Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GIPR gene

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 1853 KiB  
Article
SNPs in GPCR Genes and Impaired Osteogenic Potency in Osteoporotic Patient Lines-Based Study
by Julia Sopova, Olga Krasnova, Giomar Vasilieva, Anna Zhuk, Olga Lesnyak, Vitaliy Karelkin and Irina Neganova
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(24), 13594; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413594 - 19 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1159
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have emerged as critical regulators of bone development and remodeling. In this study, we aimed to identify specific GPCR mutations in osteoporotic patients via next-generation sequencing (NGS). We performed NGS sequencing of six genomic DNA samples taken from osteoporotic patients [...] Read more.
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have emerged as critical regulators of bone development and remodeling. In this study, we aimed to identify specific GPCR mutations in osteoporotic patients via next-generation sequencing (NGS). We performed NGS sequencing of six genomic DNA samples taken from osteoporotic patients and two genomic DNA samples from healthy donors. Next, we searched for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GPCR genes that are associated with osteoporosis. For three osteoporotic patients and one healthy donor, bone biopsies were used to generate patient-specific mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) lines, and their ability to undergo osteodifferentiation was analyzed. We found that MSCs derived from osteoporotic patients have a different response to osteoinductive factors and impaired osteogenic differentiation using qPCR and histochemical staining assays. The NGS analysis revealed specific combinations of SNPs in GPCR genes in these patients, where SNPs in ADRB2 (rs1042713), GIPR (rs1800437), CNR2 (rs2501431, rs3003336), and WLS (rs3762371) were associated with impaired osteogenic differentiation capacity. By integrating NGS data with functional assessments of patient-specific cell lines, we linked GPCR mutations to impaired bone formation, providing a foundation for developing personalized therapeutic strategies. SNP analysis is recognized as a proactive approach to osteoporosis management, enabling earlier interventions and targeted preventive measures for individuals at risk. Furthermore, SNP analysis contributes to the development of robust, holistic risk prediction models that enhance the accuracy of risk assessments across the population. This integration of genetic data into public health strategies facilitates healthcare initiatives. This approach could guide treatment decisions tailored to the patient’s genetic profile and provide a foundation for developing personalized therapeutic strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4249 KiB  
Article
Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide Receptor (GIPR) Overexpression Reduces the Tumorigenic Potential of Retinoblastoma Cells
by André Haase, Emily Alefeld, Fatma Yalinci, Dario Van Meenen, Maike Anna Busch and Nicole Dünker
Cancers 2024, 16(9), 1656; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091656 - 25 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1759
Abstract
Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common malignant intraocular tumor in early childhood. Gene expression profiling revealed that the gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is upregulated following trefoil factor family peptide 1 (TFF1) overexpression in RB cells. In the study presented, we found this [...] Read more.
Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common malignant intraocular tumor in early childhood. Gene expression profiling revealed that the gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is upregulated following trefoil factor family peptide 1 (TFF1) overexpression in RB cells. In the study presented, we found this G protein-coupled transmembrane receptor to be co-expressed with TFF1, a new diagnostic and prognostic RB biomarker for advanced subtype 2 RBs. Functional analyses in two RB cell lines revealed a significant reduction in cell viability and growth and a concomitant increase in apoptosis following stable, lentiviral GIPR overexpression, matching the effects seen after TFF1 overexpression. In chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays, GIPR-overexpressing RB cells developed significantly smaller CAM tumors. The effect of GIPR overexpression in RB cells was reversed by the GIPR inhibitor MK0893. The administration of recombinant TFF1 did not augment GIPR overexpression effects, suggesting that GIPR does not serve as a TFF1 receptor. Investigations of potential GIPR up- and downstream mediators suggest the involvement of miR-542-5p and p53 in GIPR signaling. Our results indicate a tumor suppressor role of GIPR in RB, suggesting its pathway as a new potential target for future retinoblastoma therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Progress and Research Trends in Ocular Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2576 KiB  
Article
The Methylation Analysis of the Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Receptor (GIPR) Locus in GH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas
by Mattia Dalle Nogare, Sarah D’Annunzio, Giovanni Vazza, Daniela Regazzo, Luna Picello, Luca Denaro, Giacomo Voltan, Carla Scaroni, Filippo Ceccato and Gianluca Occhi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(11), 9264; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119264 - 25 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2117
Abstract
The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is aberrantly expressed in about one-third of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas (GH-PAs) and has been associated with a paradoxical increase of GH after a glucose load. The reason for such an overexpression has not yet been clarified. In [...] Read more.
The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is aberrantly expressed in about one-third of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas (GH-PAs) and has been associated with a paradoxical increase of GH after a glucose load. The reason for such an overexpression has not yet been clarified. In this work, we aimed to evaluate whether locus-specific changes in DNA methylation patterns could contribute to this phenomenon. By cloning bisulfite-sequencing PCR, we compared the methylation pattern of the GIPR locus in GIPR-positive (GIPR+) and GIPR-negative (GIPR) GH-PAs. Then, to assess the correlation between Gipr expression and locus methylation, we induced global DNA methylation changes by treating the lactosomatotroph GH3 cells with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Differences in methylation levels were observed between GIPR+ and GIPR GH-PAs, both within the promoter (31.9% vs. 68.2%, p < 0.05) and at two gene body regions (GB_1 20.7% vs. 9.1%; GB_2 51.2% vs. 65.8%, p < 0.05). GH3 cells treated with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine showed a ~75% reduction in Gipr steady-state level, possibly associated with the observed decrease in CpGs methylation. These results indicate that epigenetic regulation affects GIPR expression in GH-PAs, even though this possibly represents only a part of a much more complex regulatory mechanism. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Biology of the Pituitary—3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 7884 KiB  
Article
Hippocampal Changes Elicited by Metabolic and Inflammatory Stressors following Prenatal Maternal Infection
by Sandra L. Rodriguez-Zas, Bruce R. Southey, Haley E. Rymut, Laurie A. Rund and Rodney W. Johnson
Genes 2023, 14(1), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14010077 - 26 Dec 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3056
Abstract
The hippocampus participates in spatial navigation and behavioral processes, displays molecular plasticity in response to environmental challenges, and can play a role in neuropsychiatric diseases. The combined effects of inflammatory prenatal and postnatal challenges can disrupt the hippocampal gene networks and regulatory mechanisms. [...] Read more.
The hippocampus participates in spatial navigation and behavioral processes, displays molecular plasticity in response to environmental challenges, and can play a role in neuropsychiatric diseases. The combined effects of inflammatory prenatal and postnatal challenges can disrupt the hippocampal gene networks and regulatory mechanisms. Using a proven pig model of viral maternal immune activation (MIA) matched to controls and an RNA-sequencing approach, the hippocampal transcriptome was profiled on two-month-old female and male offspring assigned to fasting, mimetic viral, or saline treatments. More than 2600 genes presented single or combined effects (FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05) of MIA, postnatal stress, or sex. Biological processes and pathways encompassing messenger cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP) signaling were enriched with genes including gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor (GIPR) predominantly over-expressed in the MIA-exposed fasting males relative to groups that differed in sex, prenatal or postnatal challenge. While this pattern was amplified in fasting offspring, the postnatal inflammatory challenge appeared to cancel out the effects of the prenatal challenge. The transcription factors C-terminal binding protein 2 (CTBP2), RE1 silencing transcription factor (REST), signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), and SUZ12 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit were over-represented among the genes impacted by the prenatal and postnatal factors studied. Our results indicate that one environmental challenge can influence the effect of another challenge on the hippocampal transcriptome. These findings can assist in the identification of molecular targets to ameliorate the effects of pre-and post-natal stressors on hippocampal-associated physiology and behavior. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Basis of Stress-Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6156 KiB  
Article
Transcriptomic Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Causing Acromegaly
by Julia Rymuza, Paulina Kober, Natalia Rusetska, Beata J. Mossakowska, Maria Maksymowicz, Aleksandra Nyc, Szymon Baluszek, Grzegorz Zieliński, Jacek Kunicki and Mateusz Bujko
Cells 2022, 11(23), 3846; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233846 - 30 Nov 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3178
Abstract
Acromegaly results from growth hormone hypersecretion, predominantly caused by a somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET). Acromegaly-causing tumors are histologically diverse. Our aim was to determine transcriptomic profiles of various somatotroph PitNETs and to evaluate clinical implication of differential gene expression. A total of [...] Read more.
Acromegaly results from growth hormone hypersecretion, predominantly caused by a somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET). Acromegaly-causing tumors are histologically diverse. Our aim was to determine transcriptomic profiles of various somatotroph PitNETs and to evaluate clinical implication of differential gene expression. A total of 48 tumors were subjected to RNA sequencing, while expression of selected genes was assessed in 134 tumors with qRT-PCR. Whole-transcriptome analysis revealed three transcriptomic groups of somatotroph PitNETs. They differ in expression of numerous genes including those involved in growth hormone secretion and known prognostic genes. Transcriptomic subgroups can be distinguished by determining the expression of marker genes. Analysis of the entire cohort of patients confirmed differences between molecular subtypes of tumors. Transcriptomic group 1 includes ~20% of acromegaly patients with GNAS mutations-negative, mainly densely granulated tumors that co-express GIPR and NR5A1 (SF-1). SF-1 expression was verified with immunohistochemistry. Transcriptomic group 2 tumors are the most common (46%) and include mainly GNAS-mutated, densely granulated somatotroph and mixed PitNETs. They have a smaller size and express favorable prognosis-related genes. Transcriptomic group 3 includes predominantly sparsely granulated somatotroph PitNETs with low GNAS mutations frequency causing ~35% of acromegaly. Ghrelin signaling is implicated in their pathogenesis. They have an unfavorable gene expression profile and higher invasive growth rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transcriptome in Human Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1455 KiB  
Article
Evidence for Involvement of GIP and GLP-1 Receptors and the Gut-Gonadal Axis in Regulating Female Reproductive Function in Mice
by Dawood Khan, Opeolu O. Ojo, Orla RM Woodward, Jo Edward Lewis, Ananyaa Sridhar, Fiona M. Gribble, Frank Reimann, Peter R. Flatt and R. Charlotte Moffett
Biomolecules 2022, 12(12), 1736; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12121736 - 23 Nov 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3834
Abstract
Substantial evidence suggests crosstalk between reproductive and gut-axis but mechanisms linking metabolism and reproduction are still unclear. The present study evaluated the possible role of glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) in reproductive function by examining receptor distribution and the effects of global GIPR [...] Read more.
Substantial evidence suggests crosstalk between reproductive and gut-axis but mechanisms linking metabolism and reproduction are still unclear. The present study evaluated the possible role of glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) in reproductive function by examining receptor distribution and the effects of global GIPR and GLP-1R deletion on estrous cycling and reproductive outcomes in mice. GIPR and GLP-1R gene expression were readily detected by PCR in female reproductive tissues including pituitary, ovaries and uterine horn. Protein expression was confirmed with histological visualisation of incretin receptors using GIPR-Cre and GLP1R-Cre mice in which the incretin receptor expressing cells were fluorescently tagged. Functional studies revealed that female GIPR−/− and GLP-1R−/− null mice exhibited significantly (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) deranged estrous cycling compared to wild-type controls, indicative of reduced fertility. Furthermore, only 50% and 16% of female GIPR−/− and GLP-1R−/− mice, respectively produced litters with wild-type males across three breeding cycles. Consistent with a physiological role of incretin receptors in pregnancy outcome, litter size was significantly (p < 0.001–p < 0.05) decreased in GIPR−/− and GLP-1R−/− mice. Treatment with oral metformin (300 mg/kg body-weight), an agent used clinically for treatment of PCOS, for a further two breeding periods showed no amelioration of pregnancy outcome except that litter size in the GIPR−/− group was approximately 2 times greater in the second breeding cycle. These data highlight the significance of incretin receptors in modulation of female reproductive function which may provide future targets for pharmacological intervention in reproductive disorders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Paper from Biomolecules Journal Reviewers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 286 KiB  
Article
The Link between Three Single Nucleotide Variants of the GIPR Gene and Metabolic Health
by Joanna Michałowska, Ewa Miller-Kasprzak, Agnieszka Seraszek-Jaros, Adrianna Mostowska and Paweł Bogdański
Genes 2022, 13(9), 1534; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13091534 - 26 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2419
Abstract
Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) of the GIPR gene have been associated with BMI and type 2 diabetes (T2D), suggesting the role of the variation in this gene in metabolic health. To increase our understanding of this relationship, we investigated the association of three [...] Read more.
Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) of the GIPR gene have been associated with BMI and type 2 diabetes (T2D), suggesting the role of the variation in this gene in metabolic health. To increase our understanding of this relationship, we investigated the association of three GIPR SNVs, rs11672660, rs2334255 and rs10423928, with anthropometric measurements, selected metabolic parameters, and the risk of excessive body mass and metabolic syndrome (MS) in the Polish population. Normal-weight subjects (n = 340, control group) and subjects with excessive body mass (n = 600, study group) participated in this study. For all participants, anthropometric measurements and metabolic parameters were collected, and genotyping was performed using the high-resolution melting curve analysis. We did not find a significant association between rs11672660, rs2334255 and rs10423928 variants with the risk of being overweight. Differences in metabolic and anthropometric parameters were found for investigated subgroups. An association between rs11672660 and rs10423928 with MS was identified. Heterozygous CT genotype of rs11672660 and AT genotype of rs10423928 were significantly more frequent in the group with MS (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.03–1.85; p = 0.0304 and OR = 1.4, 95%CI: 1.05–1.87; p = 0.0222, respectively). Moreover, TT genotype of rs10423928 was less frequent in the MS group (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.54–0.95; p = 0.0221). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
10 pages, 1231 KiB  
Article
Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Suppresses Foam Cell Formation of Macrophages through Inhibition of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5-CD36 Pathway
by Michishige Terasaki, Hironori Yashima, Yusaku Mori, Tomomi Saito, Yoshie Shiraga, Raichi Kawakami, Makoto Ohara, Tomoyasu Fukui, Tsutomu Hirano, Yuichiro Yamada, Yutaka Seino and Sho-ichi Yamagishi
Biomedicines 2021, 9(7), 832; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9070832 - 16 Jul 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3098
Abstract
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) has been reported to have an atheroprotective property in animal models. However, the effect of GIP on macrophage foam cell formation, a crucial step of atherosclerosis, remains largely unknown. We investigated the effects of GIP on foam cell formation [...] Read more.
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) has been reported to have an atheroprotective property in animal models. However, the effect of GIP on macrophage foam cell formation, a crucial step of atherosclerosis, remains largely unknown. We investigated the effects of GIP on foam cell formation of, and CD36 expression in, macrophages extracted from GIP receptor-deficient (Gipr−/−) and Gipr+/+ mice and cultured human U937 macrophages by using an agonist for GIP receptor, [D-Ala2]GIP(1–42). Foam cell formation evaluated by esterification of free cholesterol to cholesteryl ester and CD36 gene expression in macrophages isolated from Gipr+/+ mice infused subcutaneously with [D-Ala2]GIP(1–42) were significantly suppressed compared with vehicle-treated mice, while these beneficial effects were not observed in macrophages isolated from Gipr−/− mice infused with [D-Ala2]GIP(1–42). When macrophages were isolated from Gipr+/+ and Gipr−/− mice, and then exposed to [D-Ala2]GIP(1–42), similar results were obtained. [D-Ala2]GIP(1–42) attenuated ox-LDL uptake of, and CD36 gene expression in, human U937 macrophages as well. Gene expression level of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) was also suppressed by [D-Ala2]GIP(1–42) in U937 cells, which was corelated with that of CD36. A selective inhibitor of Cdk5, (R)-DRF053 mimicked the effects of [D-Ala2]GIP(1–42) in U937 cells. The present study suggests that GIP could inhibit foam cell formation of macrophages by suppressing the Cdk5-CD36 pathway via GIP receptor. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Macrophages in Health and Non-infectious Disease 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2450 KiB  
Article
A Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonist Does Not Antagonize Glucagon at Its Receptor but May Act as a Biased Agonist at the GLP-1 Receptor
by Noura Al-Zamel, Suleiman Al-Sabah, Yunus Luqmani, Lobna Adi, Siby Chacko, Tom Dario Schneider and Cornelius Krasel
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(14), 3532; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143532 - 19 Jul 2019
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 6056 | Correction
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism, making their receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) attractive targets in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GLP-1R agonists are used clinically to treat T2DM but the use of GIPR [...] Read more.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism, making their receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) attractive targets in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GLP-1R agonists are used clinically to treat T2DM but the use of GIPR agonists remains controversial. Recent studies suggest that simultaneous activation of GLP-1R and GIPR with a single peptide provides superior glycemic control with fewer adverse effects than activation of GLP-1R alone. We investigated the signaling properties of a recently reported dual-incretin receptor agonist (P18). GLP-1R, GIPR, and the closely related glucagon receptor (GCGR) were expressed in HEK-293 cells. Activation of adenylate cyclase via Gαs was monitored using a luciferase-linked reporter gene (CRE-Luc) assay. Arrestin recruitment was monitored using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assay. GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon displayed exquisite selectivity for their receptors in the CRE-Luc assay. P18 activated GLP-1R with similar potency to GLP-1 and GIPR with higher potency than GIP. Interestingly, P18 was less effective than GLP-1 at recruiting arrestin to GLP-1R and was inactive at GCGR. These data suggest that P18 can act as both a dual-incretin receptor agonist, and as a G protein-biased agonist at GLP-1R. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Biology and Pharmacology of Glucagon)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop