Psychology of Sexual and Gender Diversity

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 7556

Special Issue Editor

Psychology Program, Grenfell Campus, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Corner Brook, NL A2H 5G4, Canada
Interests: stereotyping; prejudice and discrimination; psychometrics; LGBTQ2S+ psychology; human sexuality (relationships; pornography; variations of sex work)
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Research focusing on various aspects of sexual and gender diversity is no longer an uncommon enterprise. However, the recent rise in anti-LGBTQ2SIA+ rhetoric and vitriol calls into question the applicability of results from prior to this shift in public sentiment. For example, perhaps participants who would have previously refrained from articulating anti-LGBTQ2SIA+ sentiments now feel emboldened to do so. The increase in such rhetoric may also have greater negative consequences for the most vulnerable LGBTQ2SIA+ targets, with a severity that has yet to be identified and/or communicated. However, LGBTQ2SIA+ community members are also finding new ways to persevere, which may reflect an evolution of sorts to the types of resiliency commonly observed. The aim of this Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences is to showcase papers that focus on such topics, along with: 1) research dealing with identity and how it may be conceptualized among any of various sexual and gender diverse populations; 2) experiences with marginalization and any shifts that may have occurred following the recent rise of anti-LGBTQ2SIA+ rhetoric; 3) psychometric advances by way of measurement of variables related to sexual and gender diverse populations (including, but not limited to, the development of new measures); 4) research acknowledging and highlighting various populations and communities, beyond sexual orientation, that may engage in sexual practices considered “non-traditional” or “abnormal” and remain pathologized (e.g., BDSM); 5) perceptions of allyship and how it may be conceptualized by those who consider themselves allies of various communities and populations; 6) intersectionality of various marginalized identities; and 7) any other subjects or themes that offer empirical evidence pertaining to the psychology of sexual and gender diversity.

Dr. CJ Bishop
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sexual diverse
  • gender diverse
  • sexual and/or gender minority
  • LGBTQ2SIA+
  • identity
  • prejudice and discrimination
  • BDSM
  • resiliency
  • allyship
  • intersectionality

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 783 KiB  
Article
Psychosocial Profiles of Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) Influencing PrEP Acceptability: A Latent Profile Analysis
by Anthony J. Gifford, Rusi Jaspal, Bethany A. Jones and Daragh T. McDermott
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 818; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060818 - 14 Jun 2025
Viewed by 561
Abstract
Despite the availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United Kingdom (UK), uptake among men who have sex with men (MSM) remains inconsistent, signalling a persistent ‘PrEP Gap’. Empirical studies show the important role of psychosocial factors (e.g., stigma, identity, trust in science, [...] Read more.
Despite the availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United Kingdom (UK), uptake among men who have sex with men (MSM) remains inconsistent, signalling a persistent ‘PrEP Gap’. Empirical studies show the important role of psychosocial factors (e.g., stigma, identity, trust in science, and sexual behaviours) in PrEP acceptability and uptake. This study aimed to identify subgroups of MSM in the UK based on psychosocial predictors of PrEP acceptability. A cross-sectional survey of MSM (N = 500) was conducted between June and September 2023. Participants completed validated measures assessing identity resilience, internalised homonegativity, LGBTQ+ connectedness, trust in science, NHS perceptions, HIV stigma, PrEP self-efficacy, condom self-efficacy, sociosexual orientation, perceived HIV risk, and PrEP acceptability. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to identify distinct subgroups based on these psychosocial dimensions. Four psychosocial profiles were defined: (1) PrEP Ambivalent (15%); (2) PrEP Accepting (36.2%); (3) PrEP Hesitant (37%); and (4) PrEP Rejecting (11.8%). These profiles provide evidence for varied combinations of personal and structural factors influencing PrEP acceptability. PrEP acceptability among MSM in the UK is shaped by distinct psychosocial configurations, influenced by identity, stigma, trust, and perceived risk. These findings highlight the need for differentiated and targeted interventions for enhancing PrEP acceptability based on psychosocial profile. Audience segmentation strategies offer a promising pathway to bridge the awareness-to-engagement gap and address the nuanced barriers facing diverse subgroups within the MSM community. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychology of Sexual and Gender Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 552 KiB  
Article
Childhood Sexual Abuse, Adult Attachment Styles, and Involvement in BDSM Practices in Adult Intimate Relationships
by Maja Selič and Vesna Jug
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 813; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060813 - 13 Jun 2025
Viewed by 2619
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the role of childhood sexual abuse in attachment styles and involvement in BDSM (bondage, discipline, dominance, submission, and sadomasochism) practices in adult intimate relationships. A model was built to test the predictive value of factors for involvement in [...] Read more.
This study aimed to examine the role of childhood sexual abuse in attachment styles and involvement in BDSM (bondage, discipline, dominance, submission, and sadomasochism) practices in adult intimate relationships. A model was built to test the predictive value of factors for involvement in BDSM practices. This study included 318 participants. Demographic data were collected and three questionnaires were used: the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) identified past sexual abuse, the Adult Attachment Scale (RSQ) assessed attachment style in adulthood, and the Sadomasochism Checklist (SMCL) assessed interest in masochistic practices. The results show that childhood sexual abuse is associated with practicing and enjoying BDSM, positively with submissiveness, negatively with dominance, and positively with a composite score measuring both submissiveness and dominance. It is also linked to fearful and preoccupied attachment styles in adulthood, but not dismissive attachment. Men exhibit higher levels of submissiveness and dominance in BDSM compared to women. Older individuals are more inclined to engage in BDSM. Urban residents show higher involvement in BDSM compared to those in other environments. Homosexual or bisexual individuals in open relationships are more frequently involved in BDSM. These findings highlight the complexity of connections between past experiences, sexual preferences in BDSM, and secure attachment in intimate relationships. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychology of Sexual and Gender Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 255 KiB  
Article
Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Greek Version of the Attitudes toward Transgendered Individuals Scale
by Dimitra Lekka, Argyro Pachi, Constantinos Togas, Athanasios Tselebis, Ilias Toliadis and George Alexias
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 739; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090739 - 25 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1819
Abstract
Numerous investigations have consistently underscored the impact of societal stigma on the well-being of transgender individuals. The primary objective of the current research is to translate and adapt the Attitudes Toward Transgendered Individuals Scale into the Greek language. This scale specifically assesses stigma, [...] Read more.
Numerous investigations have consistently underscored the impact of societal stigma on the well-being of transgender individuals. The primary objective of the current research is to translate and adapt the Attitudes Toward Transgendered Individuals Scale into the Greek language. This scale specifically assesses stigma, excluding components such as discreteness and violence, and is tailored to evaluate individuals within the general populace. Employing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and assessing gender metric equivalence, the analyses yielded highly favorable outcomes, demonstrating excellent scale fit, reliability, and construct validity, reflecting the robustness of the adapted tool for the Greek population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychology of Sexual and Gender Diversity)
22 pages, 646 KiB  
Article
“We Can Do Better”: Developing Attitudinal Scales Relevant to LGBTQ2S+ Issues—A Primer on Best Practice Recommendations for Beginners in Scale Development
by CJ Bishop and Todd Graham Morrison
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070611 - 18 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1517
Abstract
In this primer, following best practice recommendations and drawing upon their own expertise in psychometrics, the authors provide a step-by-step guide for developing measures relevant to sexual- and gender-marginalized persons (SGMPs). To ensure that readers operate from a uniform understanding, definitions for central [...] Read more.
In this primer, following best practice recommendations and drawing upon their own expertise in psychometrics, the authors provide a step-by-step guide for developing measures relevant to sexual- and gender-marginalized persons (SGMPs). To ensure that readers operate from a uniform understanding, definitions for central elements of psychometric testing (e.g., reliability and validity) are provided. Then, detailed information is given about developing and refining scale items. Strategies designed to reduce a pool of items to a manageable number are also highlighted. The authors conclude this primer by discussing various forms of validation (e.g., convergent, discriminant, and known groups). To further readers’ understanding, illustrative examples from measures designed for SGMPs are brought into focus throughout. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychology of Sexual and Gender Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop