Explorations of Pet Owners’, Veterinarians’, Farmers’, and Animal Experimenters’ Relationship to Animals

A special issue of Animals (ISSN 2076-2615). This special issue belongs to the section "Human-Animal Interactions, Animal Behaviour and Emotion".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2026 | Viewed by 1430

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Clinical Psychology, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Freudplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
Interests: dysfunctional and clinical aspects of human animal interactions and relationships; stress in the field of HAI; animal assisted interventions
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Clinical Psychology, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Freudplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
Interests: human-animal bond and stress; companion animals and mental health in vulnerable populations; psychophysiological effects of animal-assisted interventions; attachment and bonding in human-animal relationships; ethical aspect in the context of HAI
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Research on the relationship between humans and animals has drastically changed over the last years. Results show more and more ambivalent trends and ambiguities in human–animal relationships. Different results and a broad variety of settings and study designs allow to deepen our understanding in this special research field of Anthrozoology.

In addition to relationships between humans and pets in their households, a large variety of people living and/or working with animals are considered in studies. This growing body of research underlines the multifaceted nature of human–animal relationships, highlighting their significance not only for human health but also for animal welfare and broader ecological systems considering concepts such as one-wellbeing.

Recent research has shown that particularly in long-term relationships with companion animals, stressors may arise that significantly affect human wellbeing—a phenomenon that has received relatively little attention so far. At the same time, short-term interventions with animals have demonstrated numerous positive outcomes, however the human–animal relationship in professional settings such as veterinary visits are under researched.

Therefore, we are especially interested in the wide range of human–animal interactions to explore the importance of responsibility in different kinds of human–animal relationships further and understand how varying contexts and relational dynamics influence outcomes for both parties.

We invite papers focusing on different types of relationships between humans and animals. Studies on relationships with companion animals are welcome as well as the relationship to animals in contexts such as veterinary care, farming, shelter work or experimental research.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Birgit U. Stetina
Dr. Christine Smetaczek
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Animals is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • human-animal relationship(s)
  • human-animal relationship(s) in professional settings
  • companion animals
  • veterinarians
  • veterinary care
  • farmers
  • animal experiments
  • laboratory work
  • job stressors
  • occupation-al stressors

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

17 pages, 294 KB  
Article
Measuring the Attitudes of Animal Hospital Staff Toward Animals in Türkiye
by Şule Sanal, Sefa Yıldırım, Mehmet Yücel, Ali İlteriş Aykun, Mehmet Akif Sarı and Ayşe Menteş
Animals 2026, 16(6), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16060888 - 12 Mar 2026
Viewed by 398
Abstract
This study examined general attitudes toward animals among staff working in licensed animal hospitals in Türkiye. Using the 10-item Animal Attitude Scale (AAS-10), an online survey was administered to animal hospital staff; 193 questionnaires were completed from 17 provinces. Because total scores deviated [...] Read more.
This study examined general attitudes toward animals among staff working in licensed animal hospitals in Türkiye. Using the 10-item Animal Attitude Scale (AAS-10), an online survey was administered to animal hospital staff; 193 questionnaires were completed from 17 provinces. Because total scores deviated from normality, group comparisons were conducted using non-parametric tests, and a multiple linear regression model was fitted to examine joint associations with demographic and professional variables. Overall, participants reported generally positive attitudes (mean AAS-10 = 36.7 ± 5.85; range 10–50). Women scored higher than men (p < 0.001), and respondents aged 20–29 years scored higher than those aged ≥40 years (p = 0.029) in unadjusted comparisons; however, the age pattern was small and did not persist after adjustment for gender and other covariates. Professional variables, including occupational role and length of service, were not meaningfully associated with total scores. Exploratory item-level analyses suggested gender-related differences in acceptance of specific forms of animal use, but these should be interpreted cautiously given multiple comparisons. These findings provide a descriptive baseline of AAS-10 scores in a heterogeneous animal hospital workforce and support hypothesis generation for future research that incorporates practice-specific measures. Full article

Other

Jump to: Research

17 pages, 1419 KB  
Hypothesis
The Canine Search and Adoption Decision Process: A Conceptual Framework for Companion Pet Shelter Adoption
by Lawrence Minnis and Doris Bitler Davis
Animals 2026, 16(8), 1255; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16081255 - 19 Apr 2026
Viewed by 566
Abstract
Understanding how individuals decide to adopt shelter dogs remains a significant challenge within animal welfare research, as existing studies identify correlates of adoption outcomes without explaining the underlying decision process. This hypothesis introduces a conceptual framework that synthesizes empirical findings from dog adoption [...] Read more.
Understanding how individuals decide to adopt shelter dogs remains a significant challenge within animal welfare research, as existing studies identify correlates of adoption outcomes without explaining the underlying decision process. This hypothesis introduces a conceptual framework that synthesizes empirical findings from dog adoption studies with interdisciplinary theories to explain how adoption decisions emerge. Using a signal-to-noise perspective, the framework conceptualizes early bond formation between a potential adopter and a dog as a valuation signal that competes with uncertainty arising throughout the process. The functional model describes the adoption process as a lifecycle involving search, visitation, interaction, and decision phases, during which potential adopters seek information, evaluate available dogs, and form perceptions of compatibility. Interdisciplinary decision models, including Prospect Theory and the Diffusion Decision Model, are integrated to explain how information is framed, evaluated, and accumulated until a decision is reached. Empirical findings from human–dog interaction research are used to support the hypothesis that potential adopters evaluate companionship potential based on early bond formation associated with human–dog interactions. The framework offers a broad perspective on how adoption decisions may occur and establishes a theoretical foundation to guide future hypothesis development, measurement, and experimental research in companion animal adoption. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop