Financial Engineering to Address Complexity

A special issue of Risks (ISSN 2227-9091).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 April 2015) | Viewed by 24089

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Aziendali e Statistiche. Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 13, 90128 Palermo, Italy
Interests: financial and insurance modeling; portfolio optimization; numerical methods for risk management; computational finance; simulation models

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Cyprus and The Wharton Financial Institutions Center, University of Cyprus, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid pace of worldwide financial integration has led to a magnification of the interrelations between the different components of the economic systems, thus increasing its complexity as a whole. To give but a few examples, the recent sub-prime crisis has caused serious repercussions on economic growth in many countries and hampered their capacity to pay their debt. International trading of securitized assets caused banking crises and raised questions as to the sustainability of sovereigns’ liabilities after bank bailout. Regulatory boards are struggling to grapple with the manifolds option-like features are embedded in pension plans and insurance policies. As a consequence, the regulators now require the mark-to-market evaluations or credit exposure of such hidden contingent claims, envisaging the possible danger of negative events triggered in sectors that are seemingly associated to the core of their business.

The aim of this Special Issue is to collect financial engineering contributions to addressing such increasing complexity, at the same time being cognizant that financial engineering has contributed to the increased complexity. The objective is to bridge the gap between academics, decision makers and regulators, with the objective of fostering solution models that deal with complexity, instead of oversimplifying it for the sake of theoretical tractability.

The Special Issue will focus both on research topics relevant to the scientific community, and evidence from industry and decision-making case studies. We are interested in original results and innovative methods to solve realistic problems, presented and potentially tested in a rigorous form.

Dr. Andrea Consiglio
Dr. Stavros A. Zenios
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Risks is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.


Keywords

  • financial modelling
  • portfolio optimization
  • scenario generation
  • sovereign debt management
  • option evaluation
  • systemic risk

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

1228 KiB  
Article
The Financial Stress Index: Identification of Systemic Risk Conditions
by Mikhail V. Oet, John M. Dooley and Stephen J. Ong
Risks 2015, 3(3), 420-444; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks3030420 - 16 Sep 2015
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 11313
Abstract
This paper develops a financial stress measure for the United States, the Cleveland Financial Stress Index (CFSI). The index is based on publicly available data describing a six-market partition of the financial system comprising credit, funding, real estate, securitization, foreign exchange, and equity [...] Read more.
This paper develops a financial stress measure for the United States, the Cleveland Financial Stress Index (CFSI). The index is based on publicly available data describing a six-market partition of the financial system comprising credit, funding, real estate, securitization, foreign exchange, and equity markets. This paper improves upon existing stress measures by objectively selecting between several index weighting methodologies across a variety of monitoring frequencies through comparison against a volatility-based benchmark series. The resulting measure facilitates the decomposition of stress to identify disruptions in specific markets and provides insight into historical stress regimes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Engineering to Address Complexity)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

1182 KiB  
Article
Supervising System Stress in Multiple Markets
by Mikhail V. Oet, John M. Dooley, Amanda C. Janosko, Dieter Gramlich and Stephen J. Ong
Risks 2015, 3(3), 365-389; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks3030365 - 14 Sep 2015
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 6033
Abstract
This paper develops an extended financial stress measure that considers the supervisory objective of identifying risks to the stability of the financial system. The measure provides a continuous and bounded signal of financial stress using daily public market data. Broad coverage of material [...] Read more.
This paper develops an extended financial stress measure that considers the supervisory objective of identifying risks to the stability of the financial system. The measure provides a continuous and bounded signal of financial stress using daily public market data. Broad coverage of material financial system markets over time is achieved by leveraging dynamic credit weights. We consider how this measure can be used to monitor, analyze, and alert financial system stress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Engineering to Address Complexity)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

382 KiB  
Article
Custom v. Standardized Risk Models
by Zura Kakushadze and Jim Kyung-Soo Liew
Risks 2015, 3(2), 112-138; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks3020112 - 20 May 2015
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5785
Abstract
We discuss when and why custom multi-factor risk models are warranted and give source code for computing some risk factors. Pension/mutual funds do not require customization but standardization. However, using standardized risk models in quant trading with much shorter holding horizons is suboptimal: [...] Read more.
We discuss when and why custom multi-factor risk models are warranted and give source code for computing some risk factors. Pension/mutual funds do not require customization but standardization. However, using standardized risk models in quant trading with much shorter holding horizons is suboptimal: (1) longer horizon risk factors (value, growth, etc.) increase noise trades and trading costs; (2) arbitrary risk factors can neutralize alpha; (3) “standardized” industries are artificial and insufficiently granular; (4) normalization of style risk factors is lost for the trading universe; (5) diversifying risk models lowers P&L correlations, reduces turnover and market impact, and increases capacity. We discuss various aspects of custom risk model building. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Engineering to Address Complexity)
Back to TopTop