Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.8
3.0
Journals
Administrative Sciences
Special Issues
Organizations, Stakeholders and Public Affairs
share announcement

Organizations, Stakeholders and Public Affairs

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2013) | Viewed by 23577

Special Issue Editor

Dr. David Eduardo Cavazos

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Anderson School of Management, University of New Mexico, MSC 05 3090, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Interests: regulation; corporate political strategy; reputation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The realm of firm public affairs is extremely broad and complex. Issues ranging from stakeholder relations, issues management, political participation, strategy and agenda setting are among the wide range of issues that pose a variety of questions regarding firm interactions with external organizations. In addition such questions may have different, unique answers depending on context and global perspective. The special issue, accordingly, seeks original research from a broad and diverse set of perspectives that seeks to address questions dealing with how organizations, public or private, interact with external actors including, among others, stakeholder groups, media outlets, regulatory organizations and political actors. Submissions can, for instance, explore the tools organizations apply to set specific agendas as well as the strategies formulated and implemented to manage specific issues. Within the realm of politics potential topics may include exploring the interface between public and private organizations as well as how firms implement strategies to deal with public sector organizations.

Dr. David Eduardo Cavazos
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • media
  • stakeholders
  • public relations
  • political strategy
  • agenda setting

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

156 KiB  
Article
It Does Matter How You Get to the Top: Differentiating Status from Reputation
by Karen D. W. Patterson, David Eduardo Cavazos and Marvin Washington
Adm. Sci. 2014, 4(2), 73-86; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci4020073 - 4 Apr 2014
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6879
Abstract
Status and reputation have long been recognized as important influences in management research and recently much attention has been paid to defining the two concepts and understanding how they are utilized by organizations. However, few strategic management studies have identified the different methods [...] Read more.
Status and reputation have long been recognized as important influences in management research and recently much attention has been paid to defining the two concepts and understanding how they are utilized by organizations. However, few strategic management studies have identified the different methods through which status and reputation are constructed. While reputation has been linked with a history of quality, and status has been identified as an externally assigned measure of social position, empirical studies have been highly idiosyncratic in their identification of the mechanisms used to obtain either construct. This paper attempts to rectify that gap in the literature by identifying two distinct methods used to obtain reputation and status. We argue that certification contests can be used to increase organizational reputation and tournament rituals can be used to increase organizational status. We build theoretical propositions regarding the use of certification contexts and tournament rituals to show how reputation and status are achieved through similar, but distinct, methods and further the research on teasing apart these two important and intertwined concepts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organizations, Stakeholders and Public Affairs)
359 KiB  
Article
Managing Relational Legacies: Lessons from British Columbia, Canada
by Sofiane Baba and Emmanuel Raufflet
Adm. Sci. 2014, 4(1), 15-34; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci4010015 - 8 Jan 2014
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 8287
Abstract
Issues related to company-community relations and the social license to operate have emerged as strategic business issues. This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research on long-term company-community relations. An analysis of the relationship between Alcan (Aluminum of Canada, Montréal, [...] Read more.
Issues related to company-community relations and the social license to operate have emerged as strategic business issues. This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research on long-term company-community relations. An analysis of the relationship between Alcan (Aluminum of Canada, Montréal, Canada part of Rio Tinto since 2007) with the Cheslatta Carrier First Nation in the Kemano-Kitimat area of northern British Columbia, Canada, provides three contributions. The first is related to the notion of relational legacy, which refers to the sedimentation of unresolved issues that have the potential to impede the realization of corporate activities and the reproduction of low levels of social license to operate. The second concerns stakeholder management. While the literature suggests that stakeholders should be managed by companies according to the degree of salience, this analysis suggests that researchers and managers should consider the evolution of the environmental context in their analyses. Third, the analysis suggests that small or marginalized groups, depicted by the stakeholder management literature as dormant stakeholders, should not be underestimated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organizations, Stakeholders and Public Affairs)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

415 KiB  
Article
Relationships of the Trade Unions with the Media: The Lithuanian Case
by Asta Krašenkienė, Lina Kazokienė and Dalia Susnienė
Adm. Sci. 2014, 4(1), 1-14; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci4010001 - 3 Jan 2014
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 7926
Abstract
The various practices of different countries show that, in order to achieve trade unions’ goals, working relationships with the media are very important, especially in terms of influencing public (stakeholder) opinion, as well as instilling confidence in trade unions. This paper presents some [...] Read more.
The various practices of different countries show that, in order to achieve trade unions’ goals, working relationships with the media are very important, especially in terms of influencing public (stakeholder) opinion, as well as instilling confidence in trade unions. This paper presents some examples and empirical research results that prove the significance of such relationships. The situation in Lithuania is analyzed based on qualitative research results. The results reveal that Lithuanian trade unions do not have effective tools at their disposal for the promotion of their activity. Moreover, their notion of their relationships with the media is limited to a narrow understanding such as “the article or broadcast in media”. Due to this and other reasons, the promotion of employers’ concessions is weak. Different situations can be noticed by analyzing the independent trade unions which use other practices and systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organizations, Stakeholders and Public Affairs)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop