 m. It should be noted that the results obtained have local characteristics related to the area of north-eastern Poland. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Radar, Sonar and Navigation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 7532 KB  
Article
Using Deep Learning to Map Ionospheric Total Electron Content over Brazil
by Andre Silva, Alison Moraes, Jonas Sousasantos, Marcos Maximo, Bruno Vani and Clodoaldo Faria
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(2), 412; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020412 - 9 Jan 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3198
Abstract
The low-latitude ionosphere has an active behavior causing the total electron content (TEC) to vary spatially and temporally very dynamically. The solar activity and the geomagnetic field have a strong influence over the spatiotemporal distribution of TEC. These facts make it a challenge [...] Read more.
The low-latitude ionosphere has an active behavior causing the total electron content (TEC) to vary spatially and temporally very dynamically. The solar activity and the geomagnetic field have a strong influence over the spatiotemporal distribution of TEC. These facts make it a challenge to attempt modeling the ionization response. Single frequency GNSS users are particularly vulnerable due to these ionospheric variations that cause degradation of positioning performance. Motivated by recent applications of machine learning, temporal series of TEC available in map formats were employed to build an independent TEC estimator model for low-latitude environments. A TEC dataset was applied along with geophysical indices of solar flux and magnetic activity to train a feedforward artificial neural network based on a multilayer perceptron (MLP) approach. The forecast for the next 24 h was made relying on TEC maps over the Brazilian region using data collected on the previous 5 days. The performance of this approach was evaluated and compared with real data. The accuracy of the model was evaluated taking into account seasonality, spatial coverage and dependence on solar flux and geomagnetic activity indices. The results of the analysis show that the developed model has a superior capacity describing the TEC behavior across Brazil, when compared to global ionosphere maps and the NeQuick G model. TEC predictions were applied in single point positioning. The achieved errors were 27% and 33% lower when compared to the results obtained using the NeQuick G and global ionosphere maps, respectively, showing success in estimating TEC with small recent datasets using MLP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancement of GNSS Signal Processing and Navigation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3958 KB  
Article
Evaluation of NeQuick2 Model over Mid-Latitudes of Northern Hemisphere
by Lingxuan Wang, Erhu Wei, Si Xiong, Tengxu Zhang and Ziyu Shen
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(16), 4124; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14164124 - 22 Aug 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2858
Abstract
NeQuick2 is a three-dimensional ionospheric electron density empirical model that uses numerical integration to calculate the total electron content along any line-of-sight (LOS). As one of the most commonly used three-dimensional ionospheric models, it is necessary to objectively evaluate the accuracy and stability [...] Read more.
NeQuick2 is a three-dimensional ionospheric electron density empirical model that uses numerical integration to calculate the total electron content along any line-of-sight (LOS). As one of the most commonly used three-dimensional ionospheric models, it is necessary to objectively evaluate the accuracy and stability of NeQuick2 over a long period, especially over the mid-latitudes of the northern hemisphere where most of the ground-based GNSS stations are distributed. Therefore, different methods are used in this study to evaluate the accuracy of the NeQuick2 model from 2008 to 2021, including comparison with the International Global Navigation Satellite System Global Ionosphere Maps (IGSG), Jason2 Vertical Electron content (VTEC), and self-consistent evaluation. The comparison with IGSG shows that the standard deviation (STD) value is about 2.59 TECU. The accuracy of the IGSG and NeQuick2 model over ocean regions shows that the bias of IGSG is more significant than that of the NeQuick2 model. The mean STD value is 2.09 TECU for IGSG, and the corresponding value is 3.18 TECU for the NeQuick2 model, which is about 50% worse than IGSG. The dSTEC assessment results indicate that the variation in bias for IGSG is more stable than that of the NeQuick2 model. The mean STD value is 0.86 and 1.52 TECU for IGSG and NeQuick2 model, respectively. The conclusion could be made that NeQuick2 model represents the average ionosphere electron content and its accuracy fluctuates with solar conditions. Compared with the IGSG, the NeQuick2 model always underestimates TEC value, especially in low solar activity periods and compared with Jason2, the TEC values obtained by NeQuick2 model are overestimated, but the degree of overestimation is smaller than that of IGSG. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon, Water and Climate Monitoring Using Space Geodesy Observations)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 8949 KB  
Article
An Ionospheric TEC Forecasting Model Based on a CNN-LSTM-Attention Mechanism Neural Network
by Jun Tang, Yinjian Li, Mingfei Ding, Heng Liu, Dengpan Yang and Xuequn Wu
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(10), 2433; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102433 - 19 May 2022
Cited by 76 | Viewed by 6773
Abstract
Ionospheric forecasts are critical for space-weather anomaly detection. Forecasting ionospheric total electron content (TEC) from the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) is of great significance to near-earth space environment monitoring. In this study, we propose a novel ionospheric TEC forecasting model based on [...] Read more.
Ionospheric forecasts are critical for space-weather anomaly detection. Forecasting ionospheric total electron content (TEC) from the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) is of great significance to near-earth space environment monitoring. In this study, we propose a novel ionospheric TEC forecasting model based on deep learning, which consists of a convolutional neural network (CNN), long-short term memory (LSTM) neural network, and attention mechanism. The attention mechanism is added to the pooling layer and the fully connected layer to assign weights to improve the model. We use observation data from 24 GNSS stations from the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) to model and forecast ionospheric TEC. We drive the model with six parameters of the TEC time series, Bz, Kp, Dst, and F10.7 indices and hour of day (HD). The new model is compared with the empirical model and the traditional neural network model. Experimental results show the CNN-LSTM-Attention neural network model performs well when compared to NeQuick, LSTM, and CNN-LSTM forecast models with a root mean square error (RMSE) and R2 of 1.87 TECU and 0.90, respectively. The accuracy and correlation of the prediction results remained stable in different months and under different geomagnetic conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 5371 KB  
Article
Performance of NeQuick-2 and IRI-Plas 2017 Models during Solar Maximum Years in 2013–2014 over Equatorial and Low Latitude Regions
by Kenneth Iluore, Jianyong Lu, Francisca Okeke and Kesyton Oyamenda Ozegin
Universe 2022, 8(2), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8020125 - 13 Feb 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3035
Abstract
This paper carries out a comparative investigation of the Total Electron Content (TEC) values calculated by using the NeQuick-2 and IRI-Plas 2017 models. The investigation was carried out for the solar maximum year of 2013–2014 with data from eight GPS stations within the [...] Read more.
This paper carries out a comparative investigation of the Total Electron Content (TEC) values calculated by using the NeQuick-2 and IRI-Plas 2017 models. The investigation was carried out for the solar maximum year of 2013–2014 with data from eight GPS stations within the equatorial and low latitude regions. The results show that both models agree quite well with the observed TEC values obtained from GPS measurements in all the stations, although with some overestimations and underestimations observed during the daytime and nighttime hours. The NeQuick-2 model, in general, performed better in months, seasons, and in most of the stations when the IRI-Plas overestimates the GPS-TEC. However, it is interesting to know that with an increase in solar activity in some seasons, the quality of forecasting IRI-Plas can improve, whereas for the NeQuick-2 model, it decreases, but this is not true for all the seasons and all the stations. Factors causing the discrepancies in the IRI-Plas data model might be caused by the plasmaspheric part included in the IRI, and it is found to be maximum at the MBAR (34%) station, whereas that of the NeQuick-2 data model is found to be maximum at the ADIS (47.7%) station. There is a latitudinal dependence for both models in which the prediction error decreases with the increasing latitudes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space Weather in the Sun–Earth System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop