Search Results (65)

This study examines the impact of overall Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and its pillars on the default probability of Australian-listed firms. Using a panel dataset spanning 2014 to 2022 and applying the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) regression, we find that firms with higher ESG scores exhibit a significantly lower likelihood of default. Disaggregating the ESG components reveals that the Environmental and Social pillars have a negative association with default risk, suggesting a risk-mitigating effect. In contrast, the Governance pillar demonstrates a positive relationship with default probability, which may reflect potential greenwashing behavior or an excessive focus on formal governance mechanisms at the expense of operational and financial performance. Furthermore, the analysis identifies trade credit financing (TCF) as a partial mediator in the ESG–default risk nexus, indicating that firms with stronger ESG profiles rely less on external short-term financing, thereby reducing their default risk. These findings provide valuable insights for corporate management, investors, regulators, and policymakers seeking to enhance financial resilience through sustainable practices. Full article

The aim of this paper is to empirically investigate the development of the ESG score and, in particular, the respective pillar scores, as well as the data availability based on region, firm size, and business sector within the insurance industry. We also analyze the interrelationships of the ESG score and data availability, focusing on descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. For this purpose, we use data from the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG), over a period of 13 years (2010–2022). Our results show that region, firm size, and the different core businesses of insurers lead to different developments in ESG scores and data availability. Differences can also be found in the general level of the scores. However, there is no clear pattern in the evolution of ESG scores and data availability. Furthermore, we find significant and strong interrelationships within the ESG score and its data availability. In summary, the findings of this study provide a foundation for improving the interpretation and application of ESG metrics. Full article

In this work, we examine the correlation between financial inclusion and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors of sustainable development with the assistance of an exhaustive panel dataset of 103 emerging and developing economies spanning 2011 to 2022. The “Account Age” variable, standing for financial inclusion, is the share of adults owning accounts with formal financial institutions or with the providers of mobile money services, inclusive of both conventional and digital entry points. Methodologically, the article follows an econometric approach with panel data regressions, supplemented by Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) with instrumental variables in order to control endogeneity biases. ESG-specific instruments like climate resilience indicators and digital penetration measures are utilized for the purpose of robustness. As a companion approach, the paper follows machine learning techniques, applying a set of algorithms either for regression or for clustering for the purpose of detecting non-linearities and discerning ESG-inclusion typologies for the sample of countries. Results reflect that financial inclusion is, in the Environmental pillar, significantly associated with contemporary sustainability activity such as consumption of green energy, extent of protected area, and value added by agriculture, while reliance on traditional agriculture, measured by land use and value added by agriculture, decreases inclusion. For the Social pillar, expenditure on education, internet, sanitation, and gender equity are prominent inclusion facilitators, while engagement with the informal labor market exhibits a suppressing function. For the Governance pillar, anti-corruption activity and patent filing activity are inclusive, while diminishing regulatory quality, possibly by way of digital governance gaps, has a negative correlation. Policy implications are substantial: the research suggests that development dividends from a multi-dimensional approach can be had through enhancing financial inclusion. Policies that intersect financial access with upgrading the environment, social expenditure, and institutional reconstitution can simultaneously support sustainability targets. These are the most applicable lessons for the policy-makers and development professionals concerned with the attainment of the SDGs, specifically over the regions of the Global South, where the trinity of climate resilience, social fairness, and institutional renovation most significantly manifests. Full article

The main objective of this study is to examine the impact of the environmental, social and governance (ESG) pillars on financial performance. To do so, we constructed a sample of 126 non-financial companies in the MENAT region between 2017 and 2023. To estimate this relationship, we used the system GMM method, addressing endogeneity concerns like reverse causality, unobserved heterogeneity and dynamic panel bias. The empirical evidence confirms that environmental and social pillars positively and significantly contribute to financial performance, highlighting their strategic role in value creation. The governance pillar, however, does not appear to influence financial performance directly, suggesting that the governance processes within the region are not efficient enough to lead to substantial financial impacts. Of greater significance, though, are the positive and significant effects of interactions between audit quality and ESG, such that good audit practice can increase the effectiveness of ESG efforts in terms of affecting financial performance. The results may be useful for policy makers and company managers in the MENAT countries by increasing ESG performance. Full article

The link between ESG and financial performance is still under debate. In this study, we explore which aspects of ESG specifically drive market valuations through both systematic and idiosyncratic risk channels. We analyze the impact of the three core ESG pillars, 10 subcategories, and associated controversies on market valuations in the energy sector. This analysis reveals that the environmental factor has a stronger impact (regression coefficient = 0.05) than the governance factor (regression coefficient = 0.003), emphasizing the need to prioritize environmental performance in ESG strategies. The positive coefficients for environmental resource use (0.005) and innovation (0.008) indicate that investments in efficiency and clean technologies are beneficial, while the negative coefficient for emissions (−0.004) underscores the risks associated with poor emissions management. These findings suggest that environmental risks currently outweigh governance risks for the energy sector, reinforcing the importance of aligning governance practices with environmental goals. To maximize ESG effectiveness, energy firms should focus on measurable improvements in resource efficiency, innovation, and emissions reduction and transparently communicate this progress to stakeholders. The evidence suggests that energy firms approach the ESG landscape differently, with sustainability leaders benefiting from higher valuations, particularly when ESG efforts are aligned with core competencies. However, many energy companies under-invest in value-creating environmental initiatives, focusing instead on emission management, which erodes value. While they excel in emission control, they lag in innovation, missing opportunities to enhance valuations. This underscores the potential for ESG risk analysis to improve portfolio performance, as sustainability can both create value and mitigate risks by factoring into valuation equations as both risks and opportunities. This study uniquely contributes to the ESG–financial performance literature by disentangling the specific ESG dimensions that drive market valuations in the energy sector, revealing that value is created not through emission control but through strategic alignment with eco-innovation, governance, and social responsibility. Full article

The fundamental principles of “sustainable development” and “green” promoted by ESG align with the concept of “green and sustainable” development. Enhancing enterprise ESG is a methodical endeavor that necessitates enterprises to possess ESG investment capabilities, coordinate many stakeholders, and leverage the influence of prominent market players. State-owned enterprises (SOEs) possess a specific level of support within a nation’s economy. SOEs serve as a fundamental pillar of China’s socialist economic system with distinctive characteristics, significantly influencing business conduct and reinforcing corporate value orientation. Consequently, the capacity of SOEs to assume a strategic leadership role in enhancing supply chain ESG performance is of paramount importance for the general elevation of ESG standards among Chinese enterprises. Limited research has investigated the transmission effect of the ESG performance among chain enterprises from a supply chain viewpoint, particularly regarding the pivotal role of SOEs in enhancing the ESG performance of these entities. This article examines the influence of SOEs’ ESG performance on the ESG performance of supply chain enterprises, focusing on the spillover effects of SOEs’ ESG performance within the supply chain context. It investigates how SOEs lead upstream and downstream enterprises in enhancing their ESG performance, aiming to address the existing cognitive gap in this area and provide substantial evidence for pertinent theories and practices. This article, employing an empirical research methodology, discovers that the ESG performance of state-owned supply chain core enterprises significantly enhances the ESG performance of enterprises in a supply chain, while non-state-owned supply chain core enterprises do not exhibit this effect. Furthermore, research indicates that this effect is asymmetric: when the supply chain core enterprise is a SOE and the enterprises in the supply chain are non-state-owned, the leading effect is more pronounced, and this effect is more powerful for upstream enterprises. The heterogeneity test reveals that the impact of the ESG performance is more pronounced in larger state-owned supply chain core enterprises that have been publicly listed for an extended duration and operate in highly competitive markets. The conclusions of this essay address the deficiencies of current research and provide significant practical implications for the development of green supply chains in the contemporary era. Full article

This paper introduces the Integrated Model for Sustainable Development (IMSD), a theory-driven governance framework that embeds Corporate Diversity Responsibility (CDR) into climate and energy policy to advance systemic equity, institutional resilience, and inclusive innovation. Grounded in Institutional Theory, the Resource-Based View (RBV), and Intersectionality Theory, IMSD unifies fragmented sustainability efforts across five pillars: Climate Sustainability, Social Sustainability (CDR), Governance Integration, Collaborative Partnerships, and Implementation and Monitoring. Aligned with SDGs 7, 10, and 13, IMSD operationalizes inclusive leadership, anticipatory adaptation, and equity-centered decision-making. It addresses the compounded climate vulnerabilities faced by women and marginalized groups in the Global South, integrating insights from Indigenous resilience and intersectional adaptation strategies. Unlike conventional CSR or ESG models, IMSD institutionalizes diversity as a strategic asset and governance principle. It transforms DEIB from symbolic compliance into a catalyst for ethical leadership, legitimacy, and performance in turbulent environments. The model’s modular structure supports cross-sector scalability, making it a practical tool for organizations seeking to align ESG mandates with climate justice and inclusive innovation. Future empirical validation of the IMSD framework across diverse governance settings will further strengthen its applicability and global relevance. IMSD represents a paradigm shift in sustainability governance—bridging climate action and social equity through theory-based leadership and systemic institutional transformation. Full article

The increasing integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices into corporate strategy has raised important questions about their financial implications. This study examines the relationship between ESG performance and financial outcomes in the tourism industry, an industry that is both highly visible and environmentally sensitive. To achieve this, this study analyzes the impact of the three ESG dimensions on financial performance, measured by Return on Assets (ROA). Using panel data econometric techniques, this study examines a balanced panel dataset of 154 listed tourism services firms between 2017 and 2021 to assess how each ESG pillar influences profitability. ESG data were sourced from Refinitiv Eikon, a widely validated provider in ESG-financial research. The analysis employs panel data econometric techniques with firm size and leverage as control variables. Our findings indicate that the Environmental, Social, and Governance scores each have a statistically significant negative effect on ROA, while the ESG controversies score is not statistically significant. These results suggest that despite the reputational value of ESG engagement, its short-term financial impact may be limited or negative in capital-intensive service sectors, such as tourism. This study contributes to the literature by providing sector-specific, post-crisis empirical evidence and highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of ESG–financial dynamics across industries. Full article

This study investigates the moderating role of independent directors on corporate boards in raising the ESG reporting for non-financial listed firms in Pakistan to strive for a greener revolution around the economy. A sample of 369 firms listed and operated on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) for a period covering 2012–2023 (both inclusive) have been taken out of a target population of 456 non-financial listed firms. The results are investigated using bivariate, multiple, and hierarchical regression analyses. This study has significant findings in the context of Pakistan and can be generalized to struggling economies around the globe. The interventional role of independent directors has significant findings for the full model. Findings from the Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy Score (CSRSS) are inconclusive irrespective of the measurement method used, i.e., environmental innovation score (EIS) or environmental pillar score (EPS). Environmental, Social, Governance Score (ESGS) has revealed a positive and significant impact when EIS is used as a performance variable, whereas when EPS is taken as a performance measure, the results are significant and negative. Under the lens of stakeholders’ theory, upper echelon theory, and agency theory, this study contributes to the corporate governance domain and the literature on environmental improvisation and ESG reporting. Researchers, statutory authorities, and academicians can benefit from it. The vital role of independent directors is the key to developing economies to strive for a sustained greener environment. This study is the first in the Asian and, specifically, Pakistani context to take on the interventional role of independent directors in promoting ESG reporting requirements for corporate greener revolution efforts. Full article

The present study aims to assess the determinants of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of European insurance companies, exploring the connections between the determinants and each of the three ESG pillars. Using a European panel dataset, the study includes a sample of the 30 most relevant European insurance companies listed in the stock exchange index Stoxx Europe 600 index, over the period 2016–2020. Main findings indicate that older insurance companies, with a larger dimension and profitability, less leveraged, with smaller boards, but with more gender diverse boards, with a sustainability committee and with a standalone sustainability report, tend to present a higher level of ESG performance. Findings also indicate that insurance companies with higher ESG performance are located in countries with higher gross domestic product growth rate. The current research setting has never been studied hitherto. Therefore, it adds to the limited empirical research on the determinants of ESG performance among insurance companies, which is focused on insurances companies in the United States of America. Full article

As Saudi Arabia accelerates its Vision 2030 agenda, sustainable urban development has emerged as a critical pillar for economic diversification and climate resilience. This study investigates the role of green municipal bonds (GMBs) as a catalytic financing tool to address funding gaps in low-carbon infrastructure and renewable energy projects within the Kingdom’s arid, fossil-fuel-dependent context. Employing a mixed-methods approach—combining qualitative case studies of global best practices (e.g., Gothenburg, Cape Town) and quantitative analysis of Saudi municipal financial data—we evaluate the feasibility of GMBs in bridging fiscal shortfalls while aligning with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. The research introduces a novel conceptual framework that integrates regulatory harmonization, stakeholder coordination, and Shariah-compliant financial mechanisms, tailored to Saudi Arabia’s socio-economic and climatic realities. Key findings reveal that GMBs could cover 40% of municipal revenue gaps, attract global ESG investors, and reduce carbon emissions by 30% through projects such as NEOM’s renewable grids and Riyadh’s urban greening initiatives. By addressing underexplored intersections of fossil-fuel transitions, arid-climate governance, and Islamic finance, this study advances sustainable urban scholarship and offers actionable policy recommendations, including a phased roadmap for GMB adoption and the establishment of a Saudi Green Bond Taskforce. The results position Saudi Arabia as a regional leader in climate-resilient finance, providing replicable insights for resource-dependent economies pursuing carbon neutrality. Full article

This study examines the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on the persistence of firm value among publicly listed companies in Taiwan from 2016 to 2023, using survival analysis. This approach addresses a gap in the literature, which has largely overlooked the temporal dimension of firm value. The findings indicate that only higher social scores are significantly associated with a longer duration of firm value persistence, whereas environmental and governance scores do not exhibit this effect. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that within the social pillar, only product quality and safety contribute meaningfully to sustaining firm value. Although previous studies have often linked sustainability practices to higher firm value, the present findings suggest that such effects may not endure over time. These results underscore the importance of aligning ESG initiatives with core business strategies and enhancing disclosure credibility to ensure authentic commitment. Full article

This study explores the following two aspects: (i) the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores and corporate ownership characteristics on the performance of Chinese listed companies, and (ii) whether different ownership characteristics (state-owned, private, foreign) moderate the relationship between ESG participation and corporate performance. By analyzing a comprehensive sample of 4649 listed companies in China, we provide robust evidence that ESG participation and its three pillars (i.e., Environmental, Social, and Governance) can significantly enhance corporate performance, as measured by the accounting-based proxy return on assets (ROA). Moreover, our research findings reveal an important and novel discovery: in the Chinese market, ownership types have significantly different moderating effects on the relationship between ESG and corporate performance. Specifically, compared to state-owned enterprises and private corporations, foreign ownership exhibits a stronger moderating effect in enhancing the positive impact of ESG on ROA, followed by private corporations, while the moderating effect of state-owned enterprises is the weakest. This result provides new perspectives and empirical support on how ESG and ownership structure jointly affect corporate performance, offering references for future related research and policy formulation. Full article

Our investigation examined the impact of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) activities on corporate financial distress. This research utilised data from companies listed in the FTSE All-Share index from 2014 to 2022 from the Refinitiv EIKON database. We incorporated year- and industry-fixed effects into our analysis to address changing economic conditions and industry-specific effects. ESG scores were used as a proxy for ESG activities, while Z-scores were utilised to gauge financial distress. The results unveiled a compelling trend: ESG activities showcased a negative correlation with financial distress, implying that companies actively involved in ESG actions are less likely to face default, even after incorporating several robustness and endogeneity tests. Moreover, when examining the role of bribery, corruption, and fraud issues (negative issues) as a moderating factor, our findings revealed that lower negative issues strengthen the negative relationship between ESG (governance pillar) and financial distress. This suggests that governance mechanisms effectively reduce financial distress in less corrupt environments, where institutional quality supports properly implementing governance practices. These findings offer valuable insights for companies seeking to mitigate financial distress by adopting ESG strategies. Full article

The construction industry is one of the most environmentally sensitive sectors, significantly impacting the adoption of sustainable development practices. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) pillars are essential for assessing corporate sustainability performance, revealing risks, and guiding improvement. Despite the widespread use of indicators, a notable gap exists in ESG frameworks oriented to assess company performance within the sector, with limited research on achieving standard tools. This study proposes a practical standardized framework of indicators for the European construction industry and provides a set of KPIs for the Italian context, serving as a tool to measure and report ESG performance. The methodology consists of the selection of indicators from established protocols for assessing and reporting ESG criteria, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB). The selection process resulted in the identification of 118 indicators, categorized into 44 environmental, 54 social, and 20 governance indicators, enabling construction companies to comprehensively measure and report their ESG performance in accordance with disclosure regulations. The result of this work serves policymakers seeking to develop standardized frameworks specific to the construction industry, for defining expert panels to evaluate mandatory disclosures from companies, and as guidance for companies who need guidelines to assess their sustainability performance and ensure compliance and alignment with existing frameworks. Full article