Towards Equity: Services for Disabled Children and Youth

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "Childhood and Youth Studies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 3 November 2025 | Viewed by 5009

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Child and Youth Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
Interests: critical disability studies; disabled children’s childhood studies; critical animal studies; disability media studies; arts-based research; expressive writing and non-normative narrative; digital storytelling/world-making

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Early Childhood Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
Interests: inclusive curriculum; teaching and learning; disability studies in education and childhood; special education policy and practice; early years service planning and delivery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Disabled children’s lives are imbricated in services and supports that take shape globally. This Special Issue critically considers what counts as “service” in the lives of disabled children and youth, with an aim to share transnational knowledge about how disabled children and youth receive, deliver, interact with, and resist services in various contexts.

As two white scholars based in Canada, the editors come to this issue with an understanding that services and support often materialize and universalize Western responses to disability. “Service” is an ambition uncritically transferred across various nation-states and sectors (Mehrotra, 2020). Sometimes this transference happens on a global scale. For example, major industries such as education and healthcare animate international service and support commitments, including those outlined in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Understandings of service are often limited to a Western imaginary that assumes disabled people across transnational spaces share similar experiences, despite evidence generated by decolonial disability studies holding that services located in North American and Western European nation-states are not universal (Nguyen, 2023). By contrast, disability theory in the Global South consistently resists impositions of Global North service, refusing to limit understandings of service to a Western imaginary that homogenizes disabled children’s experiences. Disentangling disabled children’s lives from services that are founded in developmentalism is both challenging and, for many disabled people, undesirable and perhaps impossible. We are interested in alternative approaches that present a new vision for community, engaged and informed by disabled people’s actual experiences and desires.

Given that it requires several voices to explore disabled children and youth’s services on a transnational scale, the editors invite submissions from a variety of contexts that interrupt and interrogate charity-based, unidirectional understandings of service. The Special Issue’s focus on disabled children and youth—and their experiences with service—speaks to the many ways in which transnational services are built on and around the lives and experiences of disabled young people. Community interventions rooted in young people’s activism and social justice movements represent important supports, and, in some cases, respond to and resist service interventions. These actions have us looking closely at the business of service and its implications for disabled young people. In appreciating that service and business are intertwined via global capitalism, the editors also critique goals of equity. Goals of equity raise questions about the value of disabled young people’s lives and experiences in relation to service production and delivery: In what ways do services build equity when disabled children and youth are understood as assets worthy of investments? If equity is both a measurement of assets and a gesture toward fairness, what role do disabled children and youth play in global-scale service production?

Taking a critical and multi-directional approach to understanding “service,” this collection will illustrate how much there is learn about how complexly services emerge, and are experienced, transnationally. The collection will reflect a global community of scholarship commenting on “service” as it emerges in the lives of disabled children and youth.

Recognizing unequal relations of power between disability scholars in the Global North and South, the editors invite submissions from both realms that critically reinterpret mainstream, Western understandings of service. Submissions will describe how “service” manifests transnationally and in relation to the lives of disabled children and youth. Submission topics may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Decolonial disability studies’ interpretations of “service”;
  • Community interventions on/responses to “service”;
  • Disabled children and youth’s reactions to/reflections on services;
  • Critiques of developmentalism, healthism, sanism, and/or assimilation in service delivery;
  • Anticolonial approaches to resisting and/or advancing “service”;
  • Intersections of “service” with disability justice;
  • Interdependence and accessibility in relation to “service”;
  • Refusals and/or rejection of services by/for disabled children and youth;
  • Intersectional interpretations of service experiences;
  • Services produced in the interest of transnational solidarity.

Proposed abstracts (300–500 words) for research articles can be emailed with the subject line “Services Special Issue” to Drs. Chelsea Jones and Kathryn Underwood at cjones@brocku.ca by the deadline of 3 November 2025. Abstracts should include the following:

  • A plan for the article (i.e., research question, methodology, findings, discussion, significance);
  • References for any work cited in the abstract;
  • Names of author or authors, as well a 200-word bibliography for each author that includes their affiliations and email addresses.

Submissions will undergo a multi-stage process of peer review, beginning with a friendly review by the guest editors. Contributors will be notified of the decision on their abstract by (DATE). Acceptance of an abstract does not guarantee inclusion in the Special Issue.

References

  • Mehrotra, Mili, and Karthik V. Natarajan. "Value of combining patient and provider incentives in humanitarian health care service programs." Production and Operations Management 29, no. 3 (2020): 571-594.
  • Nguyen, Xuan Thuy. "Towards a decolonial approach to disability as knowledge and praxis: Unsettling the ‘colonial’ and re-imagining research as spaces of struggles." In Intersectional Colonialities, pp. 233-251. Routledge.

Dr. Chelsea Temple Jones
Prof. Dr. Kathryn Underwood
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • disabled children and youth
  • transnational services
  • service experiences
  • community interventions
  • intersectional interpretations

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

15 pages, 348 KiB  
Article
Strengthening Parental Capabilities: Examining the Role of Interdisciplinary Support in Enhancing Parental Well-Being and Capabilities in Developmental Disability Care
by Lumka Magidigidi-Mathiso, Gérard Charl Filies and Jose Frantz
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(6), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060321 - 22 May 2025
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore parents’ lived experiences raising children with developmental disabilities (DDs), examine their emotional and physical challenges, and investigate the role of interdisciplinary support in strengthening parental capabilities. Materials and Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was [...] Read more.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore parents’ lived experiences raising children with developmental disabilities (DDs), examine their emotional and physical challenges, and investigate the role of interdisciplinary support in strengthening parental capabilities. Materials and Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using two focus groups (n = 23 parents). Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-step thematic analysis. Results: Five major themes emerged: (1) acceptance and emotional journey, (2) healthcare system navigation challenges, (3) educational and community integration barriers, (4) the development of coping strategies and support systems, and (5) resilience and positive growth. Parents reported significant emotional challenges but demonstrated remarkable resilience when supported by comprehensive care systems. Conclusions: The findings highlight the need for integrated support systems that address both the practical and emotional needs of parents raising children with DDs. Healthcare providers and community stakeholders must work collaboratively to create more inclusive and supportive environments for these families. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards Equity: Services for Disabled Children and Youth)
17 pages, 1229 KiB  
Article
Understanding Speech-Language Pathology from the Standpoint of Families: A Systemic Analysis
by Kathryn Underwood, Alice-Simone Balter, Thanya Duvage, Catriona Kollar, Tricia van Rhijn and Michelle Jones
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(12), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13120656 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1518
Abstract
The Inclusive Early Childhood Service System (IECSS) project is a longitudinal institutional ethnography that studies disability services in early childhood, and the interactions between these services and other systems, from the standpoint of families. In this paper, we examine speech-language services as part [...] Read more.
The Inclusive Early Childhood Service System (IECSS) project is a longitudinal institutional ethnography that studies disability services in early childhood, and the interactions between these services and other systems, from the standpoint of families. In this paper, we examine speech-language services as part of a system of services and a site of participation for disabled children. We use longitudinal data from annual interviews with 117 informants to map Speech and Language services over the first six years of children’s lives. We report that speech and language pathology (SLP) as a professional discourse holds cultural significance and influences the organization of disabled children and their families. The analysis of the data illustrates the pervasiveness, organizational structure, and governance of speech and language pathology (SLP) in early childhood, leading to professional discourses of childhood and disability in early intervention, preschool, and school-based services which reinforce individualized pathology as the dominant way of understanding development. We discuss how the professional practices of SLP-related services could help to disrupt disabling constructs of childhood development and colonial practices in early childhood disability services. We emphasize how speech and language development emerges in relationship with individuals and socio-political contexts. We suggest possibilities for SLP to operate within community contexts where speech and language services contribute to reducing family workload, increasing the participation of all children, and disrupting ableism in practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards Equity: Services for Disabled Children and Youth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 280 KiB  
Article
Addressing the Shortage of Special Education Teachers of Color: Implications for Teacher Education Programs and K-12 Systems
by Doreen N. Myrie, Nicci T. Dowd and Michelle D. Latiker
Soc. Sci. 2024, 13(11), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110622 - 16 Nov 2024
Viewed by 2151
Abstract
A critical shortage of special education teachers persists nationwide, challenging the realization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) mandate of providing Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for students with disabilities. Exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, this shortage disproportionately affects teachers [...] Read more.
A critical shortage of special education teachers persists nationwide, challenging the realization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) mandate of providing Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for students with disabilities. Exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, this shortage disproportionately affects teachers of color. Moreover, it extends beyond K-12 systems, impacting special education educator preparation programs, where faculties are often drawn from practicing teachers pursuing advanced degrees. This paper delineates the multifaceted implications of the shortage of special education teachers of color in both teacher education programs and K-12 systems. Emphasizing the indispensable role and specialized skill set of special educators, we offer strategies to mitigate this crisis, including improvements in preparation, recruitment, and retention efforts. Anticipating a diverse readership encompassing teacher education programs, K-12 administrators, teachers, and education policymakers, we aim to foster awareness, prompt dialog, and inspire actionable steps to address this pressing issue. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards Equity: Services for Disabled Children and Youth)

Review

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 253 KiB  
Review
De Cero a Siempre: Reflections on the Colombian Early Childhood Policy from a Human Rights Perspective
by Cristian Jovan Rojas Romero, Marisol Moreno Angarita, Yeison Guerrero and Laura Sofia Prieto Cifuentes
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(3), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14030137 - 25 Feb 2025
Viewed by 768
Abstract
This article critically examines De Cero a Siempre (DCAS), a cross-sectoral policy established in Colombia in 2016 to provide coordinated and comprehensive early childhood development services. The policy aims to promote optimal conditions for children from pregnancy to six years of age by [...] Read more.
This article critically examines De Cero a Siempre (DCAS), a cross-sectoral policy established in Colombia in 2016 to provide coordinated and comprehensive early childhood development services. The policy aims to promote optimal conditions for children from pregnancy to six years of age by addressing their nutritional, health, educational, and social needs while fostering participation and citizenship. Designed with a differential approach, the DCAS integrates and adapts services considering gender, culture, income, ethnicity, displacement, and disability. This study evaluates the DCAS policy through the human rights approach. First, we examine the conceptual definitions Second, we identify specific programs and services Third, we assess the implementation and effectiveness of these services using the official System for Monitoring the Comprehensive Development of Early Childhood. The findings reveal a strong policy framework that values human dignity and equity but highlights critical gaps in coverage, particularly in rural areas, due to geographical and social challenges. The current landscape of disability services reveals significant systemic limitations in addressing individualized developmental needs. Our comprehensive analysis exposes critical challenges in designing comprehensive intervention strategies for CWDDs. The article concludes with recommendations to enhance policy implementation and improve service delivery, ensuring equitable access for all children. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards Equity: Services for Disabled Children and Youth)
Back to TopTop