Platinum-Group Elements, Chromium and Nickel in Ultrabasic-Basic Complexes: New Results

Serpentinites and associated chromitites of the Neoproterozoic Bou Azzer ophiolite (Central Anti-Atlas, Morocco) provide key constraints on mantle depletion, melt–rock interaction, and the tectono-metamorphic evolution of a supra-subduction zone (SSZ) system. This study integrates field observations, petrography, Raman spectroscopy, and whole-rock/mineral chemistry to decipher the history of this highly dismembered ultramafic suite. The mantle sequence is dominated by antigorite-bearing serpentinites derived primarily from refractory harzburgitic and dunitic protoliths. Whole-rock geochemistry and highly depleted chromite compositions (Cr# = 0.50–0.68; Mg# = 0.43–0.77; TiO₂ ≤ 0.18 wt.%) demonstrate that these peridotites represent refractory residues formed after high degrees of partial melting (~15–25%). The data delineate a clear evolutionary trend from abyssal to fore-arc and back-arc environments, where infiltrating boninitic melts drove localized podiform chromitite formation through intense melt–rock interaction. Crucially, thermodynamic and mineral–chemical constraints challenge previous models of simple greenschist-facies obduction. Equilibration temperatures exceeding 600 °C and chromite stability within the lower amphibolite to near-granulite facies indicate that the oceanic lithosphere underwent deep subduction prior to its exhumation. This high-temperature, high-pressure metamorphism was followed by multistage retrogressive serpentinization and intense CO₂-rich metasomatism (talc-magnesite alteration) during Pan-African transpressional tectonics. Ultimately, the Bou Azzer ophiolite represents a mature SSZ mantle wedge, recording a complete geodynamic cycle from deep subduction-zone metamorphism to final tectonic emplacement along the northern margin of the West African Craton. Full article

Geochemical whole-rock variations in the Kovdozero complex in the Lapland–Belomorian Belt (LBB) are compared with those observed in the Pados-Tundra layered complex in the Serpentinite Belt (SB) in the complementary structure in the Fennoscandian Shield. A great variety of coronitic associations exists in the entire LBB–SB system. The Kovdozero complex largely consists of more evolved products of crystallization. Our results of U–Pb dating (zircon and baddeleyite) give the dates of 2514 ± 5 and 2478 ± 6 Ma, leading to the revised age ~2.5 Ga for the Kovdozero complex. It is thus considered to be coeval with Pados-Tundra, Perchatka, and gabbro–anorthosite associations of the Belomorian province in the White Sea region. The variation trends are generally extensive, continuous and close to linear at Kovdozero, which point to crystallization of chonolithic bodies of the complex from a single portion of melt, in separate reservoirs that likely communicated to develop as a whole in the connected system. The extreme degree of differentiation of derivatives of the initial komatiitic magma occurred in the large-scale plume. It led to the development of shallowly emplaced complexes grading from dunitic rocks and associated chromitites with Ru–Os–Ir mineralization at Pados-Tundra (the center) to leucocratic gabbroic rocks at Kovdozero, and likely to gabbro–anorthosite rocks of the Belomorian province (the periphery); these are considered the final products in the megastructure. The εNd(T) values are slightly negative at Kovdozero: −0.43 and −0.60. They imply some degree of crustal contamination of the initial magma. The generalized date of 2.5 Ga likely represents the age of the coronitic complexes of ultrabasic–basic rocks that crystallized from portions of komatiite-derived melts in hypabyssal settings of the LBB–SB megastructure in the eastern Fennoscandian Shield. Full article

The six platinum group elements (PGE) are among the rarest elements in the upper continental crust of the earth. Higher values of PGE have been detected in the upper mantle and in chondrite meteorites. The PGE are siderophile and chalcophile elements and are divided into the following: (1) the Ir subgroup (IPGE) = Os, Ir, and Ru and (2) the Pd subgroup (PPGE) = Rh, Pt, and Pd. The IPGE are more refractory and less chalcophile than the PPGE. High concentrations of PGE led, in rare cases, to the formation of mineral deposits. The PGE are carried in discrete phases, the platinum group minerals (PGM), and are included as trace elements into the structure of base metal sulphides (BM), such as pentlandite, chalcopyrite, pyrite, and pyrrhotite. Similarly to PGE, the PGM are also divided into two main groups, i.e., IPGM composed of Os, Ir, and Ru and PPGM containing Rh, Pt, and Pd. The PGM occur both in mafic and ultramafic rocks and are mainly hosted in stratiform reefs, sulphide-rich lenses, and placer deposits. Presently, there are only 169 valid PGM that represent about 2.7% of all 6176 minerals discovered so far. However, 496 PGM are listed among the valid species that have not yet been officially accepted, while a further 641 are considered as invalid or discredited species. The main reason for the incomplete characterization of PGM resides in their mode of occurrence, i.e., as grains in composite aggregates of a few microns in size, which makes it difficult to determine their crystallography. Among the PGM officially accepted by the IMA, only 13 (8%) were discovered before 1958, the year when the IMA was established. The highest number of PGM was discovered between 1970 and 1979, and 99 PGM have been accepted from 1980 until now. Of the 169 PGM accepted by the IMA, 44% are named in honour of a person, typically a scientist or geologist, and 31% are named after their discovery localities. The nomenclature of 25% of the PGM is based on their chemical composition and/or their physical properties. PGM have been discovered in 25 countries throughout the world, with 64 from Russia, 17 from Canada and South Africa (each), 15 from China, 12 from the USA, 8 from Brazil, 6 from Japan, 5 from Congo, 3 from Finland and Germany (each), 2 from the Dominican Republic, Greenland, Malaysia, and Papua New Guinea each, and only 1 from Argentine, Australia, Bulgaria, Colombia, Czech Republic, England, Ethiopia, Guyana, Mexico, Serbia, and Tanzania each. Most PGM phases contain Pd (82 phases, 48% of all accepted PGM), followed, in decreasing order of abundances, by those of Pt 35 phases (21%), Rh 23 phases (14%), Ir 18 phases (11%), Ru 7 phases (4%), and Os 4 phases (2%). The six PGE forming the PGM are bonded to other elements such as Fe, Ni, Cu, S, As, Te, Bi, Sb, Se, Sn, Hg, Ag, Zn, Si, Pb, Ge, In, Mo, and O. Thirty-two percent of the 169 valid PGM crystallize in the cubic system, 17% are orthorhombic, 16% hexagonal, 14% tetragonal, 11% trigonal, 3% monoclinic, and only 1% triclinic. Some PGM are members of a solid-solution series, which may be complete or contain a miscibility gap, providing information concerning the chemical and physical environment in which the mineral was formed. The refractory IPGM precipitate principally in primitive, high-temperature, mantle-hosted rocks such as podiform and layered chromitites. Being more chalcophile, PPGE are preferentially collected and concentrated in an immiscible sulphide liquid, and, under appropriate conditions, the PPGM can precipitate in a thermal range of about 900–300 °C in the presence of fluids and a progressive increase of oxygen fugacity (fO₂). Thus, a great number of Pt and Pd minerals have been described in Ni-Cu sulphide deposits. Two main genetic models have been proposed for the formation of PGM nuggets: (1) Detrital PGM represent magmatic grains that were mechanically liberated from their primary source by weathering and erosion with or without minor alteration processes, and (2) PGM reprecipitated in the supergene environment through a complex process that comprises solubility, the leaching of PGE from the primary PGM, and variation in Eh-pH and microbial activity. These two models do not exclude each other, and alluvial deposits may contain contributions from both processes. Full article