Search Results (24)

Background: Administration of PARP inhibitors against breast and ovarian cancers with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations has shown clinical benefits in patients. However, these agents are also toxic and have a narrow therapeutic index. Objectives: In this work, we aimed to identify membrane proteins that are specifically upregulated in these cancers. Methods: We interrogated public datasets to analyze genes upregulated or downregulated when these mutations were present, compared with wild-type cancers. Surface protein expression and functional annotation analyses were also performed. Results: In breast cancer, we identified 11 upregulated and 44 downregulated transcripts in BRCA1-mut, while 10 upregulated and 57 downregulated transcripts were identified in BRCA2-mut cancers. In ovarian cancer, 79 transcripts were upregulated and 123 were downregulated in BRCA1-mut cancers, while five were upregulated and seven were downregulated in BRCA2-mut tumors. Regarding the biological function related to these genes, in BRCA1-mutated ovarian cancers, the main functions of upregulated genes included MHC assembly or regulation of the interferon gamma pathway; in BRCA2-mut ovarian cancers, regulation of phosphorylation and signaling; in BRCA1-mut breast cancers, cell damage repair and angiogenesis; and finally, in BRCA2-mut breast cancers, cytokine production and T-cell migration. Genes expressed in the surface membrane or extracellular matrix and related to patient outcomes included B3GNT7 and CTSV in BRCA2-mut breast cancers, exhibiting detrimental prognoses. CD6, CXCL9, and CXCL13 were associated with favorable outcomes in BRCA1-mutant ovarian cancers. The last three genes were also correlated with the infiltration of effector T cells and dendritic cells in ovarian tumors. Conclusions: In summary, we identified deregulated candidate genes that could be used as therapeutic targets. Full article

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) show cytotoxicity in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) seen in BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer (OvCa). Despite initial responses, resistance often develops. The reintroduction of different PARPis, such as niraparib or rucaparib, has shown some clinical activity in BRCA mutation-associated OvCa patients with prior olaparib treatment, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To investigate the differential sensitivity to different PARPis, we established an olaparib-resistant BRCA1-mutant OvCa cell line (UWB-OlaJR) by exposing UWB1.289 cells to gradually increasing concentrations of olaparib. UWB-OlaJR exhibited restored HR capability without BRCA1 reversion mutation or increased drug efflux. We examined cell viability, DNA damage, and DNA replication fork dynamics in UWB-OlaJR treated with various PARPis. UWB-OlaJR exhibits varying sensitivity to PARPis, showing cross-resistance to veliparib and talazoparib, and sensitivity with increased cytotoxicity to niraparib and rucaparib. Indeed, DNA fiber assay reveals that niraparib and rucaparib cause higher replication stress than the others. Moreover, S1 nuclease fiber assay shows that niraparib and rucaparib induce greater DNA single-strand gaps than other PARPis, leading to increased DNA damage and cell death. Our study provides novel insights into differential PARPi sensitivity in olaparib-resistant BRCA-mutant OvCa, which requires further investigation of inter-agent differences in large prospective studies. Full article

Ovarian cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in women. The treatment landscape underwent significant changes as new agents were introduced in ovarian cancer management over the last decade. We present two cases of long responses to Olaparib in BRCA (BReast CAncer gene) mutant ovarian cancer patients. The first case belongs to a 42-year-old female diagnosed with advanced ovarian carcinoma with a rare germinal mutation (BRCA1 c.68_69delAG, commonly found in descendants of Ashkenazi Jewish populations, but also Arabic and Asian ones) and a significant family history of ovarian and breast cancers. After poorly tolerated neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. After eight months, the disease progressed, and first-line platinum chemotherapy was administered. Although not well-tolerated (grade 3 anemia, allergic reactions), chemotherapy resulted in a partial response, and given the patient’s characteristics, maintenance with Olaparib was recommended. Treatment is ongoing (total current duration 69 months) and tolerated well (grade 1 side effects). This case illustrates the long-term benefits that novel therapies like Olaparib may offer in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer harboring a rare BRCA mutation. The second case highlights a 55-year-old postmenopausal woman diagnosed with ovarian cancer, FIGO stage IVA. Initial treatment included six cycles of chemotherapy, which led to a partial response, followed by interval debulking surgery and another four cycles of chemotherapy. Subsequent Olaparib maintenance therapy post BRCA1 mutation identification contributed to a significant progression-free survival of 65 months until disease recurrence and secondary cytoreductive surgery, showcasing the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in personalized oncology treatment of ovarian cancer. Full article

Chemoresistance is a major obstacle in cancer treatment, often leading to disease progression and poor outcomes. It arises through various mechanisms such as genetic mutations, drug efflux pumps, enhanced DNA repair, and changes in the tumor microenvironment. These processes allow cancer cells to survive despite chemotherapy, underscoring the need for new strategies to overcome resistance and improve treatment efficacy. Crizotinib, a first-generation multi-target kinase inhibitor, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of ALK-positive or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), refractory inflammatory (ALK)-positive myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) and relapsed/refractory ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Crizotinib exists in two enantiomeric forms: (R)-crizotinib and its mirror image, (S)-crizotinib. It is assumed that the R-isomer is responsible for the carrying out various processes reviewed here The S-isomer, on the other hand, shows a strong inhibition of MTH1, an enzyme important for DNA repair mechanisms. Studies have shown that crizotinib is an effective multi-kinase inhibitor targeting various kinases such as c-Met, native/T315I Bcr/Abl, and JAK2. Its mechanism of action involves the competitive inhibition of ATP binding and allosteric inhibition, particularly at Bcr/Abl. Crizotinib showed synergistic effects when combined with the poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARP), especially in ovarian cancer harboring BRCA gene mutations. In addition, crizotinib targets a critical vulnerability in many p53-mutated cancers. Unlike its wild-type counterpart, the p53 mutant promotes cancer cell survival. Crizotinib can cause the degradation of the p53 mutant, sensitizing these cancer cells to DNA-damaging substances and triggering apoptosis. Interestingly, other reports demonstrated that crizotinib exhibits anti-bacterial activity, targeting Gram-positive bacteria. Also, it is active against drug-resistant strains. In summary, crizotinib exerts anti-tumor effects through several mechanisms, including the inhibition of kinases and the restoration of drug sensitivity. The potential of crizotinib in combination therapies is emphasized, particularly in cancers with a high prevalence of the p53 mutant, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Full article

The emergence of targeted therapeutics in ovarian cancer, particularly poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi’s), has created additional opportunities for patients seeking frontline and recurrent disease management options. In particular, PARPi’s have shown clinical benefits in BRCA mutant and/or homologous recombination deficient (HRD) ovarian cancer. Until recently, response was thought to be limited in BRCA wild-type, homologous recombination proficient (HRP) cancers. Therefore, attempts have been made at combination therapy involving PARPi to improve patient outcomes. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated underwhelming results involving ovarian cancer. Many are searching for reliable biomarkers of immune response to increase efficacy of ICI therapy involving ovarian cancer. In this review, we examine the evidence supporting the combination of PARPi and ICIs in ovarian cancer, which is still lacking. Full article

Tumors with a pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation are homologous recombination (HR)-deficient (HRD) and consequently sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and Poly-[ADP-Ribose]-Polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). We hypothesized that functional HR status better reflects real-time HR status than BRCA1/2 mutation status. Therefore, we determined the functional HR status of 53 breast cancer (BC) and 38 ovarian cancer (OC) cell lines by measuring the formation of RAD51 foci after irradiation. Discrepancies between functional HR and BRCA1/2 mutation status were investigated using exome sequencing, methylation and gene expression data from 50 HR-related genes. A pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation was found in 10/53 (18.9%) of BC and 7/38 (18.4%) of OC cell lines. Among BRCA1/2-mutant cell lines, 14/17 (82.4%) were HR-proficient (HRP), while 1/74 (1.4%) wild-type cell lines was HRD. For most (80%) cell lines, we explained the discrepancy between functional HR and BRCA1/2 mutation status. Importantly, 12/14 (85.7%) BRCA1/2-mutant HRP cell lines were explained by mechanisms directly acting on BRCA1/2. Finally, functional HR status was strongly associated with COSMIC single base substitution signature 3, but not BRCA1/2 mutation status. Thus, the majority of BRCA1/2-mutant cell lines do not represent a suitable model for HRD. Moreover, exclusively determining BRCA1/2 mutation status may not suffice for platinum-based chemotherapy or PARPi patient selection. Full article

The recent success of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has led to the approval of four different PARP inhibitors for the treatment of BRCA1/2-mutant breast and ovarian cancers. About 40–50% of BRCA1/2-mutated patients do not respond to PARP inhibitors due to a preexisting innate or intrinsic resistance; the majority of patients who initially respond to the therapy inevitably develop acquired resistance. However, subsets of patients experience a long-term response (>2 years) to treatment with PARP inhibitors. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is an enzyme that plays an important role in the recognition and repair of DNA damage. PARP inhibitors induce “synthetic lethality” in patients with tumors with a homologous-recombination-deficiency (HRD). Several molecular mechanisms have been identified as causing PARP-inhibitor-resistance. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying the PARP-inhibitor-resistance in BRCA-mutated breast cancer and summarize potential therapeutic strategies to overcome the resistance mechanisms. Full article

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are one of the most successful examples of clinical translation of targeted therapies in medical oncology, and this has been demonstrated by their effective management of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutant cancers, most notably in breast and ovarian cancers. PARP inhibitors target DNA repair pathways that BRCA1/2-mutant tumours are dependent upon. Inhibition of the key components of these pathways leads to DNA damage triggering subsequent critical levels of genomic instability, mitotic catastrophe and cell death. This ultimately results in a synthetic lethal relationship between BRCA1/2 and PARP, which underpins the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors. Despite the early and dramatic response seen with PARP inhibitors, patients receiving them often develop treatment resistance. To date, data from both clinical and preclinical studies have highlighted multiple resistance mechanisms to PARP inhibitors, and only by understanding these mechanisms are we able to overcome the challenges. The focus of this review is to summarise the underlying mechanisms underpinning treatment resistance to PARP inhibitors and to aid both clinicians and scientists to develop better clinically applicable assays to better select patients who would derive the greatest benefit as well as develop new novel/combination treatment strategies to overcome these mechanisms of resistance. With a better understanding of PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms, we would not only be able to identify a subset of patients who are unlikely to benefit from therapy but also to sequence our treatment paradigm to avoid and overcome these resistance mechanisms. Full article

Ovarian cancer (OC) accounts for approximately 4% of cancer deaths in women worldwide and is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy. High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most predominant ovarian cancer, in which BRCA1/2 gene mutation ranges from 3 to 27%. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have shown promising results as a synthetically lethal therapeutic approach for BRCA mutant and recurrent OC in clinical use. However, emerging data indicate that BRCA-deficient cancers may be resistant to PARPi, and the mechanisms of this resistance remain elusive. We found that amplification of KRAS likely underlies PARPi resistance in BRCA2-deficient HGSOC. Our data suggest that PLK1 inhibition restores sensitivity to PARPi in HGSOC with KRAS amplification. The sequential combination of PLK1 inhibitor (PLK1i) and PARPi drastically reduces HGSOC cell survival and increases apoptosis. Furthermore, we were able to show that a sequential combination of PLK1i and PARPi enhanced the cellular apoptotic response to carboplatin-based chemotherapy in KRAS-amplified resistant HGSOC cells and 3D spheroids derived from recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Our results shed new light on the critical role of PLK1 in reversing PARPi resistance in KRAS-amplified HGSOC, and offer a new therapeutic strategy for this class of ovarian cancer patients where only limited options currently exist. Full article

Background: Despite impressive progression-free survival (PFS) results from PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian cancer, concerns about their effect on post-progression treatment outcomes have recently arisen, particularly when administered in the relapsed setting. Overlapping mechanisms of resistance between PARPi and platinum have been described, and optimal therapies upon progression to PARPi are unknown. We communicate real-world data (RWD) on outcomes of subsequent chemotherapy upon progression to PARPi used as maintenance in ovarian cancer relapses, particularly focusing on platinum rechallenge, according to BRCA status. Methods: Data from high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer patients who received subsequent chemotherapy after progression to maintenance PARPi in the relapsed setting, in 16 Catalan hospitals between August 2016 and April 2021, and who were followed-up until July 2021, were included. Endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), and PFS and overall survival (OS) measured from the subsequent chemotherapy starting date. Results: 111 patients were included [46 (41.4%) presented pathological BRCA1/2 mutations, 8 (7.5%) in other homologous recombination-related genes]. Sixty-four patients (57.7%) had received two prior chemotherapy lines, including the one immediately prior to PARPi. PARPi were niraparib (n = 60, 54.1%), olaparib (n = 49, 44.1%), and rucaparib (n = 2, 1.8%). A total of 81 patients remained platinum-sensitive (PS population) after progression to PARPi (when progression-free interval [PFI] was >6 months after the last cycle of prior platinum) [median PFI 12.0 months (interquartile range, IQR, 8.8–17.1)]. Of those, 74 were treated with subsequent platinum regimens, with the following results: ORR of 41.9%, median PFS (mPFS) of 6.6 months (95% CI 6–9.2), and median OS (mOS) of 20.6 months (95% CI 13.6–28.9). Analysis of these 74 patients according to BRCA status showed that PFIs for BRCA mutant and non BRCA-mutant patients were 13.6 [IQR11.2–22.2] and 10.3 [IQR 7.4–14.9] months, respectively (p = 0.010); ORR were 40.0% versus 43.6%, respectively; Rates of progression (as best response) to subsequent platinum were 45.7% versus 17.9%, respectively (p = 0.004); mPFS and mOS were 3.5 (95% CI 2.5–8.6) versus 7.5 months (95% CI 6.5–10.1, p = 0.03), and 16.4 (95% CI 9.3–27.5) versus 24.2 months (95% CI 17.2–NR, p = 0.036), respectively. Conclusion: This is the largest series of real-world data on ovarian cancer patients retreated with platinum in the post-PARPi scenario, separately analyzing BRCA mutant and non-mutant patients, to our knowledge. In our platinum-sensitive population, rechallenge with platinum after progression upon PARPi in the 3rd or later lines for ovarian cancer relapses shows relevant ORR and similar PFS outcomes to historical series of the prePARPi era. However, BRCA mutant patients presented significantly higher rates of progression under subsequent platinum and worse survival outcomes associated with subsequent platinum than non-BRCA-mutant patients. Full article

Ovarian cancer accounts for 3% of the total cancers in women, yet it is the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths among women. The BRCA1/2 germline and somatic mutations confer a deficiency of the homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway. Inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), another important component of DNA damage repair, are somewhat effective in BRCA1/2 mutant tumors. However, ovarian cancers often reacquire functional BRCA and develop resistance to PARP inhibitors. Polyamines have been reported to facilitate the DNA damage repair functions of PARP. Given the elevated levels of polyamines in tumors, we hypothesized that treatment with the polyamine synthesis inhibitor, α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), may enhance ovarian tumor sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor, rucaparib. In HR-competent ovarian cancer cell lines with varying sensitivities to rucaparib, we show that co-treatment with DFMO increases the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to rucaparib. Immunofluorescence assays demonstrated that, in the presence of hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage, DFMO strongly inhibits PARylation, increases DNA damage accumulation, and reduces cell viability in both HR-competent and deficient cell lines. In vitro viability assays show that DFMO and rucaparib cotreatment significantly enhances the cytotoxicity of the chemotherapeutic agent, cisplatin. These results suggest that DFMO may be a useful adjunct chemotherapeutic to improve the anti-tumor efficacy of PARP inhibitors in treating ovarian cancer. Full article

Background: Approximately 50% of ovarian cancer patients harbour homologous recombination repair deficiencies. These deficiencies have been successfully targeted using poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) particularly for patients harbouring BRCA1/2 mutations. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of the PARPi rucaparib in vitro using cell lines with BRCA2 mutations in comparison to those with BRCA2 wild type. Methods: Cell proliferation assays, RT-qPCR, immunofluorescence, annexin V/PI assays were used to assess the effects of rucaparib in vitro. Results: The BRCA2 mutant ovarian cancer cell line PEO1 exhibited higher PARP1 activity when treated with H₂O₂ compared to wild type cell lines. The migratory and proliferative capacity of PEO1 cells was compromised following treatment with rucaparib 10 µM compared to BRCA2 wild-type cell lines via a mechanism involving the mTOR pathway. Rucaparib treatment significantly increased DNA damage primarily in PEO1 cells and SKOV3 cells compared with wild type. Conclusions: Appropriate identification of robust predictive biomarkers for homologous recombination deficiency using ‘liquid’ biopsies would facilitate the identification of patients suitable for PARPi therapy. Preliminary efforts to undertake such testing are described here. This study also demonstrates the mechanisms of action of rucaparib (PARPi) which may involve elements of the mTOR pathway. Full article

Several poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are now in clinical use for tumours with defects in BReast CAncer genes BRCA1 or BRCA2 that result in deficient homologous recombination repair (HRR). Use of olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib for the treatment of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, including in the maintenance setting, has extended both progression free and overall survival for women with this malignancy. While different PARP inhibitors (PARPis) are mechanistically similar, differences are apparent in their chemical structures, toxicity profiles, PARP trapping abilities and polypharmacological landscapes. We have treated ovarian cancer cell line models of known BRCA status, including the paired cell lines PEO1 and PEO4, and UWB1.289 and UWB1.289+BRCA1, with five PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, talazoparib and veliparib) and observed differences between PARPis in both cell viability and cell survival. A cell line model of acquired resistance to veliparib showed increased resistance to the other four PARPis tested, suggesting that acquired resistance to one PARPi may not be able to be rescued by another. Lastly, as a proof of principle, HRR proficient ovarian cancer cells were sensitised to PARPis by depletion of BRCA1. In the future, guidelines will need to emerge to assist clinicians in matching specific PARPis to specific patients and tumours. Full article

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is caused by a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The frequency of germline BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and the ratio of germline BRCA1 to BRCA2 mutations in BRCA-related cancer patients vary depending on the population. Genotype and phenotype correlations have been reported in BRCA mutant families, however, the correlations are rarely used for individual risk assessment and management. BRCA genetic testing has become a companion diagnostic for PARP inhibitors, and the number of families with germline BRCA mutation identified is growing rapidly. Therefore, it is expected that analysis of the risk of developing cancer will be possible in a large number of BRCA mutant carriers, and there is a possibility that personal and precision medicine for the carriers with specific common founder mutations will be realized. In this review, we investigated the association of ovarian cancer risk and BRCA mutation location, and differences of other BRCA-related cancer risks by BRCA1/2 mutation, and furthermore, we discussed the difference in the prevalence of germline BRCA mutation in ovarian cancer patients. As a result, although there are various discussions, there appear to be differences in ovarian cancer risk by population and BRCA mutation location. If it becomes possible to estimate the risk of developing BRCA-related cancer for each BRCA mutation type, the age at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy can be determined individually. The decision would bring great benefits to young women with germline BRCA mutations. Full article

Aberrantly activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, as well as platelet-activating factor (PAF), contribute to cancer progression and metastasis of many cancer entities. Nonetheless, the role of the degradation enzyme named platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PLA2G7/PAF-AH) in ovarian cancer etiology is still unclear. This study investigated the functional impact of platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase on BRCA1 mutant ovarian cancer biology and its crosstalk with the Wnt signaling pathway. PAF-AH, pGSK3β, and β-catenin expressions were analyzed in 156 ovarian cancer specimens by immunohistochemistry. PAF-AH expression was investigated in ovarian cancer tissue, serum of BRCA1-mutated patients, and in vitro in four ovarian cancer cell lines. Functional assays were performed after PLA2G7 silencing. The association of PAF-AH and β-catenin was examined by immunocytochemistry. In an established ovarian carcinoma collective, we identified PAF-AH as an independent positive prognostic factor for overall survival (median 59.9 vs. 27.4 months; p = 0.016). PAF-AH correlated strongly with the Wnt signaling proteins pGSK3β (Y216; nuclear: cc = 0.494, p < 0.001; cytoplasmic: cc = 0.488, p < 0.001) and β-catenin (nuclear: cc = 0.267, p = 0.001; cytoplasmic: cc = 0.291, p < 0.001). In particular, high levels of PAF-AH were found in tumor tissue and in the serum of BRCA1 mutation carriers. By in vitro expression analysis, a relevant gene and protein expression of PLA2G7/PAF-AH was detected exclusively in the BRCA1-negative ovarian cancer cell line UWB1.289 (p < 0.05). Functional assays showed enhanced viability, proliferation, and motility of UWB1.289 cells when PLA2G7/PAF-AH was downregulated, which underlines its protective character. Interestingly, by siRNA knockdown of PLA2G7/PAF-AH, the immunocytochemistry staining pattern of β-catenin changed from a predominantly membranous expression to a nuclear one, suggesting a negative regulatory role of PAF-AH on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Our data provide evidence that PAF-AH is a positive prognostic factor with functional impact, which seems particularly relevant in BRCA1 mutant ovarian cancer. For the first time, we show that its protective character may be mediated by a negative regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Further studies need to specify this effect. Potential use of PAF-AH as a biomarker for predicting the disease risk of BRCA1 mutation carriers and for the prognosis of patients with BRCA1-negative ovarian cancer should be explored. Full article