Techniques and Applications in Quantifying Fluid Flow in Medical Imaging

A special issue of Journal of Imaging (ISSN 2313-433X). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 2152

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, WI, USA
Interests: 4D-CT; 4D-flow MRI; deep learning; spectral methods; data-driven methods

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA
Interests: biomedical modeling, deep learning, boiling heat transfer; breast cancer; 4D-Flow MRI; fuel cells

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

It is well known that hemodynamics interactions play an important role in initiation and progression of cardiovascular diseases. Traditionally, patient-specific hemodynamic analysis has been conducted using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, the fidelity of this approach is severely limited by modeling assumptions and the uncertainty in inputs such as boundary conditions, vascular geometry, and model parameters. Recently, there have been significant advancements in methods including 4D-flow MRI, ultrasound vector flow imaging, diffuse optical spectroscopy, and 4D-CT to non-invasively image in vivo flows in the human vascular system. While imaging techniques are not limited by the aforementioned modeling issues, they suffer from issues such as imaging artifacts, low SNR, and low spatiotemporal resolution. A number of recent publications have explored techniques such as Kalman filtering, deep learning, and variational data assimilation to address the limitations of flow imaging by incorporating flow physics. In vivo flow image enhancement is a promising research area that will lead to diagnostic clinical tools for patient-specific diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases.

This Special Issue will focus on state-of-the art methods for spatiotemporal image enhancement of medical flow images and consider methods for analysis of imaging data, including computation of relevant hemodynamic metrics. Topics include but are not limited to:

  1. Novel hemodynamic imaging modalities;
  2. Algorithms for spatiotemporal image enhancement;
  3. Error and uncertainty quantification of flow velocities and flow-velocity-derived metrics;
  4. Verification and validation of flow image enhancement;
  5. Image-based hemodynamic analysis metrics;
  6. Generating synthetic imaging data through simulation of flow and imaging modalities.

Dr. Roshan M. D’Souza
Dr. Isaac Bernabe Perez Raya
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Imaging is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • 4D-flow MRI
  • 4D-CT
  • doppler ultrasound
  • hemodynamics
  • deep learning
  • physics-informed neural nets

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 1084 KiB  
Article
Segmentation of 4D Flow MRI: Comparison between 3D Deep Learning and Velocity-Based Level Sets
by Armando Barrera-Naranjo, Diana M. Marin-Castrillon, Thomas Decourselle, Siyu Lin, Sarah Leclerc, Marie-Catherine Morgant, Chloé Bernard, Shirley De Oliveira, Arnaud Boucher, Benoit Presles, Olivier Bouchot, Jean-Joseph Christophe and Alain Lalande
J. Imaging 2023, 9(6), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9060123 - 19 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1762
Abstract
A thoracic aortic aneurysm is an abnormal dilatation of the aorta that can progress and lead to rupture. The decision to conduct surgery is made by considering the maximum diameter, but it is now well known that this metric alone is not completely [...] Read more.
A thoracic aortic aneurysm is an abnormal dilatation of the aorta that can progress and lead to rupture. The decision to conduct surgery is made by considering the maximum diameter, but it is now well known that this metric alone is not completely reliable. The advent of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging has allowed for the calculation of new biomarkers for the study of aortic diseases, such as wall shear stress. However, the calculation of these biomarkers requires the precise segmentation of the aorta during all phases of the cardiac cycle. The objective of this work was to compare two different methods for automatically segmenting the thoracic aorta in the systolic phase using 4D flow MRI. The first method is based on a level set framework and uses the velocity field in addition to 3D phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. The second method is a U-Net-like approach that is only applied to magnitude images from 4D flow MRI. The used dataset was composed of 36 exams from different patients, with ground truth data for the systolic phase of the cardiac cycle. The comparison was performed based on selected metrics, such as the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorf distance (HD), for the whole aorta and also three aortic regions. Wall shear stress was also assessed and the maximum wall shear stress values were used for comparison. The U-Net-based approach provided statistically better results for the 3D segmentation of the aorta, with a DSC of 0.92 ± 0.02 vs. 0.86 ± 0.5 and an HD of 21.49 ± 24.8 mm vs. 35.79 ± 31.33 mm for the whole aorta. The absolute difference between the wall shear stress and ground truth slightly favored the level set method, but not significantly (0.754 ± 1.07 Pa vs. 0.737 ± 0.79 Pa). The results showed that the deep learning-based method should be considered for the segmentation of all time steps in order to evaluate biomarkers based on 4D flow MRI. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop