Ceramic Membranes for Removal of Emerging Pollutants

A special issue of Membranes (ISSN 2077-0375). This special issue belongs to the section "Membrane Applications for Water Treatment".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 April 2025) | Viewed by 4365

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
Interests: water and wastewater treatment; ceramic membranes; water reuse
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Extensive research has focused on ceramic membranes for water and wastewater treatment in different fundamental and scientific approaches to industrial implementation. Compared with their polymeric counterparts, these membranes have exhibited numerous advantages, with impressive developments in their modifications as well as in novel materials. 

This Special Issue on “Ceramic Membranes for Removal of Emerging Pollutants” of the journal Membranes aims to collect original, high-quality articles that explore the potential of ceramic membranes for a wide range of applications related to drinking or wastewater technologies as well as industrial wastewater. Topics include, but are not limited to, new materials and modifications, water and wastewater treatment, ceramic membrane manufacturing, membrane fouling and cleaning, the removal of emerging contaminants, and industrial application. Authors are invited to submit their latest results; both original papers and reviews are welcome.

Dr. Chanhyuk Park
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Membranes is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ceramic membrane
  • water treatment
  • emerging contaminants
  • inorganic membrane
  • environmental

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 4356 KiB  
Article
Surfactant-Enhanced Cleaning Solutions for Ceramic Membranes: A Comparative Study on Humic Acid and BSA Fouling
by Navneet Kallapalli and Onita D. Basu
Membranes 2025, 15(3), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15030073 - 2 Mar 2025
Viewed by 889
Abstract
Control of natural organic matter (NOM) reversible and irreversible fouling with ceramic membranes for drinking water applications with chemically enhanced backwash (CEB) protocols is limited. This research examines the efficiency of various chemical combinations with non-ionic surfactants to control the NOM fouling caused [...] Read more.
Control of natural organic matter (NOM) reversible and irreversible fouling with ceramic membranes for drinking water applications with chemically enhanced backwash (CEB) protocols is limited. This research examines the efficiency of various chemical combinations with non-ionic surfactants to control the NOM fouling caused by humic acid (HA) and protein foulants. Two commercially available non-ionic surfactants, Tween 80 and Triton X100, combined with conventional cleaning solutions, were analyzed with respect to membrane fouling and cleaning using the resistance in series (RIS) model, membrane permeability, carbon mass balance, and contact angle measurements. The results demonstrated that in all cases, CEB outperformed hydraulic backwashing; in addition, the inclusion of surfactants demonstrated enhanced the fouling control with protein foulants more than humic acid. The transmembrane pressure (TMP) with surfactant CEB was controlled to within a range of 83–105 kPa compared to hydraulic backwash at approx. 128 kPa for HA and BSA. The carbon mass balance analysis indicates that Tween 80 surfactant-based CEB demonstrated effective fouling control, leaving only 20% irreversible fouling with HA and 30% with BSA while the hydraulic backwash resulted in 57% irreversible fouling of carbon on the membrane for HA and BSA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ceramic Membranes for Removal of Emerging Pollutants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2566 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Ceramic Membrane Filtration for Alternatives to Microplastics in Cosmetic Formulations Using FlowCam Analysis
by Seung Yeon Kim, Soyoun Kim and Chanhyuk Park
Membranes 2025, 15(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes15010035 - 19 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1174
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the cosmetics industry has significantly increased the adoption of alternative microplastics in response to increasingly stringent global environmental regulations. This study presents a comparative analysis of the treatment performance of silica powder and cornstarch—common alternatives for microplastics in cosmetics—using [...] Read more.
The rapid expansion of the cosmetics industry has significantly increased the adoption of alternative microplastics in response to increasingly stringent global environmental regulations. This study presents a comparative analysis of the treatment performance of silica powder and cornstarch—common alternatives for microplastics in cosmetics—using ceramic membrane filtration combined with flow imaging microscopy (FlowCam) to analyze particle behavior. Bench-scale crossflow filtration experiments were performed with commercially available alumina ceramic membranes. By analyzing high-resolution images from FlowCam, the transport and retention behaviors of the two microplastic alternatives were examined by comparing their morphological properties. Despite their similar particle sizes, the cornstarch demonstrated a higher removal efficiency (82%) than the silica (72%) in the ceramic membrane filtration due to its greater tendency to aggregate. This increased tendency for aggregation suggests that cornstarch may contribute to faster fouling, while the stability and uniformity of silica particles result in less fouling. The FlowCam analysis revealed that the cornstarch particles experienced a slight increase in circularity and compactness over time, likely due to physical swelling and aggregation, while the silica particles retained their shape and structural integrity. These findings highlight the impact of the morphological properties of alternative microplastics on their filtration behavior and fouling potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ceramic Membranes for Removal of Emerging Pollutants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 6040 KiB  
Article
A Novel Modeling Optimization Approach for a Seven-Channel Titania Ceramic Membrane in an Oily Wastewater Filtration System Based on Experimentation, Full Factorial Design, and Machine Learning
by Mohamed Echakouri, Amr Henni and Amgad Salama
Membranes 2024, 14(9), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14090199 - 20 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1662
Abstract
This comprehensive study looks at how operational conditions affect the performance of a novel seven-channel titania ceramic ultrafiltration membrane for the treatment of produced water. A full factorial design experiment (23) was conducted to study the effect of the cross-flow operating [...] Read more.
This comprehensive study looks at how operational conditions affect the performance of a novel seven-channel titania ceramic ultrafiltration membrane for the treatment of produced water. A full factorial design experiment (23) was conducted to study the effect of the cross-flow operating factors on the membrane permeate flux decline and the overall permeate volume. Eleven experimental runs were performed for three important process operating variables: transmembrane pressure (TMP), crossflow velocity (CFV), and filtration time (FT). Steady final membrane fluxes and permeate volumes were recorded for each experimental run. Under the optimized conditions (1.5 bar, 1 m/s, and 2 h), the membrane performance index demonstrated an oil rejection rate of 99%, a flux of 297 L/m2·h (LMH), a 38% overall initial flux decline, and a total permeate volume of 8.14 L. The regression models used for the steady-state membrane permeate flux decline and overall permeate volume led to the highest goodness of fit to the experimental data with a correlation coefficient of 0.999. A Multiple Linear Regression method and an Artificial Neural Network approach were also employed to model the experimental membrane permeate flux decline and analyze the impact of the operating conditions on membrane performance. The predictions of the Gaussian regression and the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation method were validated with a determination coefficient of 99% and a Mean Square Error of 0.07. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ceramic Membranes for Removal of Emerging Pollutants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop