Assessment and Management of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia

A special issue of Veterinary Sciences (ISSN 2306-7381).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 26 February 2026 | Viewed by 6993

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Hokkaido 069-8501, Japan
Interests: veterinary anesthesia (dogs, cats, cows, horses); small animal intensive care medicine; small animal nursing care
School of Veterinary Nursing & Technology, Nippon Veterinary & Life Science University, 1-7-1, Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo 180-8602, Japan
Interests: veterinary anesthesia; veterinary analgesia

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will focus on contemporary approaches to veterinary anesthesia and analgesia, covering both foundational knowledge and recent advancements in clinical practice. Emphasis will be placed on improving safety, efficacy, and welfare outcomes across a variety of species.

The scope includes, but is not limited to, the following:

  • Anesthetic protocols and innovations for small animals, large animals, and exotic species;
  • Pain assessment tools and multimodal analgesia strategies;
  • Advances in peri-operative monitoring and patient safety;
  • Anesthetic pharmacology and species-specific considerations;
  • Integration of technology (e.g., telemetry, AI-assisted monitoring);
  • Case-based insights and practical solutions for common clinical challenges.

Both original research articles and comprehensive reviews are welcome. Submissions addressing clinical applicability, evidence-based approaches, and interdisciplinary perspectives are especially encouraged.

Our aim in launching this Special Issue is to compile relevant and up-to-date resources for veterinary clinicians, researchers, and educators. By bridging scientific findings and real-world applications, this Special Issue will support evidence-based decision-making and inspire further innovation in the fields of veterinary anesthesia and pain management.

While numerous studies have explored isolated aspects of veterinary anesthesia or analgesia, few compilations have offered a holistic and clinically relevant overview spanning both disciplines, with a focus on practical application. This Special Issue will serve as a complementary resource to the existing literature by integrating current research into real-world case scenarios, highlighting under-represented species and emerging methods, and encouraging cross-disciplinary dialogue. The inclusion of diverse article types—ranging from experimental research to clinical guidelines—will help bridge the gap between academic study and veterinary practice.

Dr. Tadashi Sano
Dr. Seri Seki
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Veterinary Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2100 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • veterinary anesthesia
  • analgesia
  • pain management
  • peri-operative care
  • anesthetic monitoring
  • multimodal analgesia
  • patient safety
  • clinical veterinary medicine
  • species-specific anesthesia
  • veterinary pharmacology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 237 KB  
Article
Early Postoperative Analgesic Evaluation of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion or a Combination of Intraperitoneal and Incisional Lidocaine Splash in Female Dogs Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy
by Wanwisa Chaoum, Piyasak Wipoosak, Suvaluk Seesupa, Benedict Duncan X. Lascelles, Supranee Jitpean, Naruepon Kampa and Thanikul Srithunyarat
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(12), 1116; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12121116 - 24 Nov 2025
Viewed by 970
Abstract
Combined intraperitoneal and incisional block provides effective perioperative analgesia but is limited in clinical practice. Intravenous lidocaine offers an alternative, although its analgesic efficacy remains controversial. This study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of lidocaine intravenous infusion with combined intraperitoneal and incisional lidocaine [...] Read more.
Combined intraperitoneal and incisional block provides effective perioperative analgesia but is limited in clinical practice. Intravenous lidocaine offers an alternative, although its analgesic efficacy remains controversial. This study compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of lidocaine intravenous infusion with combined intraperitoneal and incisional lidocaine splash in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Thirty female dogs were randomized to intravenous infusion (IV), intraperitoneal and incisional splash (IP + SP), or control (C). Anesthesia included intramuscular acepromazine (0.03 mg/kg), intravenous propofol (4–6 mg/kg), isoflurane maintenance, and fentanyl (2 µg/kg) intravenous pre-incision. Group IV received intravenous lidocaine 2 mg/kg and then 50 μg/kg/min infusion. Group IP + SP received lidocaine 4 mg/kg intraperitoneally intraoperatively and 2 mg/kg as an incisional splash before skin closure. Controls received saline. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale—Short Form and analyzed using a linear mixed model. At 60 min, pain scores were 1.2 ± 0.4 (IP + SP), 1.6 ± 0.7 (IV), and 3.0 ± 2.8 (C) and at 120 min 1.3 ± 0.5, 1.4 ± 0.7, and 2.3 ± 0.8, respectively. Both treatments had significantly lower scores than controls (p = 0.004); IV and IP + SP did not differ. Therefore, intravenous lidocaine infusion may be an option for early postoperative analgesia in canine ovariohysterectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment and Management of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia)
14 pages, 1952 KB  
Article
Evaluation of the V-gel® Advanced Supraglottic Airway Device Across Different Ventilatory Modes in Anaesthetised Cats
by Jaime Viscasillas Monteagudo, Esther Martinez Parrón, Jose Manuel Gómez-Silvestre, Maria de los Reyes Marti-Scharfhausen, Eva Zoe Hernández Magaña, Alvaro Jesús Gutiérrez-Bautista, Ariel Cañon Pérez, Agustín Martínez Albiñana and José Ignacio Redondo
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(12), 1112; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12121112 - 22 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1240
Abstract
Endotracheal intubation in cats carries risks; supraglottic airway devices (SADs) offer a less invasive alternative. This prospective clinical study evaluated the V-gel® advanced in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy, with the primary aim of intra-anaesthetic gas leakage; secondary aims were ease of placement, complications, [...] Read more.
Endotracheal intubation in cats carries risks; supraglottic airway devices (SADs) offer a less invasive alternative. This prospective clinical study evaluated the V-gel® advanced in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy, with the primary aim of intra-anaesthetic gas leakage; secondary aims were ease of placement, complications, and the effect of device re-use. Spirometric inspired/expired tidal volumes were recorded under predefined ventilatory settings; leakage was calculated and analysed. Of 52 cats enrolled, 47 were analysed. Leakage occurred in 13% during spontaneous breathing and rose to 41.8% with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) 5 cmH2O; by contrast, controlled mechanical ventilation showed lower leakage, with the smallest values at Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP) of 12 cmH2O and 16 cmH2O (2.1% and 6.5%, respectively). Re-used devices leaked less than new ones (p = 0.003). Placement by students was straightforward after adequate depth was achieved. Complications included mild regurgitant material in three cats and pulmonary aspiration in two (one euthanised, one discharged after supportive care). The V-gel® advanced enabled rapid airway management with leakage influenced by ventilation mode, airway pressure, and device re-use. Findings support cautious use during spontaneous breathing or CPAP, attention to fasting and fresh-gas flows, and further controlled comparisons with prior V-gel® models and endotracheal intubation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment and Management of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1094 KB  
Article
Dexmedetomidine or Butorphanol for Co-Induction of General Anaesthesia with Propofol in Unpremedicated Healthy Dogs: Clinical and Echocardiographic Assessment
by Giuliano Ravasio, Martina Amari, Chiara Locatelli, Francesco Ferrari, Andrea Jacchetti, Valerio Bronzo and Federica Alessandra Brioschi
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(9), 885; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090885 - 13 Sep 2025
Viewed by 2724
Abstract
High induction doses of propofol (PPF) may cause adverse effects. Co-induction protocols can reduce doses and enhance the beneficial profile of each drug. This study compared the induction quality, clinical, and echocardiographic effects of two rapid co-inductions in healthy, unpremedicated dogs. Baseline cardiorespiratory [...] Read more.
High induction doses of propofol (PPF) may cause adverse effects. Co-induction protocols can reduce doses and enhance the beneficial profile of each drug. This study compared the induction quality, clinical, and echocardiographic effects of two rapid co-inductions in healthy, unpremedicated dogs. Baseline cardiorespiratory and echocardiographic variables were recorded. Dogs randomly received rapid intravenous PPF (2.2 mg/kg) with either dexmedetomidine (3 µg/kg) (PROPODEX; n = 12) or butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg) (PROPOBUT; n = 12). Induction quality, additional PPF dose, intubation time, cardiorespiratory parameters (2, 5, 10, 15, 20 min), and recovery quality were recorded. A second echocardiography was performed 5 min after induction. Induction quality was significantly higher in PROPODEX, with significantly lower additional PPF requirements and shorter intubation time. In PROPODEX, heart rate significantly decreased from baseline and was significantly lower than PROPOBUT, while arterial blood pressures significantly increased in PROPODEX and decreased in PROPOBUT from baseline. PROPOBUT significantly reduced left ventricular (LV) diastolic volumes and increased E/A ratio, while PROPODEX significantly increased LV systolic diameter and volumes, and significantly decreased fractional shortening. Recovery was significantly faster and better in PROPODEX. PROPOBUT preserved cardiac function but caused hypotension. PROPODEX provided superior induction and recovery quality, and cardiorespiratory stability, with only mild systolic function depression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment and Management of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 195 KB  
Article
Translation and Linguistic Validation into Spanish of the Owner-Reported Outcome Measure “Helsinki Chronic Pain Index” (HCPI)
by María Olcoz, Miguel Ángel Cabezas and Ignacio A. Gómez de Segura
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(9), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090811 - 26 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1172
Abstract
Due to the challenges in evaluating chronic pain in dogs, owner-reported outcome measures have been developed, such as the Helsinki Chronic Pain Index (HCPI), originally written in Finnish and published in English, limiting its use among Spanish-speaking veterinarians and owners/caretakers. The goal of [...] Read more.
Due to the challenges in evaluating chronic pain in dogs, owner-reported outcome measures have been developed, such as the Helsinki Chronic Pain Index (HCPI), originally written in Finnish and published in English, limiting its use among Spanish-speaking veterinarians and owners/caretakers. The goal of this study was to obtain an equivalent Spanish version of the HCPI. The translation process followed established guidelines. First, two native Spanish speakers independently translated the HCPI from English to Spanish. A veterinary professional and a third translator then compared the translations to create a unified version. Next, an independent linguist translated the reconciled Spanish version back into English. The research team, alongside one of the linguists, reviewed the translation to resolve any discrepancies. To conclude, a cognitive assessment was conducted with 62 dog owners from diverse demographics to evaluate clarity and understanding of the translated HCPI. This resulted in a linguistically validated Spanish version of the HCPI that is conceptually aligned with the original, as a first step to validate its use by Spanish-speaking veterinarians and researchers to manage chronic pain in dogs. The next step in the process is psychometric validation, which will ensure the tool’s reliability and applicability in both clinical and research settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment and Management of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia)
Back to TopTop