Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (212)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GERD—gastroesophageal reflux disease

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 434 KiB  
Article
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 10 Years After Bariatric Surgery—Is It a Problem? A Multicenter Study (BARI-10-POL)
by Natalia Dowgiałło-Gornowicz, Monika Proczko-Stepaniak, Anna Kloczkowska, Paweł Jaworski and Piotr Major
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5405; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155405 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 245
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) seems to be a common complaint which persists or develops after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). Endoscopic evaluation is vital in both the preoperative and postoperative phases to ensure optimal patient outcomes. The aim of this study was [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) seems to be a common complaint which persists or develops after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). Endoscopic evaluation is vital in both the preoperative and postoperative phases to ensure optimal patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of GERD after MBS in a 10-year follow-up and analyze the endoscopic outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included 368 patients who underwent single bariatric procedure. The data came from five bariatric centers in Poland, part of the BARI-10-POL project. Data on symptoms of GERD, endoscopic findings, demographics, and surgical outcomes were collected for a 10-year follow-up period. Surgical procedures included SG, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Results: Of the 305 patients without symptoms of GERD, 12.3% developed de novo GERD postoperatively. There was no statistical significance regarding the new-onset symptoms and the type of MBS (p = 0.074) and the presence of symptoms of GERD and the type of MBS (p = 0.208). However, SG was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of GERD remission after MBS (p = 0.005). Endoscopic evaluation showed abnormal findings in asymptomatic patients in both preoperative (35.8%) and postoperative (14.1%) examinations (p < 0.001). Conclusions: GERD may be a common issue after MBS. One-quarter of patients after MBS may experience symptoms of GERD, regardless of the type of MBS. SG appears to be associated with a higher risk of persistent symptoms of GERD and a lower likelihood of GERD remission after MBS. Asymptomatic patients both before and after MBS may have abnormal findings in gastroscopy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical and Surgical Updates on Bariatric Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1402 KiB  
Article
E-Gastryal® + Magnesium Alginate Plus PPI vs. PPI Alone in GERD: Results from the GENYAL® Randomized Controlled Trial
by Cristiano Spada, Daniele Salvi, Silvia Pecere, Francesca Mangiola, Simone Varca, Serban Rosu, Vora Prateek, Petru Vasile Ciobanca, Adrian Goldis, Dionisio Franco Barattini and Guido Costamagna
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4794; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134794 - 7 Jul 2025
Viewed by 552
Abstract
Background: Up to one-third of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have persistent symptoms despite proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. E-Gastryal® + MgAlg (Aurora Biofarma, Italy) is a mucosal protective agent that enhances barrier function against acid and non-acidic reflux. This study [...] Read more.
Background: Up to one-third of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have persistent symptoms despite proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. E-Gastryal® + MgAlg (Aurora Biofarma, Italy) is a mucosal protective agent that enhances barrier function against acid and non-acidic reflux. This study assessed its efficacy in combination with omeprazole versus omeprazole alone and as maintenance therapy. Methods: Patients with symptomatic GERD and Grade A reflux esophagitis confirmed by endoscopy were randomized to receive omeprazole 20 mg plus E-Gastryal® + MgAlg or omeprazole 20 mg alone. The primary endpoint was the number of rescue medications used over 28 days. Secondary endpoints included symptom relief and quality-of-life assessments using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Impact Scale (GIS), GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL), and Global Assessment of Performance (IGAP). Results: Ninety-six patients were included. The combination group used significantly fewer rescue medications (mean: 21 vs. 40.9 tablets; p = 0.002). At week 4, the combination group showed greater improvement in RSI, GIS, and GERD-HRQL scores (p < 0.001). Symptom relief was sustained during weeks 5–26 with E-Gastryal® + MgAlg alone. Conclusions: E-Gastryal® + MgAlg combined with omeprazole improves symptom control compared to PPI monotherapy. Continued use as maintenance therapy supports its role in long-term GERD management (NCT04130659). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1075 KiB  
Perspective
Strategy for Mitigating the Worldwide Burden of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease—A European Medical Association Position Paper Endorsing Innovation in Laparoscopic Surgery for Sustainable Management
by Luigi Bonavina, Guglielmo Trovato, Rosario Caruso, Prisco Piscitelli, Alberto Aiolfi, Rosario Squatrito, Roberto Penagini, Davide Bona, Giovanni Dapri and Jerome R. Lechien
Therapeutics 2025, 2(3), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/therapeutics2030012 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 394
Abstract
Background and Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common esophageal disorder worldwide and a progressive condition leading to Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Continuous medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors fails to restore the antireflux barrier and is unable to relieve symptoms [...] Read more.
Background and Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common esophageal disorder worldwide and a progressive condition leading to Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Continuous medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors fails to restore the antireflux barrier and is unable to relieve symptoms in up to 40% of patients. A tailored and standardized antireflux surgical procedure may increase cure rates and meet patient expectations. Methods and Results: Antireflux surgery aims to reestablish the natural antireflux barrier, which includes the diaphragmatic crura, the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and the angle of His along with the gastroesophageal flap valve. For decades, the Nissen total fundoplication has been the primary procedure and remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Alternatives such as Toupet partial fundoplication, Dor partial fundoplication, and the magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX™) procedure have been developed to mitigate side effects like dysphagia, gas-bloat syndrome, and the inability to belch or vomit. Recent clinical findings regarding a novel procedure, RefluxStop™, indicate that restoring the gastroesophageal flap valve, in conjunction with anterior fundoplication and a silicone device for stabilizing the LES beneath the diaphragm, can achieve lasting reflux control and enhance patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: The planning of healthcare services and actionable strategies to improve equity and quality of treatment is critical to address the global burden of GERD. Modern laparoscopic surgery for GERD is safe and effective and should be performed in centers offering a complete diagnostic pathway and specific surgical techniques tailored to the individual GERD phenotype. Shared decision-making between the surgeon and the patient is essential for the choice of operation. A personalized approach can offer clinical benefits over total fundoplication and improve patient-reported outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1605 KiB  
Article
Missed Gastroesophageal Injuries During Antireflux Surgery: Infrequent but Catastrophic Complications
by Arianna Vittori, Andrés R. Latorre-Rodríguez, Andrew Keogan, Jasmine Huang, Lara Schaheen, Ross M. Bremner and Sumeet K. Mittal
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4577; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134577 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 473
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is widely used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Iatrogenic gastroesophageal injuries, when recognized intraoperatively, can be managed without major consequences, whereas undetected injuries presenting as postoperative leaks are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite their [...] Read more.
Background: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is widely used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Iatrogenic gastroesophageal injuries, when recognized intraoperatively, can be managed without major consequences, whereas undetected injuries presenting as postoperative leaks are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite their complexity, research on post-LARS leaks is scant. We aim to describe the diagnosis and management of such injuries at a tertiary referral center. Methods: We describe a single-center case series of patients referred for gastroesophageal perforations after LARS. Patients were identified through the personal records of surgeons at our institution. A narrative literature review was conducted to summarize publications on the topic. Results: Five patients (four female [80%]; median age, 73 years [IQR, 67–74]) were included. The median time between LARS and clinical presentation was 2 (IQR, 1–8) days (range 1–15 days). The most frequent symptoms were shortness of breath (all five patients) and pain (three [60%] patients). All patients presented with hypoxia, and four (80%) patients presented with sepsis. Two (40%) patients underwent primary repair, and three (60%) required limited esophagogastrectomy without immediate reconstruction. All patients required both thoracic and abdominal exploration, and all of them experienced significant postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3). The median hospital stay was 58 days (IQR, 34–59). At a median follow-up of 14 months (IQR, 6–28), all patients were alive. Conclusions: Although infrequent, gastroesophageal perforation after LARS often requires complex surgical interventions and prolonged hospital stays. Additional efforts should focus on prevention and early recognition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 993 KiB  
Article
Amprenavir Mitigates Pepsin-Induced Transcriptomic Changes in Normal and Precancerous Esophageal Cells
by Pelin Ergun, Tina L. Samuels, Angela J. Mathison, Tianxiang Liu, Victor X. Jin and Nikki Johnston
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6182; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136182 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 621
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with inflammatory and neoplastic changes in the esophageal epithelium. Despite widespread PPI use, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence continues to rise, implicating non-acidic reflux components such as pepsin in disease progression. We performed transcriptomic profiling to assess pepsin-induced [...] Read more.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with inflammatory and neoplastic changes in the esophageal epithelium. Despite widespread PPI use, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence continues to rise, implicating non-acidic reflux components such as pepsin in disease progression. We performed transcriptomic profiling to assess pepsin-induced changes and the protective effect of amprenavir in vitro. Het-1A (normal) and BAR-T (Barrett’s) cells (n = 3) were treated at pH 7.0 with pepsin and/or 10 μM amprenavir for 1 h. RNA-seq identified DEGs (FDR ≤ 0.05, |log₂FC| ≥ 0.375), and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis revealed enriched pathways. Pepsin exposure altered mitochondrial function, oxidative phosphorylation, epithelial integrity, signaling, and inflammatory pathways in both cell lines. Amprenavir attenuated these transcriptomic perturbations, preserving mitochondrial and stress-response pathways. Notably, BAR-T cells exhibited heightened activation of wound-healing and epithelial repair pathways, whereas Het-1A cells showed greater mitochondrial and systemic stress pathway alterations. Pepsin drives transcriptomic dysregulation in esophageal epithelial cells under non-acidic conditions, and amprenavir shows potential to counteract peptic injury. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and explore amprenavir’s therapeutic utility in GERD management and EAC prevention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Esophageal Inflammation, Injury, and Repair)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 631 KiB  
Systematic Review
Efficacy of a Low-FODMAP Diet on the Severity of Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Quality of Life in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Disorders—A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
by Laura Kuźmin, Katarzyna Kubiak and Ewa Lange
Nutrients 2025, 17(12), 2045; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17122045 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 2129
Abstract
Background: A low-FODMAP diet is considered as a potential supportive treatment approach in some gastrointestinal disorders. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of the low-FODMAP diet on the severity of gastrointestinal [...] Read more.
Background: A low-FODMAP diet is considered as a potential supportive treatment approach in some gastrointestinal disorders. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of the low-FODMAP diet on the severity of gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with CASP tool and PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases resulted in the identification of fourteen randomized controlled trials. Results: Ten studies examined the effect of the low-FODMAP diet in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), three with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and one with symptomatic proton pump inhibitor (PPI) refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). All interventions compared the low-FODMAP diet with another diet and lasted from 3 to 12 weeks. Most studies on IBS showed significant improvements in abdominal pain, bloating, and quality of life compared to control diets. In IBD, improvements were mainly observed in functional gastrointestinal symptoms, while no clear benefit was demonstrated in GERD. Heterogeneity in study designs, intervention durations, comparator diets, and outcome measures limited the ability to conduct a meta-analysis. Conclusions: Although a low-FODMAP diet may reduce symptoms in selected individuals, it is not universally necessary. Importantly, the diet’s restrictive nature and potential long-term effects—such as nutritional deficiencies and alterations in gut microbiota—highlight the need for clinical supervision by dietitians with expertise in gastrointestinal disorders. Furthermore, in some cases, symptom improvement may be achievable through less restrictive changes, such as improving food hygiene and reducing intake of processed or high-sugar foods. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized endpoints and longer follow-up are needed to clarify the efficacy and safety of the low-FODMAP diet across various gastrointestinal conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1606 KiB  
Article
Design and Application of a Radiofrequency Spectrophotometry Sensor for Measuring Esophageal Liquid Flow to Detect Gastroesophageal Reflux
by Pedro J. Fito, Ricardo J. Colom, Rafael Gadea-Girones, Jose M. Monzo, Angel Tebar-Ruiz, F. Javier Puertas and Marta Castro-Giraldez
Sensors 2025, 25(11), 3533; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113533 - 4 Jun 2025
Viewed by 537
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a widespread condition that requires reliable and non-invasive diagnostic methods to minimize patient discomfort. This study presents a radiofrequency spectrophotometry sensor specifically designed to detect esophageal liquid flow and ionicity in real time without disrupting the patient’s daily [...] Read more.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a widespread condition that requires reliable and non-invasive diagnostic methods to minimize patient discomfort. This study presents a radiofrequency spectrophotometry sensor specifically designed to detect esophageal liquid flow and ionicity in real time without disrupting the patient’s daily life. The sensor operates by measuring dielectric properties and ionic conductivity through the thoracic plexus, eliminating the need for invasive probes or prolonged monitoring. A study conducted on 49 participants demonstrated the sensor’s ability to differentiate between various liquid media and identify beta dispersion relaxation as a biomarker for esophageal tissue damage, a key indicator of GERD progression. Additionally, alpha dispersion conductivity effectively distinguished reflux episodes, proving the sensor’s high sensitivity. Unlike traditional diagnostic techniques such as endoscopy or pH monitoring, this radiofrequency spectrophotometry sensor enables continuous, real-time reflux detection, allowing patients to maintain a normal lifestyle during assessment. The results validate its potential as an innovative alternative for GERD diagnosis and monitoring, with future research focused on clinical validation, optimization, and integration into long-term patient monitoring systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 1219 KiB  
Review
Comorbidities’ Effect on IPF: Pathogenesis and Management
by Andrea Salotti, Maria Chianese, Antonio Romallo, Anna De Nes, Darina Angoni, Alessandra Galantino, Maria Chernovsky, Lucrezia Mondini, Francesco Salton, Paola Confalonieri, Rossella Cifaldi, Pietro Geri, Micol Pividori, Giulia Bandini, Michael Hughes, Marco Confalonieri, Marta Maggisano and Barbara Ruaro
Biomedicines 2025, 13(6), 1362; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13061362 - 1 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1250
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition within the medical community that idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) cannot be effectively managed through a singular focus on the disease itself. Instead, a dual approach is essential, one that not only aims to prolong [...] Read more.
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition within the medical community that idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) cannot be effectively managed through a singular focus on the disease itself. Instead, a dual approach is essential, one that not only aims to prolong survival by targeting the underlying pathological mechanisms of IPF but also addresses the numerous comorbidities that frequently complicate the clinical picture for affected individuals. This narrative review seeks to provide a detailed and comprehensive exploration of the various comorbid conditions associated with IPF, which may include cardiovascular disease (CVD), lung cancer (LC), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and anxiety/depression, among others. By understanding the interplay between these comorbidities and IPF, healthcare providers can better tailor treatment regimens to meet the holistic needs of patients. Furthermore, this review delves into both current management strategies and emerging therapeutic approaches for these comorbidities, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in clinical practice. By synthesizing the latest research and clinical insights, this review aims to enhance awareness and understanding of the complexities surrounding IPF management, ultimately guiding clinicians in developing more effective, individualized care plans that address not only the fibrotic lung disease but also the broader spectrum of health challenges faced by patients. Through this comprehensive overview, we hope to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about improving quality of life and survival rates for individuals living with IPF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1928 KiB  
Article
Association of Acid-Suppressive Medication and Antimicrobial Use in Infancy with Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis
by Mohamad R. Chaaban, Julia T. Tanzo, Shvetali Thatte, Matthew Kabalan and David C. Kaelber
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3872; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113872 - 30 May 2025
Viewed by 706
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The incidence of food allergies and other allergic diseases is rising. Emerging evidence links both antimicrobials and acid-suppressive therapy with gut dysbiosis, which is implicated in allergy development. We investigated the relationship between the use of acid-suppressive medications or antimicrobials in infancy [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The incidence of food allergies and other allergic diseases is rising. Emerging evidence links both antimicrobials and acid-suppressive therapy with gut dysbiosis, which is implicated in allergy development. We investigated the relationship between the use of acid-suppressive medications or antimicrobials in infancy and the risk of developing childhood allergic diseases. Methods: The US network in the TriNetX platform was used to identify patients prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), antimicrobials ≥1, or antimicrobials ≥3 times during their first year of life from October 2015 to January 2022. ICD-10 diagnoses were used to assess two-year outcomes of anaphylaxis, food allergy, and atopic dermatitis. A sub-analysis in gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) patients was also performed. Results: Risks of anaphylaxis and food allergy increased with the prescription of PPIs (risk ratio [95% CI], 2.49 [1.40–4.41], 5.33 [4.97–5.71]), H2RAs (4.48 [3.43–5.86], 4.21 [4.01–4.41]), and antimicrobials ≥1 (2.41 [2.13–2.72], 1.90 [1.86–1.94]), or ≥3 times (3.69 [3.12–4.37], 2.79 [2.70–2.88]). Risk of atopic dermatitis was increased in both H2RA (1.41 [1.35–1.48]) and antimicrobial groups (2.25 [2.22–2.28], 3.35 [3.29–3.41]), but not in the PPI group. In the GERD sub-analysis, anaphylaxis risk was not significantly different, food allergy risk was increased in both PPI (2.30 [2.08–2.53]) and H2RA groups (1.77 [1.63–1.92]), and atopic dermatitis decreased in the PPI group (0.76 [0.67–0.85]) but slightly increased in the H2RA group (1.11 [1.03–1.20]). Conclusions: Exposure to acid-suppressive or antimicrobial medications during infancy was associated with increased risk of food allergy and anaphylaxis in early childhood. In infants diagnosed with GERD, exposure to acid-suppressive medications was still associated with increased food allergy risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 770 KiB  
Article
Impact of Fundoplication Surgery and Multidisciplinary Approach on Quality of Life in Children with Neurological Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
by Alessandro Raffaele, Francesco De Leo, Emanuele Cereda, Thomas Foiadelli, Valentina Motta, Salvatore Savasta, Marco Brunero, Gloria Pelizzo, Romano Piero Giovanni, Luigi Avolio, Gian Battista Parigi, Giovanna Riccipetitoni and Mirko Bertozzi
Gastrointest. Disord. 2025, 7(2), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord7020038 - 28 May 2025
Viewed by 614
Abstract
Background: Neurologically impaired children often face severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), feeding difficulties, and related challenges, profoundly impacting their quality of life (QoL) and that of their caregivers. Surgery is often necessary to alleviate symptoms in this population, and the success of surgical [...] Read more.
Background: Neurologically impaired children often face severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), feeding difficulties, and related challenges, profoundly impacting their quality of life (QoL) and that of their caregivers. Surgery is often necessary to alleviate symptoms in this population, and the success of surgical treatment, along with the achievement of clinical endpoints, must also consider the impact on QoL. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of fundoplication surgery on the QoL of both children and caregivers. Methods: All patients treated between 2010 and 2023 at the Pediatric Surgery Department of San Matteo Hospital in Pavia were included in the study. The modified 1996 O’Neill questionnaire was identified as a suitable model for a QoL survey. QoL assessments included caregiver-reported outcomes using validated questionnaires, focusing on physical, psychological, and social domains. Patients with a follow-up period of less than 12 months were excluded. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the satisfaction of patients treated after 2020 who received integrated care through a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. Results: Among the 77 patients, 42 were treated between 2010 and 2021. Of these, 16 participated in pre- and post-operative QoL evaluations, showing significant improvements in GERD resolution, feeding ease, and caregiver stress. From 2020, 35 patients benefited from a multidisciplinary approach; 12 underwent robotic fundoplication. Feeding ease scores improved significantly (mean increase from 37.5 to 84.2; p < 0.001), while caregiver stress scores decreased by 35% (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The combination of surgical and multidisciplinary interventions significantly enhances QoL for SNI children and their families. Integrated care models provide a framework for addressing complex needs and should be prioritized in clinical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1031 KiB  
Article
Remineralizing Treatments for Dental Erosion and Sensitivity in Patients Suffering from Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD): Randomized Clinical Trial
by Andrea Scribante, Alessia Pardo, Maurizio Pascadopoli, Federico Biagi, Annalisa Schiepatti, Valentina Giammona, Marco Vecchio, Christian Alquati, Gioia Giada Modica, Cinzia Casu and Andrea Butera
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3525; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103525 - 18 May 2025
Viewed by 971
Abstract
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition that causes an abrupt decrease in salivary pH in the oral cavity, which can lead to demineralization, erosion, hypersensitivity, functional impairment, and possibly fracture of dental elements. The aim of this clinical study is [...] Read more.
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition that causes an abrupt decrease in salivary pH in the oral cavity, which can lead to demineralization, erosion, hypersensitivity, functional impairment, and possibly fracture of dental elements. The aim of this clinical study is to compare two types of treatment in patients with dental erosion diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux. Methods: Thirty patients were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial. Each patient underwent clinical evaluation and esophageal pH measurement, in order to diagnose GERD. After an initial examination and assessment by an experienced dentist, the Trial group (15 patients) was assigned to home treatment with a zinc hydroxyapatite-based toothpaste and a hydroxyapatite-based paste, while the Control group (15 patients) was assigned to home treatment with zinc hydroxyapatite-based toothpaste only. The following indices were measured: Basic Erosive Wear Examination Index (BEWE); Schiff Air Index (SAI); Plaque Index (PI); and Bleeding Score (BS). Each index was assessed at T0 during the first visit, one month (T1), three months (T2), six months (T3), nine months (T4), and 12 months (T5). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to analyze the normality of the data, while Friedman’s test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test were used to compare the two groups (significance threshold: p < 0.05). Results: The results showed no statistically significant change in the BEWE and SAI indexes (p > 0.05). However, an improvement in dentin sensitivity and BS was observed. Plaque control also improved. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the additional hydroxyapatite paste did not significantly improve the outcomes of the study in respect to hydroxyapatite toothpaste alone. However, there was an improvement in the oral health of GERD patients using hydroxyapatite-based remineralizing treatment in terms of oral and periodontal indices calculated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interaction Between Systemic Diseases and Oral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 794 KiB  
Review
Advances in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Management: Exploring the Role of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Novel Therapies
by Katarzyna Hossa and Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(5), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18050699 - 9 May 2025
Viewed by 2979
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent chronic gastrointestinal disorder that affects a substantial proportion of the global population. It is characterized by the extensive backward flow of stomach contents into the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms and potential complications. Proton pump inhibitors [...] Read more.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent chronic gastrointestinal disorder that affects a substantial proportion of the global population. It is characterized by the extensive backward flow of stomach contents into the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms and potential complications. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have long been the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment for GERD, effectively suppressing gastric acid secretion. However, a substantial subset of patients, referred to as PPI-refractory GERD, experience inadequate symptom control despite optimal PPI therapy. GERD significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, affecting domains, such as vitality, pain, and physical functioning. Consequently, there is an urgent need for alternative therapeutic strategies and novel pharmacologic agents to provide more effective, long-term relief. Emerging treatment options include potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) like vonoprazan, which offer more potent and sustained inhibition of gastric acid secretion compared to traditional PPIs. Additionally, prokinetic agents such as itopride have gained attention due to their potential to improve GERD symptoms by enhancing gastrointestinal motility and accelerating gastric emptying. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, and potential of these novel therapeutic approaches in improving patient outcomes in GERD management. With the growing prevalence of PPI resistance and side effects, a personalized, multifaceted approach to treatment is becoming increasingly necessary to optimize care for patients with GERD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New and Emerging Treatment Strategies for Gastrointestinal Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1935 KiB  
Article
Effective Restoration of Gastric and Esophageal Tissues in an In Vitro Model of GERD: Mucoadhesive and Protective Properties of Xyloglucan, Pea Proteins, and Polyacrylic Acid
by Sara Ferrari, Federica Ferulli, Rebecca Galla, Riccardo Vicini, Veronica Cattaneo, Simone Mulè and Francesca Uberti
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4409; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094409 - 6 May 2025
Viewed by 705
Abstract
Esophageal barrier dysfunction is a crucial pathophysiological mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, treatments mainly aim to reduce gastric acidity rather than improve tissue integrity. This study evaluated the protective and mucoadhesive properties of a formulation containing xyloglucan, pea proteins, and polyacrylic [...] Read more.
Esophageal barrier dysfunction is a crucial pathophysiological mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, treatments mainly aim to reduce gastric acidity rather than improve tissue integrity. This study evaluated the protective and mucoadhesive properties of a formulation containing xyloglucan, pea proteins, and polyacrylic acid (XPPA) in gastric and esophageal cells. Cells were exposed to hydrochloric acid (HCl) and subsequently treated with the test compound. Trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER), tight junction (TJ) expression, and mucoadhesion of XPPA on gastric and esophageal cells were evaluated. To further confirm the protective ability of XPPA, a Lucifer Yellow assay was performed on a human reconstructed esophageal epithelium to assess the ability of XPPA to prevent HCl-induced hyperpermeability. XPPA possesses noteworthy mucoadhesive properties, ensuring an extended contact time between the product and the damaged mucosa to allow sustained mucosal protection. Furthermore, XPPA effectively restored gastroesophageal barrier integrity after HCl-induced damage, as assessed with TEER, after 1 h (p < 0.05). Finally, XPPA helped to restore TJ expression (p < 0.05) and protected the tissues from hyperpermeability for at least 2 h (p < 0.05). These results pave the way for using XPPA as a promising treatment to ameliorate gastroesophageal barrier properties in GERD patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1034 KiB  
Review
Updates in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Management: From Proton Pump Inhibitors to Dietary and Lifestyle Modifications
by Jakov Ivan Bucan, Tamara Braut, Antea Krsek, Vlatka Sotosek and Lara Baticic
Gastrointest. Disord. 2025, 7(2), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord7020033 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 4551
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder that greatly influences patients’ quality of life and represents a growing public health concern. Characterized by typical and atypical symptoms, GERD encompasses a range of clinical phenotypes and is associated with complications such [...] Read more.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder that greatly influences patients’ quality of life and represents a growing public health concern. Characterized by typical and atypical symptoms, GERD encompasses a range of clinical phenotypes and is associated with complications such as erosive esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus. This review intends to provide a thorough overview of current scientific knowledge on the etiological factors, risk determinants, and pathophysiology of GERD, while exploring diagnostic challenges and therapeutic approaches. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain the mainstay of medical therapy; however, concerns regarding their long-term safety have encouraged interest in adjunctive and alternative strategies. Emerging pharmacological agents, plant-based treatments, and integrative approaches rooted in traditional medicine offer promising modalities for enhanced management. Additionally, dietary and lifestyle modifications such as weight control, meal timing, and avoidance of trigger foods, are essential components of effective care. A multidisciplinary framework incorporating pharmacological, nutritional, and behavioral strategies is emphasized as the most reliable path toward personalized and sustainable GERD management. This review further aims to synthesize current therapeutic modalities and evolving perspectives in the treatment of GERD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3858 KiB  
Article
Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Balloon-Assisted Laser Treatment (EBLT) for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Functional, Structural, and Gene Expression Analysis in Preclinical Model
by Boram Cha, Hyejin Kim, Van Gia Truong, Sun-Ju Oh, Seok Jeong and Hyun Wook Kang
Photonics 2025, 12(5), 421; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12050421 - 28 Apr 2025
Viewed by 516
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent disorder caused by lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction, often requiring long-term treatment. This study assessed the feasibility of endoscopic balloon-assisted laser treatment (EBLT) using a porcine GERD model. One week after GERD induction, EBLT was performed [...] Read more.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent disorder caused by lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction, often requiring long-term treatment. This study assessed the feasibility of endoscopic balloon-assisted laser treatment (EBLT) using a porcine GERD model. One week after GERD induction, EBLT was performed on three animals, while one served as a control. A 980 nm continuous-wave laser was delivered at 30 W for 90 s (energy = 2700 J and power density = 2.17 W/cm2) in a circumferential, non-contact manner using a balloon-assisted catheter. Real-time mucosal temperature monitoring was achieved using a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor integrated with the balloon, maintaining temperatures below 40 °C. Endoscopic ultrasound and manometry were used to evaluate LES thickness and pressure before and after treatment. After a 12-week observation period, esophageal tissues were harvested for histological and gene expression analysis. Compared to the control, the treated group showed an increase in LES thickness (3.6 ± 0.2 mm vs. 1.5 mm) and relative LES pressure changes (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 0.6). Upregulation of fibrosis- and hypertrophy-related genes suggested structural remodeling of the LES. No adverse effects or mucosal injury were observed. These findings support EBLT as a promising and minimally invasive strategy for GERD treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop