Next Article in Journal
Identifying Promising Novel Compounds Against Free-Living Amoebae: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
Previous Article in Journal
CsNOSIP Reverses NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation Induced by CsESPs via Inducing iNOS and NO Expression and Inhibiting NF-κB Signaling Pathway in Macrophages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epidemiological Insights into Haemonchosis from Necropsy Records of Small Ruminants in Northeast Brazil

by
Artefio Martins Oliveira
1,
Erick Platiní Ferreira Souto
2,
Antônia Aniellen Raianne Moisés Aguiar
1,
Victor Hugo Alves Sousa Formiga
3,
Thais Ferreira Feitosa
1,3,
Antônio Flávio Medeiros Dantas
1 and
Vinícius Longo Ribeiro Vilela
1,3,*
1
Post-Graduate Program in Science and Animal Health, Federal University of Campina Grande—UFCG, Patos 58708-110, Paraíba, Brazil
2
Department of Animal Sciences, Federal Rural University of the Semi-Arid—UFERSA, Mossoró 59625-900, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
3
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Institute of Paraíba—IFPB, Sousa 58814-000, Paraíba, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Parasitologia 2025, 5(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040055
Submission received: 23 September 2025 / Revised: 14 October 2025 / Accepted: 21 October 2025 / Published: 22 October 2025

Abstract

The main pathological, epidemiological, and clinical findings of haemonchosis in goats and sheep in a semi-arid region of Northeast Brazil are described. Necropsy records conducted between January 2012 and December 2021 at the Animal Pathology Laboratory (APL) of the UFCG, were reviewed. In 2022, a prospective study monitored the necropsies performed on these species. In total, necropsies were conducted on 410 goats and 319 sheep, haemonchosis was observed in 50 (12%) goats and 49 (15%) sheep. For goats, females (45/50, 90%; p ≤ 0.05), the age range of 13–35 months (25/50, 50%; p ≤ 0.05), and crossbred animals (38/50, 76%; p ≤ 0.05) were most affected. Both goat and sheep, respectively, raised in a semi-intensive system were more infected (41/50, 82%; 36/49, 76.5%; p ≤ 0.05). The animals came from the States of Paraíba, Pernambuco, Ceará, and Rio Grande do Norte. The proportion of goats (32/50, 64%) and sheep (30/49, 61.2%) with a normal body condition score was significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). The main pathological alterations (p ≤ 0.05) were the mucosal and carcass paleness, and the presence of H. contortus specimens in the abomasum. Haemonchosis remains a significant parasitic disease affecting small ruminants in the semi-arid region of Northeast Brazil, leading to mortality and decreased production rates, posing substantial economic challenges that adversely impact goat and sheep farming.

1. Introduction

Sheep and goat farming plays a fundamental role in Brazilian livestock production, especially in semiarid regions such as the Northeast, contributing to food security and the local economy [1]. The region concentrates about 11.9 million goats and 20.5 million sheep, corresponding to 95% and 70% of the national herd, respectively [2]. These animals are well adapted to adverse conditions, being hardy, heat-tolerant, and efficient in feed and water use, thus providing economic and environmental benefits [3,4]. However, infection by gastrointestinal endoparasites remains the greatest obstacle to maintaining productivity in small ruminant farming systems, due to the significant economic losses associated with reduced weight gain, decreased milk production and fertility, in addition to increased mortality and high costs of treatment, control and prophylaxis measures [5,6,7].
Among the endoparasites that affect small ruminants, Haemonchus contortus is particularly relevant, being the parasite that causes haemonchosis, which causes major economic losses in the livestock industry worldwide [8]. Haemonchosis mainly affects goats and sheep of all ages, causing severe anemia and hypoproteinemia. These changes are consequences of the hematophagous activity of parasites that feed on blood from the abomasum capillaries, resulting in clinical signs such as pale mucous membranes, subcutaneous and cavity edema [6,8,9]. In the semiarid region of the Northeast, the disease shows a seasonal pattern, with the highest incidence observed after the rainy period, due to the high temperature and humidity, which favor the persistence of infective larvae in pastures [10].
The main parasitic control method in small ruminants is the use of synthetic anthelmintics [11]. However, factors such as the frequency of treatments, sub-dosing, mass deworming, and the prolonged use of the same active ingredient have led to widespread anthelmintic resistance among parasite populations, especially to chemical groups such as imidazothiazoles, benzimidazoles, and macrocyclic lactones worldwide [12,13,14], including in the semiarid region of Northeast Brazil [15].
The disease represents the primary cause of mortality in small ruminants in various regions of Brazil [16,17,18]. Despite this relevance, there is a lack of studies based on necropsy records that characterize the pathological aspects of haemonchosis in animals from the semiarid region, which could provide valuable epidemiological insights into local mortality patterns and parasite dynamics.
Therefore, this study aimed to describe and analyze the main pathological findings of haemonchosis and their relationship with epidemiological and clinical information obtained from necropsied small ruminants in the semiarid region of Northeast Brazil. This approach provides practical information that may support regional parasite control programs and improve herd health management.

2. Materials and Methods

The necropsy archival records of 398 goats and 306 sheep at the Animal Pathology Laboratory (APL) of the Veterinary University Hospital at the Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Patos, Sate of Paraíba, were reviewed for the period from January 2012 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria for the classification of haemonchosis were defined as the identification of H. contortus in the abomasum, along with the presence of characteristic clinical signs (e.g., anemia, pale mucous membranes, subcutaneous or cavity edema) and/or pathological lesions observed during necropsy. Epidemiological data (gender, age, breed, deworming, animal origin, breeding system, and herd size), clinical information (body condition score, presence of anorexia, apathy, emaciation, diarrhea, decubitus, dyspnea and/or paresis, and fur aspect), as well as pathological findings (presence of H. contortus on the abomasum, alterations like mucous and carcass paleness, pulmonary, subcutaneous, mesenteric and abomasal edema, hydropericardium, hydrothorax, ascites, atrophy of cardiac fat, abomasal ulcers, and concurrent parasitic infections) were collected from clinical and necropsy records. Cases were selected in which H. contortus were observed in the abomasum associated with clinical and pathological signs of the disease. The completeness and quality of the records were verified by checking for missing or inconsistent data; records lacking essential epidemiological, clinical, or pathological information were excluded from the analysis to ensure reliability.
Additionally, from January to December 2022, a prospective study was conducted, involving a thorough search, measurement, and classification of gastrointestinal nematode infections in small ruminants. During this period, 12 goats and 13 sheep referred to APL-UFCG were necropsied for gastrointestinal nematode identification following the guidelines established by the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) and described by Vercruysse et al. [19]. The gastrointestinal tract was divided into its anatomical segments (abomasum, small intestine, and large intestine), which were isolated and subsequently separated by double ligatures with cotton string. Each segment was opened, and the contents were stored in an individual container, with a 10% aliquot of this content taken for preservation in 5% formalin [20]. Parasite counts obtained from the 10% aliquot were multiplied by 10 to estimate the total number of parasites in each segment, in accordance with WAAVP guidelines, ensuring accurate assessment of infection intensity.
The counting and identification of adult forms of parasites recovered from the gastrointestinal tract of necropsied animals in the prospective study were carried out using a stereomicroscope. Morphological identification of H. contortus was confirmed based on key diagnostic features, including body length and shape, the presence of the characteristic “barber pole” appearance of females, the structure of the buccal capsule, esophageal length, and spicule morphology in males, following the taxonomic criteria described by Ueno and Gonçalves [20]. Infection intensity was classified according to the number of parasites: mild (<500), moderate (500–1500), and severe (>1500).
Descriptive statistical analysis was used to calculate the frequencies of the results obtained. The dependent variable, positivity, was defined as the presence of H. contortus infection confirmed through necropsy and morphological identification. Independent variables included epidemiological factors (sex, age, breed, origin, herd size, and breeding system), clinical information (body condition score, presence of anorexia, apathy, emaciation, diarrhea, decubitus, dyspnea, paresis, and fur aspect), and pathological findings (abomasal lesions and other relevant organ alterations).
Univariate associations between each independent variable and positivity were assessed using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, with a significance level of 5%. Statistical assumptions, including expected cell counts and independence of observations, were verified prior to analysis. Although multivariate analysis (e.g., logistic regression) was considered, the sample size and distribution of cases limited its feasibility. Therefore, univariate analyses were used as the most appropriate approach to identify potential associations in this epidemiological dataset. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 software.

3. Results

Retrospective study: During the retrospective study haemonchosis was observed in 11.8% (47/398) goats and 14.4% (44/309) sheep.
Prospective study: During the prospective study, haemonchosis was observed in 25% (3/12) goats and 38.5% (5/13) sheep. Although the sample size was limited, these cases were included to complement the retrospective findings with current observations under similar regional conditions. Data on parasitic load and infection severity are presented in Table 1.
Combined analysis: For spatial and descriptive purposes, data from both retrospective and prospective studies were combined to represent all confirmed cases of haemonchosis (totaling 50 goats and 49 sheep). Figure 1 and Figure 2 illustrate the geographical origin of these animals, encompassing both study periods. The affected goats originated mainly from municipalities in Paraíba (94%; 47/50), Pernambuco (4%; 2/50), and Rio Grande do Norte (2%; 1/50) (Figure 1), while most affected sheep came from Paraíba (88%; 43/49), followed by Ceará (6%; 3/49), Pernambuco (4%; 2/49), and Rio Grande do Norte (2%; 1/49) (Figure 2).
Epidemiological data (Table 2) indicated that female goats were most affected (45/50, 90%; p ≤ 0.05), particularly in the 13–35 months age range (25/50, 50%; p ≤ 0.05), and among crossbred animals (38/50, 76%; p ≤ 0.05). Both goats and sheep raised under semi-intensive systems were significantly more affected (41/50, 82%; and 36/49, 76.5%; p ≤ 0.05).
Haemonchosis occurred mainly from February to December, with peaks in May (30%; 15/50) for goats and September (26.5%; 13/49) for sheep. Moderate infections were the most frequent, representing 44% (22/50) in goats and 49% (24/49) in sheep, followed by severe (40%; 20/50 and 36.7%; 18/49) and mild infections (16%; 8/50 and 14.3%; 7/49). The main clinical and pathological aspects are summarized in Table 3. The proportion of goats (32/50, 64%) and sheep (30/49, 61.2%) with a normal body condition score was significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). At necropsy, significant findings (p ≤ 0.05) for both species included the presence of H. contortus in the abomasum (100%) and mucosal and carcass pallor (56% and 71.4%, respectively), as illustrated in Figure 3.

4. Discussion

Haemonchosis remains one of the most significant parasitic diseases affecting small ruminants worldwide, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. The present study provides an integrated analysis of the epidemiological, clinical, and pathological characteristics of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep and goats reared under semiarid conditions in Northeastern Brazil, combining retrospective and prospective data obtained over a ten-year period. The diagnosis of haemonchosis was established based on epidemiological, clinical, and pathological findings. This condition represents a significant disease for small ruminants in the semi-arid of the Northeast region of Brazil and is a recognized limiting factor for animal production. It is an endemic disease, with prevalence rates in small ruminants determined through coproparasitological exams measuring eggs per gram of feces (EPG) reaching approximately 80% [18,21,22]. This study considered only the direct visualization of parasites in the abomasum and only in animals undergoing necropsy at APL-UFCG, with infection observed in 12% of the goats and 15% of the sheep. These data are similar to those observed in other regions of the country and the world, where infections by H. contortus account for 14.5% to 22.2% of the total diagnoses of necropsies [23,24,25].
The low frequency of observing H. contortus in this study may be primarily related to the deworming protocol carried out during clinical hospitalization in animals with haemonchosis that reduces the parasitic load [26]. Also, the interval between the animal’s death and necropsy can lead to the displacement of parasites to subsequent organs [27]. Additionally, the small size of the parasites, which in mild infections can go unnoticed, and the diagnosis of haemonchosis can be underreported. In circumstances where the cause of death is not related to the gastrointestinal tract, there may be neglect in inspecting the abomasum [28], as confirmed by the results of the prospective study, when were performed more detailed necropsies on the gastrointestinal tract, increasing the diagnosis of haemonchosis in goats and sheep.
Females may be more susceptible to infection during specific physiological periods, such as the peripartum and lactation phases, due to immunosuppression and negative energy balance [23,29]. Supporting literature on female susceptibility associated with periparturient immunosuppression was also added [30,31]. The lower frequency of observed infections in males in our study likely reflects the shorter lifespan of males, as they are typically slaughtered at a younger age [28], rather than a true lower susceptibility.
In this study, the highest prevalence of haemonchosis occurred in adult animals, similar to what has been observed in other studies [26,29,32]. This may also be related to the profile of animals referred for treatment at the veterinary hospital. However, it is known that young animals are more susceptible when compared to adults, who exhibit a better immune response due to frequent exposure to natural infections in pastures [33]. Additionally, grazing habits, management practices, the breeding system, and habitat are factors that can influence the prevalence of infection among different categories [25].
It is likely that the higher occurrence of haemonchosis in crossbred animals is related to this being the predominant profile of animals raised in the study region [23,24], which generally do not have a defined breed standard and are not subjected to assisted crossbreeding. Although it is believed that some breeds are more resistant to infection, such as Santa Inês and Morada Nova sheep [33], while Dorper sheep and Boer goats appear to be more susceptible [34].
The significant frequency of the disease in animals raised under semi-intensive management (81.6% in goats and 72.9% in sheep) may be attributed to housing conditions that predispose the animals to increased contact with their excreta, a situation that favors the transmission of infection among animals within the same herd [21]. Indeed, in the present study, concomitant infections by other parasitic agents such as Cysticercus tenuicollis, Moniezia expansa, Oesophagostumum columbianum, Trichostrongylus axei, and Trichuris ovis were observed.
The clinical signs and necropsy findings reflect the marked debilitating effect of parasites on the host, which, through their blood-feeding activity, can trigger severe anemia. It is estimated that each worm can suck up to 0.05 mL of blood daily, which, coupled with the high parasitic load, can lead to the death of the animal [35]. Also, the physical and chemical damage to the abomasal mucosa induces changes in the local pH, circulatory disorders, and inflammatory processes, resulting in anorexia, poor absorption, weight loss, and tend to be progressive, worsening the clinical condition [36].
Despite the high parasitic load observed in some animals, a considerable number did not exhibit marked anemia or cachexia. This apparent inconsistency is consistent with the concept of resilience, in which certain animals are able to maintain adequate body condition despite high parasite burdens. Such adaptive responses have been reported in tropical and semiarid regions, where repeated exposure to infection favors the development of partial immunity and clinical tolerance [5,33,37].
In this study, some of the affected animals had been recently dewormed. Even though, parasitism by H. contortus was observed. Anthelmintic resistance represents the main obstacle to disease control in the semi-arid regions [15,38,39]. An alternative to overcome resistance is the use of the FAMACHA© method, which involves deworming only symptomatic animals, significantly reducing the use of anthelmintics [40]. Alternative control methods such as rotational grazing, reduction in pasture stocking rates, and alternating grazing with cattle may be effective in reducing the disease [7,41,42,43].
Because this study relied on retrospective and prospective necropsy records, quantitative correlations between parasite burden and macroscopic lesions were limited. Nevertheless, the mild–moderate–severe classification provides a practical diagnostic framework. Statistical analysis used univariate tests (chi-square and Fisher’s exact), appropriate for the categorical variables and sample size; multivariate approaches were considered but limited by the low number of positive cases. The geographic maps included were designed solely to depict the spatial distribution of confirmed cases. Because the dataset was based on necropsy submissions rather than systematic field sampling, spatial or environmental correlations (e.g., with rainfall or temperature) could not be reliably assessed. These limitations are now explicitly acknowledged to avoid misinterpretation of the spatial data.

5. Conclusions

Haemonchosis is an important parasitic disease affecting goats and sheep in the semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, causing animal deaths and reductions in productivity. The higher prevalence observed in females and adults likely reflects herd demographics rather than inherent susceptibility, while the presence of animals with normal body condition despite high parasite burdens highlights the role of resilience in herd health. Thorough necropsies provide a more accurate estimate of infection prevalence, although limitations such as the small prospective sample and potential underestimation in retrospective records should be considered. These findings underscore the importance of targeted parasite control and the implementation of practical strategies, including FAMACHA© monitoring, selective deworming, and improved pasture management, to mitigate the impact of haemonchosis and associated economic losses.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by A.M.O., E.P.F.S., A.A.R.M.A., V.H.A.S.F., T.F.F. and V.L.R.V. The first draft of the manuscript was written by A.M.O., T.F.F., A.F.M.D. and V.L.R.V.; and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/Brazil) provided scholarship to V.L.R.V. (grant number 304472/2021-2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The work was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals of the Instituto Federal da Paraíba, Brazil, approval number: 01457.018329/2020-14.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they did not have any conflict of interest relevant to the content of this article. Given his role as Associate Editor, Vinícius Vilela had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review.

References

  1. Barros, K.G.; Neres, C.P.; Pinho, E.B.; Santos, J.S.; Brito, E.C.S.; Gonçalves, R.S.; Meireles, W.A.; Ferreira, E.A.; Rosanova, C. Melhoramento genético na ovinocultura nacional: Uma revisão sobre seus avanços e desafios. Rev. Multidiscip. Nordeste Min. 2025, 4, 2178–6925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Pecuária Municipal. 2024. Available online: https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/tabela/3939 (accessed on 10 June 2024).
  3. Santos, W.S.; Albuquerque, H.J.O.; Albuquerque, H.O.; Cabral, A.M.D.; Ferreira, F.F.S. Diagnóstico da cadeia produtiva de caprinos e ovinos no Brasil e na Região Nordeste. Braz. J. Dev. 2023, 9, 21283–21303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ferreira, J.; Silva, E.A.; Silveira, R.M.F.; Sousa, J.E.R.; Costa, R.L.D.; McManus, C.M.; Façanha, D.A.E. Assessment of the adaptive capacity of Morada Nova ewes with diferent coat coloration. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2024, 68, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Islam, S.; Hossain, S.; Dey, A.R.; Alim, A.; Akter, S.; Alam, M.Z. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites of small ruminants in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2017, 4, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arsenopoulos, K.V.; Fthenakis, G.C.; Katsarou, E.I.; Papadopoulos, E. Haemonchosis: A Challenging Parasitic Infection of Sheep and Goats. Animals 2021, 11, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ribeiro, W.L.C.; Vilela, V.L.R. Editorial: Alternatives for the control of parasites to Promote sustainable livestock. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 9, 1097432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Adduci, I.; Sajovitz, F.; Hinney, B.; Lichtmannsperger, K.; Joachim, A.; Wittek, T.; Yan, S. Haemonchosis in Sheep and Goats, Control Strategies and Development of Vaccines against Haemonchus contortus. Animals 2022, 12, 2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Besier, R.B.; Kahn, L.P.; Sargison, N.D.; Van Wik, J.A. The pathophysiology, ecology and epidemiology of Haemonchus contortus infection in small ruminants. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 95–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Souza, M.F.; Pimentel-Neto, M.; Pinho, A.L.S.; Silva, R.M.; Farias, A.C.B.; Guimarães, M.P. Seasonal distribution of gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep in a semiarid region, northeastern Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2013, 22, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Calvete, C.; González, J.M.; Ferrer, L.M.; Ramos, J.J.; Lacasta, D.; Delgado, I.; Uriarte, J. Assessment of targeted selective treatment criteria to control subclinical gastrointestinal nematode infections on sheep farms. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 277, 109018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chaparro, J.J.; Villar, D.; Zapata, J.D.; López, S.; Howell, S.B.; López, A.; Storey, B.E. Multi-drug resistant Haemonchus contortus in a sheep flock in Antioquia, Colombia. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2017, 10, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kaplan, R.M. Biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of livestock. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2020, 36, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sacarrão-Birrento, L.; Harrison, L.J.S.; Pienaar, R.; Toka, F.N.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Vilela, V.L.R.; Hernández-Castellano, L.E.; Arriaga-Jordán, C.M.; Soltan, Y.A.; Ungerfeld, R.; et al. Challenges for animal health and production in the tropics and Mediterranean for the next 55 years. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2024, 56, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Silva, F.F.; Bezerra, H.M.F.F.; Feitosa, T.F.; Vilela, V.L.R. Nematode resistance to five anthelmintic classes in naturally infected sheep herds in Northeastern Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2018, 27, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lira, M.A.; Simões, S.V.D.; Riet-Correa, F.; Pessoa, C.M.; Dantas, A.F.M.; Miranda Neto, E.G. Doenças do sistema digestório de caprinos e ovinos no semiárido do Brasil. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2013, 33, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cecco, B.S.; Molossi, F.A.; Henker, L.C.; Lorenzett, M.P.; Correa, G.L.F.; Driemeier, D.; Pavarini, S.P.; Sonne, S. Causes of death in sheep in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: Analysis of 523 cases (2004–2019). Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2021, 41, e06886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vilela, V.L.R.; Bezerra, H.M.F.F.; Dantas, M.O.; Alcântara, E.T.; Oliveira, L.V.S.; Nóbrega, K.S.; Kalazans, F.B.; Feitosa, T.F.; Braga, F.B.; Molento, F.B. Sustainable agriculture: The use of FAMACHA method in Santa Ines sheep in the Semi-arid region of Brazil. Semin. Ciências. Agrárias 2021, 42, 1647–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vercruysse, J.; Holdsworth, P.; Letonja, T.; Barth, D.; Conder, G.; Hamamoto, K.; Ohano, K. International harmonisation of anthelmintic efficacy guidelines. Vet. Parasitol. 2001, 96, 171–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ueno, H.; Gonçalves, P.C. Manual Para Diagnóstico das Helmintoses de Ruminantes; Japan International Cooperation Agency: Tokyo, Japan, 1998.
  21. Vieira, V.D.; Feitosa, T.F.; Vilela, V.L.R.; Azevedo, S.S.; Almeida Neto, J.L.; Morais, D.F.; Ribeiro, A.R.C.; Athayde, A.C.R. Prevalence and risk factors associated with goat gastrointestinal helminthiasis in the Sertão region of Paraíba State, Brazil. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2014, 46, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vieira, V.D.; Vilela, V.L.R.; Feitosa, T.F.; Athayde, A.C.R.; Azevedo, S.S.; Souto, D.V.O.; Silveira, G.L.; Melo, L.R.B. Sheep gastrointestinal helminthiasis in the Sertão region of Paraíba State, Northeastern Brazil: Prevalence and risk factors. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2014, 23, 488–494, Erratum in Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2018, 27, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Almeida, T.L.; Brum, K.B.; Lemos, R.A.; Leal, C.R.; Borges, F.A. Doenças de ovinos diagnosticadas no Laboratório de Anatomia Patológica Animal da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (1996–2010). Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2013, 33, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bassuino, D.M.; Konradt, G.; Bianchi, M.V.; Snel, G.G.M.; Sonne, L.; Pavarini, S.P.; Driemeier, D. Causas de morte em caprinos diagnosticadas no estado do Rio Grande do Sul: Análise de 322 casos (2000–2016). Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2018, 38, 2080–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gareh, A.; Elhawary, N.M.; Tahoun, A.; Ramez, A.M.; El-Shewehy, D.M.; Elbaz, E.; Khalifa, M.I.; Alsharif, K.F.; Khalifa, R.M.A.; Dyab, A.K.; et al. Epidemiological, morphological, and morphometric study on Haemonchus spp. recovered from goats in Egypt. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 705619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rosa, F.B.; Caprioli, R.A.; Silva, T.M.; Galiza, G.J.N.; Barros, C.S.L.; Irigoyen, L.F.; Fighera, R.A.; Kommers, G.D. Doenças de caprinos diagnosticadas na região Central no Rio Grande do Sul: 114 casos. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2013, 33, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Radostits, O.M.; Gay, C.; Hinchcliff, K.W.; Constable, P.D. Haemonchosis in ruminants. In Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs, and Goats; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sprenger, L.K.; Risolia, L.W.; Gabardo, L.B.; Molento, M.B.; Silva, A.W.C.; Sousa, R.S. Doenças de ruminantes domésticos diagnosticadas no laboratório de patologia veterinária da Universidade Federal do Paraná: 1075 casos. Arch. Vet. Sci. 2015, 20, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rissi, D.R.; Pierezan, F.; Oliveira Filho, J.C.; Fighera, R.A.; Irigoyen, L.F.; Kommers, G.D.; Barros, C.S.L. Doenças de ovinos da região Central do Rio Grande do Sul: 361 casos. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2010, 30, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amarante, A.F.T.; Bricarello, P.A.; Huntley, J.F.; Mazzolin, L.P.; Gomes, J.C. Relationship of abomasal histology and parasite-specific immunoglobulin A with the resistance to Haemonchus contortus infection in three breeds of sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 128, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chiejina, S.N.; Musongong, G.A.; Musongong, G.A.; Wakelin, D. The modulatory influence of Trypanosoma brucei on challenge infection with Haemonchus contortus in Nigerian West African Dwarf goats segregated into weak and strong responders to the nematode. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 128, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dutta, B.; Konch, P.; Rahman, T.; Upadhyaya, T.N.; Pathak, D.C.; Tamuli, S.M.; Phangchoo, C.V.; Begum, S.A. Occurrence and pathology of Haemonchus contortus infection in goats. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2017, 5, 1284–1287. [Google Scholar]
  33. Toscano, J.H.B.; Santos, I.B.; Von Haehling, M.B.; Giraldelo, L.A.; Lopes, L.G.; Silva, M.H.; Figueiredo, A.; Esteves, S.N.; Chagas, A.C.S. Morada Nova sheep breed: Resistant or resilient to Haemonchus contortus infection. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 276, 100019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Estrada-Reyes, Z.M.; Tsukahara, Y.; Amadeu, R.R.; Goetsch, A.L.; Gipson, T.A.; Sahlu, T.; Puchala, R.; Wang, Z.; Hart, S.P.; Mateescu, R.G. Signatures of selection for resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep and goats. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Amarante, A.F.T.; Rogozo, A.M.A.; Silva, B.F. Os Parasitas de Ovino; Editora UNESP: São Paulo, Brazil, 2014; p. 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alam, R.T.; Hassanen, E.A.; El-Mandrawy, S.M. Heamonchus contortus infection in Sheep and Goats: Alterations in haematological, biochemical, immunological, trace element and oxidative stress markers. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2020, 48, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Habte, A.; Ibrahim, N. Prevalence of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep slaughtered at Jimma town municipal abattoir, Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2018, 50, 1865–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Melo, L.R.B.; Vilela, V.L.R.; Feitosa, T.F.; Almeida Neto, J.L.; Morais, D.F. Resistência anti-helmíntica em pequenos ruminantes do semiárido da Paraíba, Brasil. Ars. Vet. 2013, 29, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vilela, V.L.R.; Feitosa, T.F.; Braga, F.R.; Araújo, J.V.; Santos, A.; Morais, D.F.; Souto, D.V.O.; Athayde, A.C.R. Coadministration of nematophagous fungi for biological control over gastrointestinal helminths in sheep in the semiarid region of northeastern Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 221, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vilela, V.L.R.; Feitosa, T.F.; Linhares, E.F.; Athayde, A.C.R.; Molento, M.B.; Azevedo, S.S. FAMACHA method as an auxiliary strategy in the control of gastrointestinal helminthiasis of dairy goats under semiarid conditions of Northeastern Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 190, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brito, D.L.; Dalago, B.S.L.; Louvandini, H.; Santos, V.R.V.; Torres, S.E.F.A.; Gomes, E.F.; Amarante, A.F.T.; Melo, C.B.; McManus, C.M. Effect of alternate and simultaneous grazing on endoparasite infection in sheep and cattle. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2013, 22, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Riet-Correa, B.; Simões, S.V.D.; Riet-Correa, F. Sistemas produtivos de caprinocultura leiteira no semiárido nordestino: Controle integrado das parasitoses gastrointestinais visando contornar a resistência anti-helmíntica. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2013, 33, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vieira, V.D.; Riet-Correa, W.; Vilela, V.L.R.; Medeiros, M.A.; Batista, J.A.; Melo, L.R.B.; Santos, A.; Riet-Correa, F. Controle de parasitas gastrintestinais em ovinos e análise financeira de uma fazenda com sistema de pastejo rotacionado irrigado no semiárido nordestino. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2018, 38, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographic distribution and number of goats necropsied with Haemonchus contortus infection in a semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, from January 2012 to December 2022.
Figure 1. Geographic distribution and number of goats necropsied with Haemonchus contortus infection in a semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, from January 2012 to December 2022.
Parasitologia 05 00055 g001
Figure 2. Geographic distribution and number of sheep necropsied with Haemonchus contortus infection in a semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, from January 2012 to December 2022.
Figure 2. Geographic distribution and number of sheep necropsied with Haemonchus contortus infection in a semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, from January 2012 to December 2022.
Parasitologia 05 00055 g002
Figure 3. Haemonchosis in small ruminants. (A) Goat: marked paleness of the ocular mucosa. (B) Goat: yellowish transudate in the abdominal cavity (ascites). (C) Goat: subcutaneous edema in the submandibular region. (D) Sheep: yellowish transudate in the pericardial sac (hydropericardium). (E) Goat: foamy content in the trachea (pulmonary edema). (F) Sheep: Haemonchus contortus parasites on the abomasal mucosa.
Figure 3. Haemonchosis in small ruminants. (A) Goat: marked paleness of the ocular mucosa. (B) Goat: yellowish transudate in the abdominal cavity (ascites). (C) Goat: subcutaneous edema in the submandibular region. (D) Sheep: yellowish transudate in the pericardial sac (hydropericardium). (E) Goat: foamy content in the trachea (pulmonary edema). (F) Sheep: Haemonchus contortus parasites on the abomasal mucosa.
Parasitologia 05 00055 g003
Table 1. Parasitic load and severity of Haemonchus contortus infection in small ruminants necropsied in a semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, from January to December 2022.
Table 1. Parasitic load and severity of Haemonchus contortus infection in small ruminants necropsied in a semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, from January to December 2022.
Quantity of ParasitesInfection Classification *
MalesFemalesTotal
Sheep
1745010,90018,350severe
2143025503980severe
360130190mild
4160370530moderate
5130210340mild
Goats
1256016654225severe
29605801540severe
3210170380mild
* According to Ueno and Gonçalves [20].
Table 2. Epidemiological aspects of haemonchosis in small ruminants necropsied at the Animal Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Campina Grande, from 2012 to 2022.
Table 2. Epidemiological aspects of haemonchosis in small ruminants necropsied at the Animal Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Campina Grande, from 2012 to 2022.
VariablesGoatsSheep
Total%Total%
Gender
Male5102244.9
Female45 *902755.1
Age (months)
≤128161224.5
13–3525 *502142.8
≥368161224.5
Not informed91848.2
Breed
Crossbred38 *762449
Boer918--
Saanen24--
Alpine Brown12--
Dorper--1530.6
Santa Inês--816.3
Morada Nova--24.1
Deworming
≤3 months17341632.7
>3 months14282142.8
No19381224.5
Raising System
Intensive4848.2
Semi-intensive41 *8236 *73.5
Extensive510918.3
Herd
≤10 animals17341530.6
11–99 animals11222653.1
≥100 animals2244816.3
* Statistically significant difference according to chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 3. Clinical and pathological aspects of haemonchosis in small ruminants necropsied at the Animal Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Campina Grande, from 2012 to 2022.
Table 3. Clinical and pathological aspects of haemonchosis in small ruminants necropsied at the Animal Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Campina Grande, from 2012 to 2022.
FindingsGoatsSheep
Total%Total%
Clinical Signs
Body Condition Score
Normal32 *6430 *61.2
Thin14281530.6
Emaciated4848.2
Anorexia18361224.5
Apathy14281530.6
Emaciation816816.3
Diarrhea 81648.2
Decubitus612612.2
Dyspnea51048.2
Paresis4848.2
Raised Fur2448.2
Pathological Signs
H. contortus on the abomasum50 *10049 *100
Pale mucous and carcass28 *5635 *71.4
Pulmonary edema16321326.5
Hydropericardium14281428.6
Subcutaneous edema9181224.5
Hydrothorax8161020.4
Ascites8161122.5
Atrophy of cardiac fat61248.2
Mesenteric edema51024.1
Abomasal ulcers51024.1
Edema of the abomasal wall1236.1
Concurrent parasitic infections
Oesophagostomum columbianum1020816.3
Cysticercus tenuicollis71448.2
Moniezia expansa4824.1
Trichostrongylus axei3624.1
Trichuris ovis1224.1
* Statistically significant difference according to chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests (p ≤ 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oliveira, A.M.; Souto, E.P.F.; Aguiar, A.A.R.M.; Formiga, V.H.A.S.; Feitosa, T.F.; Dantas, A.F.M.; Vilela, V.L.R. Epidemiological Insights into Haemonchosis from Necropsy Records of Small Ruminants in Northeast Brazil. Parasitologia 2025, 5, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040055

AMA Style

Oliveira AM, Souto EPF, Aguiar AARM, Formiga VHAS, Feitosa TF, Dantas AFM, Vilela VLR. Epidemiological Insights into Haemonchosis from Necropsy Records of Small Ruminants in Northeast Brazil. Parasitologia. 2025; 5(4):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oliveira, Artefio Martins, Erick Platiní Ferreira Souto, Antônia Aniellen Raianne Moisés Aguiar, Victor Hugo Alves Sousa Formiga, Thais Ferreira Feitosa, Antônio Flávio Medeiros Dantas, and Vinícius Longo Ribeiro Vilela. 2025. "Epidemiological Insights into Haemonchosis from Necropsy Records of Small Ruminants in Northeast Brazil" Parasitologia 5, no. 4: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040055

APA Style

Oliveira, A. M., Souto, E. P. F., Aguiar, A. A. R. M., Formiga, V. H. A. S., Feitosa, T. F., Dantas, A. F. M., & Vilela, V. L. R. (2025). Epidemiological Insights into Haemonchosis from Necropsy Records of Small Ruminants in Northeast Brazil. Parasitologia, 5(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia5040055

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop