Free and Voluntary Agreement to Sexual Activity in the Contemporary Age: When Should Fraud Invalidate Consent?

A special issue of Laws (ISSN 2075-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 September 2025) | Viewed by 376

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Arts, Business, Law and Economics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
Interests: prosecution role and discretion; position and experiences of witnesses and victims in the criminal justice system; modern law reform; indigenous jury participation; technology and the criminal law; prerogative of mercy and exercise of death penalty in 19th century; gender and crime in 19th century

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Interests: law; criminal justice; technology; indigenous peoples; pluralism

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The concept of consent as a free and voluntary agreement to sexual activity is integral to both modern sexual assault law and contemporary values of autonomy and informed choice. The integral element of the crime of rape is the victim’s lack of consent. The law has traditionally taken a narrow approach to where fraud will invalidate consent, typically limiting it to fraud as to the nature of the act or fraud as to the identity of the alleged perpetrator.

In most Western jurisdictions, deceit regarding age, marital status, employment, social status, religion and ethnicity are deemed fraud to ‘attributes’ and is insufficient to negate consent. Such conduct, if effective in procuring consent to sexual activity, may be immoral, but such consent is not rendered invalid. That said, the law has proved contentious, and the circumstances in which deceit or fraud may or should invalidate consent has become increasingly outdated and problematic with rapid changes in technology and social beliefs, including the advent of ‘catfishing’. The acceptance of diverse gender and sexual identities has further complicated the legal circumstances in which consent may or should be invalidated, as have considerations regarding requirements to disclose sexually transmitted infections and deceptions concerning contraception.

The concept of what constitutes sexual activity may also need to be reconsidered in light of advances in technology, including video calls, AI and VR platforms.

This Special Issue calls for contributions to consider these involved questions from both a legal and/or criminological perspective. Is there a single underlying principle that should apply? In what circumstances should deceit render consent to sexual activity invalid? What should amount to free and voluntary agreement in this context?

Dr. David Plater
Dr. Kris Wilson
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Laws is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • criminal law
  • fraud
  • sexual offences
  • contemporary issues
  • technology
  • gender

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 362 KB  
Article
“Nobody Really Got Hurt”—The Legitimization of the Grey Area of Sexual Violence and the Reflection of Gender Roles
by Aixa Louro de Almeida, Sofia Knittel, Bárbara Pereira, Emma de Thouars da Silva and Andreia de Castro Rodrigues
Laws 2025, 14(5), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14050073 - 6 Oct 2025
Abstract
There is little research exploring the grey area of sexual violence (SV), considered in the literature as being a more subtle manifestation of SV, and therefore tending to be trivialized, legitimized, and normalized by society. This study aimed to compare students’ perceptions of [...] Read more.
There is little research exploring the grey area of sexual violence (SV), considered in the literature as being a more subtle manifestation of SV, and therefore tending to be trivialized, legitimized, and normalized by society. This study aimed to compare students’ perceptions of the grey area of SV based on the gender of those involved, in a cis-hetero context, as well as potential sex differences in these perceptions. A vignette methodology was employed to gain valuable insights into the topic. The sample consisted of 164 university students living in Portugal, 71.3% (n = 117) female, with an average age of 23 (SD = 5.84). The thematic analysis revealed a central theme, Severity, reflecting participants’ perceptions of the seriousness of sexual violence within the “grey area”. This theme is expressed through four sub-themes: Attribution of severity, referring to how seriousness is assigned depending on context and beliefs; Identifying sexual violence, highlighting difficulties in recognizing certain behaviors as abusive; Frequency, capturing perceptions of how often such situations occur; and Report, addressing the barriers and facilitators to formal reporting. Our results indicated that while some participants minimized the scenario, the majority of the sample considered the situation as somewhat or very serious. Only few participants trivialized subtle forms of SV, perceiving incidents without overt physical force as less severe. Notably, sex differences emerged, despite being in the minority of the sample, female participants were more inclined to recognize these behaviors as abusive and to view the allegations as credible, whereas male participants tended to downplay the severity. Full article
Back to TopTop