Building Healthy Communities

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698). This special issue belongs to the section "The Social Nature of Health and Well-Being".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 2229

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA
Interests: nonprofit organizations; community studies; sociology of community
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Training & Technical Assistance Manager, BLH Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD 20850, USA
Interests: community economic development; national urban policy; advocacy planning; poverty

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We invite submissions to a Special Issue of the electronic journal Societies, published by MDPI, on the topic of “Building Healthy Communities”. “Healthy” communities is a catchall term that is used to illustrate how the integration and collaboration of multiple partners are coordinated to meet the basic needs of residents in an area. Healthy communities involve the integration of ecosystems that cut across economic, physical, and social spheres. “Healthy communities” also foster equity for disadvantaged persons and groups, allowing them to participate in and contribute to the public square. In most cases, the process of community building involves organizing in a “bottom-up” model using methodologies such as those in the tradition of Saul Alinsky (Fisher, et al., 2018) or Kretzmann and McKnight’s (1993) Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD). Assets are identified at the grassroots level so that they empower economic and social change and community power is decentralized. However, these communities can also be part of governmental efforts to enable vertical integration of change efforts, so that the voices of local people are heard and so that they are given power in decision-making processes.

The focus of this Special Issue is on organizational arrangements that build the health of communities. This Special Issue is influenced by the philosophy of communitarianism as articulated by Amitai Etizioni (1996) and expressed by papers presented at the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (https://sase.org/news/in-memory-of-amitai-etzioni/). Values that strengthen basic social units like the family and the neighborhood are highlighted in a communitarian approach.  Organization helps to link elements of a community together within the locality, between localities, and vertically to more encompassing systems.

We, the Guest Editors, have been part of a group of scholars who have explored the varieties of effective local organizations (Cnaan and Milofsky 2006; 2018). We continue, however, to lack a base of well-crafted case studies that show how local organizations work, what makes them effective, and what strategies or plans inform their development. We need a better understanding of how idiosyncratic, local cases can scale up to provide effective community development on a larger scale. For this, we need more effective theories of local organizations.

Authors are encouraged to submit abstracts of their proposed papers to the Guest Editors for initial determination of fit for this Special Issue no later than October 31, 2024. Authors of accepted abstracts will be notified by November 15, 2024. Full papers should be submitted by June 15, 2025. These papers will then be sent for peer review by the Editors of Societies, with editorial decisions being finalized no later than 60 days after full submission. It is anticipated that the electronic version of accepted papers for this Special Issue will be published by August 15, 2025.

References

Cnaan, R.A. and C. Milofsky (eds) (2006).  Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations.  New York: Springer.

Cnaan, R.A. and C. Milofsky (eds) (2018).  Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations in the 21st Century.  Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Etzioni, A. (1996).  The New Golden Rule.  Community and Morality in a Democratic Society. New York: Basic Books.

Fisher, R.; J. DeFilippis; and E. Shragge (2018).  “Contested community: A selected and critical history of community organizing.”  Ch. 17, pp. 281-297 in R.A. Cnaan and C. Milofsky (eds.), Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations in the 21st Century.  Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Kretzmann, J.P. and J. McKnight (1993). Building Communities from the Inside Out : A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets. Evanston, IL:  Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research, Asset-Based Community Development Institute.

Shaw, R. and K. Goda (2004). “From disaster to sustainable civil society: The Kobe experience.”  Disasters 28 (1): 16-40. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00241.x?casa_token=scGRi9WseIgAAAAA:Zz9xb6Cfnynmul9INPXxxncwuA9ibLnMgFVIf4aCgiOEu3nANuLOHGQwxvs3-FpOkIIXOLmEy6YO5r7-.

Contributions have to be within one of the three categories of papers (article, conceptual paper, or review) of the journal and address the topic of the Special Issue.

Prof. Dr. Carl Milofsky
Dr. Brian Holland
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • healthy communities
  • community organizations
  • communitarianism
  • social capital
  • values and community

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

15 pages, 271 KB  
Article
Loneliness, Social Cohesion, and the Role of Art Making
by Olivia Sagan
Societies 2025, 15(9), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15090237 - 27 Aug 2025
Abstract
Global interest in the rising rates of loneliness runs parallel to increased concern about weakening social cohesion. Both phenomena are described as complexly entwined with trust and agency and related to wellbeing at both an individual and societal level. Whilst opinions are numerous [...] Read more.
Global interest in the rising rates of loneliness runs parallel to increased concern about weakening social cohesion. Both phenomena are described as complexly entwined with trust and agency and related to wellbeing at both an individual and societal level. Whilst opinions are numerous and divided on how to alleviate loneliness and build social cohesion, there is some important coalescence around claims of the contribution of art making to both warding off loneliness and building social cohesion. This paper draws on the work of Hannah Arendt and contemporary readings of her theory of loneliness to suggest how art making can be efficacious and why it should play a central role in community building rather than be relegated to a peripheral desideratum. Drawing on data from two studies into community art making, the paper explores how the inter- and intrapersonal processes of being seen and showing can alleviate loneliness, begin to restore agency, and help build social cohesion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Building Healthy Communities)
21 pages, 579 KB  
Article
Contrasting Prosumption Models: Experiences, Benefits and Continuation in Allotment Gardens and Community-Supported Agriculture in Switzerland
by Stefan Galley, Stefan Mann and Patrick Bottazzi
Societies 2025, 15(5), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050126 - 6 May 2025
Viewed by 602
Abstract
Agricultural prosumption is a transformative pathway, enabling individuals to reconnect to nature whilst producing food for their own consumption. Allotment gardens (AGs) and community-supported agriculture (CSA) are two main types of this practice, forming opposing sides on a continuous prosumption scale, ranging from [...] Read more.
Agricultural prosumption is a transformative pathway, enabling individuals to reconnect to nature whilst producing food for their own consumption. Allotment gardens (AGs) and community-supported agriculture (CSA) are two main types of this practice, forming opposing sides on a continuous prosumption scale, ranging from prosumption-as-consumption (p-a-c), as in consumption focused CSA initiatives, to prosumption-as-production (p-a-p), as in the production-orientated AGs. Using a survey completed by Swiss CSA (n = 250) and AG members (n = 201), this study shows how prosumers perceive the benefits of their activity, how these experiences shape their likeliness to continue and how differently they rate the effects of prosumption on individuals, communities and society. In addition, it provides an outlook on associated societal developments, regarding these activities as forms of contributive economy. Although the two groups differed in their socio-demographics, their attitudes and experiences were similar. P-a-p organisations (AGs) enhance production-related individual benefits, while p-a-c organisations foster positive experiences around consumption activities. AG continuation is driven by the experienced health and food-related benefits, while CSAs rely on the communal and organisational involvement of their members. While AG members focus on individual benefits, CSA members strive to be part of a food system change, using their communal structures to create a social movement. This demonstrates the wide range and potential of food prosumption in fostering diverse forms of engagement, offering insights into its potential for sustaining participation and contributing to alternative economic models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Building Healthy Communities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

22 pages, 389 KB  
Concept Paper
Displaced Communities: Can They Be Healthy?
by Iris Posklinsky, Ram A. Cnaan, Hani Nouman, Limor Musayell and Odeya Shabtai Getahun
Societies 2025, 15(7), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15070187 - 4 Jul 2025
Viewed by 685
Abstract
Emergency displacement has become an increasingly salient global phenomenon, precipitated by the intensification of climate crises and persistent geopolitical conflicts. These events forcibly displace millions each year and generate complex social, political, and institutional challenges. While the literature on displacement is expanding, much [...] Read more.
Emergency displacement has become an increasingly salient global phenomenon, precipitated by the intensification of climate crises and persistent geopolitical conflicts. These events forcibly displace millions each year and generate complex social, political, and institutional challenges. While the literature on displacement is expanding, much of it centers on individual and household experiences, often overlooking the collective dimensions of displacement. This article addresses this gap by critically examining the concept of the displaced community, a term used to describe collectivities formed in host societies comprising individuals who have been forcibly uprooted. The article undertakes a conceptual investigation of displaced communities, seeking to define their constitutive features while accounting for their internal heterogeneity and contextual variability. To sharpen analytical clarity, the study contrasts displaced communities with healthy communities, thereby situating two polar ends of a continuum. Based on these two types of community, the question arises, “can displaced communities be healthy communities?” The article advances a conceptual model of a healthy displaced community, positing that such a construct extends conventional understandings of resilience by foregrounding the processual dynamics of recovery and adaptation. Specifically, it is argued that community health in contexts of forced displacement must be understood as the outcome of iterative processes intentionally involving community-based intervention, empowerment, and long-term sustainability. Drawing on published case studies and empirical accounts of work with displaced populations, the article demonstrates how these three pillars—community intervention, empowerment, and sustainability—are implemented in practice. It concludes with policy and practice recommendations designed to prevent further deterioration and promote the development of health and well-being within displaced communities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Building Healthy Communities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop