From Local Disasters to Global Design Discourse: Interior Architecture Theses in Türkiye
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- What is the distribution of disaster-oriented postgraduate theses by program level, and what is their proportion within the total number of theses? What are the academic titles of the advisors involved in these theses, and how does the advisor profile relate to the program level?
- What is the production trend of disaster-themed theses over the years? In which years is the increase, particularly after 2021, more pronounced?
- In which universities are disaster-themed theses concentrated, and what are the institutional differences?
- Under which institutes and departments are the theses conducted?
- Which research methods are preferred in disaster-themed theses?
- What research designs are used in the theses? Which data collection tools are preferred in disaster-themed theses?
- What study groups are included in the theses?
- Which themes stand out in the results of disaster-oriented theses? How are these themes distributed across technical, social, and design dimensions?
- Under which themes are the recommendations presented in the theses grouped? These questions were designed to comprehensively support the quantitative (frequency–percentage distributions) and qualitative (content–theme analysis) components of the research.
3. Results
3.1. Distribution Data on Program Levels and Advisor Profiles
3.2. Distribution Data on the Years of Postgraduate Theses
3.3. Distribution Data on Postgraduate Theses by University
3.4. Distribution Data on Postgraduate Theses by Institute and Department
3.5. Distribution Data on Postgraduate Theses by Research Methods
3.6. Distribution Data on Postgraduate Theses by Research Designs and Data Collection Tool
3.7. Distribution Data on Postgraduate Theses by Study Groups
3.8. Distribution Data on Postgraduate Theses by Research Findings
3.9. Distribution Data of Postgraduate Theses by Recommendations
4. Conclusions and Recommendations
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ulay, G. Analyses of Interior Furnishings Against Earthquakes. In Proceedings of the 2nd National Furniture Congress, Denizli, Türkiye, 11–13 April 2013; pp. 618–627. [Google Scholar]
- Tarakçı, B.İ.; Ertaş Beşir, Ş.; Seyfettinoğlu, M. The Effectiveness of Disaster Management and Temporary Shelter Units: Examples from Around the World and Turkey. In Proceedings of the 9th International Social Sciences Congress, Ankara, Türkiye, 27–29 September 2024; pp. 1048–1068. [Google Scholar]
- Diktaş Yerli, G. Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis of Postgraduate Studies on Disaster in the Field of Social Sciences. J. Disaster Risk 2023, 6, 961–976. [Google Scholar]
- Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD). Glossary of Disaster Management Terms with Explanations; Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry: Ankara, Türkiye, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Işık, Ö.; Aydınlıoğlu, H.M.; Koç, S.; Gündoğdu, O.; Korkmaz, G.; Ay, A. Disaster Management and Disaster-Oriented Health Services. Okmeydanı Med. J. 2012, 28, 82–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Presidency of Strategy and Budget (SBB). Report on the Kahramanmaraş and Hatay Earthquakes. 2023. Available online: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-Kahramanmaras-ve-Hatay-Depremleri-Raporu.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Disaster and Emergency Management Authority, Earthquake Department (AFAD-DDB). General Directorate of Earthquake and Risk Reduction. 2023. Available online: https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/ (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Ertaş Beşir, Ş.; Tarakçı, B.İ.; Seyfettinoğlu, M. The Effects of Disasters on Cultural Heritage: An Evaluation in Hatay. In Proceedings of the International Urban Landscape and Art Congress-V, Paris, France, 25–27 October 2024; pp. 879–895. [Google Scholar]
- Tarakci, B.I.; Kavut, I.E. Problems Experienced in Post-Disaster Temporary Shelter Units: The Case of Hatay/Iskenderun. Turk Deprem Arast. Derg. 2025, 7, 321–334. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency [AFAD]. Disaster management and natural disaster statistics in Türkiye. 2018. Available online: https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/35429/xfiles/turkiye_de_afetler.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2024).
- Inform Risk. INFORM Risk Index. 2025. Available online: https://drmkc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/inform-index (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Noraslı, M. Evaluation of Distance Education in Applied Courses by Interior Architecture Department Students in Pandemic and Post-Earthquake Practices. Turk. Online J. Des. Art Commun. 2024, 14, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boehm, S.; Kopec, D. Interior Design as a Post-Disaster Team Partner. Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ. 2016, 7, 276–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, A.N.; Salama, A.M.; Rigoni, C. Agile by Design: Embracing Resilient Built Environment Principles in Architectural and Urban Pedagogy. Architecture 2025, 5, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahvecioğlu, B.; Selçuk, S.A. Review of sustainable temporary housing and reuse strategy for post-disaster architectures: Current trends and strategic gaps. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2025, 72, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barmina, A.; Veselov, F.; Alieva, A.; Verkeev, A. There is No Such Thing as Natural Disasters: Key Approaches in Social Studies of Disasters. Laboratorium 2025, 17, 176–215. [Google Scholar]
- Karasar, N. Scientific Research Method, 19th ed.; Nobel Publishing: Ankara, Turkey, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Glesne, C. Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction, 4th ed.; Pearson Education: Boston, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Bowen, G.A. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qual. Res. J. 2009, 9, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yıldırım, A.; Şimşek, H. Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences, 5th ed.Seçkin Publishing: Ankara, Türkiye, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Council of Higher Education (YÖK). National Thesis Center. 2025. Available online: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/ (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Karadağ, E. Thematic Analysis of Doctoral Dissertations in the Field of Educational Sciences. Ahi. Evran. Univ. J. Kırşehir Educ. Fac. 2009, 10, 75–87. [Google Scholar]
- Aksöz, E.O.; Yücel, E. Bibliometric Analysis of Postgraduate Theses in the Field of Disability Tourism. J. Turk. Tour. Res. 2020, 4, 388–404. [Google Scholar]
- Al, U.; Doğan, G. Citation Analysis of Theses in the Department of Information and Records Management at Hacettepe University. Turk. Librariansh. 2012, 26, 349–369. [Google Scholar]
- Çakır, M. Discourse of Democracy: A Study on Postgraduate Theses. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Univ. J. Soc. Sci. 2017, 9, 312–326. [Google Scholar]
- Lopes, R.M.; Santos de Faria, F.; Fidalgo-Neto, A.; Mota, F.B. Facebook in Educational Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Scientometrics 2017, 111, 1591–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coşkun, İ.; Dündar, Ş.; Parlak, C. Examination of Postgraduate Theses in the Field of Special Education in Turkey in Terms of Various Variables. Ege J. Educ. 2014, 15, 375–396. [Google Scholar]
- Kasemodel, M.G.C.; Makishi, F.; Souza, R.C.; Silva, V.L. Following the Trail of Crumbs: A Bibliometric Study on Consumer Behavior in the Food Science and Technology Field. Int. J. Food Studies 2016, 5, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürbüz, S.; Şahin, F. Research Methods in Social Sciences; Seçkin Publishing: Ankara, Türkiye, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Karataş, Z. Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. J. Spirit. Based Soc. Work. Res. 2015, 1, 62–80. [Google Scholar]
- Hartmann, D.P. Considerations in the Choice of Interobserver Reliability Measures. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 1977, 10, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]



| Program Level | All Theses | Disaster-Oriented Theses | ![]() | ||||
| f | % | f | % | ||||
| Masters’s (MA) | 2207 | 85.25 | 27 | 1.04 | |||
| Doctorate (PhD) | 246 | 9.50 | 2 | 0.81 | |||
| Proficiency in Art (PA) | 136 | 5.25 | 4 | 0.15 | |||
| Total | 2589 | 100 | 33 | 1.27 | |||
| DISASTER-ORIENTED POSTGRADUATE THESES (f = 33) | |||||||
| No | Thesis Information | ||||||
| MA1 | Analysis of the living conditions of families whose homes were damaged in the August 17, 1999 İzmit earthquake, in terms of building and furniture aspects/17 Ağustos 1999 İzmit depreminde evi zarar gören ailelerin geçici ve kalıcı konutlardaki yaşamlarının bina-mobilya açısından incelenmesi ve sonuçları | 247p. | |||||
| MA2 | Security analysis and solution proposals for interior spaces in earthquake zone housing/Deprem bölgesi konutları için iç mekanların güvenlik analizi ve çözüm önerileri | 118p. | |||||
| MA3 | Examination of the interior design of mobile houses in terms of visual perception: Case of temporary disaster housing/Mobil konutların iç mekân tasarımlarının görsel algı açısından irdelenmesi: Geçici afet konutları örneği | 206p. | |||||
| MA4 | Examination of post-earthquake temporary housing units through visual and competition project examples/Deprem sonrası geçici barınma ünitelerinin görsel ve yarışma proje örnekleri üzerinden incelenmesi | 172p. | |||||
| MA5 | Spatial analysis of Sarıçam camp as an example of temporary housing design in refugee camps in Türkiye/Türkiye’deki mülteci kamplarında geçici konut tasarım örneği olarak sarıçam kampının mekânsal analizi | 183p. | |||||
| MA6 | On the housing problems of refugees in Turkey: Analysis of refugee settlement area in Erzincan/Türkiye’de mültecilerin barınma sorunları üzerine: Erzincan’da mülteci yerleşim alanı analizi | 147p. | |||||
| MA7 | Analysis of post-disaster emergency housing projects in terms of interior space quality parameters/Afet sonrası acil konut projelerinin iç mekan kalite parametreleri açısından analizi | 142p. | |||||
| MA8 | Participatory approach proposals examining living conditions in prefabricated temporary housing during post-disaster reconstruction/Afet sonrası yeniden yapılanma döneminde prefabrike geçici konutlardaki yaşam şartlarını irdeleyen katılımcı yaklaşım önerileri | 168p. | |||||
| MA9 | Earthquake-resistant traditional houses: The case of Sakarya-Hendek/Depreme dayanıklı geleneksel konutlar: Sakarya- Hendek örneği | 106p. | |||||
| MA10 | Risk management for disasters and emergencies in studio apartment interior design: An earthquake modeling example/İç mekân tasarımında stüdyo daireler için afet ve acil durumlara yönelik risk yönetimi: depreme yönelik modelleme örneği (Berk, 2021) | 218p. | |||||
| MA11 | A study on the flexible use of residential-type shelters in Türkiye/Türkiye’deki konut tipi sığınakların esnek kullanımına ilişkin bir araştırma | 137p. | |||||
| MA12 | Evaluation of post-disaster temporary settlements through the concept of mass production/Afet sonrası geçici yerleşim alanlarının seri üretim kavramı ile değerlendirilmesi | 162p. | |||||
| MA13 | Transformation of hospitals through the COVID-19 pandemic/Transformation of hospitals through COVID-19 pandemic | 153p. | |||||
| MA14 | Development of digital internship design based on Bologna program competencies in architecture, planning, and design education during and after pandemic/disaster conditions/Pandemi/afet durumu ve sonrasında mimarlık, planlama ve tasarım eğitiminde bologna program yeterlilikleri üzerinden dijital staj kurgusunun gelişmesi | 136p. | |||||
| MA15 | Use of containers as temporary housing and development of spatial design solutions/Konteynerlerin geçici konut olarak kullanımı ve mekânsal çözüm önerileri geliştirilmesi | 69p. | |||||
| MA16 | Smart homes from the perspective of disaster resilience and their effects on the real estate sector in Istanbul/Afete karşı dirençlilik perspektifinden akıllı konutlar ve İstanbul’da gayrimenkul sektörü üzerindeki etkileri | 140p. | |||||
| MA17 | Proposal of an educational model addressing hazards and risks caused by non-structural elements during earthquakes/Deprem sürecinde yapısal olmayan elemanların neden olduğu tehlike ve risklere yönelik eğitim modelinin önerilmesi | 220p. | |||||
| MA18 | Creating space according to changing needs: Post-disaster temporary housing units/Değişen ihtiyaçlara göre mekan yaratma: Afet sonrası geçici konut birimleri | 88p. | |||||
| MA19 | Interior design principles for post-disaster temporary housing in Istanbul/İstanbul’da afet sonrası geçici konut iç mekan tasarım ilkeleri | 127p. | |||||
| MA20 | User satisfaction analysis of post-disaster permanent housing: Case of Elazığ/Afet sonrası kalıcı konutlarda kullanıcı memnuniyeti analizi: Elazığ örneği | 104p. | |||||
| MA21 | Examination of interior ergonomics of buildings constructed during the post-earthquake temporary settlement period/Deprem sonrası geçici yapılanma döneminde inşa edilen yapıların iç mekan ergonomilerinin incelenmesi | 211p. | |||||
| MA22 | Proposal for modular housing design for post-earthquake use/Deprem sonrası kullanıma yönelik modüler konut tasarımı önerisi | 112p. | |||||
| MA23 | Mobile home applications and post-disaster temporary housing potentials/Mobil ev uygulamaları ve afet sonrası geçici barınma potansiyelleri | 111p. | |||||
| MA24 | Classification of requirements in post-earthquake temporary housing units and their impact on design/Deprem sonrası kullanılan geçici barınma ünitelerindeki gereksinimlerin sınıflandırılması ve tasarıma etkisi | 230p. | |||||
| MA25 | Determining the relationship between project risk scores related to non-structural elements and students’ knowledge and awareness levels: The case of Akdeniz University/Yapısal olmayan elemanlara yönelik proje risk puanları ile öğrencilerin bilgi ve farkındalık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi: Akdeniz Üniversitesi örneği | 136p. | |||||
| MA26 | Pop-up as a form of temporary spatial intervention and interior space analysis/Geçici mekânsal müdahale biçimi olarak pop up ve iç mekân analizleri | 118p. | |||||
| MA27 | Causes of damage in earthquake zone housing and proposals for reducing earthquake effects/Deprem bölgesi konutlarının hasar alma sebepleri ve deprem etkilerinin azaltılması için öneriler | 157p. | |||||
| PhD28 | Development of a fast, easy, and repeatable installation model and service infrastructure for an emergency module usable in disaster management/Afet yönetiminde kullanılabilir acil durum modülü için hızlı-kolay-tekrarlanabilir bir kurulum modeli geliştirilmesi ve hizmet alt yapısının kurgulanması | 194p. | |||||
| PhD29 | Proposal for a temporary housing design model in emergencies: The case of Türkiye/Acil durumlarda geçici konut tasarım model önerisi: Türkiye örneği | 255p. | |||||
| PA30 | The role of disaster and emergency risk planning in determining interior design criteria/İç mekan tasarım kriterlerinin belirlenmesinde afet ve acil durum risk planlamasının rolü | 333p. | |||||
| PA31 | Green building project from containers; A health unit modeling example/Konteynerlerden yeşil yapı projesi; Sağlık ünitesi modelleme örneği | 181p. | |||||
| PA32 | Concepts of flexibility and adaptability in disaster housing/Afet konutlarında esneklik ve değişebilirlik kavramları | 168p. | |||||
| PA33 | Proposal for a micro-scale mobile space model for emergency situations/Olağanüstü durumlara yönelik mikro ölçekte mobil mekân modeli önerisi | 95p. | |||||
| Program Level | All Theses | Disaster-Focused Theses | Advisor Profile of Disaster-Focused Theses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. Dr. | Assoc. Prof. Dr. | Asst. Prof. Dr. | ||||||||
| f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | |
| Master’s Degree | 2207 | 85.25 | 27 | 1.04 | 5 | 15.15 | 12 | 36.36 | 10 | 30.30 |
| Doctorate (PhD) | 246 | 9.50 | 2 | 0.81 | 1 | 3.03 | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | 0 |
| Proficiency in Art | 136 | 5.25 | 4 | 0.15 | 3 | 9.09 | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2589 | 100 | 33 | 1.27 | 9 | 27.27 | 14 | 42.42 | 10 | 30.30 |
![]() | ||||||||||
| The total values were obtained by combining the numerical data for each program level and the frequencies of advisor titles. | ||||||||||
| Distribution Data by Year | Disaster-Focused Theses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Master’s Degree | Doctorate (PhD) | Proficiency in Art | Total | |||||
| f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | |
| 2003 | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.03 |
| 2008 | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.03 |
| 2011 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.03 | 1 | 3.03 |
| 2013 | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.03 |
| 2016 | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.03 | 2 | 6.06 |
| 2018 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.03 | 1 | 3.03 |
| 2019 | 2 | 6.06 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 6.06 |
| 2020 | 2 | 6.06 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 6.06 |
| 2021 | 6 | 18.18 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 6 | 18.18 |
| 2022 | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.03 |
| 2023 | 5 | 15.15 | 1 | 3.03 | 0 | 0.00 | 6 | 6.06 |
| 2024 | 7 | 21.21 | 1 | 3.03 | 1 | 3.03 | 9 | 27.27 |
![]() | ||||||||
| The total values were obtained by combining the frequency data derived from the distribution values for each year. | ||||||||
| Universities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Akdeniz U. | Atılım U. | Bahçeşehir U. | Başkent U. | Çankaya U. | Erciyes U. | Hacettepe U. | İstanbul Kültür U. | İstanbul Ticaret U. | İstanbul Teknik U. | İzmir Ekonomi U. | KTU | Kocaeli U. | Marmara U. | MSGSU | Yaşar U. | Işık U. | ||
| MA | f | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| % | 9.09 | 6.06 | 12.1 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 6.06 | 0.09 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 6.06 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 9.09 | 6.06 | 3.03 | |
| PhD | f | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| PA | f | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| T | f | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| % | 9.09 | 6.06 | 12.1 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 18.1 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 6.06 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 12.1 | 6.06 | 3.03 | |
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total values are obtained by combining the frequencies of numerical data collected at each program level. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution by Institute | Distribution by Department | |||||||||||
| Institute of Science | Graduate Education Institute | Institute of Fine Arts | Institute of Social Sciences | Department of Interior Architecture | Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design | Department of Interior Design | Department of Architecture | Department of Interior Architectural Design | Department of Design Studies | Department of Interior Architecture (Art Major) | ||
| T | f | 14 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| % | 42.42 | 33.33 | 21.21 | 9.09 | 45.45 | 30.30 | 9.09 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.03 | |
![]() | ||||||||||||
| The total values were obtained by combining the frequencies of the numerical data derived from the total number of theses (f = 33) | ||||||||||||
| Method | All Theses | |
|---|---|---|
| f | % | |
| Qualitative | 24 | 72.73 |
| Quantitative | 1 | 24.24 |
| Mixed | 8 | 3.03 |
| Total | 33 | 100 |
![]() | ||
| The total values were obtained by combining the frequencies of the numerical data derived from the total number of theses (f = 33) | ||
| Research Design | All Theses | Data Collection Tool | All Theses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f | % | f | % | ||
| Descriptive + Case Study | 17 | 51.52 | Document Analysis | 30 | 32.25 |
| Descriptive | 4 | 12.12 | Observation | 15 | 16.12 |
| Action Research | 4 | 12.12 | Interview | 12 | 12.90 |
| Case Analysis | 3 | 9.09 | Questionnaire/Survey | 6 | 6.45 |
| Descriptive + Field Research | 1 | 3.03 | Modeling/Design | 8 | 8,60 |
| Case Study | 3 | 9.09 | Content Analysis | 5 | 5.37 |
| Experimental + Case Study | 1 | 3.03 | Search Conference | 3 | 3.22 |
| Total | 33 | 100 | SWOT Analysis | 2 | 2.15 |
![]() | Visual Analysis | 2 | 2.15 | ||
| GIS Software | 1 | 1.07 | |||
| Demographic Information Form | 3 | 3.22 | |||
| Statistical Tests | 2 | 2.15 | |||
| Spatial Analysis | 4 | 4.30 | |||
| Total | 93 | 100 | |||
![]() | |||||
| Total values were obtained by combining tool counts and thesis data frequencies. | |||||
| Study Groups | All Theses | |
|---|---|---|
| f | % | |
| Earthquake Survivors/Disaster Victims | 8 | 17.0 |
| Academics/Experts | 6 | 12.8 |
| Students (Interior Architecture/Architecture) | 4 | 8. |
| Municipal Officials/Public Representatives | 2 | 4.3 |
| Competition/Project Participants | 2 | 4.3 |
| Temporary–Permanent Housing Users | 7 | 14.9 |
| Healthcare Facilities/Hospitals | 2 | 4.3 |
| Refugees/Migrant Families | 1 | 2.1 |
| Post-Disaster Field Cases | 7 | 14.9 |
| Institutional Experts | 3 | 6.4 |
| Others (Technical Team, Mentor Group) | 3 | 6.4 |
| Total | 47 | 100 |
![]() | ||
| Since a single thesis may include more than one group, the table shows the total number of occurrences, not the total number of theses. | ||
| Themes | Codes/Findings | f |
| Temporary Housing / Modular Structures | Temporary housing units exhibit rapid assembly and mobility features. | 13 |
| The modular production approach offers potential for reuse. | ||
| Designs fail to adapt to cultural differences and adequately address privacy needs. | ||
| There are deficiencies in infrastructure components such as water, electricity, and heating. | ||
| Mobility, container, and portable solution approaches are widely used. | ||
| Psychological and Social Recovery | Users often fail to experience a sense of belonging or ‘home’. | 11 |
| Spatial arrangements need to support post-traumatic recovery. | ||
| Common spaces for social interaction are insufficient. | ||
| Small and cramped spaces increase stress levels. | ||
| Sustainability and Energy Autonomy | Energy generation through photovoltaic and wind systems is feasible. | 8 |
| The use of recycled materials is becoming more widespread. | ||
| Water and waste management systems strengthen environmental sustainability. | ||
| Off-grid energy management is targeted. | ||
| Education and Awareness | Users who receive earthquake training demonstrate increased risk awareness. | 8 |
| Awareness of non-structural elements remains low. | ||
| Drill-based and practice-oriented training remains insufficient. | ||
| There is a need for interdisciplinary education modules. | ||
| Design and Planning Proposals | Flexible and modular planning approaches are recommended. | 7 |
| Functional and adaptable furniture solutions are proposed. | ||
| Ergonomic and accessibility criteria are central to the design. | ||
| Color, lighting, wayfinding, and privacy arrangements need improvement. | ||
| Production, Installation, and Logistical Efficiency | Mass production and prefabricated systems accelerate processes. | 7 |
| Quick-assembly and portable building components enhance installation efficiency. | ||
| Container logistics and storage processes provide operational ease. | ||
| Interdisciplinary Approach and Participation | Collaboration among architecture, engineering, sociology, and psychology disciplines is required. | 6 |
| User participation processes remain limited. | ||
| Interdisciplinary coordination needs persist. | ||
| Interior Quality and Functionality | Parameters of storage, kitchen, and esthetic quality are often inadequate. | 6 |
| Ergonomic arrangements remain insufficient. | ||
| Heating and cooling performance is inadequate. | ||
| Spatial satisfaction levels are low. | ||
| Technology and Innovation | Smart home systems are lacking in most examples. | 5 |
| Digital design and software-based analytical approaches are utilized. | ||
| Technology-based disaster awareness solutions are being developed. | ||
| Technology and Innovation | Deficiencies exist in regulatory and governance structures. | 4 |
| Inconsistencies are observed in implementation processes. | ||
| Risk reduction policies remain weak. | ||
| Structural Resilience and Technical Issues | Ground conditions, short-column effects, and low concrete strength increase damage levels. | 4 |
| Workmanship errors and irregular structural forms negatively affect performance. | ||
| Inspection processes are inadequate. | ||
| Economic and Circular Use | Reuse and modular production approaches reduce costs. | 3 |
| Reutilization of idle building elements provides economic efficiency. | ||
| Cultural and Social Adaptation | Existing solutions fail to align with local habits and social bonds. | 3 |
| Housing expectations compatible with cultural contexts are unmet. | ||
| Requirements for social integration remain unfulfilled. | ||
| The Role of Interior Architecture and Scale Approach | Comfort, privacy, and safety needs are decisive in interior environments. | 3 |
| Ethical responsibility and user-centered design principles remain essential. | ||
| Micro-scale solution development represents a core contribution of the field. | ||
| User Diversity and Accessibility | The needs of disabled, elderly, and child users are insufficiently considered in design decisions. | 3 |
| Universal design principles are limited in application. | ||
| Inclusive planning approaches are not widespread. | ||
| User Diversity and Accessibility | Knowledge exchange between theory and practice is weak. | 3 |
| Experience sharing and data transfer are insufficient. | ||
| Regulation and Supervision | Compliance with regulations remains low. | 2 |
| Effective supervision is not achieved in implementation processes. | ||
| Furniture and Fixture Safety | Unsecured furniture increases the risk of injury and damage. | 2 |
| Furniture placement occasionally obstructs evacuation routes. | ||
| Field Structures / Health Modules | Field hospitals and mobile modules are used during emergencies. | 2 |
| Temporary health structures can be adapted for long-term use. | ||
| Climatic Adaptation and Structural Flexibility | Elevated configurations provide advantages under different climatic conditions. | 2 |
| Modules with structural flexibility enhance climatic adaptability. | ||
| Limitations of Participatory Approach | Factors such as time, language, and hesitation limit participation. | 2 |
| Community-based processes are not sufficiently implemented. | ||
| Land and Site Selection | Planning decisions do not align adequately with topography and climate data. | 2 |
| Site selection and accessibility criteria remain limited in practice. | ||
| Planning and Accessibility | Continuity of access between building, environment, and interior space is not ensured. | 1 |
| Evacuation routes are not comprehensively planned. | ||
| Evacuation and Wayfinding Systems | Readability of escape routes and wayfinding systems remains weak. | 1 |
| Interior Components (Horizontal/Vertical) | Surface, material, and detail choices increase risks of collapse or falling. | 1 |
| Installation Systems and Integration | There is a lack of integration among electrical, gas, and HVAC systems. | 1 |
| Disaster Type–Space Matching | Spatial requirements for earthquake, flood, fire, and chemical disasters remain undefined. | 1 |
| Operational Continuity | Plans for post-disaster operational continuity are not established. | 1 |
| Data and Traceability | Recording and monitoring systems remain insufficient. | 1 |
| Ethics and Responsibility | Safety criteria are not central to design decisions. | 1 |
| Sustainability Performance and Regulatory Compliance | Compliance with health regulations and sustainability standards is achievable. | 1 |
| Intellectual Property and Commercialization | Patent potential and entrepreneurial opportunities are emerging. | 1 |
| Social Benefit and Multipurpose Use | Shelter, logistics, and aid functions can be integrated within the same modular setup. | 1 |
| Micro-Mobile Space Approach | Rapid installation needs during the first 72 h after a disaster are critical. | 1 |
| Micro-scale solutions based on environment–user–space relationships are emphasized. | ||
| User-Oriented Flexibility and Adaptive Planning | Movable panels and customizable modules enhance user-oriented flexibility. | 1 |
| Universal design principles and low-maintenance requirements support long-term usability. | ||
| Non-load-bearing interior partitions allow safe adaptation. | ||
![]() | ||
| Frequencies reflect repetitions rather than thesis count. | ||
| Themes | Codes/Recommendations | f |
| User-Centered Design | It is recommended to develop flexible and user-oriented modular designs. | 14 |
| Interdisciplinary Participation/Planning | Post-disaster housing and interior design require coordinated interdisciplinary work. | 12 |
| Design Improvements/Ergonomics | Interior layouts should be designed to provide functional, esthetic, and psychological support. | 11 |
| Policy, Standards and Governance | Developing design-phase regulations and control systems is essential. | 10 |
| Disaster/Temporary Housing Design | It is recommended to develop planned, sustainable, and user-oriented post-disaster housing strategies. | 10 |
| Planning and Settlement/Site Selection | Planning should address micro-zoning, modular layouts, and climate adaptation. | 10 |
| Education and Awareness/Curriculum | To raise disaster awareness, curriculum integration, assessment, and practical training should be expanded. | 9 |
| Sustainability and Energy Use | Recyclable solutions with PV and micro-wind systems for energy and water efficiency are recommended. | 9 |
| Psychological and Social Comfort | Living spaces that strengthen privacy, spaciousness, belonging, and community support should be designed. | 8 |
| Material and Detail Enhancement | Local, durable, and eco-friendly systems should be promoted to enhance spatial quality. | 8 |
| Logistics and Infrastructure Management | Stock planning and portable system design should be improved for temporary sheltering. | 7 |
| Storage and Furniture Design | Modular storage and standardized fastening systems are essential. | 6 |
| Disaster Safety and Evacuation Planning | Solutions ensuring safe escape routes and infrastructure should be implemented. | 5 |
| Cultural and Local Adaptation | Designs should align with local lifestyles and principles of cultural sustainability. | 5 |
| Spatial Privacy and Security | Lighting, circulation, and partition elements should be arranged to ensure safe transitions. | 4 |
| Curriculum Development and Educational Reform | Risk-based studio practices and project-based learning models should be integrated into higher education curricula. | 4 |
| Sustainability Policies/Green Technology | It is recommended to integrate green technologies such as energy efficiency, environmental planning, and microgrid systems into designs. | 4 |
| Accessible/Inclusive Design | Access routes and module adaptations should be improved in line with universal design principles. | 4 |
| Structural Resilience and Reinforcement | Seismic anchoring, FRP, and steel jacketing reinforcement methods should be applied in disaster housing. | 3 |
| Standardized Installation | Module standardization enabling rapid assembly and tool-free installation should be developed. | 3 |
| Knowledge Sharing and Digital Guide | It is recommended to prepare and share typology matrices and checklists through digital platforms. | 3 |
| Energy and Building Envelope Performance | Energy efficiency should be enhanced using high R-value panels and HVAC recovery systems. | 3 |
| Functional Packages (Healthcare Facilities) | Developing healthcare packages with clinical, triage, and sterilization units is recommended. | 2 |
| Logistics Optimization | Logistical processes should be optimized through palletizing, stock management, and RFID/QR systems. | 2 |
| Material & Energy Improvements | Eco-friendly healthcare facilities should use PV-battery systems and low-VOC materials. | 2 |
| Certification & Testing | It is recommended to make field drills mandatory through IEC/EN compliance tests. | 2 |
| Supply & Production Strategy | Local supply chains and quality control should be strengthened through DFMA. | 2 |
| Settlement Guide and Micro-Planning | It is recommended to standardize circulation, drainage, and insulation plans through guideline documents. | 2 |
| Adaptability and Scenario Planning | Variant modular designs suitable for disaster and refugee scenarios should be developed. | 2 |
| Pilot and User Testing | It is recommended to measure user experience through field tests and update designs accordingly. | 2 |
| 72-Hour Operational Planning | Operational plans for the first 72 h after a disaster should focus on supply and stabilization | 1 |
| Modular Transformable Interiors | It is recommended to create plug-and-play systems with foldable structures and multifunctional modules. | 1 |
| Micro-Infrastructure and Rapid Installation Package | Infrastructure solutions that can be activated within 60 min using PV, battery, greywater, and chemical WC systems should be developed. | 1 |
| Open Model/Graphic Guide | Open guides with visual standards and disaster-specific appendices are recommended. | 1 |
| Participatory Needs Program and Modular Grid | Modular grid standards including panel systems, accessibility sets, and maintenance guides based on socio-cultural profiles should be developed. | 1 |
![]() | ||
| A thesis may include multiple themes and codes; frequencies show occurrences, not total theses. | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tarakçı, B.İ. From Local Disasters to Global Design Discourse: Interior Architecture Theses in Türkiye. Trends High. Educ. 2025, 4, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu4040072
Tarakçı Bİ. From Local Disasters to Global Design Discourse: Interior Architecture Theses in Türkiye. Trends in Higher Education. 2025; 4(4):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu4040072
Chicago/Turabian StyleTarakçı, Betül İrem. 2025. "From Local Disasters to Global Design Discourse: Interior Architecture Theses in Türkiye" Trends in Higher Education 4, no. 4: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu4040072
APA StyleTarakçı, B. İ. (2025). From Local Disasters to Global Design Discourse: Interior Architecture Theses in Türkiye. Trends in Higher Education, 4(4), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu4040072












