Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (34)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = DILI diagnosis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 536 KiB  
Review
Autoimmune Hepatitis and Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Japan
by Hiroki Nishikawa, Soo Ki Kim and Akira Asai
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4514; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134514 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 462
Abstract
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is the most common liver disease caused by autoimmunity. In Japan, the number of patients with AIH has been increasing in recent years. AIH develops as a result of the loss of immune tolerance to autoantigens in the liver. Drug-induced [...] Read more.
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is the most common liver disease caused by autoimmunity. In Japan, the number of patients with AIH has been increasing in recent years. AIH develops as a result of the loss of immune tolerance to autoantigens in the liver. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an extremely important cause of liver injury in clinical practice and should always be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis. Recently, DILI caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors has been attracting attention. For the diagnosis of DILI, it is important to carefully exclude other possible causes of liver injury and obtain a detailed history of medications and the timing of their use. On the other hand, drug-induced AIH, like hepatitis, also exists and is clinically important because it is often difficult to differentiate from idiopathic AIH. A solid understanding of the pathogenesis of both AIH and DILI is essential for clinicians. This article provides an overview of AIH and DILI in Japan, including the latest findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 339 KiB  
Review
Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis: Robust Causality Assessment Using Two Different Validated and Scoring Diagnostic Algorithms
by Rolf Teschke, Axel Eickhoff and Gaby Danan
Diagnostics 2025, 15(13), 1588; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131588 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 594
Abstract
Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a relatively new subtype of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI), but the features of DIAIH have been variably described due to the inhomogeneity of assessed study cohorts. The aim of this analysis is to harmonize DIAIH cohorts by [...] Read more.
Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a relatively new subtype of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI), but the features of DIAIH have been variably described due to the inhomogeneity of assessed study cohorts. The aim of this analysis is to harmonize DIAIH cohorts by unifying causality assessments, which may help characterize the features of DIAIH. Methods: Published reports of DIAIH cases were evaluated for the causality assessment methods used to verify the diagnosis of DIAIH. This disorder consists of two parts, i.e., the iDILI part and the autoimmune (AIH) part, whereby each part needs a specific diagnostic algorithm. The validated and scoring Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment (RUCAM) is privileged for assessing the iDILI part, and the validated, simplified AIH score is the perfect choice for evaluating the AIH part. The analysis of DIAIH publications revealed that 12/20 reports (60%) presented cases assessed by both the RUCAM and the simplified AIH score, providing 49 drugs and drug combinations as causative drugs in up to 25 cases of DIAIH. Serum alanine aminotransferase activities of up to 3489 UL and high titers of autoimmune parameters such as anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-smooth-muscle antibodies, and soluble liver antigen antibodies supported DIAIH diagnosis. In contrast, 4/20 reports (20%) applied only RUCAM, and 2/20 reports (10%) used only the simplified AIH score; these 6 reports therefore provided insufficient criteria for a valid DIAIH diagnosis. Moreover, 2/20 reports (10%) did not use any causality algorithm, providing elusive features of DIAIH. While DIAIH is clearly restricted to drugs as responsible agents, this term is erroneously used to refer to disease induced by non-drugs such as herbs, green tea, dimethoate (an organophosphate insecticide), dietary supplements, biologics, herbal remedies, different viruses, and bacteria, as well as vaccines. For diseases induced by these agents, a better term could be, for instance, non-drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis. Drug cessation and immunotherapy with corticosteroids and azathioprine comprise the treatment of choice. The characteristics of DIAIH can best be described if both the RUCAM and the simplified AIH score are used concomitantly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
19 pages, 1099 KiB  
Review
Pathophysiological Differences and Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune and Drug-Induced Hepatitis
by Nicola Zeni, Alessandro Cristofani, Salvatore Silvio Piano, Massimo Bolognesi and Antonietta Romano
Livers 2025, 5(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/livers5020022 - 13 May 2025
Viewed by 1611
Abstract
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are major causes of liver inflammation with distinct pathophysiology but overlapping clinical features. Among acute cases, DILI is a key differential diagnosis for AIH, especially when drug history is unclear or the injury is non-dose-dependent. [...] Read more.
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are major causes of liver inflammation with distinct pathophysiology but overlapping clinical features. Among acute cases, DILI is a key differential diagnosis for AIH, especially when drug history is unclear or the injury is non-dose-dependent. Mechanisms of DILI include direct toxicity, metabolic idiosyncrasies, and immune-mediated responses that can mimic AIH. Moreover, certain drugs can induce AIH-like syndromes, further complicating the diagnosis. While causality assessment tools aid initial evaluations, liver biopsy remains valuable for distinguishing AIH from DILI; given these complexities, hepatologist consultation is often essential to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 7560 KiB  
Case Report
Primary Iliopsoas Abscess and Drug-Induced Liver Injury in the Emergency Department: A Case Report
by Ovidiu Alexandru Mederle, Laurentiu Sima, Daian Ionel Popa, Carmen Gabriela Williams, Diana Mitu, Dumitru Șutoi, Cosmin Iosif Trebuian, Mircea Selaru, Dan Lolos, Ana-Maria Pah and Florina Buleu
Diseases 2024, 12(12), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12120326 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1631
Abstract
Background and objective: Iliopsoas abscess (IPA) is a rare condition with varied symptomology and etiology. Less than one-third of patients with IPA present in the emergency department (ED) with the traditional triad of fever, back pain, and restricted hip motion (or limp), leading [...] Read more.
Background and objective: Iliopsoas abscess (IPA) is a rare condition with varied symptomology and etiology. Less than one-third of patients with IPA present in the emergency department (ED) with the traditional triad of fever, back pain, and restricted hip motion (or limp), leading to delays in diagnosis and management. Acute liver failure is also a rare clinical presentation in the ED, being associated with high morbidity and mortality. It occurs most often in young patients without pre-existing liver disease, presenting unique challenges in clinical management. Most cases currently happen because of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), mainly from acetaminophen or idiosyncratic drug reactions. This case report aims to raise awareness among healthcare professionals regarding the two atypical presentations in ED and introduce a potential differential diagnosis when evaluating patients with fever and back pain or liver enzyme elevations with or without nonspecific symptoms associated with the development of jaundice. The intention is to provide insights into the signs and symptoms that may indicate the presence of an iliopsoas abscess and prompt additional investigations. Case report: Here, we describe a case of primary iliopsoas abscess associated with drug-induced liver injury in our ED. The patient complained of pain in the left lumbar region and fatigue that started two weeks before this presentation, claiming that, during the previous night, the pain suddenly worsened. At the first clinical examination in the ED, the patient presented pain at palpation in the right hypochondriac and left lumbar regions, accompanied by fever, vomiting, and jaundice. On abdominal ultrasonography, the diagnosis of acute cholangitis was suspected. The laboratory test shows leukocytosis with neutrophilia, thrombocytosis, elevated liver enzymes, and hyperbilirubinemia with the predominance of indirect bilirubin. After analyzing the laboratory test results, we repeated and performed a more detailed anamnesis and medical history of the patient. Because of her increasing pain and persistent fever, she recognized excessive consumption in the last five days of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. We performed abdominal and pelvic computed tomography, which confirmed the diagnosis of cholelithiasis observed with the diameter of the bile duct within normal limits but also showed an abscess collection fused to the interfibrillar level of the left iliopsoas muscle, a diagnosis we most likely would have missed. The patient was hospitalized in the General Surgery Department, and surgical abscess drainage was performed. The patient’s evolution was excellent; she was discharged after 11 days. Conclusions: The case presented here exemplifies how iliopsoas abscess, a rare cause of back pain, can quickly go unrecognized, especially in the emergency department. Our experiences will raise awareness among doctors in emergency departments about this uncommon but essential diagnosis. With advancements in diagnostic tools and techniques, we hope that more cases of iliopsoas abscess will be accurately diagnosed. Moreover, no case report from the literature has presented IPA associated with DILI. This case is unique because our patient did not exhibit classic features of either pathology. This case also emphasizes the importance of a medical history that includes thorough evaluations of potential high utilization of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 454 KiB  
Review
Idiosyncratic Hepatocellular Drug-Induced Liver Injury by Flucloxacillin with Evidence Based on Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method and HLA B*57:01 Genotype: From Metabolic CYP 3A4/3A7 to Immune Mechanisms
by Rolf Teschke
Biomedicines 2024, 12(10), 2208; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102208 - 27 Sep 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1734
Abstract
Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) by flucloxacillin presents as both cholestatic and hepatocellular injury. Its mechanistic steps are explored in the present analysis as limited data exist on the cascade of events leading to iDILI in patients with an established diagnosis assessed for [...] Read more.
Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) by flucloxacillin presents as both cholestatic and hepatocellular injury. Its mechanistic steps are explored in the present analysis as limited data exist on the cascade of events leading to iDILI in patients with an established diagnosis assessed for causality by the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM). Studies with human liver microsomes showed that flucloxacillin is a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) with ist preferred isoforms CYP 3A4/3A7 that toxified flucloxacillin toward 5′-hydroxymethylflucloxacillin, which was cytotoxic to human biliary epithelial cell cultures, simulating human cholestatic injury. This provided evidence for a restricted role of the metabolic CYP-dependent hypothesis. In contrast, 5′-hydroxymethylflucloxacillin generated metabolically via CYP 3A4/3A7 was not cytotoxic to human hepatocytes due to missing genetic host features and a lack of non-parenchymal cells, including immune cells, which commonly surround the hepatocytes in the intact liver in abundance. This indicated a mechanistic gap regarding the clinical hepatocellular iDILI, now closed by additional studies and clinical evidence based on HLA B*57:01-positive patients with iDILI by flucloxacillin and a verified diagnosis by the RUCAM. Naïve T-cells from volunteers expressing HLA B*57:01 activated by flucloxacillin when the drug antigen was presented by dendritic cells provided the immunological basis for hepatocellular iDILI caused by flucloxacillin. HLA B*57:01-restricted activation of drug-specific T-cells caused covalent binding of flucloxacillin to albumin acting as a hapten. Following drug stimulation, T-cell clones expressing CCR4 and CCR9 migrated toward CCL17 and CCL25 and secreted interferon-γ and cytokines. In conclusion, cholestatic injury can be explained metabolically, while hepatocellular injury requires both metabolic and immune activation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 367 KiB  
Review
Human Leucocyte Antigen Genetics in Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury with Evidence Based on the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method
by Rolf Teschke and Gaby Danan
Medicines 2024, 11(4), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines11040009 - 11 Apr 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2583
Abstract
The human leucocyte antigen (HLA) allele variability was studied in cohorts of patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). Some reports showed an association between HLA genetics and iDILI, proposing HLA alleles as a potential risk factor for the liver injury. However, the [...] Read more.
The human leucocyte antigen (HLA) allele variability was studied in cohorts of patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). Some reports showed an association between HLA genetics and iDILI, proposing HLA alleles as a potential risk factor for the liver injury. However, the strength of such assumptions heavily depends on the quality of the iDILI diagnosis, calling for a thorough analysis. Using the PubMed database and Google Science, a total of 25 reports of case series or single cases were retrieved using the terms HLA genes and iDILI. It turned out that in 10/25 reports (40%), HLA genetics were determined in iDILI cases, for which no causality assessment method (CAM) was used or a non-validated tool was applied, meaning the findings were based on subjective opinion, providing disputable results and hence not scoring individual key elements. By contrast, in most iDILI reports (60%), the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) was applied, which is the diagnostic algorithm preferred worldwide to assess causality in iDILI cases and represents a quantitative, objective tool that has been well validated by both internal and external DILI experts. The RUCAM provided evidence-based results concerning liver injury by 1 drug class (antituberculotics + antiretrovirals) and 19 different drugs, comprising 900 iDILI cases. Among the top-ranking drugs were amoxicillin–clavulanate (290 cases, HLA A*02:01 or HLA A*30:02), followed by flucloxacillin (255 cases, HLA B*57:01), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (86 cases, HLA B*14:01 or HLA B*14:02), methimazole (40 cases, HLA C*03:02), carbamazepine (29 cases, HLA A*31:01), and nitrofurantoin (26 cases, HLA A*33:01). In conclusion, the HLA genetics in 900 idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury cases with evidence based on the RUCAM are available for studying the mechanistic steps leading to the injury, including metabolic factors through cytochrome P450 isoforms and processes that activate the innate immune system to the adaptive immune system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The 10th Anniversary of Medicines: Future Directions)
14 pages, 2475 KiB  
Article
Exploring Individual Variability in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Responses through Metabolomic Analysis
by Marta Moreno-Torres, Guillermo Quintás, Teresa Martínez-Sena, Ramiro Jover and José V. Castell
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(5), 3003; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25053003 - 5 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2276
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a serious adverse hepatic event presenting diagnostic and prognostic challenges. The clinical categorization of DILI into hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed phenotype is based on serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values; however, this classification may not [...] Read more.
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a serious adverse hepatic event presenting diagnostic and prognostic challenges. The clinical categorization of DILI into hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed phenotype is based on serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values; however, this classification may not capture the full spectrum of DILI subtypes. With this aim, we explored the utility of assessing changes in the plasma metabolomic profiles of 79 DILI patients assessed by the RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) score to better characterize this condition and compare results obtained with the standard clinical characterization. Through the identification of various metabolites in the plasma (including free and conjugated bile acids and glycerophospholipids), and the integration of this information into predictive models, we were able to evaluate the extent of the hepatocellular or cholestatic phenotype and to assign a numeric value with the contribution of each specific DILI sub-phenotype into the patient’s general condition. Additionally, our results showed that metabolomic analysis enabled the monitoring of DILI variability responses to the same drug, the transitions between sub-phenotypes during disease progression, and identified a spectrum of residual DILI metabolic features, which can be overlooked using standard clinical diagnosis during patient follow-up. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Toxicology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1014 KiB  
Review
Hemochromatosis: Ferroptosis, ROS, Gut Microbiome, and Clinical Challenges with Alcohol as Confounding Variable
by Rolf Teschke
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(5), 2668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052668 - 25 Feb 2024
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 6771
Abstract
Hemochromatosis represents clinically one of the most important genetic storage diseases of the liver caused by iron overload, which is to be differentiated from hepatic iron overload due to excessive iron release from erythrocytes in patients with genetic hemolytic disorders. This disorder is [...] Read more.
Hemochromatosis represents clinically one of the most important genetic storage diseases of the liver caused by iron overload, which is to be differentiated from hepatic iron overload due to excessive iron release from erythrocytes in patients with genetic hemolytic disorders. This disorder is under recent mechanistic discussion regarding ferroptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), the gut microbiome, and alcohol abuse as a risk factor, which are all topics of this review article. Triggered by released intracellular free iron from ferritin via the autophagic process of ferritinophagy, ferroptosis is involved in hemochromatosis as a specific form of iron-dependent regulated cell death. This develops in the course of mitochondrial injury associated with additional iron accumulation, followed by excessive production of ROS and lipid peroxidation. A low fecal iron content during therapeutic iron depletion reduces colonic inflammation and oxidative stress. In clinical terms, iron is an essential trace element required for human health. Humans cannot synthesize iron and must take it up from iron-containing foods and beverages. Under physiological conditions, healthy individuals allow for iron homeostasis by restricting the extent of intestinal iron depending on realistic demand, avoiding uptake of iron in excess. For this condition, the human body has no chance to adequately compensate through removal. In patients with hemochromatosis, the molecular finetuning of intestinal iron uptake is set off due to mutations in the high-FE2+ (HFE) genes that lead to a lack of hepcidin or resistance on the part of ferroportin to hepcidin binding. This is the major mechanism for the increased iron stores in the body. Hepcidin is a liver-derived peptide, which impairs the release of iron from enterocytes and macrophages by interacting with ferroportin. As a result, iron accumulates in various organs including the liver, which is severely injured and causes the clinically important hemochromatosis. This diagnosis is difficult to establish due to uncharacteristic features. Among these are asthenia, joint pain, arthritis, chondrocalcinosis, diabetes mellitus, hypopituitarism, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and cardiopathy. Diagnosis is initially suspected by increased serum levels of ferritin, a non-specific parameter also elevated in inflammatory diseases that must be excluded to be on the safer diagnostic side. Diagnosis is facilitated if ferritin is combined with elevated fasting transferrin saturation, genetic testing, and family screening. Various diagnostic attempts were published as algorithms. However, none of these were based on evidence or quantitative results derived from scored key features as opposed to other known complex diseases. Among these are autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or drug-induced liver injury (DILI). For both diseases, the scored diagnostic algorithms are used in line with artificial intelligence (AI) principles to ascertain the diagnosis. The first-line therapy of hemochromatosis involves regular and life-long phlebotomy to remove iron from the blood, which improves the prognosis and may prevent the development of end-stage liver disease such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver transplantation is rarely performed, confined to acute liver failure. In conclusion, ferroptosis, ROS, the gut microbiome, and concomitant alcohol abuse play a major contributing role in the development and clinical course of genetic hemochromatosis, which requires early diagnosis and therapy initiation through phlebotomy as a first-line treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heavy Metal Toxicity: Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Therapies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 817 KiB  
Article
Utility of Liver Biopsy in the Diagnosis and Management of Possible Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients Receiving Antituberculosis Therapy: A Retrospective Study
by Gina Gualano, Drieda Zace, Silvia Mosti, Paola Mencarini, Maria Musso, Raffaella Libertone, Carlotta Cerva, Delia Goletti, Alessia Rianda, Franca Del Nonno, Laura Falasca and Fabrizio Palmieri
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2023, 15(6), 735-746; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr15060066 - 28 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2203
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) secondary to ATT treatment (TB-DILI) is reported in 2–28% of patients. We present here a series of clinical cases of suspected DILI arising during antituberculosis treatment, studied with the aid of liver biopsy. Methods: this was a retrospective [...] Read more.
Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) secondary to ATT treatment (TB-DILI) is reported in 2–28% of patients. We present here a series of clinical cases of suspected DILI arising during antituberculosis treatment, studied with the aid of liver biopsy. Methods: this was a retrospective descriptive study including 10 tuberculosis patients who underwent liver biopsy for suspected TB-DILI at the “Lazzaro Spallanzani” Institute from 2017 to 2022. Results: Ten patients who underwent LB were extracted from the database and included in the retrospective study cohort. According to the clinical classification, eight patients had hepatocellular liver injury, one patient had cholestatic injury, and another had mixed-type injury. Histopathological diagnosis revealed liver damage due to DILI in 5/10 (50%) cases. In one case, liver biopsy showed necrotizing granulomatous hepatitis. Conclusions: Severe and persistent elevation of hepatic transaminases, hepatic cholestasis despite discontinuation of therapy, and other suspected hepatic conditions are indications for liver biopsy, which remains a valuable tool in the evaluation of selected tuberculosis patients with suspected DILI for many reasons. However, the decision to perform a liver biopsy should be based on clinical judgment, considering the benefits and risks of the procedure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2013 KiB  
Article
Investigating Acute Hepatitis after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination or Infection: A Genetic Case Series
by Elisa Bernasconi, Matteo Biagi, Stefania Di Agostino, Carmela Cursaro, Cristina Felicani, Enrico Ronconi, Elena Franchi, Arianna Carmen Costanzo, Filippo Gabrielli, Alessia Cavicchioli, Giuseppe Ienopoli, Paolo Marenghi, Alessandra Bartoli, Beatrice Serra, Davide Scalabrini, Pamela Sighinolfi and Pietro Andreone
Biomedicines 2023, 11(10), 2848; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102848 - 20 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2216
Abstract
(1) Background: Despite the advantages of COVID-19 vaccination, rare cases of acute hepatitis developing after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine or the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have been reported. The aim of the study is to describe a [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Despite the advantages of COVID-19 vaccination, rare cases of acute hepatitis developing after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine or the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have been reported. The aim of the study is to describe a case series of patients who experienced the onset of acute hepatitis, with or without autoimmune features, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection and to hypothesize a genetic susceptibility in the pathogenesis. (2) Methods: A group of patients with acute onset hepatitis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection were evaluated in our hepatology outpatient clinic, where they underwent biochemical and autoimmune tests. Hepatitis A (HAV), B (HBV), and C virus (HCV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections were excluded. Patients with a diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or drug-induced liver injury (DILI) underwent HLA typing and histological testing. (3) Results: Five patients experienced new-onset AIH after COVID-19 vaccination, one of which developed mild symptoms after vaccination that strongly worsened during subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection. One patient had AIH relapse after COVID-19 vaccination while on maintenance immunosuppressive treatment. All of them had HLA DRB1 alleles known to confer susceptibility to AIH (HLA DRB1*03,*07,*13,*14), and in three of them, HLA DRB1*11 was also detected. Two patients developed acute hepatitis without autoimmune hallmarks which resolved spontaneously, both positive for HLA DRB1*11. (4) Conclusions: An association between AIH and COVID-19 vaccine or infection can be hypothesized in individuals with a genetic predisposition. In patients without autoimmune features and spontaneous improvement of hypertransaminasemia, the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is probable. Further studies are needed to determine the presence of an actual association and identify a possible role of HLA DRB1*11 in the pathogenesis of acute liver injury after SARS-CoV2 vaccination or infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Immunology and Immunotherapy in Europe)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 4668 KiB  
Review
Idiosyncratic DILI and RUCAM under One Hat: The Global View
by Rolf Teschke and Gaby Danan
Livers 2023, 3(3), 397-433; https://doi.org/10.3390/livers3030030 - 19 Aug 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4236
Abstract
Drugs are prescribed worldwide to treat diseases but with the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). The most important difficulty is how best to establish causality. Based on strong evidence and principles of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve complex processes through quantitative [...] Read more.
Drugs are prescribed worldwide to treat diseases but with the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). The most important difficulty is how best to establish causality. Based on strong evidence and principles of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve complex processes through quantitative algorithms using scored elements, progress was achieved with the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) in its original and updated versions, often viewed now as the gold standard. As a highly appreciated diagnostic algorithm, the RUCAM is in global use with around 100,000 iDILI cases published worldwide using RUCAM to assess causality, largely outperforming any other specific causality assessment tool in terms of case numbers. Consequently, the RUCAM helps to establish a list of top-ranking drugs worldwide implicated in iDILI and to describe clinical and mechanistic features of iDILI caused by various drugs. In addition, the RUCAM was recently applied in iDILI cases of patients treated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections or cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as well as in the search for new treatment options with conventional drugs in iDILI. Analyses of RUCAM-based iDILI cases are helpful to support pathogenetic steps like immune reactions, genetic predisposition as evidenced by human leucocyte antigens (HLA) genotypes for selected drugs, and the role of the gut microbiome. To achieve consistency in data collection, analysis, and specific clinical and pathogenetic presentation, researchers, regulatory agencies, and pharmaceutical firms should place iDILI and the updated RUCAM as the causality tool under one and the same hat in review articles and clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of iDILI. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2332 KiB  
Article
A Simple ICT-Based Fluorescent Probe for HOCl and Bioimaging Applications
by Yan Zheng, Shuang Wu, Yifan Bing, Huimin Li, Xueqin Liu, Wenlan Li, Xiang Zou and Zhongyuan Qu
Biosensors 2023, 13(7), 744; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13070744 - 18 Jul 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2338
Abstract
Over the past few decades, drug-induced liver damage (DILI) has become a serious public health problem due to drug abuse. Among multifarious reactive oxygen species, mounting evidence attests that ClO has been used as a potential biomarker in DILI. In this work, [...] Read more.
Over the past few decades, drug-induced liver damage (DILI) has become a serious public health problem due to drug abuse. Among multifarious reactive oxygen species, mounting evidence attests that ClO has been used as a potential biomarker in DILI. In this work, a new “turn-on” fluorescent probe 1 was designed and synthesized by modifying 4′-hydroxybiphenyl-4-carbonitrile (dye 2) with N, N-dimethylthiocarbamate as a response site for detecting ClO. Probe 1 displayed a low detection limit (72 nM), fast response time (30 s), wide pH operating range (6–8), great tissue penetration, large Stokes shift (125 nm) and 291-fold fluorescence enhancement at 475 nm in the mapping of ClO. Probe 1 could trace amounts of exogenous and endogenous ClO with high sensitivity in MCF-7 cells and HeLa cells. Expectantly, the fluoxetine-induced liver injury model is successfully established, and probe 1 has been used for detecting the fluctuation of ClO levels in the mouse model of fluoxetine-induced liver injury. All in all, probe 1 with its high specificity, good biological compatibility and liver tissue penetration ability is expected to assist with the early diagnosis of DILI and the clinical screening of various new drugs. We expect that probe 1 could be efficiently used as a powerful molecular tool to predict clinical DILI and explore molecular mechanisms between molecules and disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biosensor and Bioelectronic Devices)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1109 KiB  
Review
Advances in Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Issues: New Clinical and Mechanistic Analysis Due to Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method Use
by Rolf Teschke and Gaby Danan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10855; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310855 - 29 Jun 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3458
Abstract
Clinical and mechanistic considerations in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) remain challenging topics when they are derived from mere case narratives or iDILI cases without valid diagnosis. To overcome these issues, attempts should be made on pathogenetic aspects based on published clinical iDILI [...] Read more.
Clinical and mechanistic considerations in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) remain challenging topics when they are derived from mere case narratives or iDILI cases without valid diagnosis. To overcome these issues, attempts should be made on pathogenetic aspects based on published clinical iDILI cases firmly diagnosed by the original RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) or the RUCAM version updated in 2016. Analysis of RUCAM-based iDILI cases allowed for evaluating immune and genetic data obtained from the serum and the liver of affected patients. For instance, strong evidence for immune reactions in the liver of patients with RUCAM-based iDILI was provided by the detection of serum anti-CYP 2E1 due to drugs like volatile anesthetics sevoflurane and desflurane, partially associated with the formation of trifluoroacetyl (TFA) halide as toxic intermediates that form protein adducts and may generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). This is accompanied by production of anti-TFA antibodies detected in the serum of these patients. Other RUCAM-based studies on serum ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies) and SMA (anti-smooth muscle antibodies) associated with AIDILI (autoimmune DILI) syn DIAIH (drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis) provide additional evidence of immunological reactions with monocytes as one of several promoting immune cells. In addition, in the blood plasma of patients, mediators like the cytokines IL-22, IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP), IL-6, IL-10, IL 12p70, IL-17A, IL-23, IP-10, or chemokines such as CD206 and sCD163 were found in DILI due to anti-tuberculosis drugs as ascertained by the prospective updated RUCAM, which scored a high causality. RUCAM-based analysis also provided compelling evidence of genetic factors such as HLA (human leucocyte antigen) alleles contributing to initiate iDILI by a few drugs. In conclusion, analysis of published RUCAM-based iDILI cases provided firm evidence of immune and genetic processes involved in iDILI caused by specific drugs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Toxicity of Drugs in Human and Animal Organs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 743 KiB  
Review
Molecular Idiosyncratic Toxicology of Drugs in the Human Liver Compared with Animals: Basic Considerations
by Rolf Teschke
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(7), 6663; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076663 - 3 Apr 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2822
Abstract
Drug induced liver injury (DILI) occurs in patients exposed to drugs at recommended doses that leads to idiosyncratic DILI and provides an excellent human model with well described clinical features, liver injury pattern, and diagnostic criteria, based on patients assessed for causality using [...] Read more.
Drug induced liver injury (DILI) occurs in patients exposed to drugs at recommended doses that leads to idiosyncratic DILI and provides an excellent human model with well described clinical features, liver injury pattern, and diagnostic criteria, based on patients assessed for causality using RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) as original method of 1993 or its update of 2016. Overall, 81,856 RUCAM based DILI cases have been published until mid of 2020, allowing now for an analysis of mechanistic issues of the disease. From selected DILI cases with verified diagnosis by using RUCAM, direct evidence was provided for the involvement of the innate and adapted immune system as well as genetic HLA (Human Leucocyte Antigen) genotypes. Direct evidence for a role of hepatic immune systems was substantiated by (1) the detection of anti-CYP (Cytochrome P450) isoforms in the plasma of affected patients, in line with the observation that 65% of the drugs most implicated in DILI are metabolized by a range of CYP isoforms, (2) the DIAIH (drug induced autoimmune hepatitis), a subgroup of idiosyncratic DILI, which is characterized by high RUCAM causality gradings and the detection of plasma antibodies such as positive serum anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA), rarely also anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), (3) the effective treatment with glucocorticoids in part of an unselected RUCAM based DILI group, and (4) its rare association with the immune-triggered Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) caused by a small group of drugs. Direct evidence of a genetic basis of idiosyncratic DILI was shown by the association of several HLA genotypes for DILI caused by selected drugs. Finally, animal models of idiosyncratic DILI mimicking human immune and genetic features are not available and further search likely will be unsuccessful. In essence and based on cases of DILI with verified diagnosis using RUCAM for causality evaluation, there is now substantial direct evidence that immune mechanisms and genetics can account for idiosyncratic DILI by many but not all implicated drugs, which may help understand the mechanistic background of the disease and contribute to new approaches of therapy and prevention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Toxicity of Drugs in Human and Animal Organs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 326 KiB  
Review
Hepatotoxicity of Drugs Used in Multiple Sclerosis, Diagnostic Challenge, and the Role of HLA Genotype Susceptibility
by Lucy Meunier and Dominique Larrey
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 852; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010852 - 3 Jan 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 7249
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and the association with other autoimmune diseases is well-documented. There are many therapeutic options for the treatment of MS. Most of the available drugs cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to [...] Read more.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and the association with other autoimmune diseases is well-documented. There are many therapeutic options for the treatment of MS. Most of the available drugs cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to variable extents with heterogeneous clinical and biological manifestations, including liver injury with or without signs of hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. The diagnosis of DILI may be particularly difficult because MS is frequently associated with idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis. Recent advances suggest that MS and immune-mediated DILI could be promoted by genetic factors, including HLA genotype. In addition, some of these drugs may promote hepatitis B virus reactivation. This review explores the potential hepatotoxicity of drugs used to treat MS and the criteria to distinguish DILI from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis associated with MS. The role of susceptible genes both promoting MS and causing the hepatotoxicity of the drug used for MS treatment is also discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Toxicology of Drug Induced Liver Injury)
Back to TopTop