Origins and Development of the Pure Land Tradition Through the Lens of Sacred Site Transference

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2026) | Viewed by 8576

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Interests: Chinese Buddhism; Buddhist philosophy; relationships between Buddhism and Chinese philosophy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Since the Song dynasty (960–1127), Pure Land and Chan Buddhism have stood as two of the most influential traditions in Chinese Buddhism, each with deeply rooted and enduring practices. Over the past millennium, these traditions have profoundly shaped the Buddhist landscape across East Asia, leaving a lasting cultural imprint on secular life throughout the Sinosphere.

Because of its association with Huiyuan 慧遠 (334–416), the reputed founder of the Pure Land tradition, and the White Lotus Society 白蓮社 he established there, Mount Lu 廬山 in Jiujiang 九江 of Jiangxi 江西 has long been regarded as the primary—if not the sole—origin of this influential Buddhist movement. As a result, Pure Land traditions that emerged elsewhere have often faded from scholarly focus or even disappeared from view.

However, Huiyuan’s origin in Shanxi 山西merits serious reconsideration, as it suggests that the roots of the Pure Land tradition may, in fact, be traced to what is now Shanxi Province. The movement flourished under Tanluan 曇鸞 (476–542) of Yanmen, Datong, during the Northern Wei period. Inspired by miraculous visions on Mount Wutai 五臺山, Tanluan embraced monastic life early on and became a central figure in the promotion of Pure Land teachings. His disciples, Daochuo 道綽 (562–645) and Shandao 善導 (613–681) of Bingzhou 並州, Shanxi, carried forward his legacy, establishing Xuanzhong Monastery 玄中寺 in Jiaocheng 交城 (present-day Shanxi) as a major Pure Land center. Together, these figures laid the foundation for what became a cornerstone of Chinese Buddhism. To this day, Japanese Buddhists still venerate them as the patriarchs of the Pure Land tradition in Japan.

Following this lineage was Fazhao 法照 (747–821), honored as the Fourth Patriarch of the Pure Land tradition in China. Inspired by Huiyuan’s example, Fazhao devoted himself to the practice of Buddha-Recitation Samādhi 念佛三昧 at Mount Lu and developed the Five-Stage Method of Buddha-Name Recitation 五會念佛, earning widespread reverence as a Pure Land patriarch. He later experienced a profound vision of the Great Sage Bamboo Monastery 大聖竹林寺, where Mañjuśrī Bodhisattva and other holy figures were said to be expounding the Dharma. This vision prompted Fazhao’s pilgrimage to Mount Wutai, where he paid homage to the sacred site and dedicated himself to spreading Pure Land teachings. Historical accounts of Fazhao’s life reveal how the shifting geography of Pure Land sacred sites reflects the dynamic relationship between evolving religious thought and the relocation of sacred spaces.

The Pure Land tradition, which took root during the Three Jin periods, continued to leave visible traces across Shanxi’s historic sites. For instance, the late Tang (846–907) mural Amitābha Preaching 阿彌陀佛說法圖 at Foguang Monastery 佛光寺 on Mount Wutai, along with numerous Pure Land transformation tableaux adorning monastery walls throughout Shanxi, offer enduring visual testimony to this legacy.

From its Shanxi origins, the Pure Land tradition spread across China and East Asia, evolving into a far-reaching religious phenomenon. To fully grasp this development, a global, cross-regional, cross-cultural, and interdisciplinary approach is essential. Such a multi-layered framework not only opens new perspectives on the Pure Land tradition but also underscores the significance of Shanxi Buddhism within a broader glocalization context—linking local traditions to transnational Buddhist histories.

The study of Buddhist sacred sites encompasses a wide range of themes, including religious history, doctrinal development, sectarian formation, and institutional structures. To advance our understanding of the formation and evolution of the Pure Land tradition—and the roles sacred sites have played in its history—the aim of this Special Issue is to bring together scholars from around the world to engage in a collaborative exploration of key historical and contemporary issues related to these themes.

The scope of this Special Issue includes, but is not limited to, the following areas of research:

  • Origins of the Pure Land tradition;
  • Pure Land tradition, Buddhism at Mount Wutai, and Buddhism in Shanxi;
  • Development and dissemination of the Pure Land tradition;
  • The Pure Land tradition and Buddhist sacred sites;
  • Pure Land sacred sites in Korea and Japan;
  • Cross-border exchanges of Pure Land sacred sites;
  • Local and global historical studies of the Pure Land tradition;
  • The role of the Pure Land tradition in the formation, development, and transformation of East Asian societies;
  • Modernization of the Pure Land tradition;
  • Sociological studies on the Pure Land tradition;
  • Mural art of the Pure Land tradition;
  • Methodological approaches and new perspectives in Pure Land Studies;
  • Key historical figures in the Pure Land tradition.

We cordially invite the submission of papers related to the formation and transmission of Pure Land Buddhism.

Prof. Dr. Jinhua Chen
Prof. Dr. Kai Sheng
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Pure Land
  • Huiyuan
  • Mount Lu
  • Mount Wutai
  • Shandao
  • Fazhao

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (13 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 466 KB  
Article
Ji’s View of the Pure Land in “Commentary of Vimalakīrtinirdeśasūtra”
by Zurong Yang
Religions 2026, 17(5), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17050611 - 19 May 2026
Abstract
The Shuo Wugoucheng jing shu 說無垢稱經疏 [Commentary on the Vimalakīrtinirdeśasūtra] by Ji 基 (632–682) is a systematic exposition of the concept of the Buddha-land. It not only comprehensively constructs the theoretical framework of the “Eight Gates and Fourfold Realm” but also addresses [...] Read more.
The Shuo Wugoucheng jing shu 說無垢稱經疏 [Commentary on the Vimalakīrtinirdeśasūtra] by Ji 基 (632–682) is a systematic exposition of the concept of the Buddha-land. It not only comprehensively constructs the theoretical framework of the “Eight Gates and Fourfold Realm” but also addresses two key questions within the framework of “as the mind is pure, so is the Buddha-land 隨其心淨則佛土淨”—namely, what constitutes a Bodhisattva’s Pure Land and why Śāriputra perceived impurities in the Buddha-land. In this process, Ji extensively incorporates ideas from Yogācāra texts such as the Cheng weishi lun 成唯識論 [Vijñapti-mātratā-siddhi] and the Fodijing lun 佛地經論 [Buddhabhūmisūtra-śāstra]. He further advances the discourse by constructing the Pure Land from the perspectives of both the Buddha and sentient beings. In doing so, he presents a distinctly Yogācāra interpretation. Additionally, through his explanation of the causality of the Pure Land, he outlines a progression: cultivation of wisdom → purification of consciousness → purification of the land. Ji thereby embarks on a different interpretive path from Kumārajīva 鳩摩羅什 (344–413), Sengzhao 僧肇 (384–414), and others, highlighting his distinctive contribution and the unique significance of his Pure Land thought within the Yogācāra tradition and the Shuo Wugoucheng jing 說無垢稱經 [Vimalakīrtinirdeśasūtra] exegetical lineage. Full article
21 pages, 6916 KB  
Article
Reconsidering Material Culture in Unified Silla’s Pure Land Buddhism
by Jinyoung Chung
Religions 2026, 17(5), 571; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17050571 - 10 May 2026
Viewed by 253
Abstract
This paper challenges the conventional assumption that the widespread popularity of Pure Land Buddhism in Unified Silla naturally resulted in mass production of Amitābha statues. Drawing on historical records, inscriptions, and reliable iconographic evidence, it can be demonstrated that only twenty-two extant statues [...] Read more.
This paper challenges the conventional assumption that the widespread popularity of Pure Land Buddhism in Unified Silla naturally resulted in mass production of Amitābha statues. Drawing on historical records, inscriptions, and reliable iconographic evidence, it can be demonstrated that only twenty-two extant statues can be definitively identified as Amitābha—far fewer than earlier scholarly estimates, which often relied on insufficient criteria such as hand gestures and orientation toward the west. How, then, can we account for this discrepancy between Pure Land Buddhism’s broad appeal and the relatively limited production of Amitābha imagery? The answer lies in two defining features of Amitābha devotion in Unified Silla: its appeal to ordinary lay believers and its emphasis on name-recitation. Historical records indicate that Pure Land Buddhism was especially widespread among commoners, who primarily practiced name-recitation without reliance on Buddhist images rather than engaging in the costly commissioning of statues. Doctrinally, Buddhist scriptures emphasized that recitation was spiritually equivalent to—or even a substitute for—other meritorious deeds, including image making, thereby providing justification for this accessible practice. Monks active in Silla likewise underscored the salvific efficacy of name-recitation. Given these devotional priorities and the socioeconomic constraints facing ordinary practitioners, the scarcity of Amitābha statues becomes explicable. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1614 KB  
Article
The Esoteric Nenbutsu in Tendai
by Bernard Faure
Religions 2026, 17(4), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17040408 - 24 Mar 2026
Viewed by 492
Abstract
Until recently, our view of Chinese Buddhist history was overly influenced by sectarian categories inherited by Japanese Buddhism, which clearly distinguished Zen/Chan, Pure Land, and esoteric Buddhism (mostly Shingon 真言). Recently, scholars have begun to study syncretistic trends known as “esoteric Zen” and [...] Read more.
Until recently, our view of Chinese Buddhist history was overly influenced by sectarian categories inherited by Japanese Buddhism, which clearly distinguished Zen/Chan, Pure Land, and esoteric Buddhism (mostly Shingon 真言). Recently, scholars have begun to study syncretistic trends known as “esoteric Zen” and “esoteric nenbutsu.” However, the latter has so far been mostly examined within the framework of Shingon Buddhism. This paper will emphasize the importance of nenbutsu in the esoteric Tendai school (Taimitsu 台密), particularly in a secret ritual called “Genshi Kimyōdan” 玄旨帰命壇. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 332 KB  
Article
Saving Those in Need: The Nirvana Sutra’s Contribution to Pure Land Thought
by Mark Blum
Religions 2026, 17(3), 346; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17030346 - 10 Mar 2026
Viewed by 460
Abstract
This paper examines the influence of the Nirvana Sutra 涅槃經 on the early formative stage of Pure Land Buddhist thought in China, focusing on three tropes common within the Nirvana Sutra and which also become central to the identity of the Pure Land [...] Read more.
This paper examines the influence of the Nirvana Sutra 涅槃經 on the early formative stage of Pure Land Buddhist thought in China, focusing on three tropes common within the Nirvana Sutra and which also become central to the identity of the Pure Land path but are not found in the normative versions of the Sukhāvatīvyūha sūtra: buddha-nature as a universal, the importance of the category of people known as “ordinary beings”, and the transformation of Ajātaśatru from evil person to bodhisattva. Central to this development is the crucial role of a later Pure Land sutra known as the Guanjing 觀經 (Contemplation Sutra), which I argue is influenced by the Nirvana Sutra itself. The hermeneutic contexts for this discussion are the early commentaries on the Guanjing; although the Shandao commentary became the locus classicus for how these tropes function the Pure Land discourse, here I try to show how the two earliest commentaries on the Guanjing by Huiyuan and Jizang, both of whom are not considered patriarchs of the tradition like Shandao, were the first commentaries to feature these Nirvana Sutra themes. Full article
14 pages, 388 KB  
Article
Sanskrit Antecedents for the Expression ‘Pure Land’ and Its Related Cosmology and Soteriology: A Preliminary Report on Studies in the Indian Origins of Pure Land Thought and Practice
by Stephen Jenkins
Religions 2026, 17(3), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17030319 - 4 Mar 2026
Viewed by 507
Abstract
This is a preliminary report on a study of Indic precedents for Pure Land traditions. It contests anglophone scholarship that find those traditions to be predominantly East Asian constructions in discontinuity with Indian Buddhism. The first part, related to previously unpublished research, disputes [...] Read more.
This is a preliminary report on a study of Indic precedents for Pure Land traditions. It contests anglophone scholarship that find those traditions to be predominantly East Asian constructions in discontinuity with Indian Buddhism. The first part, related to previously unpublished research, disputes a common leading point of such arguments that the expression pure land, jingtu, has no Sanskrit antecedents. The article will show that Sanskrit antecedents for jingtu are in fact abundant. The second part summarizes previously published work showing that the cosmology, soteriology, and buddhology of buddhakṣetras have explicit foundations among the heavens and devas. The third part forecasts research for Kenneth Tanaka’s “Other Power” project. ‘Other-power’ has been seen as discordant with Indian traditions, when even abhidharma sources state that, through ‘a single mind of faith in Buddha to the marrow of one’s bones, one can overcome infinite bad karma.’ The salvific power of the names of buddhas is a common concept in Indian Buddhism, declared even by Nāgārjuna. Not discounting Chinese and Japanese creative contributions and acculturation, Pure Land traditions are in strong natural continuity with Indian Buddhist thought. Full article
9 pages, 200 KB  
Article
Bound for the West: (Mis)Representations of Pure Land Buddhism in Christian Theology
by Kendall Marchman
Religions 2026, 17(2), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020233 - 13 Feb 2026
Viewed by 519
Abstract
This paper builds on Tomoko Masuzawa’s influential critique in The Invention of World Religions by analyzing how colonial and theological frameworks shaped Western representations of Pure Land Buddhism. While Masuzawa exposed the Eurocentric foundations of religious studies, this study examines a specific dimension [...] Read more.
This paper builds on Tomoko Masuzawa’s influential critique in The Invention of World Religions by analyzing how colonial and theological frameworks shaped Western representations of Pure Land Buddhism. While Masuzawa exposed the Eurocentric foundations of religious studies, this study examines a specific dimension of that legacy: Christian theological interpretations of Pure Land Buddhism. Sixteenth-century Jesuit missionaries in Japan described Pure Land Buddhism through Protestant analogies, framing it as a distorted counterpart to Christianity. This characterization persisted into the twentieth century, notably in Joseph Dahlmann’s writings, which cast Pure Land Buddhism as counterfeit Christianity and an illegitimate form of Buddhism. Later, theologians Karl Barth and Henri de Lubac reinforced this comparative lens, arguing that although Pure Land Buddhism shares certain features with Protestantism, it ultimately falls short of Christian theological standards. By interrogating these misrepresentations and their impact on academic discourse, this paper demonstrates how Western scholars and theologians constructed narratives that misrepresented Pure Land Buddhism and shaped its reception in Western intellectual history. Full article
23 pages, 549 KB  
Article
Samantabhadra Bodhisattva and Pure Land Practice in Heian Period Japanese Literature
by Mónika Kiss
Religions 2026, 17(2), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020219 - 11 Feb 2026
Viewed by 980
Abstract
Japanese Pure Land Buddhism has often been approached through the lens of Kamakura (1192–1333) doctrinal developments, emphasizing the emergence of an exclusive nenbutsu practice. In this article we reconsider pre-Kamakura Pure Land belief by examining setsuwa literature from the Heian period (794–1192) and [...] Read more.
Japanese Pure Land Buddhism has often been approached through the lens of Kamakura (1192–1333) doctrinal developments, emphasizing the emergence of an exclusive nenbutsu practice. In this article we reconsider pre-Kamakura Pure Land belief by examining setsuwa literature from the Heian period (794–1192) and focus predominantly on narratives with appearances of Samantabhadra Bodhisattva. With analysis of kōsōden, ōjōden, and Buddhist setsuwa collections such as the Hokke genki and the Konjaku monogatarishū, the study demonstrates that aspirations for rebirth in a Pure Land were embedded within a broader religious framework with prevalent practices such as Lotus Sutra devotion and repentance rituals. The figure of Samantabhadra emerges as the protector of Lotus practitioners, as a key ritual and narrative agent associated with the removal of karmic hindrances, primarily through repentance. The co-existence of Lotus Sutra devotion, repentance, and Pure Land practices such as the nenbutsu in these narratives reveals a plural and non-exclusive formation of pre-sectarian Pure Land belief. Full article
