Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.7
2.7
Journals
Healthcare
Special Issues
Human–Animal Interaction: Animal Behaviour and Whole-Person Health in Animal-Assisted Interventions
share announcement

Human–Animal Interaction: Animal Behaviour and Whole-Person Health in Animal-Assisted Interventions

A special issue of Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2026 | Viewed by 792

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Meredith L. Stensland

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
Interests: animal-assisted interventions; aging; chronic pain in older adults; treatment adherence
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Animal-assisted interventions are increasingly being utilized as a non-pharmacological approach to help meet the physical, psychological, and social needs of individuals. Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs), an umbrella term encompassing both animal-assisted therapy and animal-assisted activities, are defined by the International Association of Human–Animal Interaction Organizations as “goal oriented and structured interventions that intentionally include or incorporate animals in health, education and human services (e.g., social work) for the purpose of therapeutic gains in humans”. In recent years, the health benefits of AAIs have received increased attention, and the aim of this Special Issue is to highlight their role in promoting whole-person health across various domains of well-being. This Issue welcomes research with various populations spanning the life course, including children through older adults.

The primary focus is the impact of AAIs on the following areas of human well-being: (1) physical health (e.g., cardiovascular, exercise, sleep, mobility, pain), (2) psychological health (e.g., depression, anxiety, stress, suicide, happiness), and (3) social well-being (e.g., loneliness, social isolation, quality of life). Additionally, articles will be accepted that pertain to mechanistic biomarkers underpinning human–animal interactions (in both humans and animals); methodological considerations for AAI implementation; data on the risks/drawbacks of AAIs with special populations, such as older adults; and qualitative studies detailing individuals’ experiences with AAIs.

Article types: This Special Issue seeks original research articles, though review papers and commentaries will also be accepted.

If your research focuses more on the animal outcomes rather than human outcomes, please consider submitting to our Joint Special Issue in Animals.

Dr. Meredith L. Stensland
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Healthcare is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • animal-assisted intervention
  • whole-person health
  • human–animal bond
  • animal behaviour

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 279 KB  
Article
A Pilot Observational Study in Ohio, USA of the Healing of Our Veterans Equine Services Intensive Intervention for Veterans with Trauma Histories
by Amanda Held, Katy Hubbard, Elena Nazarenko and William Marchand
Healthcare 2025, 13(23), 3111; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13233111 - 28 Nov 2025
Viewed by 149
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Equine-assisted services are being increasingly utilized as complementary interventions for military veterans who have experienced trauma. However, rigorous research is lacking, and randomized controlled trials are needed. The H.O.O.V.E.S. Intensive intervention was developed for this population. This intensive program is an [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Equine-assisted services are being increasingly utilized as complementary interventions for military veterans who have experienced trauma. However, rigorous research is lacking, and randomized controlled trials are needed. The H.O.O.V.E.S. Intensive intervention was developed for this population. This intensive program is an equine-assisted learning approach developed for veteran and active-duty military trauma survivors. The program integrates equine-assisted learning, peer mentorship and experiential learning in a residential retreat format. The primary aim of this pilot study was to determine if more rigorous studies of this intervention are warranted. Secondary aims were to assess preliminary outcomes and explore possible relationships between changes in outcome measures. Methods: This was a pilot prospective study. Inclusion criteria for the program included veteran or active-duty military status and a history of trauma exposure. Data were collected from April–October of 2024 in Ohio, USA. Six psychological instruments were administered to participants before, immediately after and 90 days and 120 days after the intervention. These were the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQII), the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Analyses were conducted to assess for significant changes across the study timeframe and for relationships among the changes in psychological instrument scores. Results: Study participants were 32 veterans with trauma histories ranging in age from 30 to 67 years old. There were statistically significant pre- to post-intervention improvements for all instruments except the PTGI, suggesting short-term increased psychological flexibility (AAQII) and positive affect (PANAS-positive) as well as decreased anxiety (STAI), negative affect (PANAS-negative), depression (BDI) and PTSD symptoms (PCL-5). Changes in BDI and PCL-5 scores persisted at 120 days post-intervention whereas changes in the AAQII, PANAS and STAI did not persist. Increased psychological flexibility was correlated with reductions in negative affect, PTSD symptoms and anxiety, as well as with increases in positive affect. Conclusions: Preliminary results reported herein suggest participation is associated with psychological benefits. Further, decreased experiential avoidance/increased psychological flexibility should be explored as an underlying mechanism potentially contributing to the benefits of participation in EAS. A randomized controlled trial of the H.O.O.V.E.S. Intensive program is warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human–Animal Interaction: Animal Behaviour and Whole-Person Health in Animal-Assisted Interventions)
13 pages, 1973 KB  
Article
“The Sheep Did It Again”: Replication of Animal-Assisted Treatment in Psychiatric Inpatients with Substance Use Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder in a Randomized Controlled Trial
by Petra Schmid, Carmen Nauss, Claudia Jauch-Ederer, Petra Prinz, Anna Lena Kordeuter, Stefan Tschöke and Carmen Uhlmann
Healthcare 2025, 13(21), 2808; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212808 - 5 Nov 2025
Viewed by 401
Abstract
Background: In an initial pilot study, we investigated an animal-assisted treatment (AAT) procedure with sheep as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU+AAT) in psychiatric inpatients with substance use disorder (SUD). Over time, this TAU+AAT intervention significantly reduced negative emotions and improved positive [...] Read more.
Background: In an initial pilot study, we investigated an animal-assisted treatment (AAT) procedure with sheep as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU+AAT) in psychiatric inpatients with substance use disorder (SUD). Over time, this TAU+AAT intervention significantly reduced negative emotions and improved positive emotions, mindfulness, and self-efficacy expectancy compared to TAU. In the current study, we aimed to replicate these results and extend the investigation to another group of inpatients with difficulties in emotion regulation, namely borderline personality disorder (BPD). Methods: A single-session AAT procedure with sheep in a group setting as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU+AAT) was examined in an RCT compared to TAU. A total of 29 psychiatric inpatients with SUD and 31 with BPD were examined (PRE vs. POST) using questionnaires on variables that included positive and negative emotions, mindfulness, and self-efficacy expectations. Results: In the SUD sample, significant effects between PRE and POST, with large effect sizes in all four outcomes, emerged for the TAU+AAT group, in contrast to TAU. In the BPD sample, similar time (PRE vs. POST) and group (TAU+AAT vs. TAU) effects were achieved for all outcomes. Conclusions: Repeatedly, this TAU+AAT intervention, which involved a single session with sheep, improved in all outcomes. Sheep seem to be suitable for AAT with a focus on mindfulness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human–Animal Interaction: Animal Behaviour and Whole-Person Health in Animal-Assisted Interventions)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop