Search Results (240)

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed nations, exhibiting significant molecular heterogeneity that impacts prognosis and treatment response, particularly in advanced or recurrent settings. Traditional classification is increasingly supplemented by molecular subtyping (POLE-ultramutated, MSI-high/dMMR, NSMP, p53-mutated/CNH), which provides crucial prognostic information and predicts benefit from immunotherapy. This review summarizes the landscape of predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in EC, emphasizing a new therapeutic scenario for advanced and recurrent EC. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), leading to high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and increased neoantigen production, is the most established predictor, resulting in FDA approvals for pembrolizumab and dostarlimab in this subgroup. POLE mutations also confer hypermutation and high immunogenicity, predicting a favorable ICI response. Other biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression and TMB, show variable correlation with response and require further standardization. The tumor immune microenvironment, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), also influences treatment outcomes. Clinical trials have demonstrated significant survival benefits for ICIs combined with chemotherapy (e.g., dostarlimab/pembrolizumab + carboplatin/paclitaxel) in first-line settings, especially for dMMR/MSI-H EC, and for ICI combinations with targeted agents (e.g., lenvatinib + pembrolizumab) in previously treated patients. Integrating molecular classification and validated biomarkers is essential for optimizing patient selection and developing personalized immunotherapy strategies for EC. Full article

Background: Lenvatinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for advanced radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer (RAI-RTC). It is recommended to start at 24 mg per day; however, in patients who are at risk of severe adverse events, it may be reasonable to start at lower doses. Patients and Methods: We included 15 patients with RAI-RTC who started lenvatinib at a very low/low dose and evaluated the efficacy and safety. Results: Eight patients (53.3%) did not show progression of the disease, and about half of the patients (53.3%) were alive at the last follow-up visit. Up to 26.6% of patients achieved a partial response to therapy, with a notable volume reduction in the local and metastatic lesions. However, 80% of patients experienced adverse events, mainly of a moderate grade. Conclusions: Although these findings are based on a small sample size and a single-center study, treatment with lenvatinib at very low/low doses in fragile patients seems to be a promising strategy for the management of RAI-RTC, balancing effective disease control with a favorable safety profile. Full article

This study aimed to clarify the alterations in gene expression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) during disease progression and in response to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors using a syngeneic mouse mRCC model. RENCA cells were orthotopically implanted in BALB/c mice. Mice received first-line treatment with cabozantinib, anti-PD-1 antibody, or a combination. Tumor progression was monitored using serial micro-computed tomography. Lung metastasis samples were collected, and RNA sequencing was performed. Mice with apparent disease progression received second-line treatment with axitinib, everolimus, or lenvatinib after combination therapy. The median overall survival was 28, 34, 34, and 49 days in untreated mice and those treated with cabozantinib, anti-PD-1, or their combination, respectively (p < 0.05). RNA sequencing revealed upregulation of the fibroblast growth factor pathway in lung metastases after monotherapy, whereas mTOR pathway activation was observed only after combination therapy. Treatment-specific gene expression changes occur in mRCC, suggesting that the optimal target for sequential therapy in mRCC varies depending on prior treatment. Full article

Background and aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may have distinct biological characteristics influencing systemic treatment response. However, the prognostic impact of MASLD vs. alcohol-related HCC in patients receiving lenvatinib remains unclear. This study aimed to assess lenvatinib’s effectiveness and safety in these populations. Methods: A multicenter cohort of 378 HCC patients treated with lenvatinib (2019–2024) was analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed based on age, sex, tumoral stage, alpha-fetoprotein levels and Child–Pugh class. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared with the log-rank test. Results were expressed as HR and 95% CI. Results: After matching, 115 patients per group were compared. Median OS was 21 months (95% CI: 20–23) in the group with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and 19 months (95% CI: 18–21) in the group with alcohol etiology (p = 0.18). In multivariate analysis, only Child–Pugh class (HR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.84–5.41) and tumor stage (HR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.57–6.93) resulted as significant predictors of OS. Median PFS was 9 months (95% CI: 8–9) in patients with MASH and 9 months (95% CI: 7–10) in patients with alcohol etiology (p = 0.33). Only the Child–Pugh class was a significant predictor of PFS in univariate analysis (HR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15–3.41; p = 0.03). No difference in terms of adverse event rate was observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Lenvatinib is effective in patients with both MASH- and alcohol-related HCC, with no difference in oncological outcomes between the two groups. Full article

Thyroid cancer (TC) invariably remains the most prevalent endocrine cancer in the world. Major histological forms of TC include papillary (PTC), follicular (FTC), medullary (MTC), and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), each of which has a unique clinical and molecular profile. The incidence rate of TC is higher in females, and unfortunately, it has tended to increase over the last several years. Yet the treatment of advanced or aggressive TC forms has improved recently because of developments in immunotherapy and targeted medicines, including PD-1 inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., lenvatinib, sorafenib). Imaging, fine-needle aspiration biopsies, and molecular testing are implemented in the diagnostic process, e.g., in search of mutations that might affect prognosis and provide the most successful treatment option. Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radioactive iodine therapy (RAI), surgery (such as a total thyroidectomy), and molecularly targeted therapies are currently standard treatment modalities in TC. Optimizing patient outcomes requires better diagnostic precision and individualized treatment regimens based on the genetic profile and tumor subtype. To improve survival and quality of life, it is critical to comprehend the complex etiology of TC and the changing therapeutic landscape. Full article

Thyroid cancer (TC) remains a prevalent malignancy, with over 820,000 global cases diagnosed in 2022. Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), primarily papillary and follicular types, accounts for most cases and has a favorable prognosis with total thyroidectomy and radioiodine (RAI) ablation. However, 5–15% of patients develop RAI-refractory (RAI-R) disease, leading to a significantly poorer outcome. For RAI-R patients, treatment decisions depend on disease progression. Active surveillance is suitable for indolent cases, while symptomatic or progressive disease requires systemic therapy. Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) such as lenvatinib and sorafenib serve as first-line options, with cabozantinib recently approved for resistant cases. Additionally, novel targeted therapies, including RET and NTRK inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, are under investigation, offering a personalized approach. A key challenge is determining the optimal timing for systemic therapy, balancing progression-free survival (PFS) benefits against MKI-related toxicities, which significantly impact quality of life (QoL). Molecular testing can identify actionable mutations, guiding therapy selection. Clinical guidelines (ATA, ESMO) recommend initiating treatment based on disease progression and patient condition, integrating strategies such as active surveillance, surgery, and radiotherapy when appropriate. Despite advances, systemic therapies carry significant adverse events (e.g., hypertension, fatigue, gastrointestinal toxicity), necessitating careful monitoring to prevent dose reductions or interruptions. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to optimize patient outcomes and maintain QoL. As targeted therapies continue to evolve, further research is needed to refine treatment sequencing and improve outcomes for RAI-R TC. This review synthesizes current evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Full article

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of liver transplant worldwide. While liver transplantation offers a survival advantage for early-stage HCC patients, post-transplant recurrence remains a significant concern, affecting up to 15% of recipients. We sought to conduct a comprehensive review related to HCC recurrence after liver transplant. Tumor-related factors such as poor differentiation, vascular invasion, and elevated tumor biomarkers like alpha-fetoprotein are key predictors of recurrence. Donor-related factors, including graft type and surgical procedures, can also influence outcomes, though their effects are less conclusive. Advancements in patient selection criteria and scoring systems, such as the Milan Criteria and RETREAT score, have improved risk stratification by incorporating tumor size, biomarkers, and response to pre-transplant treatment. Despite these measures, recurrent HCC after transplantation poses treatment challenges. Curative approaches such as resection are feasible for localized or oligometastatic recurrence and offer the best outcomes when applicable. Locoregional treatments, including ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, provide options for unresectable cases but have limited long-term efficacy. Systemic therapies, including targeted agents like sorafenib, regorafenib, and lenvatinib, have shown modest benefits in managing advanced recurrent HCC. Emerging immunotherapy approaches hold promise but face unique challenges due to the required immunosuppression in transplant recipients. Multidisciplinary evaluation remains essential for tailoring treatment plans. Future efforts should focus on refining predictive tools and exploring novel therapies to improve survival outcomes for patients with recurrent HCC after liver transplantation. Full article

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a commonly diagnosed malignancy, with the treatment for transplant-ineligible localized disease traditionally relying on locoregional therapies, such as surgical resection, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Systemic therapy has historically been reserved for advanced, unresectable HCC. However, lenvatinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has recently gained traction as part of a multimodal approach for localized HCC in combination with locoregional treatments. An upfront TACE or TARE can induce tumor hypoxia, leading to the upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes tumor angiogenesis and progression. The rationale for combining lenvatinib with a locoregional therapy is to enhance tumor shrinkage while preserving liver function before a definitive intervention. Clinical trials, such as TACTICS and LAUNCH, have demonstrated improved outcomes with this approach. Additionally, retrospective studies, including those incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, have reported further benefits. This review explores the combination of lenvatinib with various locoregional modalities, including TARE, microwave ablation (MWA), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), highlighting their indications and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing and upcoming clinical trials investigating the integration of systemic agents with locoregional therapies for intermediate-stage HCC, including EMERALD-1, EMERALD-3, LEAP-012, and CheckMate 74W. Full article

Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs, e.g., sorafenib and lenvatinib) presents a significant hurdle for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, underscoring the need to decipher the underlying mechanisms for improved therapeutic strategies. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as critical modulators in HCC progression and TKI resistance. In this study, we report a positive correlation between the expression levels of a tumor suppressor miRNA, miR-142-3p, and increased sensitivity to sorafenib and lenvatinib, supported by clinical data from the BIOSTORM HCC cohort. Overexpression of miR-142-3p in TKI-resistant HCC cells significantly inhibited proliferation and colony formation, induced apoptosis, increased cell cycle arrest at the G2 phase, and reduced migration and invasion by reversing epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Notably, combining miR-142-3p with lenvatinib synergistically inhibited growth in both inherent and acquired TKI-resistant HCC cells by modulating critical signaling pathways, including STAT3, PI3K/AKT, MAPK, YAP1, and by impeding autophagic influx. RNA-sequencing of a TKI-resistant HCC cell line ± miR-142-3p overexpression identified YES1 and TWF1 as direct downstream target genes of miR-142-3p, both of which are key genes associated with drug resistance in HCC. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of these genes mirrored the antitumor effects of miR-142-3p and enhanced TKI sensitivity, with YES1 knockdown decreasing YAP1 phosphorylation, and TWF1 knockdown inhibiting autophagy. Collectively, these findings indicate that restoring miR-142-3p expression or targeting its downstream effectors YES1 and TWF1 offers a promising strategy to overcome drug resistance and improve therapeutic outcome in HCC. Full article

Background: Meta-analyses aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of targeted and contemporary therapies utilised in locally advanced and metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). Methods: Employing PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were explored from the inception of targeted therapy until December 2024. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness, toxicity and survival outcomes of various mutationally directed agents, chemotherapy and radiotherapy in locally advanced/metastatic ATC cases. Results: A total of 47 studies (26 prospective phase II trials and 21 retrospective studies) involving 980 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.7% (95% CI: 25.4–34.2%; I² = 42.4%; p < 0.0001). A total of 49.9% deaths were reported, although a significant number remained alive compared to baseline (mean difference [MD]: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.90–2.24; I² = 88.6%; p < 0.0001). The pooled median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.0–6.7 months; I² = 97.9%; p < 0.0001). Dabrafenib/trametinib (DT) with and without pembrolizumab and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LP) were associated with higher ORR rates and improved OS and PFS. About 51.% of studies mentioned bio-marker analysis (BRAFV600 [14.7%], PDL1 [9.2%], RAS [1.1%], PIK3CA [1.0%] and NTRK1/3 [0.7%]). Toxicity was reported in 94.7% of patients. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that DT could be a promising first-line treatment option for BRAFV600-mutated ATC, with or without immunotherapy. Alternatively, LP shows potential in BRAFV600 wild-type and PDL1-overexpressing cases. Routine biomarker analysis remains critical for optimising ATC management strategies. Full article

Objectives: Although systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the mainstay for treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), its efficacy is limited and it causes severe systemic side effects. This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (HLP), compared to SC in combination with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (SCLP) for unresectable ICC. Methods: We analyzed patients initially diagnosed with unresectable ICC at our center between March 2021 and December 2023, classifying them into HLP and SCLP groups according to treatment regimen. This study assessed and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety outcomes across the two treatment groups. Results: This study enrolled 53 subjects in total; 25 were treated with HLP and 28 with SCLP. The two groups showed well-matched baseline characteristics. The HLP group reported an extended median OS (12.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.310) and a prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.043), compared to the SCLP group. The HLP group had a better objective response rate (ORR) (52% vs. 25%, p = 0.043) and disease control rate (DCR) (96% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.104). Based on OS (p = 0.019) and PFS (p = 0.032) results, those without extrahepatic metastasis seemed to benefit more significantly from the HLP regimen than from the SCLP regimen. The HLP group experienced fewer grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) than the SCLP group. Conclusions: The HLP regimen for unresectable ICC is an effective and safe strategy and is potentially better suited for patients without extrahepatic metastases. Full article

Background/objectives: The real-world survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with lenvatinib has been explored retrospectively with a small sample size. We conducted a prospective observational 2-year extension study (510 study) of a 1-year observational post-marketing study of lenvatinib (504 study) to evaluate the long-term overall survival (OS) of patients with uHCC treated with lenvatinib and associated factors with a large sample size. Methods: Patients with uHCC included (July 2018 to January 2019) in the 504 study and who consented were eligible for the 510 study and were followed for up to 3 years after lenvatinib treatment initiation. Using the data from the 504 study and 510 study of the 504 study analysis set, we estimated the OS, the time from the first lenvatinib dose to all-cause death by the Kaplan–Meier method (ClinicalTrials.Gov Registration ID, 504 study: NCT03663114; 510 study: NCT04008082). Results: The 703 patients included in the analysis were followed for a median period (min, max) of 12.5 months (0.1, 44.8). The median OS (95% confidence interval) was 16.6 months (15.4, 18.5). OS was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with bile duct invasion (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.621), portal vein invasion (HR: 1.365), ≥ 4 intrahepatic lesions (HR: 1.437), extrahepatic lesions (HR: 1.357), Child–Pugh B/C (HR: 1.515), mALBI Grade 2a (HR: 1.331), and Grade ≥ 2b (HR: 1.811). Conclusions: This large-scale, prospective, real-world study demonstrated a long OS, comparable to that reported in the global Phase III REFLECT trial. More advanced-stage tumors and worse hepatic function have been suggested as OS-associated factors, consistent with previous reports. Full article

Background: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is one of the most aggressive human malignancies and has a poor prognosis. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 related (ATR) is a key regulator for the DNA damage response and a potential target to treat cancer. Methods: We assessed the efficacy of BAY 1895344, an ATR inhibitor, in three ATC cell lines. Results: BAY 1895344 caused dose–response cytotoxicity in three ATC cell lines. BAY 1895344 induced S-phase and G2-phase arrest, activated caspase-3 activity and induced apoptosis in ATC cells. BAY 1895344 meaningfully retarded the tumor growth of an ATC xenograft model. BAY 1895344 therapy, combined with dabrafenib and trametinib, had synergism in vitro and revealed robust tumor growth suppression in vivo in two xenograft models of ATC harboring mutant BRAF^V600E. Furthermore, the combination of BAY 1895344 with lenvatinib was more effective than either agent alone in a xenograft model of ATC. Conclusions: These results reveal that BAY 1895344 has potential in treating ATC. Full article

Background/Objectives: Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy has been established as a standard of care for first-line treatment; however, its efficacy and safety have not been fully evaluated for patients previously treated with systemic therapy. Methods: In this phase II trial, patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with lenvatinib were enrolled to receive a dose of 1,200 mg of atezolizumab and 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, subsequent therapy, and frequency of adverse events. The threshold and expected progression-free survival were 3 and 6.8 months, respectively. Considering a one-sided significance level of 0.05 and a statistical power of 80%, the minimum required sample size was 26 patients. Results: The median progression-free survival from the start of treatment was 9.70 [90% confidence interval, 5.10–14.24] months, and the lower limit of the 90% CI was above the predefined threshold. The objective response and disease control rates were 34.6% and 73.1%, respectively. Sixteen patients (61.5%) received subsequent therapies, and the median overall survival was 17.23 [90% confidence interval, 13.18–27.85] months. Severe adverse events, adverse events leading to treatment delays, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in eight (30.8%), fourteen (53.8%), and five (19.2%) patients, respectively, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination therapy is effective and can safely be administered to patients with advanced HCC previously treated with lenvatinib. Full article

Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant global health concern, primarily due to the limited efficacy of targeted therapies, which are often compromised by drug resistance and adverse side effects. Methods: In this study, we utilized a Tandem Mass Tag (TMT)-based quantitative proteomic approach to analyze global protein expression and serine/threonine/tyrosine (S/T/Y) phosphorylation modifications in HepG2 cells following treatment with three clinically relevant hepatocellular carcinoma-targeted agents: apatinib, regorafenib, and lenvatinib. Results: Utilizing KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, biological process enrichment analysis, and protein interaction network analysis, we elucidated the common and specific metabolic pathways, biological processes, and protein interaction regulatory networks influenced by three liver cancer therapeutics. The study additionally proposed potential combinational treatment strategies, highlighting a possible synergistic interaction between HCC-targeted drugs and the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor. Furthermore, through the integration of clinical phosphorylation site data, we identified several phosphorylation sites that exhibited higher abundance in tumor tissues compared to adjacent non-tumor tissues. These sites were associated with poor prognosis and elevated functional scores. Conclusions: In summary, this study conducted an in-depth analysis of the molecular alterations in proteins and phosphorylation modifications induced by clinical HCC-targeted drugs, predicting drug combination strategies and therapeutic targets. Full article