Exploring Consumer Resistance to Digital Marketing Tactics and Technology

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Marketing, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, UK
Interests: digital B2B marketing; digital marketing; consumer behaviour
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Accounting and Finance, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK
Interests: sustainability; technology; management accounting; research methodology; public sector accounting; corporate finance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Organisations are progressively transitioning their consumer influence paradigms from traditional marketing tactics towards highly sophisticated, digitally driven, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based tactics. This shift is demonstrated by substantial financial allocation, e.g., £28.7 billion (in the UK) for digital marketing expenditure in 2024 (Inspire, 2024). Globally, decision-makers plan to increase their budget by 27% for digital experience, i.e., the technology category (Forrester, 2025).  The rapid evolution of data analytics and AI technologies necessitates a fundamental re-engineering of customer engagement models, making AI adoption a critical priority that must preserve consumer trust, as affirmed by 68% of consumers (Salesforce, 2025).

Additionally, to mitigate scepticism and enhance brand image, organisations strategically incorporate ethics and social good through CSR and specialised green marketing mixes (Suparjo & Dana, 2024; Aldaihani, Islam, Saatchi & Haque, 2024), while intensifying investment in content marketing and influencer strategies (CreatorIQ, 2025), including human and AI endorsers (Pan, Blut, Ghiassaleh & Lee, 2025; Feng, Chen & Xie, 2024), and leveraging engaging prosumer-generated content (Malodia, Filieri, Otterbring & Dhir, 2024). More recently, companies are prioritising a digital orientation and value creation to enhance consumer experiences and strengthen their overall brand competitiveness (Manjunath, Padigar & Pedada, 2024). However, for these strategies to maintain influence, compliance is essential. Organisations are strategically adapting their business models to comply with global consumer data protection laws, such as the GDPR, to manage risks and retain consumer trust (Farhad, 2024).

Against these efforts, consumer responses to contemporary marketing are complex, involving both engagement and scepticism across various channels. Traditional advertising frequently encounters consumer resistance, where individuals actively employ strategies to counter persuasive attempts (Fransen, Verlegh, Kirmani & Smit, 2015). Consumers react positively to green strategies, such as green products and promotions, which boost green purchase intention (Aldaihani, Islam, Saatchi & Haque, 2024). However, they severely punish greenwashing practices, leading to a damaged brand image due to perceived deception or unethical actions (Bladt, van Capelleveen, and Yazan, 2023). Similarly, adverse reactions to dynamic pricing lead to price confusion and perceptions of price unfairness, thereby significantly increasing the intention to spread negative word of mouth (WOM) (Bambauer-Sachse & Young, 2024). Consumers are also reacting to AI marketing. Responses to AI tactics are twofold: while AI-driven personalisation can generate trust and perceived usefulness, positively impacting consumer engagement (Teepapal, 2025; Bhuiyan, 2024), it may also engender adverse effects like privacy concerns, perceived risks, and consumer alienation (Barari, Ferm, Quach, Thaichon & Ngo, 2023). Furthermore, attempting to humanise AI with conversational fillers like "hmm" can backfire by triggering suspicion of unknown motives and decreasing purchase intentions (Liu, Liu & Zhu, 2025). Also, both human and AI influencers are effective, with human influencer characteristics (such as communication) strongly influencing purchase behavior and follower characteristics (such as social identity) driving engagement [Pan, Blut, Ghiassaleh & Lee, 2025]. Yet, AI influencers face difficulties as consumer robophobia and a perceived lack of authenticity may limit trust and acceptance in commercial contexts (Feng, Chen & Xie, 2024).

Consumer resistance to marketing tactics and technologies could undermine brand reputation, hinder sales, and lead to significant negative consequences, such as damaged brand equity, reduced financial returns, and the proliferation of adverse information. It could also generate a feeling of deception and broken promises (Bladt, van Capelleveen & Yazan, 2023).  Resistance to advertising causes the entire marketing investment to fail, as consumers actively employ strategies to counter the persuasive message (Fransen, Verlegh, Kirmani & Smit, 2015). In digital domains, the "dark side of AI" results in negative effects on customers' cognitive, affective, and behavioural responses (Barari, Ferm, Quach, Thaichon & Ngo, 2023), specifically, leading to a decline in trust and satisfaction, and feelings of customer alienation and uniqueness neglect (Barari, Ferm, Quach, Thaichon & Ngo, 2023). Furthermore, misperceived AI tactics trigger consumer suspicion of ulterior motives, which directly translates into a decrease in purchase intentions (Liu, Liu & Zhu, 2025).

Against this context, it is essential to further the understanding of consumer resistance to marketing tactics and technologies. Specifically, how consumers respond to marketing tactics and interact with new technologies, particularly AI, and how firms can ethically and effectively manage complex social and commercial dynamics. Future research should prioritise a deeper understanding of consumer resistance in the evolving marketing,  technological, and ethical landscape, moving beyond identifying consequences to developing robust mitigation strategies. Also, to overcome consumer resistance and mitigate negative word-of-mouth, marketers must understand current strategies that reduce consumer confusion and perceived unfairness from marketing tactics (Bambauer-Sachse & Young, 2024), so they can design more effective strategies.

Studies are encouraged to empirically test the effectiveness of general counter-resistance mechanisms (Fransen, Verlegh, Kirmani & Smit, 2015) in the current multi-channel digital environment. It is also important to address ethical resistance; future studies are needed on the efficacy of recovery strategies to mitigate the severe, long-term damage to brand attitude caused by greenwashing (Bladt, van Capelleveen & Yazan, 2023). Moreover, revisiting theory is essential to investigate human-technology interaction, for instance, how consumers recognise and cope with AI persuasion tactics such as conversational fillers that trigger suspicion of ulterior motives (Liu, Liu & Zhu, 2025). Concurrently, research must focus on the development of effective strategies for the "dark side of AI", investigating design choices for AI-enhanced personalisation that actively address privacy concerns, perceived risks, and customer alienation to enhance trust and control (Barari, Ferm, Quach, Thaichon & Ngo, 2023; Teepapal, 2025). In relation to social media, an area for exploration is how to overcome the limited trust and acceptance of AI influencers in commercial settings by testing mechanisms like authenticity cues and disclosure (Feng, Chen & Xie, 2024).

This Special Issue aims to advance theoretical, conceptual, and empirical knowledge on the antecedents, processes, and consequences of consumer resistance to marketing tactics and technologies by addressing these identified gaps. We welcome quantitative, qualitative, conceptual, and mixed-methods research that makes a strong theoretical contribution and provides practical insight. All manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review. We particularly encourage submissions that align with the following (but not limited to):

- The attitudinal negative responses to marketing tactics and technologies. For instance, consumers' responses to organisational unethical behaviour (e.g., violations of consumer privacy, corruption, consumer isolation, organisational sustainability practices) diffuse via technologies, e.g., social media platforms.

- The negative consequences of digital technologies, including  AI use in marketing, e.g., AI personalisation, and organisation marketing strategies to counter them.

- Developing and testing mitigation strategies for consumer resistance to marketing tactics and technologies used by the organisation.

- Designing effective brand recovery strategies for ethical failures and managing specific forms of resistance.

- The complexities of social media resistance in a system using both human and AI agents.

- Investigating the antecedents of trust and acceptance in the emerging landscape of AI influencers.

- The consequences of sustained consumer resistance to marketing tactics and technologies.

- Marketing Strategies to overcome the dark side of digital technologies (e.g., AI-powered technologies). For instance, the role of digital technologies in transparency and accountability is a trust-building antecedent.

- The consequences of unethical behaviour and the development of effective recovery strategies.

- Strategies to address confusion and perceived unfairness caused by marketing tactics such as pricing, aiming to reduce the intention to spread negative word-of-mouth.

- Conceptual and empirical work on how consumer resistance impacts a firm’s strategic choices.

Dr. Kaouther Kooli
Dr. Padmi Nagirikandalage
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • consumer resistance
  • consumer scepticism
  • consumer confusion
  • marketing strategies and tactics
  • technology
  • sustainability practices
  • corporate social responsibility

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 473 KB  
Article
Internet Advertising Falsity and Consumer Harm: A Moderated Mediation Analysis of Consumer Cognitive Processes and Consumer Vulnerability
by Dongze Zhao, Xuxu Jin, Wenjing Ren, Ke Dong and Chang-Hyun Jin
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2026, 21(5), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21050133 - 25 Apr 2026
Viewed by 700
Abstract
Internet advertising, while enabling unprecedented commercial reach, has become a pervasive vehicle for deceptive practices that inflict measurable harm on consumers. This study empirically investigates the structural relationships between internet advertising falsity and consumer harm by integrating analyses of the mediating role of [...] Read more.
Internet advertising, while enabling unprecedented commercial reach, has become a pervasive vehicle for deceptive practices that inflict measurable harm on consumers. This study empirically investigates the structural relationships between internet advertising falsity and consumer harm by integrating analyses of the mediating role of consumer cognitive processes and the moderating role of consumer vulnerability within a unified structural framework. Survey data were collected from 600 adult consumers with online purchase experience in the Republic of Korea—an advanced digital economy characterized by exceptionally high mobile-commerce penetration, mature e-commerce infrastructure, and evolving digital consumer protection regulation—and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with AMOS 24.0, supplemented by Hayes’ PROCESS macro Model 59 for conditional process analysis. All 13 hypotheses were supported, although path magnitudes varied substantially across falsity dimensions and mediator pathways—with direct effects ranging from β = 0.156 (false scarcity) to β = 0.224 (performance exaggeration), and indirect effects dominated by the risk assessment distortion pathway. Among the four sub-dimensions of advertising falsity—factual misrepresentation, performance exaggeration, price deception, and false scarcity—performance exaggeration exerted the strongest direct effect on consumer harm. The three cognitive mediators—perceived advertising credibility, risk assessment distortion, and purchase decision pressure—all demonstrated significant partial mediation, with risk assessment distortion emerging as the most powerful indirect pathway. All four consumer vulnerability dimensions—digital literacy level, demographic vulnerability, prior victimization experience, and impulsive buying tendency—significantly moderated the falsity–harm relationship, with low-digital-literacy consumers experiencing approximately 1.7 times the adverse effect of high-literacy counterparts. Moderated mediation analysis revealed that the conditional indirect effect for the high-vulnerability group was approximately 2.3 times that of the low-vulnerability group, confirming that the cognitive harm mechanism intensifies systematically for vulnerable consumers. These findings advance consumer vulnerability theory in the digital context and offer evidence-based implications for consumer protection policy, platform governance, and digital literacy education. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 777 KB  
Article
From Traffic to Quality: A Study on the Dual-Path Driving Effects of Streamer Traits on Consumer Trust and Identification
by Ru Wang, Shugang Li and Liqin Zhang
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2026, 21(3), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21030091 - 17 Mar 2026
Viewed by 679
Abstract
This study is based on the practical context of the livestream e-commerce industry’s shift from “traffic competition” to “quality competition”. Addressing the limitations of existing research that predominantly focuses on streamers’ external traits while overlooking intrinsic qualities and frequently employs linear models that [...] Read more.
This study is based on the practical context of the livestream e-commerce industry’s shift from “traffic competition” to “quality competition”. Addressing the limitations of existing research that predominantly focuses on streamers’ external traits while overlooking intrinsic qualities and frequently employs linear models that oversimplify the decision-making processes of consumer purchasing behavior (CPB), a theoretical framework grounded in the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) is developed to explain how streamer traits drive consumer trust and identification through dual pathways. This study adopted a mixed-method approach combining structural equation modeling (SEM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs). By analyzing 408 valid questionnaires, it systematically investigated the driving mechanisms through which streamer traits affected consumers’ trust and identification. The study found that streamers’ integrity significantly enhanced perceived trust and perceived identification via the central route. While awareness could strengthen identification, it had no significant effect on trust building, revealing the inherent tension between “traffic” and “quality”. ANN analysis further demonstrated that the nonlinear combination of traits more effectively predicts consumer responses than traits. This study provided empirical support for the “quality transformation” of livestream e-commerce from both theoretical and methodological perspectives, offering important implications for platforms to develop a quality assessment system centered on trust and identification and to optimize the streamer cultivation mechanism. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop