Conducive Contexts and Vulnerabilities to Domestic Abuse

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760). This special issue belongs to the section "Family Studies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2025) | Viewed by 13685

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Work and Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK
Interests: gender-based violence; “honour”-based violence; intersectional inequalities; asylum harms; cultural competence

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Domestic abuse, which includes controlling, coercive, threatening, degrading, and violent behaviors, is a worldwide public health and human rights issue. As an umbrella term, domestic abuse also captures more recently recognized forms, including coercive control, gaslighting, and technology-facilitated violence as well as abuse. While domestic abuse pertains to diverse groups, globally incidents overwhelmingly represent violence against women, which is rooted in socially ascribed unequal gender relations. At the global and national levels, different groups of women face restricted recourse to protection and justice on account of intersectional inequalities and policies restricting access to welfare and rights. Most recently, the “shadow pandemic” sparked by the onset of the COVID-19 public health crisis led to a rise in domestic abuse as perpetrators took advantage of the state restrictions limiting social interactions, access to services, help-seeking opportunities, and the normal workings of the justice system. These state-induced vulnerabilities have been further compounded by overlapping crises in different national contexts, including conflict, climate change, the overhaul of immigration systems, and the cost of living crisis.

This Special Issue invites authors from diverse disciplinary backgrounds (such as social policy, sociology, psychology, criminology, and geography) to examine new vulnerabilities to domestic abuse. We are interested in manuscripts that interrogate dynamic vulnerabilities beyond the individual, illuminating new conducive contexts (Kelly, 2005) to domestic abuse and sexual harassment. We welcome manuscripts that theorize vulnerability and resistance, and which offer new empirical perspectives on the societal, institutional, and legislative failings that perpetuate domestic abuse in its variety of forms. We also welcome manuscripts that present novel methodological approaches, producing new directions for domestic abuse research in evolving societal contexts.

We encourage submissions based on rigorous, high-quality quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research, including case studies and ethnographies. Manuscripts addressing intersectional vulnerabilities and the experiences of minoritized and marginalised groups are particularly welcomed.

Please submit your proposals and any questions to Special Issue editors by 1 July 2024. Notification of acceptance will be provided by 15 July 2024. Final papers are due on 31 December 2024 for peer review.

Dr. Emmaleena Kakela
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • domestic abuse
  • gender-based violence
  • intersectionality
  • conducive context
  • COVID-19 pandemic

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 311 KB  
Article
Vulnerabilities and Inequities: Challenges Experienced by Professionals Engaged with Migrant and Refugee Survivors of Gender-Based Violence in Canada
by Catherine Holtmann, Evangelia Tastsoglou and Mia Sisic
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(5), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15050280 - 25 Apr 2026
Viewed by 385
Abstract
Migrant and refugee women are vulnerable to gender-based violence (GBV) at multiple points along the migratory pathway, including after they arrive in Canada. Their vulnerability in Canada is related to legal and policy frameworks to (im)migration, settlement and integration but also to the [...] Read more.
Migrant and refugee women are vulnerable to gender-based violence (GBV) at multiple points along the migratory pathway, including after they arrive in Canada. Their vulnerability in Canada is related to legal and policy frameworks to (im)migration, settlement and integration but also to the precarious nature of social services for migrant and refugee survivors of GBV. Drawing upon theorizing on intersectionality, vulnerability and precarity, this article describes findings from a qualitative study involving the reflexive thematic analysis of 43 interviews with professionals engaged with government policy and the provision of public services for migrant and refugee women survivors of GBV in Canada. Our analysis reveals their marginalization within social systems and their involvement in unintentionally reproducing obstacles faced by migrant and refugee women. The findings add to and nuance the small body of research on the experiences of professionals involved in Canadian GBV services for migrant and refugee women. We make contributions to theorizing, highlighting the structural components that impact service provision to migrant and refugee survivors of GBV, and suggest recommendations for policy change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conducive Contexts and Vulnerabilities to Domestic Abuse)
16 pages, 271 KB  
Article
At the Heart of the Heartless Bureaucracy of the UK Asylum System: Refugee Women’s Experiences of the State of Limbo in Between Violence and Protection
by Emmaleena Käkelä
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(4), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15040238 - 7 Apr 2026
Viewed by 452
Abstract
Considerations of gender have long been overlooked in legal discourses and public debates on asylum. In more recent years, the right-wing narrative has taken a strategic U-turn, instead misappropriating gendered concerns including gender-based violence for the purposes of promoting racialised border controls on [...] Read more.
Considerations of gender have long been overlooked in legal discourses and public debates on asylum. In more recent years, the right-wing narrative has taken a strategic U-turn, instead misappropriating gendered concerns including gender-based violence for the purposes of promoting racialised border controls on the grounds of cultural incompatibilities, and by painting refugees as a threat to British values, economy and security. This paper calls out the hypocrisy of such femonationalist framings for overlooking the ways in which Western institutions sustain refugee women’s ongoing vulnerabilities. Drawing from qualitative interviews and focus groups with refugee women survivors of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), this paper examines the continuities of harm in the lives of women who have fled gender-based persecution to Britain. The paper critically maps the way prolonged state control during the asylum process perpetuates a sense of violence as ongoing, and its damaging implications on survivors striving to navigate life after flight. In doing so, the findings contribute new insights into established scholarship on asylum harms by illuminating the gendered consequences of violence of waiting, and refugee women’s subtle individual and collective strategies to struggle against violent continuums. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conducive Contexts and Vulnerabilities to Domestic Abuse)
20 pages, 336 KB  
Article
Multiple Layers of Vulnerability: Having a Disability in an Honour-Based Context
by Siv-Britt Björktomta
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(2), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020097 - 6 Feb 2026
Viewed by 859
Abstract
Honour-based violence can be considered a serious global problem that involves violations of human rights, and having a disability may increase the risk of being subjected to violence. The purpose of this study was to investigate the situation and needs of persons with [...] Read more.
Honour-based violence can be considered a serious global problem that involves violations of human rights, and having a disability may increase the risk of being subjected to violence. The purpose of this study was to investigate the situation and needs of persons with disabilities who have been subjected to honour-based violence. Interviews were conducted with a sample of seven women and three men aged 20–60 from different minority groups living in Sweden. All had different disabilities, including intellectual disabilities, PTSD, neuropsychiatric disabilities, mental illness, impaired hearing, deafness or deaf blindness. Thematic analysis was used, identifying four themes: A family context in the shadow of violence, Violence in different forms, Conditional belonging and The price of freedom. An intersectional perspective highlights how disability, in combination with gender, age, culture, religion and honour norms, increases vulnerability to control and violence. The common thread was the group’s specific exposedness to various forms of violence. The results point to the importance of recognising the complexity of having a disability in an honour-based context. A broader perspective is necessary to develop both measures to prevent and combat this violence and support for those who have disabilities and live with protected identities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conducive Contexts and Vulnerabilities to Domestic Abuse)
22 pages, 497 KB  
Article
Health-Related COVID-19 Stressors and Intimate Partner Violence: A Novel Application of the ABCX Family Stress Model
by Victoria P. Diamond, Phoebe MacDowell, Jane Lee and Valentina Nikulina
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(2), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020081 - 30 Jan 2026
Viewed by 514
Abstract
COVID-19 brought on health-related stressors which have not been previously explored as risks for intimate partner violence (IPV). The current study applies the ABCX model of family stress to assess whether health-related stressors were associated with more severe IPV and the mediational role [...] Read more.
COVID-19 brought on health-related stressors which have not been previously explored as risks for intimate partner violence (IPV). The current study applies the ABCX model of family stress to assess whether health-related stressors were associated with more severe IPV and the mediational role of resources (i.e., negotiation skills, emotion regulation skills, social support) and perceptions (i.e., meaning in life, loneliness) in these relationships. Using MTURK, adults across the United States participated in an anonymous online survey. Participants were allocated to groups according to relationship status and IPV presence and severity. A series of multiple mediation analyses was conducted to investigate if personal resources and perception of circumstance mediated the relationship between health-related stressors and IPV severity. The findings indicate a positive association between COVID-19 health-related stressors and IPV severity. These relationships were primarily mediated by increased attempts to suppress emotional expression, feelings of loneliness, and search for meaning in one’s life. The findings support the applicability of the ABCX models to understanding IPV, suggesting that the health-related stressors should be considered as risk factors for IPV, and identify explanatory mechanisms that could also be targets for intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conducive Contexts and Vulnerabilities to Domestic Abuse)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 329 KB  
Article
Intergenerational Transmission of Domestic Violence in Peruvian Families: A Qualitative Study
by Flor Vilches, Luisa Mazeyra, Andrea Quintanilla and Luis Ramos-Vargas
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(7), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14070399 - 23 Jun 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 6112
Abstract
Domestic violence is a public health problem that has important consequences for the physical, mental and social well-being of individuals and their families, leading to negative effects on future generations, which are exacerbated or inhibited by individual, social and cultural factors. This qualitative [...] Read more.
Domestic violence is a public health problem that has important consequences for the physical, mental and social well-being of individuals and their families, leading to negative effects on future generations, which are exacerbated or inhibited by individual, social and cultural factors. This qualitative study aimed to explore the intergenerational transmission of domestic violence in Peruvian families. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with an adolescent, a mother and a grandfather from nine families. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis revealed the importance of traditional gender norms, machismo and marianismo, in intergenerational transmission. Other important subthemes in maintenance were irritability, social learning, alcohol consumption and economic dependence. On the other hand, support networks, overcoming trauma, knowing how to choose a partner, education and separation were subthemes identified as protective factors and, finally, religious beliefs were associated with contradictory effects, since they can perpetuate violence or serve as a protective factor against violence. The implications of these findings are discussed and a proposal based on the socioecological model of domestic violence is elaborated, covering the four levels: individual, relationship, community and societal. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conducive Contexts and Vulnerabilities to Domestic Abuse)
27 pages, 390 KB  
Article
Analysis of the Need for Safe Houses for Victims of Elder Abuse from the Perspective of Police Officers and Social Workers
by Teja Primc, Kaja Prislan Mihelič and Branko Lobnikar
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(4), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14040192 - 22 Mar 2025
Viewed by 4079
Abstract
Elder abuse is an increasingly significant public health and human rights issue in aging and long-lived societies. Despite existing intervention strategies, the lack of emergency housing tailored to older victims of abuse remains a critical gap. This study explores professionals’ perceptions of elder [...] Read more.
Elder abuse is an increasingly significant public health and human rights issue in aging and long-lived societies. Despite existing intervention strategies, the lack of emergency housing tailored to older victims of abuse remains a critical gap. This study explores professionals’ perceptions of elder abuse, response measures, and challenges in addressing abuse, with a focus on rural regions. A survey was conducted among 100 first responders—social workers and police officers—who intervene in cases of elder abuse. Results indicate significant differences in perceptions of elder abuse severity, with social workers consistently rating all forms of elder abuse as more severe compared to police officers. Both groups highlighted the necessity of multidisciplinary teams, crisis centers, and safe houses as essential responses but recognized a lack of specialized infrastructure and resources as a significant challenge. Respondents emphasized that victims’ reluctance to report abuse due to family dynamics, shame, and isolation further complicates intervention efforts. Good practices identified interinstitutional collaboration, building victim trust, and proactive interventions. The findings underscore the need for age-appropriate safe spaces, improved professional training, and enhanced community awareness to address elder abuse effectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conducive Contexts and Vulnerabilities to Domestic Abuse)
Back to TopTop