Soteriological and Ethical Dimensions of Forgetting in Asian Thought

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2025) | Viewed by 1464

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy and World Religions, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA
Interests: re-interpretation of Chinese Buddhist, especially Chan/Zen, thought and early Daoist thought in contemporary contexts; the comparative study and dialogue between western postmodern and Chinese thought

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue responds to recent scholarship in the study of human forgetting, which has only emerged within the past two decades in the wake of the widespread memory studies of the late 20th century. The development of this new study on forgetting not only inspects various forms of passive forgetting and its negative effects on human well-being, but also pays great heed to motivated uses or abuses of forgetting in social/institutional settings. Contrary to this negative use of forgetting, the positive use of forgetting, as Nietzsche noticed long ago, has not drawn enough attention from contemporary scholars (for example, positive forgetting is absent in Ricoeur’s 2004 book on forgetting and in many other’s). In addition, we have seen a few scholarly publications on the Asian practices of forgetting, such as on forgetting in Daoism and early Chinese philosophy, but these current publications have not covered how forgetting plays a unique role in a wide spectrum of Asian religious and philosophical traditions. This issue will focus on the positive and productive aspects of human acts of forgetting, a territory that distinguishes itself from the traditional view of forgetting as something only negative. It will collect scholarly essays that explore how forgetting is practiced voluntarily or cultivated as a virtue, how forgetting is addressed in its therapeutic and ethical dimensions in historical texts by Hindus, Indo-Tibetan, South or East Asian Buddhists, Daoists, Confucians and others, what their similarities and differences are in comparison with each other or with the West, how forgetting serves individual, social or institutional goals, how the positive use of forgetting is different from negative uses of forgetting, how acts of forgetting and memory are interplayed and what their relationships are. We are pleased to invite your contribution to this collection, as we have noticed that you are an expert in one of these traditions or have published in the areas of soteriological, ethical, historical, textual, neuroscientific, psychological or cultural studies of issues in relation to forgetting and memory. The collected essays will base their examination on solid analyses of textual materials and their social/cultural contexts, applying diverse contemporary insights or methods to probe the positive use of forgetting and the underlying connections between forgetting and other human capacities. These include letting go of negative emotions or attachments to failures and pre-conceived plans in order to efficaciously perform one’s tasks required by duty and love, avoiding damages to mental/physical health, and realizing various forms of self-healing, meditative concentration, open-mindedness, unselfishness, empathy, and responsiveness to others. This Special Issue will bring Asian perspectives into contemporary discourse on forgetting and its functions in various ethical and religious practices.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200-300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editor, or to the Assistant Editor of Religions. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the special issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Youru Wang
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Asian religions
  • Asian philosophies
  • forgetting
  • forgetfulness
  • memory
  • therapy
  • ethics
  • soteriology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 480 KiB  
Article
Pojo Chinul’s Contributions to the Philosophy of Forgetting in East Asian Sŏn Buddhism: The Ten Paths to No-Mind
by Sung Ha Yun
Religions 2025, 16(7), 825; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070825 - 24 Jun 2025
Viewed by 430
Abstract
This paper explores the role of forgetting in the thought of the Korean Sŏn (Chan in Chin.; Zen in Jpn. 禪) master Chinul (知訥, 1158–1210), situating it within broader East Asian philosophical and Buddhist discourses. While the concept of forgetting has often been [...] Read more.
This paper explores the role of forgetting in the thought of the Korean Sŏn (Chan in Chin.; Zen in Jpn. 禪) master Chinul (知訥, 1158–1210), situating it within broader East Asian philosophical and Buddhist discourses. While the concept of forgetting has often been treated negatively in Western philosophy—as a cognitive failure or loss—this study draws on recent comparative scholarship, including Youru Wang’s reading of Zhuangzi, to show how forgetting can be reframed as a conscious spiritual and philosophical practice. In particular, this paper examines how Chinul integrates the practice of forgetting into a systematic Buddhist framework grounded in no-self (anātman), emptiness (śūnyatā), and the unity of samādhi and prajñā. In Straight Talk on the True Mind (Chinsim chiksŏl 眞心直說), Chinul outlines ten distinct methods for cultivating no-mind by offering interpretations of teachings from various East Asian Chan masters. Through a detailed analysis of Chinul’s Chinsim chiksŏl, this paper argues that forgetting—when understood as the deliberate letting go of discursive thought, deluded conceptualizations, and habitual dualisms—becomes a powerful method for revealing the true mind. Ultimately, Chinul’s philosophy of forgetting offers a unique account of cognitive transformation—one that challenges conventional epistemologies and calls for a reorientation of perception itself. Therefore, Chinul’s teachings on no-mind and forgetting offer a profound understanding of how deconstructing ingrained cognitive habits can lead to the emergence of enlightened awareness, providing valuable insights into the transformative processes at the heart of East Asian Sŏn Buddhist practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soteriological and Ethical Dimensions of Forgetting in Asian Thought)
21 pages, 363 KiB  
Article
The WangBuwang Sequence and Positive Forgetting in Early Confucian Texts
by Gad C. Isay
Religions 2025, 16(7), 815; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070815 - 22 Jun 2025
Viewed by 282
Abstract
This study investigates the roles of wang (忘, forgetting) and buwang (不忘, non-forgetting) in early Confucian texts, emphasizing their interdependence within a yinyang framework. Rather than signifying total erasure, for the purposes of the mnemic process, wang functions as a selective [...] Read more.
This study investigates the roles of wang (忘, forgetting) and buwang (不忘, non-forgetting) in early Confucian texts, emphasizing their interdependence within a yinyang framework. Rather than signifying total erasure, for the purposes of the mnemic process, wang functions as a selective and creative mode, aiding cognitive refinement by withdrawing content considered secondary or extraneous. Primarily through close textual analysis of the Analects (Lunyu 論語), Mengzi (孟子), and Xunzi (荀子), this study shows how wang and buwang operate relationally, avoiding polar extremes in favor of a dynamic equilibrium. Conceptually, I argue that these terms are more accurately aligned with suspended and attentive modes of awareness, respectively. Tracing their pattern across these sources reveals the affirmative role of wang in optimizing memory, distancing the Confucian tradition from the notion of oblivion and offering a foundational perspective for future explorations of early Chinese memory-related discussions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soteriological and Ethical Dimensions of Forgetting in Asian Thought)
Back to TopTop