Next Article in Journal
Nose-to Brain Delivery of Resveratrol, a Non-Invasive Method for the Treatment of Cerebral Ischemia
Next Article in Special Issue
Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro Antimalarial Evaluation of New 1,3,5-Tris[(4-(Substituted-Aminomethyl)Phenoxy)Methyl]Benzenes
Previous Article in Journal
In Silico Therapeutic Study: The Next Frontier in the Fight against SARS-CoV-2 and Its Variants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preformulation Studies of Novel Menthol Prodrugs with Antiparasitic Activity: Chemical Stability, In Silico, and In Vitro Permeability Assays
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Opportunities and Difficulties in the Repurposing of HDAC Inhibitors as Antiparasitic Agents

Drugs Drug Candidates 2024, 3(1), 70-101; https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc3010006
by Tapas Kumar Mohapatra 1, Reena Rani Nayak 2, Ankit Ganeshpurkar 3, Prashant Tiwari 4,* and Dileep Kumar 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Drugs Drug Candidates 2024, 3(1), 70-101; https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc3010006
Submission received: 23 November 2023 / Revised: 29 December 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2024 / Published: 18 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Anti-Parasite Drug Discovery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Journal: Drugs and Drug Candidates

Manuscript ID: ddc-2762934

 Reviewers Comments – Summary

 The work is interesting and has potential, however, in its current form is not suitable for publication in Drugs and Drug Candidates. I have provided some comments for consideration.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Some moderate editing of English language required.

Author Response

The point-wise reply to comments is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The review summarizes the role of HDAC and HDAc inhibitors in the treatment of parasite infections. The review in well organized and includes a deep description of the field bibliography. However a figure about HDAC mechanism of actions at the begining of the review would be informative.

Minor points:

- line 155. Change HDCA to HDAC

- line 157. histone acetiltransferase must start with capital letter

Author Response

The point-wise reply to comments is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Review for the

Manuscript ID:  ddc-2762934 (DDC (ISSN 2813-2998))

Type: Review

Title:

Opportunities and Difficulties in the Repurposing of HDAC Inhibitors as Anti-Parasitic Agents

Authors

Tapas Kumar Mohapatra, Reena Rani Nayak , Ankit Ganeshpurkar, Prashant Tiwari , Dileep Kumar*

      Current extensive manuscript (34 pages,  178 refs.) is dedicated to the detailed review of HDAC inhibitors re-purposing, targeting the wide spectrum of parasitic diseases.

      Presented review can be useful and recommended for many researchers, including pharmaceutical specialists and medicinal chemists working with antiparasitical drugs.

      This review also focuses on repurposing opportunities and challenges of HDAC inhibitors that are preceded by their clinical development as potent new anti-parasitic drugs.

      Despite that some review papers are already previously published (for example:

Digest paper „Klug, D.M.; Gelb, M.H.; Pollastri, M.P.  Repurposing strategies for tropical disease drug discovery. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 2569-2576.“ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.03.103 .

and „Ghazy, E.; Abdelsalam, M.; Robaa, D.; Pierce, R.J.; Sippl, W. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors for the treatment of schistosomiasis. Pharmaceuticals, 2022, 15(1), 80.‘‘ https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15010080

they are mainly covering only progress in the areas dedicated for one  or another specific parasitic disease and suffered from the complete, wide and more detailed view, presented in this manuscript.

       The manuscript is submitted to the Section „Medicinal Chemistry and Preliminary Screening“ and the

Topical Collection: „Anti-Parasite Drug Discovery“ , thus, this submission is according to the thematic covered by this Section.

        In general, current paper is clearly written, detailed, and mostly accepable in technical qualilty and language, however it still need a lot of minor corrections for the improvement of the main text and in  some Figures, and also general improvement of all references part, according to the requirements for the MDPI journals.

       List of recommended corrections and improvements are presented in attachment as PDF file.

     When all these mentioned minor corrections and improvements will be done,

the manuscript can be accepted.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The point-wise reply to comments is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Here are my comments regarding this manuscript:

Line 23 – Thus is in capital letters, change

Line 33 – Parasitic disease – change in plural (and the rest of the text accordingly) – this is not just one disease

Line 37 – this sentence needs to be replaced „Annually, one million deaths occur due to parasitic diseases.”

Line 49 – change the sencence, it is grammatically incorrect

Line 209 – correct typo

Line 239 – change tgHDAC into TgHDAC

Figure 2. – Text missing below acetylated proteins

Line 350 – how was apicidin used as antimalarial, the way that I’s presented in the manuscript implies that it was used in humans, it should be more clearly stated what it means in this sentence

Line 366 – why is Apicidin written with a capital letter?

Line 372 – typo in the figure title

Figure 3 – hydroxamic acid derivatives are placed together with carboxylic acids, they should be separatedin two groups as it is in the text

Lines 398 and 399 – IC50 is written differently in the text, check in the entire manuscript

Line 410 – this sentence needs to be improved, “compounds of hydroxamic acid” sounds strange, zinc binding group is also hydroxamic acid so here it sounds as if it doesn’t belong to this group of compounds

Line 511 – Table 1 – in the text describing this table is placed that it contains chemical structure which implies that it contains image of the structure, please correct

Line 508 and 509 – compounds numbers in bold (and check in the entire manuscript)

Figure 5 – compound 34 is not hydroxamic acid, and please correct its structure, some atoms overlap. Why are there hydroxamic acids separated from the ones that were listed in the figure 3, but there they were marked as carboxylic acid derivatives?

Figure 6 – again here are some structures that belong to the hydroxamic acid group, I strongly suggest to the authors to revise the division of all the compounds they mention in the manuscript

Line 667 and 668 – which compounds do you mean here? Which are those two recently approved hydroxamates?

Line 711 and 729 – the term antileishmanial is written differently, please check the entire manuscript that all terms are written equally.

Line 875 – please correct this sentence

Comments on the Quality of English Language

I've noticed several grammar mistakes in the manuscript, so I advise you to revise the manuscript regarding the language

Author Response

The point-wise reply to comments is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop