Islamic Reformism with and without the West: Mapping Religious Reformist Discourses in Contemporary Islam

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2024) | Viewed by 14291

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Arts, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Interests: Islam–interwar Europe; modernity; hajj studies; Arabic and Islamic digital humanities

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University, 3512 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands
Interests: Islam; Islamic reformism; Islam in Europe; Islamic intellectual history

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue invites the contributions of experts whose work addresses the various ways in which contemporary Muslim intellectuals and scholars have wrestled with and responded to the challenges posed by (post)modernity. The key terms here are reform (iṣlāḥ) and renewal (tajdīd). Both concepts have a long history in Islamic thought and have always emerged in times of perceived crisis and loss of authenticity. It is, however, what the definition of “true” and “authentic” Islam comprises that was—and continues to be—the main point of contention between reformers and their critics, past and present. By questioning the dominant understanding of their societies, Muslim reformist thinkers reconfigure “Islam” in ways that support their religious, social, and political vision in the light of changing circumstances. They also reshape existing hermeneutical approaches to create a congruence between religious texts and their reformist agenda, covering a wide spectrum that stretches from the necessity of abiding to the literal meaning of the Qur’an and the Sunna to the inevitability of returning to the higher purposes (maqāṣid) of the Islamic message.

In modern and contemporary times, these methodologies have deepened the gap between traditionalists, reformists, and modernists, creating a wide range of religious and intellectual discourses, all promising to solve the aches of the Muslim world. Compared with their predecessors from the 19th and early 20th centuries, later reform-oriented writers became more sophisticated in engaging modern thought: while the first appreciated or criticized the “West” for being the main model for imitation, the latter reflect the multiple modernities (Eisenstadt 2000) that have formed Muslim majority societies in the past two hundred years, making their reformist visions a lot more than just “reactions” to the West, but global alternative models in their own right.

We are interested in scholarship examining the presence or absence of the “West” in Muslim reformist and modernization projects. In this Special Issue, we would like to examine whether it is true that Muslim intellectuals who embrace modernity are par excellence “modernists”, whereas those who reject or are critical of (post)modernist values are per definition “traditionalists” or “fundamentalists”. We do not deny that the conceptualizations of Islam in modern and contemporary times are never detached from the complex cross-cultural layers of modernity itself as a global concept. However, we are convinced that there is a Muslim self-image that contributes to the religious, political, intellectual, cultural, and social imagery and modes of transformation in the modern and postmodern world. Therefore, the focus will be laid on the following questions: How do Muslims in different times and places redefine the nature and the core principals of Islam? How do they recalibrate the ethical, religious, aesthetic, and cultural values of their religion in modern times? Does the “West” continue to inform their understandings of modernity, or do we witness the presence of a multiplicity of modern models in contemporary Muslim writings? Do Islamic texts and scholarly traditions carry in themselves enough adaptive capacity to address the burning issues of our time and age, or will Muslims be forced to look beyond them to find their place in the contemporary world? 

Prof. Dr. Umar Ryad
Dr. Mehdi Sajid
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • modernity
  • postmodernity
  • reform
  • tradition
  • Islam
  • the West

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 321 KiB  
Article
Revivalism and Decoloniality: The Paradox of Modernization without Westernization in the Political Theology of Israr Ahmad
by Mohammad Adnan Rehman
Religions 2023, 14(9), 1108; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091108 - 27 Aug 2023
Viewed by 929
Abstract
This article explores the contribution of modern Muslim revivalism to Muslims’ political decolonization, and the paradoxical role the West plays in that process. On the one hand, revivalism rejects the founding principles of liberal political theory, and on the other hand, it readily [...] Read more.
This article explores the contribution of modern Muslim revivalism to Muslims’ political decolonization, and the paradoxical role the West plays in that process. On the one hand, revivalism rejects the founding principles of liberal political theory, and on the other hand, it readily adopts the salient structures and mechanisms of the modern polity with a view to Islamize them, all the while insisting on the Muslims’ need to de-Westernize. Toward revealing the hitherto neglected dimensions of revivalism, my analysis adopts an unconventional route by subjecting revivalism to a semiotic analysis in conversation with the archetypal theories of Mircea Eliade and Carl G. Jung. The analysis unveils the universal psychological structures of revival, and their specific Muslim symbolization. I conclude (a) that depth psychology makes modern Muslim revival inevitable, which will only grow stronger and gain wider appeal while the Muslims continue to suffer decline; (b) that among the different forms of Muslim revival, revivalism ventures the farthest in decolonizing Muslim political imagination; (c) that the revivalist imagination makes their espoused caliphate imperative for the purpose of ritual participation in Islam’s sacred origins; and (d) that a critical reconstruction and evolution of revivalism holds out the promise of a greater contribution to Muslim decolonization. For my analysis, I largely turn to the Pakistani political theologian Israr Ahmad (d. 2010), whose ideas have been disseminated widely across the Muslim world, yet who has not received the requisite academic scrutiny. Moreover, intra-revivalist critique of revivalism has been a neglected aspect in the study of revival, and its careful scrutiny should become a topic of investigation in its own right. In that regard, Ahmad offers a most important critique of earlier revival efforts and their entanglement with certain aspects of coloniality. Full article
14 pages, 306 KiB  
Article
Mapping Neo-Modern and Postmodern Qur’ānic Reformist Discourse in the Intellectual Legacy of Fazlur Rahman and Mohammed Arkoun
by Humaira Ahmad
Religions 2023, 14(5), 595; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14050595 - 01 May 2023
Viewed by 1371
Abstract
Renewal and Reform have been the most discussed and dominant themes of Muslim intelligentsia, as they lived through the subjection of the greater part of the Muslim world by the Western colonial powers during the 18th and 19th centuries. The intellectual discourse on [...] Read more.
Renewal and Reform have been the most discussed and dominant themes of Muslim intelligentsia, as they lived through the subjection of the greater part of the Muslim world by the Western colonial powers during the 18th and 19th centuries. The intellectual discourse on reform by the early Muslim reformers pivoted to the adoption of Western science and values and to the struggle of developing a new ilm al kalām (theology) complementary to modern science and western ideologies. The subsequent reformers, however, were more critical of Western ideas of civilization. Fazlur Rahman and Mohammed Arkoun belonged to the later wave of Muslim reformist movement of the 20th century and are the most well-known trail blazers of this reformist discourse, which centered on the Qur’ān. This article provides insight into the reform strategies of Dr. Fazlur Rahman and Mohammed Arkoun by mapping out key concepts in their discourses and their influence on later generations of reformers. Fazlur Rahman identified the stagnant intellectual legacy as the sole cause of the downfall of Muslim Civilization, caused by the absence of Ijtihād (independent legal reasoning). In his opinion, blind imitation based on precedence and consensus has only created a new hierarchy of traditional ulama (religious scholar) whose retrogressive mindset monopolized the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Making the Qur’ān as the center point for reform, he advocated its rereading based on the comprehension of the élan (spirit) of the Qur’ān. Similarly, Mohammed Arkoun, being trained in postmodern literary theory, adopted post structural methods for re-reading the Qur’ānic text. Arkoun’s critique and approach is interwoven with complex terminologies. He advocated desacralizing the text and the radical rethinking of Islam as a cultural and religious system. This appraisal promotes a philosophical perspective in combination with an anthropological and historical approach. Both these reformers have their own set of advocates and detractors. Undeniably, however, as this paper argues, Arkoun’s approach of understanding the Qur’ān can disturb the conventional prevalent belief system. Full article
13 pages, 257 KiB  
Article
Modern Western Thought and Islamic Reformism: Intellectual Challenges, Prior Discourse, and Future Prospects
by Zia Ul Haq
Religions 2023, 14(3), 308; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030308 - 24 Feb 2023
Viewed by 2332
Abstract
Muslims were introduced to modern Western philosophy during the time of Western colonization, when they were not emotionally or mentally ready to absorb it and were generally skeptical of anything Western. This has caused an intellectual crisis, and some Muslims saw new ideas [...] Read more.
Muslims were introduced to modern Western philosophy during the time of Western colonization, when they were not emotionally or mentally ready to absorb it and were generally skeptical of anything Western. This has caused an intellectual crisis, and some Muslims saw new ideas from the West as a direct threat to Islamic identity. The point here is why Muslim societies have always been skeptical of modern Western philosophy, even though Western societies accepted all new ideas without any trouble, and it does not stop the West from moving forward as a civilization. This study uses a comparative analytical method to look at how modern Western philosophy is received in Islamic societies, what it has caused, and where it might go in the future. It focuses on the issue of faith and reason as a talking point to show how Western and Islamic ways of knowing are different. Finally, the study makes important suggestions about how to deal with the effects of modern Western philosophy on Islamic societies. Full article
16 pages, 320 KiB  
Article
Rethinking Reform: ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ṭāhā and the Temporal Reconceptualization of the Authenticity–Modernity Paradigm
by Harald Viersen
Religions 2023, 14(2), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020225 - 08 Feb 2023
Viewed by 1600
Abstract
This article looks to reconceptualize the question of reform in modern Islamic society through the work of the Moroccan thinker ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ṭāhā by highlighting how he redefines concepts central to contemporary Arab thought using an alternative temporal perspective. Starting from the observation [...] Read more.
This article looks to reconceptualize the question of reform in modern Islamic society through the work of the Moroccan thinker ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Ṭāhā by highlighting how he redefines concepts central to contemporary Arab thought using an alternative temporal perspective. Starting from the observation that discussions on the reform of heritage prominent in contemporary Arab thought display a linear-progressive character that sustains its dichotomous character as a seemingly interminable contest between modernizers and traditionalists, we will discuss Ṭāhā’s argument for puncturing the recurring structure of these debates by proposing a conceptualization of time that locates the essence of modernity in an authentic past. Not only does this reconfigure received interpretations of concepts of modernity and authenticity, but it also shows how, given the foundational role that the dominant linear-progressive conception of time plays in structuring Arab-Islamic thought, a reconceptualization of time can open up ways of reconceptualizing this entire debate and the question of reform at the center of it. Full article
10 pages, 216 KiB  
Article
Iranian Islamic Revolution and the Transformation of Islamist Discourse in Southern India: 1979–1992
by Shaheen Kelachan Thodika
Religions 2023, 14(1), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010130 - 16 Jan 2023
Viewed by 2475
Abstract
By focusing on the publications of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH) in the Malayalam language, this article argues that the 1979 Iranian Islamic Revolution (IIR) marked a rupture from the disenchantments of the 1947 partition of British India and Cold War-centered politics for the Islamists [...] Read more.
By focusing on the publications of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH) in the Malayalam language, this article argues that the 1979 Iranian Islamic Revolution (IIR) marked a rupture from the disenchantments of the 1947 partition of British India and Cold War-centered politics for the Islamists of Kerala. This rupture from the colonial past and a Western-inspired intellectual climate had resonances in the discourse on Islam in Kerala. The Iranian revolution not only imported the idea of Islamism or revolution but also a renewed interest in democracy, modernity and the idea of “Islamist political” to the southwest coast of India. In an attempt to write an intellectual history of emotions related to the IIR, this paper argues that in the case of Islamists, there was a strong tendency to break from the intellectual discourse of the nation-state and begin afresh in politics, and the moment of 1979 provided what they sought for long. Full article
13 pages, 297 KiB  
Article
Khayr al-Din al-Tunisi and Islamic Reformism as a Synthesis between the West and the Islamic Tradition
by Hatice Rumeysa Dursun
Religions 2023, 14(1), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010109 - 12 Jan 2023
Viewed by 2254
Abstract
Muslim countries have experienced great change and transformation during the 19th and 20th centuries as a result of their encounters with the West. Islamic reformism might be considered as a discourse developed to face the diverse challenges posed by Western modernity. Khayr al-Din [...] Read more.
Muslim countries have experienced great change and transformation during the 19th and 20th centuries as a result of their encounters with the West. Islamic reformism might be considered as a discourse developed to face the diverse challenges posed by Western modernity. Khayr al-Din al-Tunisi (1810–1890) was a statesman and intellectual of the 19th century who elaborated an original approach to the question of Islamic reformism. His major work, The Surest Path to Knowledge Concerning the Conditions of Countries (Aqwam al-Masalik fi Ma’rifat Ahwal al-Mamalik), represents an important contribution to debates on Islam, modernism and the West. This study is based on this work of al-Tunisi and other primary and secondary sources (books and articles) regarding his approach. Using qualitative methods of analysis (contextualization and descriptive discourse analysis), this study aimed to scrutinize how Khayr al-Din offered a balanced reformist vision as a synthesis between Westernism and the Islamic tradition. Rather than purely imitating the West, Khayr al-Din emphasized the need for a better understanding of Western methods and institutions on the basis of Islam. Full article
Back to TopTop