Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (24)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), dimerization

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 5160 KB  
Review
A Dimer for Dinner: The Impact of GHS-R1a Heterodimerization on Feeding Circuits
by Tingting Tang, Qingli Zhang, Tingting Song, Dan Ding, Dejiu Zhang, Yan Zhang, Zichu Zhao, Jingjing Kong, Qu Chen, Lei Zhu and Hailong Li
Biomolecules 2026, 16(6), 788; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16060788 - 27 May 2026
Viewed by 699
Abstract
Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor 1a (GHS-R1a) is a key G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) governing feeding and energy homeostasis. Accumulating evidence shows that GHS-R1a forms functional heterodimers with multiple metabolic-related GPCRs, including dopamine 2 receptor (D2R), melanocortin 3 receptor (MC3R), 5-hydroxytryptamine 2c receptor (5-HT2cR), [...] Read more.
Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor 1a (GHS-R1a) is a key G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) governing feeding and energy homeostasis. Accumulating evidence shows that GHS-R1a forms functional heterodimers with multiple metabolic-related GPCRs, including dopamine 2 receptor (D2R), melanocortin 3 receptor (MC3R), 5-hydroxytryptamine 2c receptor (5-HT2cR), orexin receptor 1 (OX1R) and cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R). These heterodimers undergo distinct signal transduction reprogramming, generating novel physiological effects that are not observed with individual receptors: for instance, GHS-R1a/D2R mediates an atypical calcium signaling pathway to regulate appetite, while GHS-R1a/5-HT2cR antagonizes ghrelin-induced orexigenic effects. Meanwhile, diverse detection techniques, including co-immunoprecipitation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer, have been developed to identify and validate GHS-R1a heterodimerization, laying a solid foundation for mechanistic research. This review systematically summarizes the molecular mechanisms of GHS-R1a heterodimer formation, the characteristic signal regulation patterns of different heterodimers, and their specific regulatory roles in feeding circuits. Furthermore, we discuss the existing research gaps in this field, such as the lack of in vivo detection methods for heterodimers and the unclear structural basis of dimerization. Finally, we highlight the potential of targeting specific GHS-R1a heterodimers as a novel therapeutic strategy for obesity and anorexia, providing new directions for future pharmaceutical development and clinical translation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomacromolecules: Proteins, Nucleic Acids and Carbohydrates)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4783 KB  
Article
Neurotensin Receptor 1 Regulates HER4 Tyrosine Phosphorylation in Lung Cancer Cells
by Terry W. Moody, Irene Ramos-Alvarez and Robert T. Jensen
Biology 2026, 15(9), 686; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15090686 - 28 Apr 2026
Viewed by 622
Abstract
Neurotensin (NTS) binds to the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) NTSR1 and NTSR2. NTSR1 regulates transactivation of the EGFR, HER2, and HER3, but its effects on HER4 are unknown. By Western blot, NTSR1 and HER4 were present in six lung cancer cell lines examined. [...] Read more.
Neurotensin (NTS) binds to the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) NTSR1 and NTSR2. NTSR1 regulates transactivation of the EGFR, HER2, and HER3, but its effects on HER4 are unknown. By Western blot, NTSR1 and HER4 were present in six lung cancer cell lines examined. In NCI-H522 or NCI-H661 cells, adding NTS increased phosphorylation (P) of tyrosine (Y) 1284 on HER4. Because SR48692 antagonized NTS’s ability to increase P-HER4 or P-ERK, NTSR1 may play an important role in NSCLC. SR48692, HER4 siRNA, reactive oxygen species inhibitors, and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib inhibited NTS-induced P-HER4. Adding NTS to NCI-H661 cells increased the formation of HER4/HER4, HER4/ EGFR, and HER4/HER2 dimers. Adding NTS to NSCLC cells increased both P-ERK and P-AKT, which were inhibited by PD98059 and LY294002, respectively. The growth of NCI-H522 or NCI-H661 cells was stimulated by NTS or neuregulin 1 (NRG1), a HER4 ligand, but inhibited by SR48692 or ibrutinib. The results indicate that NTSR1 regulates HER4 transactivation, thereby increasing the proliferation of lung cancer cells. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 1693 KB  
Review
Small-Molecule Ligands of Rhodopsin and Their Therapeutic Potential in Retina Degeneration
by Zaiddodine Pashandi and Beata Jastrzebska
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(18), 8964; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188964 - 15 Sep 2025
Viewed by 2930
Abstract
Rhodopsin, the prototypical Class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and visual pigment of rod photoreceptors, has long served as a structural and mechanistic model for GPCR biology. Mutations in rhodopsin are the leading cause of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), making this receptor [...] Read more.
Rhodopsin, the prototypical Class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and visual pigment of rod photoreceptors, has long served as a structural and mechanistic model for GPCR biology. Mutations in rhodopsin are the leading cause of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), making this receptor a critical therapeutic target. In this review, we summarize the chemical, structural, and biophysical features of small-molecule modulators of this receptor, spanning both classical retinoid analogs and emerging non-retinoid scaffolds. These ligands reveal recurrent binding modes within the orthosteric chromophore pocket as well as peripheral allosteric and bitopic sites, where they mediate folding, rescue trafficking, photocycle modulation, and mutant stabilization. We organize ligand performance into a three-tier framework linking binding affinity, cellular rescue potency, and stability gains. Chemotypes in tier 2, which show sub-micromolar to low-micromolar activity with broad mutant coverage, emerge as promising candidates for optimization into next-generation scaffolds. Across scaffolds, a recurring minimal pharmacophore is evident by a contiguous hydrophobic π-surface anchored in the β-ionone region, coupled with a strategically oriented polar handle that modulates the Lys296/Glu113 microenvironment, offering tractable design vectors for non-retinoid chemotypes. Beyond the chromophore binding pocket, we highlight opportunities to exploit extracellular loop epitopes, cytoplasmic microswitch clefts, dimer/membrane interfaces, and ion co-binding sites to engineer safer, state-biased control with fewer photochemical liabilities. By integrating rhodopsin photobiophysics with environment-aware, multi-state medicinal chemistry, and by addressing current translational challenges in drug delivery, this review outlines a rational framework for advancing rhodopsin-targeted therapeutics toward clinically credible interventions for RP and related retinal degenerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2387 KB  
Article
MRAP2a Binds and Modulates Activity and Localisation of Prokineticin Receptor 1 in Zebrafish
by Maria Rosaria Fullone, Daniela Maftei, Martina Vincenzi, Roberta Lattanzi and Rossella Miele
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(14), 7816; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147816 - 17 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1527
Abstract
The prokineticin system plays a role in hypothalamic neurons in the control of energy homeostasis. Prokineticin receptors (PKR1 and PKR2), like other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in the regulation of energy intake and expenditure and are modulated by the accessory membrane protein [...] Read more.
The prokineticin system plays a role in hypothalamic neurons in the control of energy homeostasis. Prokineticin receptors (PKR1 and PKR2), like other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in the regulation of energy intake and expenditure and are modulated by the accessory membrane protein 2 of the melanocortin receptor (MRAP2). The aim of this work is to characterise the interaction and regulation of the non-melanocortin receptor PKR1 by MRAP2a in zebrafish (zMRAP2a) in order to use zebrafish as a model for the development of drugs targeting accessory proteins that can alter the localisation and activity of GPCRs. To this end, we first showed that zebrafish PKR1 (zPKR1) is able to interact with both zMRAP2a and human MRAP2 (hMRAP2). This interaction occurs between the N-terminal region of zPKR1 and the C-terminal domain of zMRAP2a, which shows high sequence identity with hMRAP2 and a similar propensity for dimer formation. Moreover, we demonstrated that in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, zMRAP2a or hMRAP2 are able to modulate zPKR1 activation induced by zebrafish PK2 (zPK2) resulting in an impaired ERK and STAT3 activation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 747 KB  
Review
G Protein-Coupled Receptor Dimerization—What Next?
by Marta Dziedzicka-Wasylewska, Agnieszka Polit, Ewa Błasiak and Agata Faron-Górecka
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(6), 3089; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063089 - 7 Mar 2024
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5645
Abstract
Numerous studies highlight the therapeutic potential of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) heterodimers, emphasizing their significance in various pathological contexts. Despite extensive basic research and promising outcomes in animal models, the translation of GPCR heterodimer-targeting drugs into clinical use remains limited. The complexities of [...] Read more.
Numerous studies highlight the therapeutic potential of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) heterodimers, emphasizing their significance in various pathological contexts. Despite extensive basic research and promising outcomes in animal models, the translation of GPCR heterodimer-targeting drugs into clinical use remains limited. The complexities of in vivo conditions, particularly within thecomplex central nervous system, pose challenges in fully replicating physiological environments, hindering clinical success. This review discusses examples of the most studied heterodimers, their involvement in nervous system pathology, and the available data on their potential ligands. In addition, this review highlights the intricate interplay between lipids and GPCRs as a potential key factor in understanding the complexity of cell signaling. The multifaceted role of lipids in modulating the dynamics of GPCR dimerization is explored, shedding light on the elaborate molecular mechanisms governing these interactions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2376 KB  
Article
Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals Differential AT1R Stoichiometry Change in Biased Signaling
by Gege Qin, Jiachao Xu, Yuxin Liang and Xiaohong Fang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(1), 374; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010374 - 27 Dec 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3620
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent promising therapeutic targets due to their involvement in numerous physiological processes mediated by downstream G protein- and β-arrestin-mediated signal transduction cascades. Although the precise control of GPCR signaling pathways is therapeutically valuable, the molecular details for governing biased [...] Read more.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent promising therapeutic targets due to their involvement in numerous physiological processes mediated by downstream G protein- and β-arrestin-mediated signal transduction cascades. Although the precise control of GPCR signaling pathways is therapeutically valuable, the molecular details for governing biased GPCR signaling remain elusive. The Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), a prototypical class A GPCR with profound implications for cardiovascular functions, has become a focal point for biased ligand-based clinical interventions. Herein, we used single-molecule live-cell imaging techniques to evaluate the changes in stoichiometry and dynamics of AT1R with distinct biased ligand stimulations in real time. It was revealed that AT1R existed predominantly in monomers and dimers and underwent oligomerization upon ligand stimulation. Notably, β-arrestin-biased ligands induced the formation of higher-order aggregates, resulting in a slower diffusion profile for AT1R compared to G protein-biased ligands. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the augmented aggregation of AT1R, triggered by activation from each biased ligand, was completely abrogated in β-arrestin knockout cells. These findings furnish novel insights into the intricate relationship between GPCR aggregation states and biased signaling, underscoring the pivotal role of molecular behaviors in guiding the development of selective therapeutic agents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Single Molecule Tracking and Dynamics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1328 KB  
Review
Unraveling the Functional Significance of Unstructured Regions in G Protein-Coupled Receptors
by Roberto Maggio, Irene Fasciani, Francesco Petragnano, Maria Francesca Coppolino, Marco Scarselli and Mario Rossi
Biomolecules 2023, 13(10), 1431; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13101431 - 22 Sep 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4929
Abstract
Unstructured regions in functional proteins have gained attention in recent years due to advancements in informatics tools and biophysical methods. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a large family of cell surface receptors, contain unstructured regions in the form of the i3 loop and C-terminus. [...] Read more.
Unstructured regions in functional proteins have gained attention in recent years due to advancements in informatics tools and biophysical methods. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a large family of cell surface receptors, contain unstructured regions in the form of the i3 loop and C-terminus. This review provides an overview of the functional significance of these regions in GPCRs. GPCRs transmit signals from the extracellular environment to the cell interior, regulating various physiological processes. The i3 loop, located between the fifth and sixth transmembrane helices, and the C-terminus, connected to the seventh transmembrane helix, are determinant of interactions with G proteins and with other intracellular partners such as arrestins. Recent studies demonstrate that the i3 loop and C-terminus play critical roles in allosterically regulating GPCR activation. They can act as autoregulators, adopting conformations that, by restricting G protein access, modulate receptor coupling specificity. The length and unstructured nature of the i3 loop and C-terminus provide unique advantages in GPCR interactions with intracellular protein partners. They act as “fishing lines”, expanding the radius of interaction and enabling GPCRs to tether scaffolding proteins, thus facilitating receptor stability during cell membrane movements. Additionally, the i3 loop may be involved in domain swapping between GPCRs, generating novel receptor dimers with distinct binding and coupling characteristics. Overall, the i3 loop and C-terminus are now widely recognized as crucial elements in GPCR function and regulation. Understanding their functional roles enhances our comprehension of GPCR structure and signaling complexity and holds promise for advancements in receptor pharmacology and drug development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 14177 KB  
Article
Cholesterol in Class C GPCRs: Role, Relevance, and Localization
by Ugochi H. Isu, Shadi A Badiee, Ehsaneh Khodadadi and Mahmoud Moradi
Membranes 2023, 13(3), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030301 - 3 Mar 2023
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5411
Abstract
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), one of the largest superfamilies of cell-surface receptors, are heptahelical integral membrane proteins that play critical roles in virtually every organ system. G-protein-coupled receptors operate in membranes rich in cholesterol, with an imbalance in cholesterol level within the vicinity [...] Read more.
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), one of the largest superfamilies of cell-surface receptors, are heptahelical integral membrane proteins that play critical roles in virtually every organ system. G-protein-coupled receptors operate in membranes rich in cholesterol, with an imbalance in cholesterol level within the vicinity of GPCR transmembrane domains affecting the structure and/or function of many GPCRs, a phenomenon that has been linked to several diseases. These effects of cholesterol could result in indirect changes by altering the mechanical properties of the lipid environment or direct changes by binding to specific sites on the protein. There are a number of studies and reviews on how cholesterol modulates class A GPCRs; however, this area of study is yet to be explored for class C GPCRs, which are characterized by a large extracellular region and often form constitutive dimers. This review highlights specific sites of interaction, functions, and structural dynamics involved in the cholesterol recognition of the class C GPCRs. We summarize recent data from some typical family members to explain the effects of membrane cholesterol on the structural features and functions of class C GPCRs and speculate on their corresponding therapeutic potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Proteins: Function, Structure, and Dynamic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4966 KB  
Article
Evolutionary Couplings and Molecular Dynamic Simulations Highlight Details of GPCRs Heterodimers’ Interfaces
by Karim Widad Temgbet Nchourupouo, Jules Nde, Yannick Joel Wadop Ngouongo, Serge Sylvain Zekeng and Bernard Fongang
Molecules 2023, 28(4), 1838; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041838 - 15 Feb 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3399
Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests that only a few amino acids (“hot-spots”) at the interface contribute most of the binding energy in transient protein-protein interactions. However, experimental protocols to identify these hot-spots are highly labor-intensive and expensive. Computational methods, including evolutionary couplings, [...] Read more.
A growing body of evidence suggests that only a few amino acids (“hot-spots”) at the interface contribute most of the binding energy in transient protein-protein interactions. However, experimental protocols to identify these hot-spots are highly labor-intensive and expensive. Computational methods, including evolutionary couplings, have been proposed to predict the hot-spots, but they generally fail to provide details of the interacting amino acids. Here we showed that unbiased evolutionary methods followed by biased molecular dynamic simulations could achieve this goal and reveal critical elements of protein complexes. We applied the methodology to selected G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), known for their therapeutic properties. We used the structure-prior-assisted direct coupling analysis (SP-DCA) to predict the binding interfaces of A2aR/D2R, CB1R/D2R, A2aR/CB1R, 5HT2AR/D2R, and 5-HT2AR/mGluR2 receptor heterodimers, which all agreed with published data. In order to highlight details of the interactions, we performed molecular dynamic (MD) simulations using the newly developed AWSEM energy model. We found that these receptors interact primarily through critical residues at the C and N terminal domains and the third intracellular loop (ICL3). The MD simulations showed that these residues are energetically necessary for dimerization and revealed their native conformational state. We subsequently applied the methodology to the 5-HT2AR/5-HTR4R heterodimer, given its implication in drug addiction and neurodegenerative pathologies such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Further, the SP-DCA analysis showed that 5-HT2AR and 5-HTR4R heterodimerize through the C-terminal domain of 5-HT2AR and ICL3 of 5-HT4R. However, elucidating the details of GPCR interactions would accelerate the discovery of druggable sites and improve our knowledge of the etiology of common diseases, including AD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Structure, Function and Interaction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3690 KB  
Article
The Adhesion G-Protein-Coupled Receptor GPR115/ADGRF4 Regulates Epidermal Differentiation and Associates with Cytoskeletal KRT1
by Romy Winkler, Marianne Quaas, Stefan Glasmacher, Uwe Wolfrum, Torsten Thalheim, Jörg Galle, Knut Krohn, Thomas M. Magin and Gabriela Aust
Cells 2022, 11(19), 3151; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11193151 - 7 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3895 | Correction
Abstract
Among the 33 human adhesion G-protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs), a unique subfamily of GPCRs, only ADGRF4, encoding GPR115, shows an obvious skin-dominated transcriptomic profile, but its expression and function in skin is largely unknown. Here, we report that GPR115 is present in a [...] Read more.
Among the 33 human adhesion G-protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs), a unique subfamily of GPCRs, only ADGRF4, encoding GPR115, shows an obvious skin-dominated transcriptomic profile, but its expression and function in skin is largely unknown. Here, we report that GPR115 is present in a small subset of basal and in most suprabasal, noncornified keratinocytes of the stratified epidermis, supporting epidermal transcriptomic data. In psoriatic skin, characterized by hyperproliferation and delayed differentiation, the expression of GPR115 and KRT1/10, the fundamental suprabasal keratin dimer, is delayed. The deletion of ADGRF4 in HaCaT keratinocytes grown in an organotypic mode abrogates KRT1 and reduces keratinocyte stratification, indicating a role of GPR115 in epidermal differentiation. Unexpectedly, endogenous GPR115, which is not glycosylated and is likely not proteolytically processed, localizes intracellularly along KRT1/10-positive keratin filaments in a regular pattern. Our data demonstrate a hitherto unknown function of GPR115 in the regulation of epidermal differentiation and KRT1. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 18911 KB  
Article
Selective Interactions of Mouse Melanocortin Receptor Accessory Proteins with Somatostatin Receptors
by Meng Wang, Jing Xu, Xiao-Wei Lei, Cong Zhang, Shang-Yun Liu, Li-Na Jin and Chao Zhang
Cells 2022, 11(2), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11020267 - 13 Jan 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3107
Abstract
Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) known to regulate exocrine secretion, neurotransmission, and inhibit endogenous cell proliferation. SSTR subtypes (SSTR1-SSTR5) exhibit homo- or heterodimerization with unique signaling characteristics. Melanocortin receptor accessory protein 1 (MRAP1) functions as an allosteric modulator of melanocortin [...] Read more.
Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) known to regulate exocrine secretion, neurotransmission, and inhibit endogenous cell proliferation. SSTR subtypes (SSTR1-SSTR5) exhibit homo- or heterodimerization with unique signaling characteristics. Melanocortin receptor accessory protein 1 (MRAP1) functions as an allosteric modulator of melanocortin receptors and some other GPCRs. In this study, we investigated the differential interaction of MRAP1 and SSTRs and examined the pharmacological modulation of MRAP1 on mouse SSTR2/SSTR3 and SSTR2/SSTR5 heterodimerization in vitro. Our results show that the mouse SSTR2 forms heterodimers with SSTR3 and SSTR5 and that MRAP1 selectively interacts with SSTR3 and SSTR5 but not SSTR2. The interactive binding sites of SSTR2/SSTR3 or SSTR2/SSTR5 with MRAP1 locate on SSTR3 and SSTR5 but not SSTR2. The binding sites of MRAP1 to SSTR3 are extensive, while the ones of SSTR5 are restricted on transmembrane region six and seven. The heterodimerization of mouse SSTR2, SSTR3, and SSTR5 can be modulated by binding protein in addition to an agonist. Upregulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases phosphorylation, p27Kip1, and increased cell growth inhibition with the co-expression of SSTR2/SSTR3 or SSTR2/SSTR5 with MRAP1 suggest a regulatory effect of MRAP1 on anti-proliferative response of two SSTR heterodimers. Taken together, these results provide a new insight of MRAP1 on the maintenance and regulation of mouse SSTR dimers which might be helpful to better understand the molecular mechanism involving SSTRs in tumor biology or other human disorders. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 1314 KB  
Review
Integration and Spatial Organization of Signaling by G Protein-Coupled Receptor Homo- and Heterodimers
by Roberto Maggio, Irene Fasciani, Marco Carli, Francesco Petragnano, Francesco Marampon, Mario Rossi and Marco Scarselli
Biomolecules 2021, 11(12), 1828; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121828 - 3 Dec 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4462
Abstract
Information flow from a source to a receiver becomes informative when the recipient can process the signal into a meaningful form. Information exchange and interpretation is essential in biology and understanding how cells integrate signals from a variety of information-coding molecules into complex [...] Read more.
Information flow from a source to a receiver becomes informative when the recipient can process the signal into a meaningful form. Information exchange and interpretation is essential in biology and understanding how cells integrate signals from a variety of information-coding molecules into complex orchestrated responses is a major challenge for modern cell biology. In complex organisms, cell to cell communication occurs mostly through neurotransmitters and hormones, and receptors are responsible for signal recognition at the membrane level and information transduction inside the cell. The G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane receptors, with nearly 800 genes coding for these proteins. The recognition that GPCRs may physically interact with each other has led to the hypothesis that their dimeric state can provide the framework for temporal coincidence in signaling pathways. Furthermore, the formation of GPCRs higher order oligomers provides the structural basis for organizing distinct cell compartments along the plasma membrane where confined increases in second messengers may be perceived and discriminated. Here, we summarize evidence that supports these conjectures, fostering new ideas about the physiological role played by receptor homo- and hetero-oligomerization in cell biology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Compartmentalized GPCR Signaling)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4859 KB  
Article
BRET Analysis of GPCR Dimers in Neurons and Non-Neuronal Cells: Evidence for Inactive, Agonist, and Constitutive Conformations
by Chayma El Khamlichi, Laetitia Cobret, Jean-Michel Arrang and Séverine Morisset-Lopez
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(19), 10638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910638 - 30 Sep 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5406
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are dimeric proteins, but the functional consequences of the process are still debated. Active GPCR conformations are promoted either by agonists or constitutive activity. Inverse agonists decrease constitutive activity by promoting inactive conformations. The histamine H3 receptor (H3 [...] Read more.
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are dimeric proteins, but the functional consequences of the process are still debated. Active GPCR conformations are promoted either by agonists or constitutive activity. Inverse agonists decrease constitutive activity by promoting inactive conformations. The histamine H3 receptor (H3R) is the target of choice for the study of GPCRs because it displays high constitutive activity. Here, we study the dimerization of recombinant and brain H3R and explore the effects of H3R ligands of different intrinsic efficacy on dimerization. Co-immunoprecipitations and Western blots showed that H3R dimers co-exist with monomers in transfected HEK 293 cells and in rodent brains. Bioluminescence energy transfer (BRET) analysis confirmed the existence of spontaneous H3R dimers, not only in living HEK 293 cells but also in transfected cortical neurons. In both cells, agonists and constitutive activity of the H3R decreased BRET signals, whereas inverse agonists and GTPγS, which promote inactive conformations, increased BRET signals. These findings show the existence of spontaneous H3R dimers not only in heterologous systems but also in native tissues, which are able to adopt a number of allosteric conformations, from more inactive to more active states. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Protein-Protein Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 32655 KB  
Article
Evidence for Protein–Protein Interaction between Dopamine Receptors and the G Protein-Coupled Receptor 143
by Beatriz Bueschbell, Prashiela Manga, Erika Penner and Anke C. Schiedel
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(15), 8328; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22158328 - 3 Aug 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 6008
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can augment their functionality and increase the repertoire of signaling pathways they regulate. New therapeutics designed to modulate such interactions may allow for targeting of a specific GPCR activity, thus reducing potential for side effects. Dopamine [...] Read more.
Protein-protein interactions between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can augment their functionality and increase the repertoire of signaling pathways they regulate. New therapeutics designed to modulate such interactions may allow for targeting of a specific GPCR activity, thus reducing potential for side effects. Dopamine receptor (DR) heteromers are promising candidates for targeted therapy of neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s disease since current treatments can have severe side effects. To facilitate development of such therapies, it is necessary to identify the various DR binding partners. We report here a new interaction partner for DRD2 and DRD3, the orphan receptor G protein-coupled receptor 143 (GPR143), an atypical GPCR that plays multiple roles in pigment cells and is expressed in several regions of the brain. We previously demonstrated that the DRD2/ DRD3 antagonist pimozide also modulates GPR143 activity. Using confocal microscopy and two FRET methods, we observed that the DRs and GPR143 colocalize and interact at intracellular membranes. Furthermore, co-expression of wildtype GPR143 resulted in a 57% and 67% decrease in DRD2 and DRD3 activity, respectively, as determined by β-Arrestin recruitment assay. GPR143-DR dimerization may negatively modulate DR activity by changing affinity for dopamine or delaying delivery of the DRs to the plasma membrane. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 319 KB  
Review
CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 Axis in Colorectal Cancer: Therapeutic Target in Preclinical and Clinical Studies
by Tripti Khare, Marc Bissonnette and Sharad Khare
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(14), 7371; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147371 - 9 Jul 2021
Cited by 124 | Viewed by 9831
Abstract
Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines that promote cancer growth, metastasis, and regulate resistance to chemotherapy. Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1) also known as C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12), a prognostic factor, is an extracellular homeostatic chemokine that is the natural ligand for chemokine receptors [...] Read more.
Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines that promote cancer growth, metastasis, and regulate resistance to chemotherapy. Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1) also known as C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12), a prognostic factor, is an extracellular homeostatic chemokine that is the natural ligand for chemokine receptors C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), also known as fusin or cluster of differentiation 184 (CD184) and chemokine receptor type 7 (CXCR7). CXCR4 is the most widely expressed rhodopsin-like G protein coupled chemokine receptor (GPCR). The CXCL12–CXCR4 axis is involved in tumor growth, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC). CXCR7, recently termed as atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3), is amongst the G protein coupled cell surface receptor family that is also commonly expressed in a large variety of cancer cells. CXCR7, like CXCR4, regulates immunity, angiogenesis, stem cell trafficking, cell growth and organ-specific metastases. CXCR4 and CXCR7 are expressed individually or together, depending on the tumor type. When expressed together, CXCR4 and CXCR7 can form homo- or hetero-dimers. Homo- and hetero-dimerization of CXCL12 and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 alter their signaling activity. Only few drugs have been approved for clinical use targeting CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 axis. Several CXCR4 inhibitors are in clinical trials for solid tumor treatment with limited success whereas CXCR7-specific inhibitors are still in preclinical studies for CRC. This review focuses on current knowledge of chemokine CXCL12 and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7, with emphasis on targeting the CXCL12–CXCR4/CXCR7 axis as a treatment strategy for CRC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cytokines/Chemokines in Cancer Metastasis 2.0)
Back to TopTop