21st Century Evidence-Informed Behavioral Interventions Tackling Emerging Criminal Modalities

A Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X) belonging to the section "Social Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 24 March 2027 | Viewed by 1518

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
FPCEUP—Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200–135 Porto, Portugal
Interests: criminology; hate crime; environmental crime; youth crime; drug-related crime; peace building and peace cultures; social and environmental justice; drug policies

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
Interests: violence and interpersonal aggression; juvenile delinquency; intervention and prevention programs

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200–135 Porto, Portugal
Interests: violence and crime; victims and offenders; intervention programs and the process of change; forensic psychology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Criminal behavior poses persistent challenges to academics, policy makers, and practitioners around the globe and—while behavioral sciences have already built a consistent body of evidence, not only on criminal acts themselves, but also on the related psychosocial determinants—contemporary societies are witnessing the emergence of modified forms of transgression, frequently connected to the growing relevance of digital environments for our communities. Phenomena like cybercrime, technology-facilitated violence, digital organized crime, and online radicalization demand tailored and innovative science-informed interventions that behavioral sciences are strategically positioned to design and implement. There remains, however, a disconnect between how quickly those crimes emerge and the rhythm of scientific production on, for example, how to promote individual and community resilience in affected environments.

This Special Issue aims to gather together ground-breaking empirical psychology-oriented research, theoretical analyses, and secondary studies on interventions targeting emerging forms of criminality. We therefore welcome proposals dedicated to all of the different stages of action and targeting both the people involved in criminal activities and the people or communities who experience them.

By gathering cutting-edge research in this Special Issue, we aim to advance a set of “what works” principles and practices that can help shape adequate responses to contemporary criminal issues.

Dr. Marta Sofia De Sousa Pinto
Dr. Ricardo Barroso
Dr. Celina Manita
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • criminal justice interventions
  • intervention effectiveness
  • intervention efficiency
  • evidence-based practice
  • criminology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Other

32 pages, 796 KB  
Opinion
School-Based Restorative Justice for Student Conflicts in China: Theoretical Logic and Local Adaptation
by Xuanyu Chen and Feng Han
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(8), 1346; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081346 - 5 Aug 2026
Viewed by 1078
Abstract
Conflicts are an everyday reality in the school environment. Student conflicts can escalate into bullying, violence, and injury disputes when schools rely solely on incident-focused or punitive responses. This conceptual, normative article examines how restorative justice might complement, rather than replace, disciplinary accountability [...] Read more.
Conflicts are an everyday reality in the school environment. Student conflicts can escalate into bullying, violence, and injury disputes when schools rely solely on incident-focused or punitive responses. This conceptual, normative article examines how restorative justice might complement, rather than replace, disciplinary accountability in Chinese schools. Drawing on relational justice, behavioural science accounts of student conflict, international school-based restorative practice, and Chinese legal and policy materials, it advances three propositions. First, a relational account locates conflict in disrupted interpersonal and institutional relationships and directs attention to harm, needs, responsibility, and repair. Student conflict intervention should focus on more educational and relationship-restorative response pathways. Second, international evidence suggests that restorative approaches may support social–emotional learning, conflict-management skills, and school relationships; however, outcomes vary with programme quality, institutional support, school culture, and cultural context. Third, while the introduction of restorative justice into Chinese campuses appears to enjoy a degree of foundational compatibility with traditional cultural resources and the structural characteristics of the school environment, it also confronts challenges of conceptual adaptation and institutional integration that warrant careful scholarly attention. The article therefore proposes a layered model combining universal preventive education and proportionate restorative interventions. Restorative justice should be treated as a cautiously adapted supplementary framework whose feasibility and effects in Chinese schools require local empirical evaluation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop