Critical Phenomenologies of Illness and Normality

A special issue of Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 December 2025) | Viewed by 2314

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy, Columbian College of Arts & Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
Interests: phenomenology; existentialism; feminist theory; critical race theory; philosophy of literature; philosophy of disability

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Ethnology, History of Religion and Gender Studies (ERG), Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Interests: feminist philosophy; especially phenomenology and philosophy of subjectivity; body/embodiment theory; sexual difference theory; intersectionality; “new materialism”; film philosophy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The growing interdisciplinary field of critical phenomenology takes as a point of departure the social and political implications of embodied perceptual experience. It pays special attention to marginalized subjects whose gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, class, age, and/or disabilities have not been done justice to in (allegedly) universal phenomenological descriptions of human existence. Critical phenomenology is increasingly playing a transformative role across multiple areas of study such as disability studies, medical humanities, queer theory, critical race studies, cultural anthropology, environmental studies, and performance studies. In addition to challenging traditional dualisms such as mind/body, subject/object, self/other, and body/world, critical phenomenologists address other powerful dualisms that have failed to capture the full range of human experience, including that between normality and illness, which is the subject of this Special Issue. Highlighting how such dualisms emerge from and reflect quasi-transcendental structures of power and privilege, rather than being inherent features of human existence, critical phenomenology validates various ways of being in the world that have historically been neglected, pathologized, and devalued.

This Special Issue, “Critical Phenomenologies of Illness and Normality”, focuses on the oppressive as well as liberatory ways that normality and illness are experienced, expressed, and inscribed in both theory and practice. Possible topics include the following:

  • The role of illness narratives in reinforcing or combating traditional views of normality;
  • Intersubjective dimensions of illness and normality;
  • Norms of gender, race, class, sexuality, and ability in relation to different types of illness;
  • The challenges illness poses to autonomy and conventional perceptual norms;
  • The social harms associated with stigmatized vs. nonstigmatized illnesses;
  • The embodiment of normality and normal(ized) embodiment;
  • The “normal abnormality” of chronic illness experiences;
  • The deficiencies of a logic of cure;
  • Distinctive temporalities and spatialities of illness experience.

Possible questions to consider are the following:

  • How has the concept of health traditionally excluded the possibility that illness is normal?
  • How are different vulnerabilities manifested in experiences of illness and normality?
  • In what ways are both normality and illness intersubjectively and/or intercorporeally
  • constituted?
  • How does the experience of illness positively and negatively affect our relations with
  • others?
  • In what ways does the recognition that illness is normal force us to reconceive both
  • normality and illness?
  • How do first-person illness narratives broaden the field of describable experience and transform phenomenological conceptions of embodiment and subjectivity?
  • What unique resources can an ethics of care (or other relational ethics) bring to phenomenological descriptions of illness and normality?

Prof. Dr. Gail Weiss
Dr. Lisa Käll
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Philosophies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • critical phenomenology
  • embodiment
  • illness
  • normality
  • disability
  • pathologization
  • vulnerability

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 248 KB  
Article
Beyond the Future: Protentional Friction and Suspended Sense in the Lived Time of Illness
by Donald A. Landes and Kathleen Hulley
Philosophies 2026, 11(2), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11020062 - 16 Apr 2026
Viewed by 417
Abstract
From hours spent in waiting rooms amidst uncertainty to the experience of recovering from medical treatments, the lived time of illness is marked by intervals of suspended sense. By disorienting our relation to the future, illness disrupts and reconfigures lived time from within, [...] Read more.
From hours spent in waiting rooms amidst uncertainty to the experience of recovering from medical treatments, the lived time of illness is marked by intervals of suspended sense. By disorienting our relation to the future, illness disrupts and reconfigures lived time from within, shaping how we navigate our intersubjective milieu and make sense of our unfolding lives. In this paper, we introduce the phenomenological concept of “protentional friction” as a way of understanding these experiences. Drawing upon Simone de Beauvoir’s work on subjectivity and becoming, alongside Henri Bergson’s and Eugène Minkowski’s emphasis on durée and élan, we demonstrate how protentional friction allows us to negotiate the tensions of our situation, orient ourselves toward the future through projects, and gear into the ongoing work of sense-making. As a counterbalance to normalizing cultural discourses surrounding illness, we reinterpret the idea of the “quotidian” as the everyday practice of sense-making to find and sustain an equilibrium. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Phenomenologies of Illness and Normality)
13 pages, 222 KB  
Article
Body-Subject or Neo-Liberal Subject? Phenomenology, Depression, and CBT
by Patrick Seniuk
Philosophies 2026, 11(2), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11020053 - 1 Apr 2026
Viewed by 531
Abstract
Depression is notable for high rates of disability. The medical model typically characterizes depression as a physiological dysfunction or psychological disorder. However, both views fail to appreciate the phenomenology of depressed experience. Drawing on the existential phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty, this article contends that [...] Read more.
Depression is notable for high rates of disability. The medical model typically characterizes depression as a physiological dysfunction or psychological disorder. However, both views fail to appreciate the phenomenology of depressed experience. Drawing on the existential phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty, this article contends that the lived experience of chronic depression is marked by a disturbance between the body-subject and the world. More specifically, the experience of depression is characterized by alienation from the world, self and others. While anti-depressants have long been the first line of treatment of depression, many governments subsidize cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as an adjunct treatment. CBT is said to be the gold standard psychotherapeutic treatment given that it is evidence-based, cost-effective, and short in duration. However, not only are these justifications questionable, but the theoretical underpinnings of CBT have ideological significance. Rather than approaching depressed persons as body-subjects, CBT casts service users as neo-liberal subjects, insofar as depression is characterized as disordered thinking that is independent of a person’s situated life. The emphasis on quickly returning people to work to reduce strain on welfare systems, while a valid economic concern, is not a valid therapeutic concern. The limited choice of subsidized psychotherapeutic options fails to recognize that depression is a heterogenous phenomenon, meaning that the CBT model of disordered thinking is not necessarily representative of the way in which depression manifests. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Phenomenologies of Illness and Normality)
Back to TopTop