Anthropology and Religion: Rethinking Identity in a Fragmented Cultural Landscape

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2026 | Viewed by 4222

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education Sciences, Language, Culture and Arts, Historical-Legal and Humanistic Sciences and Modern Languages, University Rey Juan Carlos, 28942 Fuenlabrada, Spain
Interests: anthropology; philosophy of religion; ethics (special focus on creativity as autopoiesis and self-knowledge)

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Philosophy, Pontifical Catholic University of Santiago de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile
Interests: deepfake and law; deconstruction of legal foundations; posthumanism; neurorights

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In this Special Issue, we invite scholars to critically reconsider the human being through the lens of identity—arguably one of the most pressing concerns of our time. Contemporary thought, shaped by intersecting theoretical and cultural currents, increasingly questions the very possibility of self-identical entities. One significant factor in this transformation is the disappearance of God as the guarantor of foundational meaning.

The proclaimed closure of metaphysics by Derrida in the 1960s, and the ensuing operation of deconstruction, cleared the way for a biopolitics of horizontal power (Foucault) and the ascendancy of narrative over epistemic certainty. The subject and consciousness—once rooted in religious transcendence and the metaphysics of being—now fluctuate in a realm dominated by the fluidity and recurrence of signifiers.

This existential flux is further exacerbated by new technologies, including synthetic cloning, the metaverse, and digital replication, which introduce unprecedented means for dissolving personal identity. The resulting vision of reality is one of infinite malleability, permanent contestability, and deep vulnerability.

This Special Issue seeks contributions that engage critically with these phenomena and address such questions as follows:

  • Is the notion of identity essential for understanding the human being, and what would be the implications of its disappearance or rejection?
  • What does “identity” signify in today’s philosophical and technological landscape?
  • To what extent is culture integral to the concept of identity?
  • Should identity be redefined as a technological construct?
  • What role does religious experience play in recovering a unified sense of identity?

We welcome interdisciplinary perspectives from fields such as philosophy, political theory, theology, law, cultural studies, and anthropology.

Introduction

We are pleased to invite you to contribute to this Special Issue, which explores the shifting contours of human identity in contemporary contexts. This research area is crucial for understanding the implications of cultural fragmentation, technological development, and the reconfiguration of religious and philosophical thought in our time.

Aims and Scope

This Special Issue aims to examine the intersection of anthropology and religion in the construction—and deconstruction—of identity in the 21st century. Contributions should align with the Journal’s scope, which includes religious studies and interdisciplinary approaches to cultural and philosophical issues. The scope should remain focused, avoiding topics that are overly broad or narrowly defined.

Suggested Themes and Article Types

We welcome original research articles and reviews. Possible areas of focus include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. The relationship between anthropology and religion in shaping personal identity;
  2. Intersections between personal and cultural identity;
  3. Contemporary identity debates: multiculturalism, technology, and representation;
  4. Philosophical and theological reflections on identity: creation or inheritance, fact or construct.

Authors are encouraged to submit a proposed title and a 200–300-word abstract prior to the full manuscript submission. Abstracts should be sent to the Guest Editor or the Assistant Editor of Religions to be reviewed for thematic fit. Full manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer review.

Dr. Teresa Aizpun
Prof. Dr. Raúl Madrid
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • identity
  • anthropology
  • culture
  • philosophy
  • deconstruction
  • posthumanism
  • religion
  • selfhood
  • technology
  • subjectivity

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 290 KB  
Article
The Role of the Other in the Construction of Identity: Considerations Around Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas
by Teresa Aizpún
Religions 2026, 17(4), 486; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17040486 - 16 Apr 2026
Viewed by 445
Abstract
By comparing Buber and Levinas, this article aims to clarify the constitution of the self as a place of identity. Both authors recognise, at first, that the self is only defined in relation to others and, ultimately, in relation to the You. However, [...] Read more.
By comparing Buber and Levinas, this article aims to clarify the constitution of the self as a place of identity. Both authors recognise, at first, that the self is only defined in relation to others and, ultimately, in relation to the You. However, the definition of that relationship is opposite in both authors. Levinas’ interpretation echoes Luther and Kierkegaard, as it establishes an insurmountable difference between you and me. Buber, although he borrows many concepts from the Danish philosopher, fundamentally, the definition of the individual as a relationship, contradicts Kierkegaard by defining the relationship not as a simple ‘facing’, but as a third party between me and you. Finally, it is concluded that although the individual must be preserved in the I–You relationship, this cannot be understood as something in itself, as a third part, and, on the other hand, there must be a certain knowledge about the Thou for the relationship to be real. Full article
15 pages, 332 KB  
Article
Pondering Mohammed Abed Al-Jabri’s Project of an ‘Arab Reason’
by Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Religions 2026, 17(3), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17030381 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 644
Abstract
Mohammed Abed Al-Jabri (d. 2010) is one of the most important and stimulating contemporary Arabic philosophers. He is well-known for his project Critique of Arab Reason (Naqd al-ʿaql al-ʿArabī), in which he deconstructs the Arabic philosophical and cultural tradition, revitalizing the [...] Read more.
Mohammed Abed Al-Jabri (d. 2010) is one of the most important and stimulating contemporary Arabic philosophers. He is well-known for his project Critique of Arab Reason (Naqd al-ʿaql al-ʿArabī), in which he deconstructs the Arabic philosophical and cultural tradition, revitalizing the rationalist legacy of the classical period, mainly, the philosophical ideas of Ibn Rushd (Averroes). According to Al-Jabri, the renewal of Arab thought requires a non-traditionalist understanding of tradition. In this paper, I shall critically examine Al-Jabri’s “contextualist” methodology. I first provide some historical background for understanding Al-Jabri’s concern with fostering a critique of Arab reason. Secondly, I discuss the way Al-Jabri reinterprets Islamic intellectual history, emphasizing his attempt to overcome the idiosyncratic approaches to Arab culture, namely, religious Salafists, Orientalists, and left nationalists. Thirdly, I discuss the extent to which his renewal of classical intellectual tradition, mainly his approach to Ibn Rushd, allows for the socio-political and cultural reformation of an Arab identity through his idea of “understanding oneself through the other.” Finally, I highlight some successful aspects of Al-Jabri’s epistemic project and its potential relevance for the present. Full article
19 pages, 619 KB  
Article
Through the Face of the Dead: Constructing Totemic Identity in Early Neolithic Egypt and the Near East
by Antonio Muñoz Herrera
Religions 2025, 16(10), 1312; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16101312 - 15 Oct 2025
Viewed by 2055
Abstract
This study examines the construction of individual and collective identity in pre-Neolithic Egypt and the Levant through the post mortem manipulation of human remains. Focusing on funerary rituals and skull reuse, interpreted using recent anthropological theory frameworks, we propose a totemic framework of [...] Read more.
This study examines the construction of individual and collective identity in pre-Neolithic Egypt and the Levant through the post mortem manipulation of human remains. Focusing on funerary rituals and skull reuse, interpreted using recent anthropological theory frameworks, we propose a totemic framework of ontological identity, in which clans associated with specific animals structured their ritual and spatial practices. Based on archaeological, taphonomic, and ethnohistorical evidence, it is possible to identify how these practices reflect clan-based social units, seasonal mobility, and a reciprocal relationship with the environment, integrating corporeal and mental continuity. Plastered skulls in the Levant acted as intergenerational anchors of communal memory, while early Egyptian dismemberment practices predate the standardization of mummification and reveal the function of some structures of pre-Neolithic sanctuaries. By interpreting these mortuary rituals, we argue that selective body treatment served as a deliberate mechanism to reinforce totemic identity, transmit ancestry, and mediate ontological transitions in response to sedentarization and environmental change. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop