Search Results (146)

Background/Objectives: For viral entry into host cells, the spike (S) protein of coronavirus (CoV) uses its S1 domain to bind to the host receptor and S2 domain to mediate the fusion between virion and cellular membranes. The S1 domain acquired multiple mutations as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) evolved to give rise to Variant of Concerns (VOCs) but the S2 domain has limited changes. In particular, the stem helix in S2 did not change significantly and it is fairly well-conserved across multiple beta-CoVs. In this study, we generated a murine mAb 7B2 binding to the stem helix of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: MAb 7B2 was isolated from immunized mouse and its neutralization activity was evaluated using microneutralization, plaque reduction and cell–cell fusion assays. Bio-layer interferometry was used to measure binding affinity and AlphaFold3 was used to model the antibody–antigen interface. Results: MAb 7B2 has lower virus neutralizing and membrane block activities when compared to a previously reported stem helix-binding human mAb S2P6. Alanine scanning and AlphaFold3 modeling reveals that residues K1149 and D1153 in S form a network of polar interactions with the heavy chain of 7B2. Conversely, S2P6 binding to S is not affected by alanine substitution at K1149 and D1153 as indicated by the high ipTM scores in the predicted S2P6-stem helix structure. Conclusions: Our detailed characterization of the mechanism of inhibition of 7B2 reveals its distinctive binding model from S2P6 and yields insights on multiple neutralizing and highly conserved epitopes in the S2 domain which could be key components for pan-CoV vaccine development. Full article

Community-based serosurveillance for emerging zoonotic viruses can provide a powerful and cost-effective measurement of cryptic spillovers. Betacoronaviruses, including SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, are known to infect bats and can cause severe respiratory illness in humans, yet remain under-surveyed in high-risk populations. This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of betacoronaviruses in an occupational cohort in contact with bats before and after the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Serum samples from pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic were screened using antigen-based multiplex microsphere immunoassays (MMIAs) and a multiplex surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Pre-pandemic samples showed no SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while post-pandemic samples from vaccinated participants displayed binding and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and a related bat CoV. Furthermore, one participant (1/237, 0.43%) had persistent antibodies against MERS-CoV in 2017, 2018 and 2021 but was seronegative in 2023, despite reporting no history of traveling abroad or severe pneumonia. The observed sustained antibody levels indicate a possible exposure to MERS-CoV or a MERS-CoV-like virus, although the etiology and clinical relevance of this finding remains unclear. Ongoing surveillance in high-risk populations remains crucial for understanding virus epidemiology and mitigating zoonotic transmission risk. Full article

Background: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines appears to decline rapidly over time due to waning immunity and immune evasion by emerging variants of concern, and may be reduced in high-risk populations. We aimed to evaluate the rates of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection or severe COVID-19, both in individuals who had completed their primary COVID-19 vaccination, and in those who had received their first booster vaccination. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate whether persons with certain risk factors, such as age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and specified comorbidities have an increased risk of either breakthrough infection or severe COVID-19, compared to those without the respective risk factors. Methods: Data on COVID-19 vaccinations, infections, hospitalizations, and deaths were collected from the PHARMO Data Network, consisting of health records from Dutch residents. Two cohorts were established: (1) all persons who have completed their primary COVID-19 vaccination regimen, and (2) those who have received their first booster vaccination. The outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection, and severe COVID-19, defined as either hospitalization or death following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Incidence rates of these outcomes were calculated in both cohorts. The adjusted incidence rate ratios of these outcomes in persons with certain risk factors were calculated, using generalized linear models with a Poisson distribution. Results: In 2021, a total of 1,090,567 individuals received either two doses of BNT162b2, AZD1222, or mRNA-1273, or one dose of Ad26.COV2.S and were included in the primary vaccination cohort, of which 344,153 (31.6%) received a booster vaccination. Overall incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and severe COVID-19 after primary vaccination were 29.9 and 3.1 per 1000 person-years, respectively, and after booster vaccination were 256.4 and 2.3, respectively. Male gender, older age, lower SES, history of COVID-19, and recent hospitalization were factors associated with a lower risk of breakthrough infection after primary vaccination, and a higher risk of severe COVID-19. The risk of severe COVID-19 after primary vaccination was increased in persons with several comorbidities, compared to those without, and remained elevated after booster vaccination in persons with diabetes or lung disease. Conclusions: Our study emphasizes the crucial role of boosters in reducing breakthrough infections, particularly in high-risk populations. The varied impact on severe outcomes in individuals with comorbidities underscores the need for ongoing surveillance and tailored vaccination strategies. Full article

Background. The pathogenic coronaviruses (CoVs) MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, which are responsible for the MERS outbreak and the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively, continue to infect humans, with significant adverse outcomes. There is a continuing need to develop mucosal vaccines against these respiratory viral pathogens to prevent entry and replication at mucosal sites. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the CoV spike (S) protein is a critical vaccine target, and glycan masking is a unique approach for designing subunit vaccines with improved neutralizing activity. Methods. We evaluated the efficacy of mucosal immunity, broad neutralizing activity, and cross-protection afforded by a combined glycosylated mucosal subunit vaccine encoding the RBDs of the original SARS-CoV-2 strain (SARS2-WT-RBD), the Omicron-XBB.1.5 variant (SARS2-Omi-RBD), and MERS-CoV (MERS-RBD). Results. Intranasal administration of the three-RBD protein cocktail induced effective, durable IgA and systemic IgG antibodies specific for the S protein of these CoVs, thereby neutralizing infection by pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2-WT, Omicron-XBB.1.5, and MERS-CoV. The mucosal vaccine cocktail protected immunized mice from challenge with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-XBB.1.5 and MERS-CoV, leading to a significant reduction in the viral titers in the lungs. By contrast, the individual glycosylated RBD proteins only induced such immune responses and neutralizing antibodies against either SARS-CoV-2 or MERS-CoV, protecting against subsequent challenge with either SARS-CoV-2 or MERS-CoV; they did not provide simultaneous protection against both CoVs. Conclusions. This study describes a unique strategy for designing efficacious mucosal subunit vaccines that induce durable mucosal immunity, cross-neutralizing activity, and cross-protection against SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, highlighting the potential for the design of mucosal vaccines against other pathogens. Full article

Background: As COVID-19 has become an epidemic, we conducted an open-label study aimed to identify immunogenicity and reactogenicity of boosters of the BNT162b2 vaccine in a real-world cohort of long-survivor metastatic lung cancer patients (LS-mLC pts). Methods and Analysis: According to the timing of the booster dose (BD) and SARS-CoV-2 infection (Cov-I) during anticancer treatment (ACT), between October 2021 and February 2022, we prospectively enrolled 166 cancer patients into five parallel cohorts. The primary endpoints were seroprevalence of IgG Anti-spike-RBD (anti-S IgG) at two pre-defined timepoints (T1: +30–90 days after BD; T2: +6 months +/− 4 weeks after BD). As an exploratory endpoint, we compared the median pre-vaccination value of four cytokines (IL-6, IL-2R, TNF-α, IL-10) with post-BD values in immunotherapy-treated pts (IO-pts). Results: The anti-S IgG seropositivity rate was 100% at T1 and 98.8% at T2. After 6 months, hybrid immunisation was associated with a higher median anti-S IgG titre compared to vaccine-alone-induced seroconversion (p < 0.0001). In uninfected pts, the median anti-S IgG titre was significantly lower in IO-pts compared to non-IO-pts (p = 0.02); no difference was found when comparing myelosuppressive or not ACT. Among the 68 IO-pts, 5 pts (7.3%) showed a significant increase (≥1.5 fold) of at least two cytokines in post-BD samples, without reporting ir-AEs. Conclusions: Boosters of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were effective and safe. In IO-pts without recent Cov-I, additional BDs should be considered to prolong serological immunity. Full article

Background/Objectives: COVID-19 vaccines have significantly reduced the mortality and morbidity associated with SARS-CoV-2. In the fall of 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended its emergency use authorization guidelines for COVID-19 vaccines to allow the administration of booster vaccine doses based on sound scientific evidence of the increase in effectiveness conferred by boosters. The effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 booster vaccine during the periods of Delta and Omicron variant dominance is unknown. This study used real-world data to estimate the effectiveness of booster heterologous or homologous Ad26.COV2.S vaccination compared to that of a primary Ad26.COV2.S or mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series. Methods: A retrospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study design was used with a total eligible sample population consisting of 72,461,026 individuals in the HealthVerity dataset. The study cohort consisted of individuals ≥18 years in the United States with evidence of a COVID-19 primary vaccination series (Ad26.COV2.S or mRNA) administered between 1 January 2021 and 6 July 2022. Two exposure groups were considered based on retrospective database classification: a heterologous Ad26.COV2.S booster and a homologous Ad26.COV2.S booster. Individuals eligible for the referent groups, defined as those with a primary vaccine series alone, were identified through exact matching by age, sex, time since primary series vaccine, location, and Gagne comorbidity score. Propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate outcomes, including COVID-19-related hospitalization and medically attended COVID-19. Results: Depending on the comparison group of interest, the adjusted hazard ratios for COVID-19-related hospitalization ranged from 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.72) to 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.90), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.96) to 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97) for medically attended COVID-19, both favoring booster vaccination. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the effectiveness of an Ad26.COV2.S booster vaccination compared to primary series vaccination in preventing COVID-19 hospitalization and medically attended COVID-19 for at least 12 months. This study adds to the scientific evidence that demonstrates the importance of COVID-19 booster vaccinations to support public health policy. Full article

Background: Despite adverse events following immunization (AEFI) being well described in vaccine trials, there is a need to produce more real-world data on events supposedly attributed to vaccination against COVID-19. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of AEFI in the first dose of COVID-19 vaccines in the state of Brazil and to verify whether such events differ among the types of vaccines offered in this country. Methods: A population-based study using linked administrative data on vaccine registry and adverse events following immunization in 2021 and 2022. The study included 10,169,378 individuals aged 18 or over who lived in Bahia and received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccines. We calculated AEFI prevalence and verified differences among vaccines by logistic regression to estimate crude and adjusted by sex and age group prevalence ratio (PR). Results: The prevalence of AEFI was 74.3 per 100,000 doses applied, with a higher rate of nonserious events, mainly following the ChAdOx1-S. More than two-thirds of these adverse effects occurred in women, and almost half were between 30 and 49 years old. The individuals who received ChAdOx1-S had a 125% higher prevalence than those who received CoronaVac. Those who received BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S had a 71% and 58%, respectively, lower prevalence of AEFI than those who received CoronaVac. Conclusions: The use of vaccines against COVID-19 has proven to be positive and effective in combating SARS-CoV-2, significantly reducing morbidity and mortality from the disease. We cannot deny the presence of adverse events in the context of vaccination. However, the vaccines have proven to be safe and reliable. The results of this study offer relevant data that can contribute to the qualification of AEFI pharmacovigilance in Brazil and worldwide. Full article

Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) depends on the underlying disease, immunosuppression degree and the vaccine regimens. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccine schedules. Methods: The SAFER study: “Safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease”, is a Brazilian multicentric prospective observational phase IV study in the real-life. Data were analyzed after 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines: adenoviral vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Astrazeneca), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer–BioNTech) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac Biotech). IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike (IgG-S) receptor-binding domain level were quantified at baseline (T1) and 28 days after the first (T2), 2nd (T3) and 3rd (T4) doses by chemiluminescence (SARS-CoV-2-IgG-II Quant-assay, Abbott-Laboratories). Results: 721 patients with IMID were included in the analysis. The median titers of IgG-S (BAU/mL) increased progressively over the times: at baseline was 6.26 (5.41–7.24), T2: 73.01 (61.53–86.62), T3: 200.0 (174.36–229.41) and T4: 904.92 (800.49–1022.97). The multivariate linear regression showed that greater IgG-S titers were associated with pre-exposure to COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and BNT162b2 booster vaccine (p < 0.001). Rituximab and immunosuppressant drugs were independent factors for low titers (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: All platforms were safe and induced an increase in IgG-S antibodies. COVID-19 pre-exposure and BNT162b2 booster regimens were predictors of higher humoral immune responses, which is relevant in immunosuppressed populations. Immunosuppressants (mainly rituximab) predicted the lowest antibodies. Full article

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, prompted global efforts to develop vaccines to control the disease. Various vaccines, including mRNA (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273), adenoviral vector (ChAdOx1, Ad26.COV2.S), and inactivated virus platforms (BBIBP-CorV, CoronaVac), elicit high-titer, protective antibodies against the virus, but long-term antibody durability and effectiveness vary. The objective of this study is to elucidate the factors that influence vaccine effectiveness (VE) and the longevity of humoral immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines through a review of the relevant literature, including clinical and real-world studies. Here, we discuss the humoral immune response to different COVID-19 vaccines and identify factors influencing VE and antibody longevity. Despite initial robust immune responses, vaccine-induced immunity wanes over time, particularly with the emergence of variants, such as Delta and Omicron, that exhibit immune escape mechanisms. Additionally, the durability of the humoral immune responses elicited by different vaccine platforms, along with the identification of essential determinants of long-term protection—like pre-existing immunity, booster doses, hybrid immunity, and demographic factors—are critical for protecting against severe COVID-19. Booster vaccinations substantially restore neutralizing antibody levels, especially against immune-evasive variants, while individuals with hybrid immunity have a more durable and potent immune response. Importantly, comorbidities such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and cancer significantly reduce the magnitude and longevity of vaccine-induced protection. Immunocompromised individuals, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy and those with hematologic malignancies, have diminished humoral responses and benefit disproportionately from booster vaccinations. Age and sex also influence immune responses, with older adults experiencing accelerated antibody decline and females generally exhibiting stronger humoral responses compared to males. Understanding the variables affecting immune protection is crucial to improving vaccine strategies and predicting VE and protection against COVID-19. Full article

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has exposed the vulnerabilities and unpreparedness of the global healthcare system in dealing with emerging zoonoses. In the past two decades, coronaviruses (CoV) have been responsible for three major viral outbreaks, and the likelihood of future outbreaks caused by these viruses is high and nearly inevitable. Therefore, effective prophylactic universal vaccines targeting multiple circulating and emerging coronavirus strains are warranted. Methods: This study utilized an immunoinformatic approach to identify evolutionarily conserved CD4+ (HTL) and CD8+ (CTL) T cells, and B-cell epitopes in the coronaviral spike (S) glycoprotein. Results: A total of 132 epitopes were identified, with the majority of them found to be conserved across the bat CoVs, pangolin CoVs, endemic coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2, and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Their peptide sequences were then aligned and assembled to identify the overlapping regions. Eventually, two major peptide assemblies were derived based on their promising immune-stimulating properties. Conclusions: In this light, they can serve as lead candidates for universal coronavirus vaccine development, particularly in the search for pan-coronavirus multi-epitope universal vaccines that can confer protection against current and novel coronaviruses. Full article

Background: The aim of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of original and bivalent COVID-19 vaccines in reducing COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among the adult population of Turin, Italy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, test-negative, case–control study of 5768 adults aged ≥50 years who had symptoms that were consistent with COVID-19-like illness and were admitted to the hospitals of the Turin Health Unit network from 1 January 2021 to 31 January 2023. We evaluated the effectiveness of the vaccines that at the time of the study were authorized in the European Union (original/bivalent BNT162b2; original mRNA-1273; ChAdOx1-S; Ad26.COV2.S) by comparing the odds of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 in vaccinated patients with the odds of a positive test in unvaccinated patients. The association between vaccination status, hospitalization, ICU admission and positive SARS-CoV-2 test was estimated by building multivariate adjusted logistic regression models. Results: During the predominance of the pre-Omicron variants, the vaccine effectiveness of two and three doses received in the last 120 days against COVID-19-associated hospitalizations was 93.6% (95% CI: 90.1 to 95.9) and 97.1% (95% CI: 90.8 to 99.1), respectively. During the predominance of the Omicron variant, the vaccine effectiveness of two and three doses was 26.6% (95% CI: −0.6 to 46.5) and 75.2% (95% CI: 68.1 to 80.7), respectively, and it rose to 88% (95% CI: 78.2 to 93.3) for four or five doses of the bivalent vaccine. Conclusions: Our study confirms that the COVID-19 vaccines protect adult patients from hospitalizations, including the subgroup ≥80 years, also during the period of the Omicron variant’s predominance. Full article

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has prompted a massive global vaccination campaign, leading to the rapid development and deployment of several vaccines. Various COVID-19 vaccines are under different phases of clinical trials and include the whole virus or its parts like DNA, mRNA, or protein subunits administered directly or through vectors. Beginning in 2020, a few mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273) and adenovirus-based (AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S and the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S) vaccines were recommended by WHO for emergency use before the completion of the phase 3 and 4 trials. These vaccines were mostly administered in two or three doses at a defined frequency between the two doses. While these vaccines, mainly based on viral nucleic acids or protein conferred protection against the progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection into severe COVID-19, and prevented death due to the disease, their use has also been accompanied by a plethora of side effects. Common side effects include localized reactions such as pain at the injection site, as well as systemic reactions like fever, fatigue, and headache. These symptoms are generally mild to moderate and resolve within a few days. However, rare but more serious side effects have been reported, including allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis and, in some cases, myocarditis or pericarditis, particularly in younger males. Ongoing surveillance and research efforts continue to refine the understanding of these adverse effects, providing critical insights into the risk-benefit profile of COVID-19 vaccines. Nonetheless, the overall safety profile supports the continued use of these vaccines in combating the pandemic, with regulatory agencies and health organizations emphasizing the importance of vaccination in preventing COVID-19’s severe outcomes. In this review, we describe different types of COVID-19 vaccines and summarize various adverse effects due to autoimmune and inflammatory response(s) manifesting predominantly as cardiac, hematological, neurological, and psychological dysfunctions. The incidence, clinical presentation, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of different adverse effects and possible mechanisms contributing to these effects are discussed. The review highlights the potential ambivalence of human response post-COVID-19 vaccination and necessitates the need to mitigate the adverse side effects. Full article

Background: This study aimed to support the end-of-shelf life specification (2.5 × 10¹⁰ virus particles [vp]) for the standard Ad26.COV2.S dose (5 × 10¹⁰ vp). Methods: This randomized, double-blind Phase 3 study evaluated immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of several Ad26.COV2.S dose levels (range 1.25 to 9 × 10¹⁰ vp) in 1593 adults between June 2021 and July 2023. Results: Spike-binding antibody responses 28 days post-dose 1 were non-inferior for the 9 × 10¹⁰ vp, but not the 2.5 × 10¹⁰ vp group when compared with the standard dose. Non-inferiority was demonstrated in terms of spike-binding antibody responses 14 days post-dose 2 for each dose level, including the lowest dose level of 1.25 × 10¹⁰ vp, compared to 28 days after one dose and 14 days after two doses of the standard dose. Spike-binding antibody levels correlated well with virus neutralizing titers. There was no impact of pre-existing Ad26.COV2.S neutralizing titers on immunogenicity at any dose level. All dose levels were well tolerated. Conclusions: This study highlights the challenges associated with conducting clinical studies in a rapidly evolving environment and underscores the importance of platform data that can guide initial vaccine specifications such as shelf life during accelerated vaccine development. The present study supports the end-of-shelf life specifications for the approved Ad26.COV2.S dose, and could provide useful information in future vaccine developments using adenovirus vector vaccines. Full article

Transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) is an etiological agent of enteric disease that results in high mortality rates in piglets. The economic impact of the virus is considerable, causing significant losses to the pig industry. The development of an efficacious subunit vaccine to provide promising protection against TGEV is of the utmost importance. The viral antigen, spike glycoprotein (S), is widely regarded as one of the most effective antigenic components for vaccine research. In this study, we employed immunoinformatics and molecular dynamics approaches to develop an ‘ideal’ multi-epitope vaccine. Firstly, the dominant, non-toxic, highly antigenic T (Th, CTL) and B cell epitopes predicted from the TGEV S protein were artificially engineered in tandem to design candidate subunit vaccines. Molecular docking and dynamic simulation results demonstrate that it exhibits robust interactions with toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Of particular significance was the finding that the vaccine was capable of triggering an immune response in mammals, as evidenced by the immune simulation results. The humoral aspect is typified by elevated levels of IgG and IgM, whereas the cellular immune aspect is capable of eliciting the robust production of interleukins and cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-2). Furthermore, the adoption of E. coli expression systems for the preparation of vaccines will also result in cost savings. This study offers logical guidelines for the development of a secure and efficacious subunit vaccine against TGEV, in addition to providing a novel theoretical foundation and strategy to prevent associated CoV infections. Full article

Lung transplant patients are more likely to develop severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared with the general population and should be vaccinated against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, previous studies have reported reduced vaccination immunogenicity in lung transplantation patients. We aimed to investigate the serological response and associated factors after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this population. Lung transplant patients without a history of contracting coronavirus disease who had received a second or higher dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were enrolled. The anti-SARS-Cov-2 spike and neutralizing antibody levels were measured in blood samples. Firth’s logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the factors associated with non-response after vaccination. Forty-six lung transplant patients were enrolled, of which sixteen (34.8%) showed a serological response to vaccination. All patients who received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination before transplantation (n = 5) exhibited a serological response. No significant difference was observed in anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody or neutralization titers based on the number and timing of vaccination. Firth’s logistic regression showed an association between lower hemoglobin levels (odds ratio, 0.59; confidence interval, 0.35–0.92; p = 0.017) and non-response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Lung transplant patients showed poor serologic responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this pilot study; anemia may be associated with this poor response. Full article