Big Data Mining and Knowledge Graph with Application

A special issue of Mathematics (ISSN 2227-7390). This special issue belongs to the section "E1: Mathematics and Computer Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 May 2026 | Viewed by 1263

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Computer Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Interests: big data mining; knowledge graph; block chain

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
School of Computer Science and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Interests: computer vision; scene understanding; representation learning

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Modern AI systems often exhibit critical limitations in semantic grounding, explainable reasoning, and robustness when deployed in complex, dynamic environments. These challenges largely stem from the difficulty of extracting, representing, and leveraging structured knowledge from massive, heterogeneous data sources. To address this gap, knowledge graph-based semantic modeling, combined with large-scale data mining and generative frameworks (e.g., GraphRAG), has emerged as a promising direction for building more interpretable, controllable, and scalable intelligent systems.

This Special Issue aims to promote research that bridges methodological innovations in knowledge modeling with domain-grounded applications, demonstrating both technical novelty and practical impact. Submissions are expected to clearly articulate methodological advances validated in real-world scenarios, ensuring scientific rigor, reproducibility, and relevance.

Scope and Tracks:

We particularly welcome submissions that align with one or both of the following interconnected tracks:

  1. Track 1: Methodological Foundations
  • Knowledge graph construction, alignment, and dynamic evolution;
  • Representation learning and distributional semantic modeling (e.g., normalizing flows, diffusion-based reversible generation);
  • Integration of structured knowledge with generative AI frameworks, including GraphRAG;
  • Knowledge-guided mining and reasoning with enhanced interpretability and controllability.
  1. Track 2: Domain-Grounded Applications
  • Scene-oriented knowledge graphs and reasoning in intelligent transportation, urban safety, and low-altitude airspace (e.g., UAV coordination);
  • Knowledge-based systems in education, healthcare, and scientific knowledge discovery;
  • Deployment and evaluation of scalable, knowledge-enhanced AI systems in real-world settings;

Submissions that effectively bridge these two tracks—showcasing methodological innovation validated in concrete domains—are especially encouraged.

Prof. Dr. Xia Xie
Guest Editor

Dr. Wenwen Zhang
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Mathematics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • knowledge graph
  • big data mining
  • semantic modeling
  • reasoning
  • GraphRAG
  • scene graph-based scene understanding

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

28 pages, 20825 KB  
Article
Towards Robust Chain-of-Thought Prompting with Self-Consistency for Remote Sensing VQA: An Empirical Study Across Large Multimodal Models
by Fatema Tuj Johora Faria, Laith H. Baniata, Ahyoung Choi and Sangwoo Kang
Mathematics 2025, 13(18), 3046; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13183046 - 22 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1093
Abstract
Remote sensing visual question answering (RSVQA) involves interpreting complex geospatial information captured by satellite imagery to answer natural language questions, making it a vital tool for observing and analyzing Earth’s surface without direct contact. Although numerous studies have addressed RSVQA, most have focused [...] Read more.
Remote sensing visual question answering (RSVQA) involves interpreting complex geospatial information captured by satellite imagery to answer natural language questions, making it a vital tool for observing and analyzing Earth’s surface without direct contact. Although numerous studies have addressed RSVQA, most have focused primarily on answer accuracy, often overlooking the underlying reasoning capabilities required to interpret spatial and contextual cues in satellite imagery. To address this gap, this study presents a comprehensive evaluation of four large multimodal models (LMMs) as follows: GPT-4o, Grok 3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Claude 3.7 Sonnet. We used a curated subset of the EarthVQA dataset consisting of 100 rural images with 29 question–answer pairs each and 100 urban images with 42 pairs each. We developed the following three task-specific frameworks: (1) Zero-GeoVision, which employs zero-shot prompting with problem-specific prompts that elicit direct answers from the pretrained knowledge base without fine-tuning; (2) CoT-GeoReason, which enhances the knowledge base with chain-of-thought prompting, guiding it through explicit steps of feature detection, spatial analysis, and answer synthesis; and (3) Self-GeoSense, which extends this approach by stochastically decoding five independent reasoning chains for each remote sensing question. Rather than merging these chains, it counts the final answers, selects the majority choice, and returns a single complete reasoning chain whose conclusion aligns with that majority. Additionally, we designed the Geo-Judge framework to employ a two-stage evaluation process. In Stage 1, a GPT-4o-mini-based LMM judge assesses reasoning coherence and answer correctness using the input image, task type, reasoning steps, generated model answer, and ground truth. In Stage 2, blinded human experts independently review the LMM’s reasoning and answer, providing unbiased validation through careful reassessment. Focusing on Self-GeoSense with Grok 3, this framework achieves superior performance with 94.69% accuracy in Basic Judging, 93.18% in Basic Counting, 89.42% in Reasoning-Based Judging, 83.29% in Reasoning-Based Counting, 77.64% in Object Situation Analysis, and 65.29% in Comprehensive Analysis, alongside RMSE values of 0.9102 in Basic Counting and 1.0551 in Reasoning-Based Counting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data Mining and Knowledge Graph with Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop