Critical Perspectives on Legislative and Policy Approaches to Counter-Extremism and Counter-Terror

A special issue of Laws (ISSN 2075-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 6597

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The School of Criminology, University of Leicester, LE1 7QA Leicester, United Kingdom
Interests: policy approaches to counter-extremism and counter-terrorism; the far-right in Britain and Europe; right-wing terrorism; Islamophobia; hate crime
Politics and International Studies, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, United Kingdom
Interests: extreme right populism; political identities and discourses; extreme right groupuscules; counter-extremism; extreme right terrorism
The School of Criminology, University of Leicester, LE1 7QA Leicester, United Kingdom
Interests: the availability and impact of equality and diversity, and hate crime training, for police officers and staff in England.

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the past two decades, the proliferation of counter-terrorism and counter-extremism legislation and policies has been as relentless as it has unprecedented, leaving few parts of the globe untouched and unaffected. For some, this proliferation has been a necessary response to the threat posed by modern-day terrorism, evidenced by a paradigmatic shift that has transformed not only terrorism per se but so too those who perpetrate it, the way they organise and mobilise and the tactics and approaches they seek to employ. For others, this has resulted in certain communities and identities being unduly targeted and securitised, the infringement of individual and societal human rights and the use of military force by some governments. Add in the broadening of legislative definitions of terrorism and relatively newly conceived notions and definitions of extremism—both violent and non—and the picture becomes ever more complex and contested.

The Special Issue investigates counter-terrorism and counter-extremism through the lens of legislative and policy approaches. Nested within the established scholarly canon relating to counter-terrorism while simultaneously developing the rather more embryonic counter-extremism equivalent, the Special Issue affords a timely opportunity to critically reflect and engage on the legislation and policies as indeed the social, political or cultural impacts and consequences of either, as well as, importantly, the intersection and overlap between counter-terrorism and counter-extremism.

We therefore invite submissions from scholars, as indeed practitioners that have the potential to contribute new critical perspectives to this salient discussion. While necessarily broad in its remit, some indicative topics of interest to this Special Issue might include: points of convergence and divergence between counter-terrorism and counter-extremism legislation and policies; definitions of extremism, both legal and scholarly; counter-terrorism and counter-extremism in the various settings of the Global South; newly emergent extremist ideologies and/or the groups/movements associated with them; state–community tensions in relation to counter-terrorism and counter-extremism legislation and policies; and the exclusion of certain “extreme” ideologies from counter-terrorism and counter-extremism approaches. These are far from exhaustive, however, and submissions may engage with any aspect of the theme of the Special Issue, be they empirically, theoretically and/or conceptually informed and argued. Submissions are welcome from both established and early career scholars from any discipline and geographical location.

Dr. Chris Allen
Dr. Alex Oaten
Dr. Ilda Cuko
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Laws is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • counter-terrorism
  • counter-extremism
  • extremism
  • terrorism
  • Islamism
  • extreme right wing

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

35 pages, 987 KiB  
Article
The Legal Principles of Bethlehem & Operation Timber Sycamore: The “Islamist Winter” Pre-Emptively Targets “Arab Life” by Hiring “Arab Barbarians”
by Khaled Al-Kassimi
Laws 2021, 10(3), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030069 - 24 Aug 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5932
Abstract
The following legal-historical research is critical of “Islamist” narratives and their desacralized reverberations claiming that Arab-Muslim receptivity to terror is axiomatic to “cultural experiences” figuring subjects conforming to Arab-Islamic philosophical theology. The critique is founded on deconstructing—while adopting a Third World Approach [...] Read more.
The following legal-historical research is critical of “Islamist” narratives and their desacralized reverberations claiming that Arab-Muslim receptivity to terror is axiomatic to “cultural experiences” figuring subjects conforming to Arab-Islamic philosophical theology. The critique is founded on deconstructing—while adopting a Third World Approach to International Law (TWAIL)—the (im)moral consequences resulting from such rhetoric interpreting the Arab uprising of 2011 from the early days as certainly metamorphosing into an “Islamist Winter”. This secular-humanist hypostasis reminded critics that International Law and International Relations continues to assert that Latin-European philosophical theology furnishes the exclusive temporal coordinates required to attain “modernity” as telos of history and “civil society” as ethos of governance. In addition, the research highlights that such culturalist assertation—separating between law and morality—tolerates secular logic decriminalizing acts patently violating International Law since essentializing Arab-Muslims as temporally positioned “outside law” provides liberal-secular modernity ontological security. Put differently, “culture talk” affirms that since a secular-humanist imaginary of historical evolution stipulates that it is “inevitable” and “natural” that any “non-secular” Arab protests will unavoidably lead to lawlessness, it therefore becomes imperative to suspiciously approach the “Islamist” narrative of 2011 thus deconstructing the formulation of juridical doctrines (i.e., Bethlehem Legal Principles) decriminalizing acts arising from a principle of pre-emption “moralizing” demographic and geographic alterations (i.e., Operation Timber Sycamore) across Arabia. The research concludes that jus gentium continues to be characterized by a temporal inclusive exclusion with its redemptive ramifications—authorized by sovereign power—catalyzing “epistemic violence” resulting in en-masse exodus and slayed bodies across Arabia. Full article
Back to TopTop