13 pages, 547 KB  
Article
Influences of the Pure Land Teachings from Wutaishan—Fazhao (Hōshō) on Hōnen and Shinran
by Mitsuya Dake
Religions 2026, 17(2), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020198 - 6 Feb 2026
Viewed by 564
Abstract
Lushan 廬山 and Wutaishan 五臺山 have long occupied important positions in East Asian Buddhism as sacred sites. The wuhui nianfo 五会念仏 and Pure Land philosophy initiated by Fazhao 法照 (746–838) on Wutaishan greatly influenced the development of both rituals and the philosophy of [...] Read more.
Lushan 廬山 and Wutaishan 五臺山 have long occupied important positions in East Asian Buddhism as sacred sites. The wuhui nianfo 五会念仏 and Pure Land philosophy initiated by Fazhao 法照 (746–838) on Wutaishan greatly influenced the development of both rituals and the philosophy of Pure Land Buddhism in Japan. In this paper, I examine how Fazhao’s idea of the wuhui nianfo and salvation in Pure Land Buddhism influenced the transformational movement of Japanese Pure Land Buddhism in the 13th century. Hōnen’s 法然 (1133–1212) disciples, Seikaku 聖覚 (1167–1235) and Shinran 親鸞 (1173–1263), among others, wrote works in response to criticisms of Hōnen from Tendai 天台 and Hossō 法相 monks, in which they cited Fazhao’s wuhui nianfo thought to develop arguments in defense of Hōnen’s teachings. I examine how Hōnen, Seikaku, and Shinran were influenced by Fazhao’s Pure Land thought during the Kamakura-era (1185–1333) when the transformational Pure Land movement developed in Japan. Fazhao’s Pure Land thought responded to criticisms against Pure Land Buddhism of his own time. Similarly, Hōnen, Seikaku, and Shinran carried out their role in their own way, guided by Chinese Pure Land masters such as Shandao 善導 (613–681) and Fazhao. Shinran carefully interprets Fazhao’s thought so that it is not misunderstood as insisting on self-indulgence and antinomianism. Shinran intended to make clear that Fazhao’s intention was to reveal the universal working of Amida’s Vow. Furthermore, Shinran developed the ideas of shinjin 信心 and other power 他力 reflecting on it. Fazhao’s passages inspired Shinran’s deep religious awakening about the meaning of Amida’s Vow, shinjin, and other power. Shinran also composed Japanese hymns in the form of Imayō 今様, which were sung with melodies akin to the wuhui nianfo. Full article
20 pages, 476 KB  
Article
Worldly Ethics and Transcendental Liberation: Yinguang’s “Eight-Verse Guiding Principles” in the Pure Land Path
by Jia Liu and Jing Wang
Religions 2026, 17(2), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020153 - 29 Jan 2026
Viewed by 720
Abstract
This article reinterprets Yinguang’s (1861–1940) “Eight-Verse Guiding Principles” as a program that integrates worldly ethics with supramundane liberation in modern Chinese Buddhism. On the ethical level, Yinguang established “fulfilling one’s duties and preserving sincerity” as the fundamental code, insisting that moral responsibility and [...] Read more.
This article reinterprets Yinguang’s (1861–1940) “Eight-Verse Guiding Principles” as a program that integrates worldly ethics with supramundane liberation in modern Chinese Buddhism. On the ethical level, Yinguang established “fulfilling one’s duties and preserving sincerity” as the fundamental code, insisting that moral responsibility and the guarding of right mindfulness revealed the innate luminosity of the mind. Building on this, the article looks at “eliminating selfish desires and manifesting illustrious virtue” (gewu zhizhi 格物致知) as a way to connect ontology to practice, highlighting the significance of “refraining from all evils and cultivating all virtues.” The practitioner made progress toward the ultimate objective of “purifying the mind” by following these steps. On the liberation level, the bodhi-mind functions as vow-power oriented toward Buddhahood for self and others. This dual aspiration functioned as the inner motivation for rebirth in the Pure Land and the attainment of Buddhahood. The triad of “faith, vows, and practice” furnishes an accessible soteriological pathway for ordinary beings who rely on Amitābha’s vow-power to achieve rebirth with karmic burdens. Methodologically, the study combines close reading of primary writings with modern theories of religious ethics and lived religion to show how name recitation (chiming nianfo 持名念佛) concentrates the mind and conduces to the samādhi of recitation, where “the whole mind is Buddha, and the whole Buddha is mind.” Framed within the broader dynamics of Republican-era moral reform and global Pure Land transmission, the article argues that Yinguang’s eight-verse guiding principles embodied the ideal of “reaching Buddhahood by way of the human path,” providing a historically grounded yet contemporary salient model for understanding Chinese religious culture today. Full article
20 pages, 470 KB  
Article
A Study on the Nianfo 念佛 Practice in the Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna
by Jiyun Kim
Religions 2026, 17(2), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020137 - 26 Jan 2026
Viewed by 452
Abstract
The Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna 大乘起信論 has generated over 300 commentaries, yet research on its practice section, particularly nianfo practice 念佛修行, remains remarkably limited. This study examines interpretive differences in the nianfo practice section across major commentaries: Wŏnhyo’s Kisillon so 起信論疏, Fazang’s [...] Read more.
The Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna 大乘起信論 has generated over 300 commentaries, yet research on its practice section, particularly nianfo practice 念佛修行, remains remarkably limited. This study examines interpretive differences in the nianfo practice section across major commentaries: Wŏnhyo’s Kisillon so 起信論疏, Fazang’s 法藏 Dasheng qixinlun yiji 大乘起信論義記, the Shi moheyan lun 釋摩訶衍論, Tankuang’s 曇曠 Dasheng qixin lun guangshi 大乘起信論廣釋, and Zixuan’s 子璿 Qixin lun shu bixueji 起信論疏筆削記. Two key discrepancies emerge: the scope of scriptural citations and interpretations of “those who achieve rebirth.” Analysis reveals that while Fazang was influenced by Wŏnhyo, he developed independent interpretations. Later commentaries demonstrate selective reception rather than uncritical acceptance of predecessors. Post-Bixueji commentaries divide into two groups: the Qixinlun jieyao 起信論捷要, Dasheng qixinlun shulue 大乘起信論疏略, Qixinlun zhijie 起信論直解, and Qixinlun shuji huiyue 起信論疏記會閱 form one group, while the Qixinlun zuanzhu 起信論纂註 and Qixinlun xushu 起信論續疏 constitute another. This investigation illuminates doctrinal relationships among commentaries and confirms that later commentators built upon earlier works while contributing original insights. Full article
36 pages, 708 KB  
Article
Paegam Sŏngch’ong’s Precious Writings on the Pure Land: A Korean Huayan Advocate’s Seventeenth-Century Treasury of Chinese Pure Land Devotional Narratives
by Richard D. McBride II
Religions 2026, 17(2), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020133 - 25 Jan 2026
Viewed by 860
Abstract
Although Paegam Sŏngch’ong 栢庵性聰 (1631–1700) received orthodox transmission in Sŏn Buddhism in the Puhyu lineage 浮休係 (deriving from Puhyu Sŏnsu 浮休善修, 1543–1615), he is remembered as an important advocate of Huayan 華嚴 doctrinal learning in the mid-Chosŏn period. He collected Buddhist works from [...] Read more.
Although Paegam Sŏngch’ong 栢庵性聰 (1631–1700) received orthodox transmission in Sŏn Buddhism in the Puhyu lineage 浮休係 (deriving from Puhyu Sŏnsu 浮休善修, 1543–1615), he is remembered as an important advocate of Huayan 華嚴 doctrinal learning in the mid-Chosŏn period. He collected Buddhist works from the Chinese Jia-xing Canon 嘉興藏 that had washed ashore on Imja Island 荏子島 in Chŏlla Province and published them in more than 190 volumes. In 1686, the first work produced in this endeavor was Precious Writings on the Pure Land (Chŏngt’o posŏ 淨土寶書), in one volume. It is a compilation, in fourteen sections (including the preface), of excerpts and summaries of Pure Land writings and stories published in the supplementary canon section 續藏 of the Jiaxing Canon. The core and longest section of the work is chapter thirteen: “Efficacy of the Fruit of the Pure Land” (Chŏngt’o kwahŏm 淨土果驗). This chapter comprises devotional narratives on cases of rebirth in the Pure Land classified according to the social or birth status of the main figures: monks, kings and ministers, nobles and commoners, nuns, women, evildoers, animals, and so forth. The primary purpose of these narratives is to underscore to virtue of chanting the name of the Buddha Amitābha (yŏmbul, Ch. nianfo 念佛) as a means of rebirth in Sukhāvatī. This work is significant because it demonstrates the value and function of Chinese Pure Land literature in the popularization of Pure Land practice in the mid and late Chosŏn period. Full article
25 pages, 609 KB  
Article
Vasubandhu 世親 (ca. 320–400 CE) as a Putative Pure Land Patriarch in Chinese and Japanese Buddhism
by George A. Keyworth
Religions 2026, 17(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010117 - 20 Jan 2026
Viewed by 815
Abstract
In terms of his reception in East Asia and the legacy of his commentaries and compendia in translation, Vasubandhu 世親 (ca. 320–400 centuries CE) is among the most important figures in the textual history of Indian Buddhism. Although perhaps best known by modern [...] Read more.
In terms of his reception in East Asia and the legacy of his commentaries and compendia in translation, Vasubandhu 世親 (ca. 320–400 centuries CE) is among the most important figures in the textual history of Indian Buddhism. Although perhaps best known by modern scholars through his works concerning abstruse intellectual ideas presented from the Yogācāra or mind-only and Abhidharma perspectives, his legacy is arguably best represented as an authoritative voice concerning the Pure Land of Amitāyus buddha. Both Nāgārjuna 龍樹 (ca. 150–250 CE) and Vasubandhu are considered to be patriarchs (soshi 祖師) for Jōdo Shin 浄土真宗 Buddhists, following Shinran’s 親鸞 (1173–1263) teachings. In this paper I investigate the textual history of these two Indian masters who are considered to be patriarchs by Pure Land and Shin Buddhists in Japan. No one believes these individuals transmitted some sort of true mind or essential teaching from one to another as in the Chan or Zen 禪宗 tradition; they are recognized because of fundamental texts with key ideas that are ascribed to them. These key texts were never singled out in any Chinese or Indian set of special texts, nor were they highlighted in various catalogs to the Buddhist “canon.” This research demonstrates how the sacred teachings ascribed to Vasubandhu, and to a certain extent Nāgārjuna as well, by Pure Land and Shin Buddhists reveal how and why Pure Land practices were expected to be seen as mainstream Mahāyāna Buddhism and nothing at all like a reformation for a later age. Full article
16 pages, 15182 KB  
Article
A Medium for Chanting the Buddha’s Name for Rebirth in the Pure Land: The Woodblock Print of Kwŏnsu-Chŏngŏp-Wangsaeng-Ch’ŏpkyŏngdo in Chosŏn Korea
by Jahyun Kim
Religions 2026, 17(1), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010099 - 15 Jan 2026
Viewed by 578
Abstract
This study examines the Kwŏnsu-chŏngŏp-wangsaeng-ch’ŏpkyŏngdo (勸修淨業往生捷徑圖), a woodblock print created for Pure Land practice during the Chosŏn period. The print served as material evidence demonstrating how Pure Land faith developed within Chosŏn Buddhism, which consolidated various schools under the Sŏn tradition while integrating [...] Read more.
This study examines the Kwŏnsu-chŏngŏp-wangsaeng-ch’ŏpkyŏngdo (勸修淨業往生捷徑圖), a woodblock print created for Pure Land practice during the Chosŏn period. The print served as material evidence demonstrating how Pure Land faith developed within Chosŏn Buddhism, which consolidated various schools under the Sŏn tradition while integrating doctrinal studies and Pure Land faith. Through iconographic analysis of the transformation tableau and examination of its publication colophon, this paper explores how yŏmbul-Sŏn practice evolved from the early Chosŏn period and how this print functioned as a practical medium for daily Buddha recitation practice. The study argues that the Kwŏnsu-chŏngŏp-wangsaeng-ch’ŏpkyŏngdo represents empirical evidence of the synthesis between Sŏn meditation and Pure Land faith, demonstrating the inclusive approach of Chosŏn Buddhist masters who accepted both Mind-Only Pure Land and Western Pure Land concepts for the purpose of widespread religious instruction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop