The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Organizational Behaviors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2025) | Viewed by 10162

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614, USA
Interests: sexual harassment; ethnic harassment; bystander experiences; exclusion; ostracism (including linguistic ostracism); organizational behavior; intergroup relations; stress and health; neuroendocrine functioning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Policy, Organizational and Leadership Studies, Temple University, Philidelphia, PA 19122, USA
Interests: job attitudes and behaviors; training and development; teamwork; diversity and inclusion; minority issues in organizations; workplace harassment
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

People spend a large portion of their lives at work. Accordingly, it is important to assure that work environments, climates, and cultures are consistent with maintaining and enriching the lives of employees at all levels. Unfortunately, too often employees engage in misconduct and counterproductive behaviors that harm individuals as well as the larger organization and impair functioning at a high level. Research suggests that one of the most common forms of misconduct involves experiences of workplace harassment. Workplace harassment often results in a range of negative impacts for employees, teams and units, and the larger organization. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), received over 98,000 allegations, 27,000 of which involved incidents involving sexually harassing behaviors. This finding alone suggests that, even with continued research on this topic over the past several decades, social–sexual behavior continues to be an important factor within the work environment of many employees. Moreover, other forms of workplace harassment (i.e., not primarily based on social–sexual behaviors) represent a large portion of alleged harassment claims. Such experiences have the potential to create a hostile work environment and result in decreased health and well-being, organizational productivity, and the organization being viewed as less attractive to future job applicants. At the individual level, victims are apt to experience negative short- and long-term consequences, including decreased physical and psychological health, job attitudes, work performance, etc. At the group level, such experiences may serve to increase in-group/out-group distinctions and elicit group-based stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. It is worth noting that these findings are limited to US businesses and organizations and do not include countries outside of the US. Historically, much research in this area has been limited to sexual harassment (in its many forms), with less focus being placed on the antecedents and consequences of experiencing other types of work harassment or multiple types of harassment (e.g., sexual ethnic, bystander, gender role). This Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences sees to broaden our understanding of workplace harassment. Specifically, it seeks papers focused on all forms of workplace harassment and its relation to employees (at various organizational levels) health and well-being, as well as the organizational implications associated with this form of counterproductive work behavior. We welcome original research papers and review articles addressing the topics noted below, as well as other related areas: 

  • Traditional sexual harassment (antecedents and consequences);
  • Organizational implications of workplace harassment behavior/experiences;
  • Additive and multiplicative models of harassment;
  • New and innovative approaches to the study of work harassment, including measurement;
  • Victim and perpetrator characteristics;
  • LBGTQ+ status and work harassment experiences;
  • Culture-related issues including immigrants and immigration;
  • Neuroendocrine correlates of workplace harassment and their relation to health and well-being;
  • Intersectionality approaches to the study of workplace harassment;
  • Review papers related to workplace harassment and personal and organizational well-being (including theory development).
  • Non-Traditional assessments are also encouraged including longitudinal and experimental designs.

Abstract Submissions. Abstracts should be emailed to before 30 April 2025. The abstract should be embedded in the body of an email and contain (a) the title of the proposed paper; (b) list all contributing author(s) with affiliation information and emails; and (c) summarize the purpose, methods, analyses, findings, and conclusions of the proposed study in no more than 250 words.

Invitation Decisions. Decisions on abstracts and invitations to submit full manuscripts will be sent to potential authors no later than 31 May 2025. Manuscript submissions will be reviewed and the invitation of a full paper (following abstract submission) does not guarantee publication.

Submission and Review Process for Invited Papers. Authors invited to submit papers must submit full manuscripts by 31 October 2025.

Prof. Dr. Robert T. Hitlan
Prof. Dr. Armando X. Estrada
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (no more than 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • workplace harassment
  • sexual harassment
  • ethnic harassment
  • bystander harassment
  • organizational health and well-being
  • work attitudes and behaviors
  • discrimination
  • organizational climate
  • employment
  • gender
  • sexual orientation
  • intersectionality
  • misogyny
  • psychological health
  • physical health
  • social–sexual behavior

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

23 pages, 863 KB  
Article
Effects of General and Sexual Aggression on the Job, Health and Psychological Outcomes of Women Reservists in the U.S. Armed Forces
by Armando X. Estrada, Wendi L. Benson and Jawaria A. Abbasi
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030393 - 9 Mar 2026
Viewed by 411
Abstract
We examined the unique and joint effects of general and sexual aggression on the job, health, and psychological outcomes of women in the reserve component of the U.S. military with varying activation and deployment experiences (n = 13,541). We expected that general [...] Read more.
We examined the unique and joint effects of general and sexual aggression on the job, health, and psychological outcomes of women in the reserve component of the U.S. military with varying activation and deployment experiences (n = 13,541). We expected that general and sexual aggression would negatively influence women’s job, health, and psychological outcomes, and that the effects of general aggression would be stronger than the effects of sexual aggression on these outcomes. Further, we evaluated whether aggressive behaviors combined in an additive, adaptive or amplified manner to influence women’s outcomes. Consistent with our hypotheses, both general and sexual aggression experiences were associated with decreased satisfaction with work, coworkers and leaders, lower organizational commitment, poorer physical health and increased psychological distress; the effects of general aggression were stronger than the effects of sexual aggression on women’s outcomes; and the combined effects of general and sexual aggression on women’s outcomes were best characterized in terms of an adaptive response. Results were consistent for women reservists regardless of their activation or deployment experience. We discuss various implications of our findings for future research in this area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 615 KB  
Article
Prevalence and Impact of Single-Day Events of Sexual Harassment, Racial Mistreatment, and Incivility on Biomedical Health Trainees: A Mixed-Methods Study
by Margaret S. Stockdale, Ann C. Kimble-Hill, Amanda E. Mosier, Jessica Kiebler, Breianna R. N. Mildor and Darius M. Washington
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 380; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030380 - 6 Mar 2026
Viewed by 843
Abstract
Little research has examined how often biomedical trainees encounter mistreatment in a single day or how such momentary experiences may undermine engagement in training. To address this gap, we investigated the prevalence and short-term consequences of daily sexual harassment, racial mistreatment, and incivility [...] Read more.
Little research has examined how often biomedical trainees encounter mistreatment in a single day or how such momentary experiences may undermine engagement in training. To address this gap, we investigated the prevalence and short-term consequences of daily sexual harassment, racial mistreatment, and incivility among graduate students and post-doctoral fellows in U.S. biomedical programs. In Study 1, 404 National Institutes of Health-funded trainees completed a two-wave survey assessing mistreatment, mood, and program attitudes across two 24 h periods separated by 10 days. On either day, 36.9% of participants experienced or observed at least one mistreatment episode, with no differences by gender or underrepresented minority status. Day 1 mistreatment was significantly negatively associated with program attitudes 10 days later, suggesting short-term derailment effects. In Study 2, 21 participants responded to true accounts of peers’ mistreatment to describe their emotional reactions and expectations of mentors. Trainees reported anger, disgust, and betrayal, and emphasized the need for mentors to acknowledge these harms, intervene appropriately, and offer support. This study provides the first evidence of single-day mistreatment prevalence among biomedical health trainees and demonstrates that even brief exposures can degrade training program attitudes. Findings underscore the need for improved mentor training and institutional resources to protect and support trainees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 496 KB  
Article
Can Brief Empathy Training Increase Sexual Harassment Bystander Intervention Intentions?
by Tristan Barta, Zachary E. Piper, Harshit Chaubey, Jessica Kiebler and Margaret S. Stockdale
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020227 - 4 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 775
Abstract
Sexual harassment (SH) remains widespread in workplaces and academic settings. Traditional compliance-based training has shown limited success in preventing SH or motivating bystander intervention. This study developed and tested a brief online empathy training module that can be completed in under 30 min [...] Read more.
Sexual harassment (SH) remains widespread in workplaces and academic settings. Traditional compliance-based training has shown limited success in preventing SH or motivating bystander intervention. This study developed and tested a brief online empathy training module that can be completed in under 30 min that aims to help participants better understand and support people who experience SH and increase their willingness to intervene. Two experiments were conducted with U.S. adults recruited from the CloudResearch Connect platform (Study 1: 122 men and 140 women; Study 2: 132 men, 112 women, 4, other gender) who were randomly assigned to complete the SH empathy module, another empathy training module (burglary empathy training), time management training, a standard SH training module, or a waitlist control condition. Measures assessed empathy, perspective taking, and bystander intervention intentions. In Study 1, empathy correlated with bystander intentions, but there were no significant group differences; women reported higher empathy and bystander intentions than men. In Study 2, participants who received SH empathy training demonstrated higher empathy and perspective taking than those in other groups, and empathy improvements were associated with greater willingness to intervene. Gender did not moderate these effects. Overall, findings suggest that integrating a short empathy module into SH prevention programs can enhance readiness to act as supportive bystanders. Future research should assess the longevity of these effects and whether they translate into real-world behavioral change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 566 KB  
Article
Short-Term Effects of Harassment, Racial Mistreatment, and Incivility (HARM) on Career-Derailing Attitudes: An Experience Sampling Methodology Study
by Jessica M. Kiebler, Amanda E. Mosier, Wei Wu, Ann C. Kimble-Hill and Margaret S. Stockdale
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020214 - 2 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 607
Abstract
Past research has consistently demonstrated the negative effects of interpersonal mistreatment on student experiences by employing retrospective studies; however, little is known about the daily effects that could lead to career derailment. The present study advances evidence of the consequences of experiencing multiple [...] Read more.
Past research has consistently demonstrated the negative effects of interpersonal mistreatment on student experiences by employing retrospective studies; however, little is known about the daily effects that could lead to career derailment. The present study advances evidence of the consequences of experiencing multiple forms of interpersonal mistreatment, including sexual harassment, racial harassment and microaggressions, and incivility (collectively labeled HARM) by employing an experience sampling methodology (ESM) to estimate the immediate impact of HARM on career-relevant attitudes among a sample of 202 biomedical health trainees (mentees) funded by a National Institutes of Health fellowship. Grounded in Affective Events Theory, we found that mentees’ daily experiences of HARM were associated with an immediate degradation of their attitudes toward their training program mediated by negative affect. Being racially isolated in a lab or having a racially different mentor increased the prevalence of HARM; moreover, accounting for negative affect, experiences of HARM were positively associated with program attitudes for mentees who were racially well-represented, suggesting that majority status may buffer the negative impact of HARM on attitudes. Understanding these dynamics provides insight into the importance of assessing and addressing daily experiences of mistreatment among graduate and postdoctoral trainees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1189 KB  
Article
Interpersonal Dynamics at Work: How Positive and Negative Experiences Simultaneously Influence Work Attitudes
by Madison A. Malcore, Declan O. Gilmer and Vicki J. Magley
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010156 - 22 Jan 2026
Viewed by 997
Abstract
Workplace mistreatment and positive interpersonal experiences are not often considered simultaneously in empirical research. However, people are realistically experiencing positive and negative interpersonal experiences at work regularly. The goal of this study is to fill this gap by examining the relative importance of [...] Read more.
Workplace mistreatment and positive interpersonal experiences are not often considered simultaneously in empirical research. However, people are realistically experiencing positive and negative interpersonal experiences at work regularly. The goal of this study is to fill this gap by examining the relative importance of both incivility and prosocial experiences on people’s job attitudes. Data from a large university in the northeastern United States revealed significant relationships between incivility and prosocial experiences and cynicism towards organizational change, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and affective commitment. Further, relative weights analysis, controlling for established job stressors, identified interpersonal experiences as accounting for about half of the variance in job attitudes. This demonstrates the strong role that these experiences have in shaping attitudes. Further, experiences coming from supervisors were highlighted as particularly important. Follow-up analyses provide preliminary evidence that these interpersonal experiences have a stronger influence on job attitudes for racial minority workers than for white workers. Implications and future directions are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 544 KB  
Article
Follower Ostracism and Micromanagement Leadership: The Roles of Power Threat and Gender
by Vi Phung, Cong Liu and Zhi Luo
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010035 - 23 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1324
Abstract
Workplace ostracism, a form of workplace harassment, delineates the experience of being excluded or ignored at work. Despite its covert nature, workplace ostracism elicits a unique pain that distinguishes it from other overt forms of harassment, such as bullying or undermining. While a [...] Read more.
Workplace ostracism, a form of workplace harassment, delineates the experience of being excluded or ignored at work. Despite its covert nature, workplace ostracism elicits a unique pain that distinguishes it from other overt forms of harassment, such as bullying or undermining. While a growing body of literature has examined harassment directed at leaders (e.g., upward bullying), follower ostracism, in which leaders are excluded by their followers, has received relatively little attention. Drawing on Power-Dependence Theory, we conducted a multi-wave, time-lagged study (N = 137) to examine follower ostracism as an antecedent to destructive leadership, specifically micromanagement. The findings indicate that follower ostracism threatened leaders’ power, which subsequently motivated leaders to engage in micromanagement as a means to reestablish their influence and authority. Moreover, female leaders experience greater power threats, and exhibit more micromanaging behaviors than their male counterparts. This study advances the theoretical understanding of workplace ostracism, destructive leadership, and gender roles. It also offers practical solutions for organizations and leaders to prevent and cope with the detrimental effects of exclusion by subordinates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 400 KB  
Article
Sexual and Bystander Harassment Among Part-Time Employees: Effects on Work Attitudes, Stress, and Withdrawal
by Robert T. Hitlan
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010017 - 21 Dec 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 801
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of sexual and bystander harassment experiences on work attitudes, stress, withdrawal, and psychological well-being of part-time employees. Participants included 314 female employees who worked part-time in their organizations. All participants completed a computer-administered workplace experience survey assessing various [...] Read more.
This study investigated the impact of sexual and bystander harassment experiences on work attitudes, stress, withdrawal, and psychological well-being of part-time employees. Participants included 314 female employees who worked part-time in their organizations. All participants completed a computer-administered workplace experience survey assessing various aspects of their work environment, including personal and bystander harassment experiences, work-related attitudes (supervisor satisfaction, coworker satisfaction, and general job stress), work behaviors (work and job withdrawal), and psychological well-being. Experiences of sexual harassment and bystander harassment were predicted to be negatively related to satisfaction and psychological health and positively related to stress and withdrawal. Both forms of harassment were expected to contribute additively to the prediction of work outcomes and psychological health. Moderator models were examined to explore the potential interactions between sexual and bystander harassment. Results indicated that both forms of harassment were related to work attitudes, stress, and withdrawal. Sexual harassment was the strongest predictor of work outcomes. Discriminant Function Analysis provided additional support for group-based distinctions. The results are discussed in terms of interpersonal and organizational implications, limitations, and future research directions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

20 pages, 315 KB  
Review
Workplace Harassment of Transgender People: A Narrative Review
by RJ Kubicki and Joseph A. Vandello
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(4), 479; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040479 - 24 Mar 2026
Viewed by 939
Abstract
Workplace harassment of transgender employees remains pervasive and understudied. In this narrative review of 63 studies over the past 25 years, we summarize the literature on transgender workplace harassment. We focus on its prevalence and forms. Individual, organizational and cultural factors contribute to [...] Read more.
Workplace harassment of transgender employees remains pervasive and understudied. In this narrative review of 63 studies over the past 25 years, we summarize the literature on transgender workplace harassment. We focus on its prevalence and forms. Individual, organizational and cultural factors contribute to its occurrence; psychological and occupational outcomes; and strategies to reduce or prevent harassment. We find that harassment often extends beyond traditional definitions; includes misgendering, deadnaming, and the questioning or outright denial of one’s gender identity; and is particularly pervasive in masculinity contest cultures. These experiences are associated with both negative well-being of transgender employees and less effectiveness of the organizations that employ them, though more causal evidence is needed. We also highlight critical conceptual and methodological gaps to guide future research. Much of the existing research on LGBTQ+ employees in the workplace has focused primarily on sexual minorities, leaving the unique experiences of gender minorities invisible. Further, an intersectional lens is needed, as harassment experiences of trans women, trans men, and nonbinary people may differ in significant ways. Finally, we identify strategies to improve workplace climate including both top-down formal policy and bottom-up interpersonal behaviors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

13 pages, 510 KB  
Essay
An Intuitive Model of Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment
by Qiuyue Shao, Ke Zhang and Xiaoping Zhao
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(4), 477; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040477 - 24 Mar 2026
Viewed by 389
Abstract
Our paper presents an intuitive model of bystander intervention to workplace mistreatment. Drawing on the literature on moral intuition, our paper proposes (1) that bystanders match an observed conduct to mistreatment descriptions (the first type of mistreatment prototypes), and (2) that bystanders make [...] Read more.
Our paper presents an intuitive model of bystander intervention to workplace mistreatment. Drawing on the literature on moral intuition, our paper proposes (1) that bystanders match an observed conduct to mistreatment descriptions (the first type of mistreatment prototypes), and (2) that bystanders make intuitive judgments and take immediate interventions when intervention prescriptions (the second type of mistreatment prototypes) exist in their long-term memory. Our paper also argues that bystanders’ intuitive judgments and interventions depend on the accessibility of their mistreatment prototypes, which are formed through learning mechanisms. Our paper contributes to the literature on bystander responses to workplace mistreatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 876 KB  
Essay
Racialized Sex-Based Harassment: A U.S.-Based Intersectional Framework for Understanding Harassment of Black Women and Men
by Darius M. Washington, Tuyen K. Dinh and Margaret S. Stockdale
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 184; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020184 - 27 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1088
Abstract
Although scholarship has long called for attention to the intersection of race and gender in workplace harassment, the experiences of Black Americans remain insufficiently theorized. Existing frameworks often assume harassment to be gender-based in ways that center White women’s victimization, leaving limited conceptual [...] Read more.
Although scholarship has long called for attention to the intersection of race and gender in workplace harassment, the experiences of Black Americans remain insufficiently theorized. Existing frameworks often assume harassment to be gender-based in ways that center White women’s victimization, leaving limited conceptual space to understand how Black women and Black men are targeted. In this essay, we synthesize research on racialized sex-based harassment (RSBH) to illustrate how harassment directed at Black Americans is shaped by cultural narratives that simultaneously sexualize, criminalize, and devalue them. Specifically, we introduce sociohistorical archetypes (e.g., Jezebel, Mammy, Sapphire, Mandingo, Brute, Uncle Tom) as cultural mechanisms through which RSBH is enacted, rationalized, and normalized within organizational contexts. We argue that RSBH functions as a mechanism for enforcing racialized gender hierarchy: it draws on sociohistorical meanings attached to Black femininity and masculinity to mark certain identities as inherently available, threatening, or subordinate. We further review evidence linking RSBH to psychological distress, social identity threat, physiological strain, and career stagnation, as well as factors that shape vulnerability and adaptation. By conceptualizing RSBH as a patterned and predictable form of identity-based harm, grounded in the lasting impact of sociohistorical archetypes, rather than a variation of generalized sexual harassment, this work advances theories of harassment and race in organizations. We conclude by outlining implications for measurement, organizational policy, and intervention efforts aimed at disrupting the reproduction of racialized gender inequality at work. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Workplace Harassment on Employee Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop