Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.

Climate Change, Environmental Decision-Making, and Social Dilemmas from a Psychological Perspective

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2026) | Viewed by 3789

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, York College of Pennyslvania York, York, PA 17403, USA
Interests: social dilemmas in environmental decision-making; attitude change related to poverty

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Environmental challenges that have dire consequences for human and non-human life, including climate change, are becoming increasingly urgent, and solutions have not kept pace [1]. Solutions must be accelerated at every level of society—individually, institutionally, and internationally. At the individual-level, solutions include mitigation behaviors, such as sustainable food choices, energy and water use, reducing consumerism and waste, supporting pro-environmental policies and collective actions. Key solutions also include promotion of adaptation behaviors like natural disaster preparedness, home improvement and insulation efforts, and promoting adaptive community spaces like shade gardens. Many decisions regarding climate-friendly behavior operate in the context of social dilemmas. In these dilemmas, people face tradeoffs between various behavioral options, often experiencing tension between current and future consequences and between self and other’s/collective consequences. However, these tensions can also motivate change: participating in climate-related social dilemma simulations was found to increase pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors [2]. 

We join others in calling for more work to identify ways to harness the insights and applications of psychology to help environmentally sustainable behavior flourish. Psychology is uniquely poised to examine variables that allow for cross-level analysis between situational/contextual factors (e.g., social dilemmas, information framing, feedback, social norms, group values) and individual/dispositional factors (e.g., affect, values, identity, self-efficacy, political orientation) [3]. We invite empirical, theoretical, and systematic review papers addressing the psychology of social dilemmas and environmental decision making, especially those with a focus on synergizing multiple aspects of sustainability toward mitigation and adaptation.

  1. IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change;  Pörtner, H.-O.; Roberts, D.C.; Tignor, M.; Poloczanska, E.S.; Mintenbeck, K.; Alegría, A.; Craig, M.; Langsdorf, S.; Löschke, S.; Möller, V.; Okem, A.; Rama, B., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA; p. 3056. https://doi:10.1017/9781009325844.
  2. Druen, P.B.; Zawadzki, S.J. Escaping the Climate Trap: Participation in a Climate-Specific Social Dilemma Simulation Boosts Climate-Protective Motivation and Actions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169438.
  3. Swim, J.K.; Stern, P.C.; Doherty, T.J.; Clayton, S.; Reser, J.P.; Weber, E.U.; Gifford, R.; Howard, G.S. Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist 2011, 66, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023220.

Prof. Dr. Perri B. Druen
Guest Editor

Stephanie Johnson Zawadzki
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • psychology
  • climate change
  • social dilemma
  • sustainability
  • environmental challenges
  • adaptation
  • mitigation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 726 KB  
Article
Do Promotions Make Consumers More Wasteful? The Effect of Price Promotion on Consumer Food Waste Behavior
by Yan Wang, Wei Xu and Emine Sarigöllü
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(4), 495; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040495 - 26 Mar 2026
Abstract
Consumer food waste is a major global challenge to sustainable development, generating massive carbon and water footprints, exacerbating food insecurity, and undermining the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. While extensive research has documented individual and contextual drivers of consumer food waste, critical gaps [...] Read more.
Consumer food waste is a major global challenge to sustainable development, generating massive carbon and water footprints, exacerbating food insecurity, and undermining the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. While extensive research has documented individual and contextual drivers of consumer food waste, critical gaps remain in understanding how core marketing tools shape wasteful behavior, particularly the unintended post-purchase consequences of ubiquitous price promotions. Addressing this gap, we unpack the psychological mechanism underlying the classic social dilemma of promotions: short-term individual economic savings from discounts conflict with long-term collective ecological welfare. Across four rigorous studies, including a real-world field experiment in a university canteen, we establish a causal effect of price promotions on increased consumer food waste behavior. We further demonstrate that this effect is mediated by enhanced perceived resources: price promotions generate subjective feelings of windfall gains and resource abundance, which in turn increase consumers’ willingness to discard edible food. We identify two practical actionable boundary conditions that attenuate this pro-waste effect: the impact of price promotions on food waste is eliminated when consumers focus on money spent (rather than money saved) from the transaction, and when they perceive their spending as exceeding their psychological budget. Our findings advance the literature on price promotions and sustainable consumption by documenting a previously unrecognized hidden cost of promotional marketing, unpacking the micro-psychological foundations of the social dilemma in food waste decisions, and providing evidence-based, actionable implications for policymakers, food retailers, and food service operators to curb promotion-induced food waste. Full article
38 pages, 3963 KB  
Article
From Individual Behavior to Systemic Insight: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis of COM-B Applications in Responsible Consumption
by Olena Korohodova, Ionela-Andreea Puiu and Elena Druică
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 474; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030474 - 22 Mar 2026
Viewed by 142
Abstract
Understanding the psychological underpinnings of environmental decision-making is crucial for addressing climate change. Responsible consumption and pro-environmental behaviors often involve complex trade-offs between individual and collective outcomes, as well as between immediate and long-term consequences. Drawing on the Behavior Change Wheel and its [...] Read more.
Understanding the psychological underpinnings of environmental decision-making is crucial for addressing climate change. Responsible consumption and pro-environmental behaviors often involve complex trade-offs between individual and collective outcomes, as well as between immediate and long-term consequences. Drawing on the Behavior Change Wheel and its core COM-B model—a comprehensive behavioral framework integrating Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation—this study systematically examines how the COM-B model has been applied in research on responsible consumption and environmentally relevant behavior. Using a combined bibliometric and content-analytic review of peer-reviewed studies indexed in the Web of Science between 2018 and 2026, we explore the focus, the behavior targets, and the contextual factors in existing COM-B applications. The findings reveal a focus on individual-level awareness, such as dietary behavior and sustainable lifestyles, while meso- and macro-level applications addressing institutional and policy mechanisms remain limited. By identifying a structural misalignment between the COM-B framework and its empirical applications, we contribute to behavioral science by highlighting the need to integrate structural determinants with individual processes to better understand and address the psychological mechanisms underpinning responsible decisions using this theoretical breadth. In this context, we emphasize the importance of aligning behavioral research priorities with the objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 12. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 829 KB  
Article
The Intrinsic Experience of Tourism Autobiographical Memory on Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Self-Expansion Perspective
by Junxian Shen, Cora Un In Wong, Hongfeng Zhang, Fanbo Li and Jianhui Chen
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010002 - 24 Dec 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2264
Abstract
The existing literature on environmentally responsible behavior in tourists focuses primarily on the factors that influence this behavior, such as tourists’ attitudes and negative feelings. However, the intrinsic benefits of conservation for individual and societal well-being are often overlooked. Under the theoretical lens [...] Read more.
The existing literature on environmentally responsible behavior in tourists focuses primarily on the factors that influence this behavior, such as tourists’ attitudes and negative feelings. However, the intrinsic benefits of conservation for individual and societal well-being are often overlooked. Under the theoretical lens of self-expansion theory, this study examined the influence of Chinese tourists’ tourism autobiographical memory on their environmentally responsible behavior using a questionnaire survey (N = 434) with partial least squares structural equation modeling. The result attested that tourists’ self-expansion and psychological richness serially mediate the association between their tourism autobiographical memory and environmentally responsible behavior as a tourist. In addition, the implicit theories of personality moderate the prediction of tourist autobiographical memory on self-expansion. The results provide an additional explanation for environmentally responsible behavior in tourists, with practical implications for marketers and operators in the industry. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop