Environmental Sociology — Achievements and Challenges

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2024) | Viewed by 2559

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social and Policy Studies, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel
Interests: environmental sociology; climate change and society; sustainable development

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to announce this call for academic papers for a special issue of the journal Societies entitled Environmental Sociology—Achievements and Challenges.

Submission deadline: 31 October 2024

The emergence of Environmental Sociology as a sociological subdiscipline, has been traced as far back as Rachel Carson's Silent Spring. Environmental Sociology was recognized by the International Sociological Association in 1971; the American Sociological Association followed suit in 1976, forming a section then called Environment and Technology (E&T).

In this special issue of Societies, we aim to collect original research articles and critical reviews that analyze and assess the status of Environmental Sociology from its early beginnings to the present. While singular authors have done so before, this is an opportune time to reconsider Environmental Sociology's station in a more focused manner.

Submissions may address questions related to the conceptual, theoretical, empirical, and methodological contributions of Environmental Sociology to the discipline and beyond, as well as its omissions. Relevant subject matters include but are not limited to:

  • The emergence of Environmental Sociology: historical context, theoretical foundations, critical contributions, current trends, and future directions.
  • Models and paradigms: conceptions of how social structure and social processes shape our perceptions of environmental problems, and our views about and reactions to them.
  • Environmental Sociology, sustainable development, and sustainability
  • Environmental justice: environmental inequalities, marginalized communities, racism, discrimination, and conflict.
  • Policy and advocacy: does Environmental Sociology inform and affect environmental policies and regulations? Does it inform the strategies of environmental movements?
  • Has Environmental sociology left a mark on the discipline, or has it remained rather marginal to sociology as a whole?
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Has Environmental Sociology fostered engagement with other scientific disciplines? Has this collaboration enriched our understanding of environmental issues by integrating these disciplinary perspectives?
  • Theoretical and methodological challenges: Has Environmental Sociology developed comprehensive theoretical frameworks and methodologies that address the complexity of environmental issues?
We are looking forward to your contributions! Please also forward to other scholars to whom this call for papers may be of interest.

1. Dunlap, R.E., Catton, W.R. Jr. (1979). "Environmental sociology." Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 243-273. Environmental Sociology on JSTOR.

2. Schaefer Caniglia, B. Jorgenson, A., Malin, S.F., Peek, L., Pellow, D.N., Huang, X. (eds.). (2001). Handbook of Environmental Sociology. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-77712-8.

3. Scott, L.N., Erik W. Johnson E.W. (2016). "From fringe to core? The integration of environmental sociology." Environmental Sociology, 3(1), 17-29. https://labs.wsu.edu/erikjohnson/documents/2017/12/fringe-to-core.pdf/.

4. Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Company. https://archive.org/details/fp_Silent_Spring-Rachel_Carson-1962.

5. International Sociological Association. (1976). "Report of the General Assembly," The American Sociologist, 11 (2), 123-131.

6. Harper Simpson, T., Simpson, R.L. (1994). "The transformation of the American Sociological Association." Sociological Forum, 9(2), (Special Issue: What's Wrong with Sociology?), 259-278. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685045.

7. Buttel, F.H. (1987). "New directions in environmental sociology." Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 465-488. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002341.

8. Lockie, S. (2015) "Why environmental sociology?" Environmental Sociology, 1 (1), 1-3. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23251042.2015.1022983.

Prof. Dr. Avi Gottlieb
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • environmental sociology
  • sustainable development
  • environmental justice
  • environmental policy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 2402 KiB  
Article
Applying Bourdieu’s Theory to Public Perceptions of Water Scarcity during El Niño: A Case Study of Santa Marta, Colombia
by Miguel A. De Luque-Villa, Hernán Darío Granda-Rodríguez, Cristina Isabel Garza-Tatis and Mauricio González-Méndez
Societies 2024, 14(10), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14100201 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1043
Abstract
This study investigated the sociological dimensions informing public perceptions of water scarcity during the El Niño drought period in Colombia. We conducted this study in Santa Marta, Colombia, and surveyed 405 urban and rural residents to understand their perceptions of water scarcity, management, [...] Read more.
This study investigated the sociological dimensions informing public perceptions of water scarcity during the El Niño drought period in Colombia. We conducted this study in Santa Marta, Colombia, and surveyed 405 urban and rural residents to understand their perceptions of water scarcity, management, and the impacts of the El Niño phenomenon. The survey used a Likert scale to measure responses and employed a multivariate analysis of variance to analyze the data while considering factors such as location (urban versus rural) and gender. The study results indicated that urban residents often experience an irregular water supply all year, whereas most rural respondents noted a more consistent availability of water. The perception of water scarcity also differed notably between urban and rural areas due to their different historical and cultural experiences (habitus). Urban respondents mostly recognized the presence of water, while rural perspectives were less conclusive, likely influenced by their direct access to natural water sources. Participants across various demographics consistently reported that poor management by local, regional, and national governments contributes to the water scarcity crisis, highlighting the importance of improving communication about climate events like El Niño and water management to increase community engagement in public policies. Our research suggests that better understanding the social foundations of such perceptions using Bourdieu’s concepts of social fields, habitus, and capital forms can significantly enhance water management strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sociology — Achievements and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 961 KiB  
Article
Emotional Management Strategies and Care for Women Defenders of the Territory in Jalisco
by Daniela Mabel Gloss Nuñez and Silvana Mabel Nuñez Fadda
Societies 2024, 14(10), 194; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14100194 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 772
Abstract
The struggles of several women defending their territories and lives are marked by family tensions and reactions to the overload of care tasks and community rules according to their socially established roles. In this qualitative research, we analyze and discuss the cases of [...] Read more.
The struggles of several women defending their territories and lives are marked by family tensions and reactions to the overload of care tasks and community rules according to their socially established roles. In this qualitative research, we analyze and discuss the cases of three women’s collectives from different suburban and rural communities in Jalisco. Information recollected through the new ethnography approach over six years was coded and analyzed with the Atlas ti program. Results: Women’s defense of their land involvement, organizing, and social mobilization actions move to an overload of care and raise adverse reactions in their community and families in response to what is seen as a transgression of women’s roles. This increases dominant demobilization emotions: fear, sadness, loneliness, guilt, and shame. Through emotional management strategies linked with alternative forms of appropriation of space, starting with their bodies and sharing emotions and actions with their companions, the women in these collectives produced emotions of resistance: pride, hope, friendship, and anger, which led to reconfiguring their identities, family relationships, and roles within other place domains: bodies, family, and community. Conclusions: Women defenders, as principal carers of life, have produced and inherited a set of strategies that configure a growing “politics of the ordinary. “These strategies, through emotional management, subvert dominant emotions, feelings, and acting rules, gradually questioning and reinventing their roles and human and nonhuman relations in their most immediate contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Sociology — Achievements and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop