Management of Wildlife with the Goal of Localised Eradication

A special issue of Animals (ISSN 2076-2615). This special issue belongs to the section "Wildlife".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2022) | Viewed by 10780

Special Issue Editors

Department of Pest-Management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
Interests: animal monitoring; development of new vertebrate control tools; community engagement in wildlife management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Zero Invasive Predators, Wellington 6012, New Zealand
Interests: camera trapping; reducing risks to non-targets; local eradication of pests

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In 2016, the New Zealand government announced the ambitious goal of a predator-free New Zealand (removing possums, rats and mustelids) by 2050. Since that announcement, both private and publicly funded research teams have worked on scaling up existing tools and the development of new control tools to help achieve this goal.

We invite original research papers that address improved methods for the large-scale monitoring and removal of mammalian pests, with the goal of localised eradication. Additional topics may include the use of machine learning for automatic classification of animals from photos and/or video, and techniques to reduce the risks of control for non-target species.

Dr. James Ross
Dr. Maggie Nichols
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Animals is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • predator-free
  • local elimination
  • multi-kill traps
  • smart traps
  • social lures
  • long life baits
  • thermal cameras

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 3296 KiB  
Article
Targeted Mop up and Robust Response Tools Can Achieve and Maintain Possum Freedom on the Mainland
by Briar Cook and Nick Mulgan
Animals 2022, 12(7), 921; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070921 - 04 Apr 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2081
Abstract
Unfenced sites on mainland New Zealand have long been considered impossible to defend from reinvasion by possums, and are thus unsuitable for eradication. In July 2019, we began eliminating possums from 11,642 ha (including approximately 8700 ha of suitable possum habitat) in South [...] Read more.
Unfenced sites on mainland New Zealand have long been considered impossible to defend from reinvasion by possums, and are thus unsuitable for eradication. In July 2019, we began eliminating possums from 11,642 ha (including approximately 8700 ha of suitable possum habitat) in South Westland, using alpine rivers and high alpine ranges to minimise reinvasion. Two aerial 1080 (sodium fluoroacetate) applications, each with two pre-feeds, were used. Here, we detail the effort to mop up existing possums and subsequent invaders in the 13 months following the aerial operation. Possums were detected and caught using a motion-activated camera network, traps equipped with automated reporting and a possum search dog. The last probable survivor was eliminated on 29 June 2020, 11 months after the initial removal operation. Subsequently, possums entered the site at a rate of 4 per year. These were detected and removed using the same methods. The initial elimination cost NZD 163.75/ha and ongoing detection and response NZD 15.70/ha annually. We compare costs with possum eradications on islands and ongoing suppression on the mainland. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Wildlife with the Goal of Localised Eradication)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 293 KiB  
Article
Body Odours as Lures for Stoats Mustela erminea: Captive and Field Trials
by Elaine C. Murphy, Tim Sjoberg, Tom Agnew, Madeline Sutherland, Graeme Andrews, Raine Williams, Jeff Williams, James Ross and B. Kay Clapperton
Animals 2022, 12(3), 394; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030394 - 07 Feb 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2314
Abstract
Eradication and control methods to limit damage caused to native biota in New Zealand by the stoat (Mustela erminea) rely on effective lures for trapping and detection devices, such as cameras. Long-life semiochemical lures have the potential for targeting stoats in [...] Read more.
Eradication and control methods to limit damage caused to native biota in New Zealand by the stoat (Mustela erminea) rely on effective lures for trapping and detection devices, such as cameras. Long-life semiochemical lures have the potential for targeting stoats in situations where food-based lures are of limited success. The attractiveness of body odours of captive stoats was tested in a series of captive animal and extensive field trials to investigate their potential as trapping and monitoring lures. Stoats approached and spent significantly more time sniffing stoat urine and scats and bedding from oestrous female stoats than a non-treatment control. The bedding odours were attractive in both the breeding and the non-breeding season. Stoats also spent significantly more time sniffing oestrous stoat bedding than female ferret bedding, but the ferret odour also produced a significant response by stoats. In the field trials, there were no significant differences between the number of stoats caught with food lures (long-life rabbit or hen eggs) compared with oestrous female or male stoat bedding lures. These results indicate the potential of both stoat bedding odour and the scent of another mustelid species as stoat trapping lures that likely act as a general odour attractant rather than a specific chemical signal of oestrus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Wildlife with the Goal of Localised Eradication)
17 pages, 2287 KiB  
Article
Assessing Two Different Aerial Toxin Treatments for the Management of Invasive Rats
by Tess D. R. O’Malley, Margaret C. Stanley and James C. Russell
Animals 2022, 12(3), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030309 - 27 Jan 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2713
Abstract
Aotearoa–New Zealand has embarked on an ambitious goal: to completely eradicate key invasive mammals by 2050. This will require novel tools capable of eliminating pests on a large scale. In New Zealand, large-scale pest suppression is typically carried out using aerial application of [...] Read more.
Aotearoa–New Zealand has embarked on an ambitious goal: to completely eradicate key invasive mammals by 2050. This will require novel tools capable of eliminating pests on a large scale. In New Zealand, large-scale pest suppression is typically carried out using aerial application of the toxin sodium fluoroacetate (1080). However, as currently applied, this tool does not remove all individuals. A novel application method, dubbed ‘1080-to-zero’, aims to change this and reduce the abundances of target pests to zero or near-zero. One such target is black rats (Rattus rattus), an invasive species challenging to control using ground-based methods. This study monitored and compared the response of black rats to a 1080-to-zero operation and a standard suppression 1080 operation. No difference in the efficacy of rat removal was found between the two treatments. The 1080-to-zero operation did not achieve its goal of rat elimination or reduction to near-zero levels, with an estimated 1540 rats surviving across the 2200 ha treatment area. However, 1080 operations can produce variable responses, and the results observed here differ from the only other reported 1080-to-zero operation. We encourage further research into this tool, including how factors such as ecosystem type, mast fruiting and operational timing influence success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Wildlife with the Goal of Localised Eradication)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2512 KiB  
Article
Improving Trapping Efficiency for Control of American Mink (Neovison vison) in Patagonia
by Gonzalo Medina-Vogel, Francisco Muñoz, Meredith Moeggenberg, Carlos Calvo-Mac, Macarena Barros-Lama, Nickolas Ulloa, Daniel J. Pons and B. Kay Clapperton
Animals 2022, 12(2), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020142 - 07 Jan 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2393
Abstract
Two main challenges when controlling alien American mink (Neovison vison) in Patagonia are to maximize campaign efficacy and cost-effectiveness and to avoid trapping native species. We designed and tested new variants of collapsible wire box traps, compared the efficacy of a [...] Read more.
Two main challenges when controlling alien American mink (Neovison vison) in Patagonia are to maximize campaign efficacy and cost-effectiveness and to avoid trapping native species. We designed and tested new variants of collapsible wire box traps, compared the efficacy of a food-based bait and a scent lure and compared catch rates in different seasons of the year. We used the data to model the efficiency rate of the trapping and to determine the trapping effort required to remove 70–90% of the estimated discrete mink population. Between January 2018 and March 2021, we operated 59 trapping transects over 103 three-day trapping periods in southern Chile. Traps were first baited with canned fish, and afterwards with mink anal gland lure. We compared the efficacy of mink capture with that of our previous study. We trapped 196 mink (125 males, 71 females), with most captures in summer. The medium-sized GMV-18 trap caught more male mink, but the more compact GMV-13 caught fewer non-target rodents and no native mammals. The scent lure was more successful than the canned fish when the previous campaign’s data were included in the analysis. There was also a significant improvement in the proportion of female mink trapped and reduced labour compared with our previous campaign that used larger traps, fish bait and 400–500 m trap spacings. We caught relatively more females than males after the third night of trapping on a transect. Our data analysis supports the use of the GMV-13 variant of wire cage trap as the best trap size: it is effective on female mink, small, cheap and easy to transport. Combined with mink anal scent lure, it reduces the possibility of trapping native species compared with other traps tested in Chile. As the most efficient method for removing at least 70% of the estimated discrete mink population within the area covered by each trap transect in southern Chile tested to date, we recommend trapping campaigns using GMV-13 during summer, with a 200-m trap spacing, for up to 6 days before moving traps to a new site, with a combination of three days with a female scent gland lure, followed by three days with a male scent gland lure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Wildlife with the Goal of Localised Eradication)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop