Forensic DNA Profiling: PCR Techniques and Innovations

A special issue of Genes (ISSN 2073-4425). This special issue belongs to the section "Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 5 December 2026 | Viewed by 2639

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
2. Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
3. Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal, Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: genetics; forensic genetics; forensic medicine

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
Interests: genetics; forensic genetics; forensic medicine
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Forensic DNA profiling has become an essential tool in modern criminal and even civil justice, offering scientific methods for identifying individuals with high accuracy using their genetic material. Central to this process is the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), a molecular biology technique that amplifies tiny quantities of DNA recovered from crime scenes or other forensic contexts, making it possible to analyze. A PCR works by repeatedly copying specific DNA regions, exponentially increasing the amount of target DNA to detectable levels. Over the years, PCR-based methods have been refined with the introduction of a multiplex PCR, allowing for the simultaneous amplification of multiple loci in a single reaction. This technique is associated with capillary electrophoresis, which separates DNA fragments according to their size using a thin capillary filled with a gel-like polymer and offers a high resolution and speed. These methods improve the efficiency and discriminatory power of DNA analysis. In forensic applications, the traditional PCR genetic target regions have included the autossomal Short Tandem Repeat (STR), the Y-STR, mitochondrial DNA, autossomal Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), and Y-SNPs, which have formed the backbone of forensic investigations for the last four decades. Methods employing these target regions are widely used in solving crimes, identifying missing persons, and verifying familial relationships.

In recent years, however, the field has witnessed transformative innovations. Advances such as Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), rapid DNA technology, forensic genetic genealogy, and DNA phenotyping have significantly expanded the capabilities of forensic laboratories. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), also called massively parallel sequencing (MPS), allows for the sequencing of numerous DNA regions at once, providing more detailed genetic information than traditional PCR–capillary electrophoresis methods. NGS enables the simultaneous analysis of not only the STR but also Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and mitochondrial DNA, expanding laboratories’ capability to handle more complex samples. Rapid DNA technology represents another breakthrough, offering automated and portable systems capable of generating DNA profiles in under two hours. This innovation supports quick decision-making in field investigations, border control, and disaster victim identification. Forensic genetic genealogy has also emerged as a powerful tool, combining DNA analysis with large genealogical databases to identify unknown individuals by tracing their familial relationships. Finally, DNA phenotyping techniques provide the ability to infer individuals’ ancestry and physical characteristics through genetic material analysis.

PCR-based forensic DNA profiling, bolstered by modern innovations, continues to be a cornerstone of forensic science, improving both the speed and precision of criminal and civil investigations worldwide. However, despite their advantages, all of these innovations also introduce complex ethical and legal challenges, particularly in terms of privacy, data security, and consent, which must be carefully managed to maintain public trust and uphold justice.

Dr. António Amorim
Dr. Laura Mendes Cainé
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genes is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • forensic DNA profiling
  • PCR-based forensics
  • DNA analysis
  • next-generation sequencing
  • short tandem repeat (STR)
  • Y-STR
  • single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
  • Y-SNP

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 7382 KB  
Article
Usefulness of DNA Obtained from FFPE Tissue Sections Stained with Masson’s Trichrome in Forensic Identification: A Pilot Study
by María-de-Lourdes Chávez-Briones, Adriana Ancer-Arellano, Ivett Miranda-Maldonado, Juan M. Solís-Soto, Jaime García-Juárez, Marta Ortega-Martínez and Gilberto Jaramillo-Rangel
Genes 2025, 16(12), 1416; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16121416 - 28 Nov 2025
Viewed by 683
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are sometimes the only DNA source for forensic applications. The quantity and integrity of the DNA extracted from these samples depend on multiple factors. In this work, we analyzed, for the first time, whether Masson’s trichrome (MT) staining [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are sometimes the only DNA source for forensic applications. The quantity and integrity of the DNA extracted from these samples depend on multiple factors. In this work, we analyzed, for the first time, whether Masson’s trichrome (MT) staining alters the results of genetic profiles obtained from DNA extracted from FFPE tissue sections. Methods: Three pairs of sections from the year 2024 and three pairs from the year 2001 were analyzed. Each pair consisted of serial sections, one stained with hematoxylin and eosin and the other with MT. DNA was extracted using the PrepFiler Express BTA™ Forensic DNA Extraction Kit and quantified by real-time PCR using the Quantifiler™ HP DNA Quantification Kit. DNA samples were processed for short tandem repeat (STR) profiling using the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit. The amplified alleles were separated and analyzed using an ABI PRISM® 3500 genetic analyzer. Results: All MT-stained samples showed deficiency in most or all of the parameters assessed: DNA yield, degradation index, number of alleles detected, random match probability value, and intensity of the electropherogram peaks. In fact, DNA could not even be quantified in the samples processed in 2001. Conclusions: These results could be due to the large number of acids used in MT staining, which cause chemical modification and hydrolysis of DNA, affecting the success of PCR-based methods used subsequently. In conclusion, DNA obtained from MT-stained FFPE tissue sections may be highly degraded and should therefore be used with great caution in forensic settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forensic DNA Profiling: PCR Techniques and Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

30 pages, 702 KB  
Review
Genetic Identification of Human Skeletal Remains in Forensic Context: A Review
by Laura Cainé, Madalena Henriques, Adelina Rohovska, Bárbara Sousa, Heloísa Afonso Costa, Helena Correia Dias, Joana Rodrigues, Magda Franco, Olena Mukan, Rui Nascimento, Vânia Mofreita and António Amorim
Genes 2026, 17(4), 492; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17040492 - 21 Apr 2026
Viewed by 177
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Genetic identification of human skeletal remains plays a pivotal role in forensic investigations when other traditional or primary methods are not appropriate. Decomposition, storage and environmental conditions often leave the skeletal structure as the only basis for identification. This review synthesizes current [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Genetic identification of human skeletal remains plays a pivotal role in forensic investigations when other traditional or primary methods are not appropriate. Decomposition, storage and environmental conditions often leave the skeletal structure as the only basis for identification. This review synthesizes current methodologies and technological advances in damaged DNA extraction and analysis, emphasizing the forensic relevance of skeletal remains for genetic identification. Methods: A comprehensive literature analysis highlights the basis of genetic identification; sampling that considers intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing the DNA yield and its quality; pre-treatment methods; extraction protocols that are suitable for its sensitivity; genetic marker panels that allow for human identification; and statistical evaluation and analysis of the results. The last chapter demonstrates the real-world impact of genetic identification on historical cases, underscoring its broader significance in legal, humanitarian, and socio-historical contexts, supporting a critical evaluation of best practices, methodological robustness, and ethical considerations within the field. Results: Teeth, femur and the petrous portion of temporal bone are the main samples used for genetic analysis. STR profiling and mitochondrial DNA are the gold standard markers for skeletal human identification. Minimally destructive protocols that enhance a high DNA yield are chosen, with silica-based methods being highlighted in the extraction protocols. Next-Generation Sequencing techniques have also improved analytical outcomes, by enabling high-throughput data generation, increased coverage depth, nucleotide-level sequence data, and high-level multiplexing of genetic targets. Conclusions: This review provides a comprehensive framework for researchers and practitioners seeking to optimize genetic identification workflows in forensic sciences and bioarcheology. These methodological advances have significantly increased identification success rates, especially in cases involving degraded or limited skeletal remains. Reviews such as this one help us to identify methodological gaps, ethical concerns, and future research directions, thereby establishing best practices when working with highly degraded skeletal material, supporting more reliable, standardized, and legally defensible applications of genetic identification in forensic, archeological, and humanitarian contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forensic DNA Profiling: PCR Techniques and Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 444 KB  
Review
Autosomal STR Markers for Forensic Genetics: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
by Irena Zupanič Pajnič
Genes 2026, 17(3), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17030285 - 27 Feb 2026
Viewed by 987
Abstract
Autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) markers remain the cornerstone of modern forensic genetics, providing exceptional power for individualization, kinship verification, and reconstruction of complex investigative cases. Over the last decade, the field has undergone a major technological transition from length-based capillary electrophoresis (CE) [...] Read more.
Autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) markers remain the cornerstone of modern forensic genetics, providing exceptional power for individualization, kinship verification, and reconstruction of complex investigative cases. Over the last decade, the field has undergone a major technological transition from length-based capillary electrophoresis (CE) toward sequence-level characterization using massively parallel sequencing (MPS), enabling detection of internal sequence variants (isoalleles) and flanking-region polymorphisms that substantially increase discriminatory power in many forensic contexts. Although MPS is increasingly adopted in forensic laboratories, implementation remains dependent on infrastructure, cost considerations, validation requirements, and jurisdiction-specific legal frameworks. This review synthesizes the molecular mechanisms underlying STR variability, including replication slippage and mutation processes, and critically evaluates the transition to sequencing-based analysis. Particular attention is given to analytical challenges such as stochastic effects in ultra-low-template DNA and PCR inhibition in degraded samples. Special emphasis is placed on identification of skeletal remains from mass graves and historical contexts, where hierarchical analytical strategies—from mini-STR approaches to MPS-based workflows—enable recovery of highly fragmented DNA. The review also examines the evolution of probabilistic genotyping (PG), highlighting the importance of algorithmic transparency and reproducible analytical frameworks for judicial applications. By integrating technological advances with practical forensic challenges, this review outlines a comprehensive framework for implementing high-resolution STR analysis in contemporary genomic casework. As a narrative synthesis, the conclusions reflect currently available published evidence and acknowledge variability in validation status, implementation practices, and regional forensic infrastructures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forensic DNA Profiling: PCR Techniques and Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop