Next Article in Journal
Ergosterol Biosynthesis and Regulation Impact the Antifungal Resistance and Virulence of Candida spp.
Previous Article in Journal
A Maize Mutant Impaired in SL Biosynthesis (zmccd8) Shows a Lower Growth, an Altered Response to Nitrogen Starvation, and a Potential Secondary Effect on Drought Tolerance
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Effects of LED Light on Aromatic Medicinal Plants from Lavandula, Salvia, and Thymus Genera: A Systematic Review

Stresses 2024, 4(4), 627-640; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040040
by Gustavo J. Cáceres-Cevallos * and María J. Jordán
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Stresses 2024, 4(4), 627-640; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040040
Submission received: 23 August 2024 / Revised: 26 September 2024 / Accepted: 27 September 2024 / Published: 30 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Plant Responses to Environmental Stress)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The title is indeed engaging and well-aligned with the journal's scope, offering valuable insights into the effect of various LED light treatments on plant morphology, physiology, bioactive compound production, and flowering induction in aromatic medicinal plants, particularly species within the Lavandula, Salvia, and Thymus genera.

However significant revisions are required before it can be considered for publication.

1.     Keywords and Numbers: Please provide an explanation or context for these numbers to enhance their relevance and utility.

2.     Abstract: The abstract needs to be revised to explicitly state the main experimental results covered in the review. Specifically, include key findings such as root dry weight, the number of flowering buds, and other significant results. This will provide readers with a clear and concise summary of the review’s key contributions.

3.     Abbreviations: Ensure that all abbreviations are fully defined upon their first mention in the manuscript. This will enhance clarity and make the manuscript more accessible to a wider audience.

4.     Discussion Section: The discussion section requires substantial enhancement. Focus on linking ideas more coherently to provide a clear narrative of how the various LED light treatments impact the studied plant species. Strengthening the connections between findings and theoretical implications will improve the overall coherence of the discussion.

5.     Citation Format: Revise the citation format within the text by removing the years of publication. Ensure that the citations are consistent with the journal’s guidelines and provide a seamless reading experience.

6.     Conclusions: The conclusions are generally consistent with the evidence and arguments presented. However, they need further refinement to more effectively summarize and integrate the main findings of the review.

  7.   References: While the references cited are appropriate, the discussion would benefit from additional references that both support and challenge the manuscript’s findings. Including a broader range of studies will provide a more comprehensive perspective and strengthen the review.

 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1, thank you for your comments and suggestions to improve the scientific quality of the manuscript “Effects of LED light on aromatic medicinal plants from Lavandula, Salvia, and Thymus genera: A systematic review”

All the suggestions and comments have been taken into account, please find these corrections and comments below.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article entitled "Effects of LED light on aromatic medicinal plants from Lavandula, Salvia, and Thymus genera: A systematic review" was reviewed.

 

The observations are highlighted in the text.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

moderate correlation.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2

 

Thank you for your input to our research study entitled “Effects of LED light on aromatic medicinal plants from Lavandula, Salvia, and Thymus genera: A systematic review.”, we greatly appreciate you taking the time to read the document and providing your support and comments.

All the suggestions and comments have been taken into account, please find these corrections and comments below.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors, 

I have read this Manuscript with a great interest, and I am happy that I can recommend for acceptance. I only found some minor formatting issues, so just please go over the text to ensure that everything is proper. Please have a look at the attached pdf with comments I left. It may be of help with that. This is probably something that may also be pointed out to you during production of the paper. In short, the paper is very well-written, the study was performed excellently, I love how you did the meta analysis study and the conlusions you reached based on the results. You presented everything in a very clear, concise way and I found the article very informative, novel and interesting. I think the readers will also find it to be of high quality. And I wish you a lot of readers and many citations. Excellent work!

Sincerely, 

Reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Revisor 3

 

Thank you for your input to our research study entitled “Effects of LED light on aromatic medicinal plants from Lavandula, Salvia, and Thymus genera: A systematic review.”, we greatly appreciate you taking the time to read the document and providing your support and comments. All the suggestions and comments have been taken into account, please find these corrections in the Manuscript and comments below. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop