Next Article in Journal
Engineering Geological Characterization of Soils and Rocks for Urban Planning: A Case Study from Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia
Previous Article in Journal
A Standard Test Apparatus and Method for Validating the Accuracy of Mobile Phone Apps in Measuring Concrete Crack Widths
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimization of Process Parameters for Methylene Blue Dye Removal Using “Eriobotrya Japonica” Grains via Box-Behnken Design Based on Response Surface Methodology

1
Laboratory of Molecular Spectroscopy Modelling, Materials, Nanomaterials, Water and Environment, CERNE2D, ENSAM, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10010, Morocco
2
Laboratory of Advanced Materials and Process Engineering, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra BP 1246, Morocco
3
Laboratory of Organic, Bio-Organic and Environmental Chemistry, Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida 24000, Morocco
4
Higher School of Education and Training, Mohammed I University, Oujda 60000, Morocco
5
Higher School of Education and Training, Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida 24000, Morocco
6
Institut de Criminalistique de la Gendarmerie Royale, Rabat 10000, Morocco
7
Laboratory of Molecular Spectroscopy Modelling, Materials, Nanomaterials, Water and Environment, CERNE2D, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10010, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eng 2025, 6(6), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6060123
Submission received: 25 April 2025 / Revised: 21 May 2025 / Accepted: 26 May 2025 / Published: 3 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical, Civil and Environmental Engineering)

Abstract

:
This study intended to examine and assess the performance of raw and treated Eriobotrya Japonica seed waste for the adsorption-based removal of methylene blue dye from an aqueous solution. The effects of several factors, including pH, adsorbent dose, and initial concentration, on the elimination of this dye were examined. To optimize the removal process, a Box-Behnken design (BBD) based on response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to evaluate the influence of key variables, adsorbent dose, initial dye concentration, and pH, along with their interactions. The findings demonstrated that the statistical analysis reveals a high significance of the dye for raw and treated Eriobotrya Japonica seed waste, with extremely weak probability values (p < 0.0001). The optimal conditions achieved were the adsorbent dose = 21.21 mg, initial dye concentration = 7.54 mg/L, and pH = 10.92 for the raw waste and adsorbent dosage = 21.75 mg, initial dye concentration = 7.5 mg/L, and pH = 11.7 for the extracted waste. These conditions result in a dye removal efficiency of 99.48% and 99.88% for raw and treated Eriobotrya Japonica seed waste, respectively. The methylene blue adsorption kinetics on the adsorbent can be precisely represented by an effective pseudo-second-order equation. The Freundlich model showed a significantly better fit to the experimental results compared to the Langmuir model.

1. Introduction

In our modern world, dyes play an omnipresent role in various aspects of life, including clothing, food industries, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. This prevalence of dyes is largely attributed to the growing use of synthetic colorants, which offer advantages such as ease of synthesis, quick production, and a wide spectrum of dyes not easily achievable with natural dyes. Synthetic dyes have now become a flourishing industry and are integral to the advancements of modern chemistry. In the manufacturing of our clothing, textile fibers are treated with diverse coloring substances to impart them with their distinct final hues [1].
The worldwide product of synthetic dyes is estimated at 800,000 tons annually, and they today include a large variety of chemical substances. Approximately 140,000 tons of these dyes are discharged each year during textile production and dyeing operations [2]. Textile industries—particularly during the dyeing and finishing processes—use a wide range of toxic chemicals, including cancerous dyes that pollute surface and groundwater. Methylene blue (MB) is environmentally persistent, toxic, carcinogenic, and mutagenic. It is widely employed in the textile, paper, and leather sectors, resulting in a significant amount of MB-containing effluent being released into groundwater and surface water. Furthermore, MB can influence chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), and oxygen requirement levels, all of which are necessary for sustaining healthy aquatic ecosystems. Figure 1 shows the structure of methylene blue, while Table 1 gives its characteristics.
Our research focuses on methylene blue (MB) dye, which is widely utilized in numerous sectors and is commonly detected in wastewater. Its continual discharge into ecosystems is known for causing environmental and health issues. These environmental threats range from odor and taste changes in water sources to sunlight absorption in the aquatic environment, resulting in a drop in oxygen, low biodegradability, or partial degradation, which produces metabolites that are more toxic than the parent molecules [4]. There are several techniques for treating textile effluents, such as membrane filtration [5,6], ion exchange, adsorption [7], electrocoagulation [8,9], precipitation, and oxidation techniques such as photo-catalytic oxidation [10], and ozonation [11]. In this work, we employed adsorption to remove methylene blue dye from an aqueous solution. Adsorption is a physicochemical phenomenon characterized by an interaction between adsorbates and adsorbent surfaces, thereby making it a surface phenomenon. Adsorption on a solid can be defined as the accumulation of molecules from a gaseous or liquid phase on the surface of the solid [12,13].
In this research, we have also focused on evaluating a lignocellulosic adsorbent known as Eriobotrya Japonica, or loquat. Native to China and Japan, Eriobotrya Japonica is a subtropical fruit tree belonging to the Rosaceae family. Various parts of the loquat tree, including its leaves, bark, and fruit, have been shown to offer numerous health benefits. In traditional Chinese medicine, loquat is widely used to treat a range of ailments such as chronic bronchitis, inflammatory lung diseases, diabetes mellitus, and gastrointestinal disorders.
The plant contains a wealth of bioactive compounds, including carotenoids, vitamins, and polyphenolic compounds, which contribute to its diverse biological properties. Our work, however, is rooted in the context of sustainable development, where we aim to valorize loquat seeds by studying their adsorption potential under varying conditions [14].
Response surface methodology (RSM) has become a valuable asset for streamlining intricate processes and systems across various fields such as engineering, chemistry, and agriculture. It enables researchers to analyze the combined effects of multiple independent variables on one or more dependent variables concurrently, facilitating the identification of optimal operating conditions for the studied system [15,16,17]. Commonly employed RSM techniques for modeling physicochemical processes include Central Composite Design (CCD) [18], Box-Behnken Design (BBD), User-Defined Design, and the Customized Historical Data Model [19]. BBD falls under the category of rotatable or almost-rotatable second-order designs, utilizing three-level inadequate factorial designs [20].
The objective of this study is to optimize the removal of methylene blue dye by adsorption on raw and treated Eriobotrya Japonica seeds, using response surface methodology (RSM) based on the Box-Behnken design (BBD). This approach was chosen because it allows for better prediction of experimental responses. RSM was also used to determine the optimal conditions for process variables, such as adsorbent dose, initial concentration, and pH, and to generate a predictive model equation for the adsorption process. Additionally, the isotherm and kinetics of the adsorption process were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Adsorbent: Eriobotrya Japonica Seeds

To prepare the adsorbent, the raw waste (RW) of Eriobotrya Japonica seeds was crushed and sieved to obtain specific particle size fractions (50–125–250–300 µm). The grains were then cold-macerated for three days with 99% ethanol as the extraction solvent. After filtration, the extract was concentrated by removing the solvent with a rotary evaporator at 60 °C. The extraction efficiency was estimated using Formula (1) [21,22], and the yield obtained was 53%. The extracted waste of Eriobotrya Japonica seeds (EW) was crushed and sieved into the following aggregate sizes: 50–125–250–300 µm.
R d = m e c h m e x p × 100
where Rd denotes the yield in percentage; mech is the dry mass of the sample before extraction; and mexp is the mass of the extract after solvent evaporation.

2.2. Batch Adsorption Experiments

Batch adsorption experiments were conducted using various quantities of adsorbent and a 20 mL dye solution with a specified concentration. The pH of the solution was changed by adding 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH. The dye solution and Eriobotrya Japonica seeds were shaken for an hour at 300 revolutions per minute. Afterward, the mixture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 6 min to separate the solid adsorbent from the solution. A UV–visible spectrophotometer at 664 nm was used to evaluate the supernatant. The remaining equations were used to compute methylene blue’s removal effectiveness (R %) (2) and adsorption capacity (Qe) (3).
R = C i C f C i × 100
Q e = C i C f m × V
where Ci is the initial dye concentration in mg/L; Cf represents the final dye concentration in mg/L; m represents the adsorbent mass in mg; and V is the solution volume in L.

2.3. RSM Statistical Analysis Method

RSM, the statistical method employed in this study, aims to delineate the cause-and-effect association across real average ratings and input control parameters. The underlying principle of RSM entails executing a sequence of tests with the objective of attaining an ideal response [23]. In this investigation, the RSM design, specifically the Box-Behnken design (BBD), was employed. The Design Expert software (version 13) generated 17 experiments to assess the relationship between the responses of the RW removal rate of MB (Y1), the EW removal rate of MB (Y2), and the independent variables (adsorbent dose (A), initial concentration (IC) (B), and pH (C)). Table 2 displays the variables of the process employed in this experimental design, with three factors and the response each having two selected levels. The design matrix resulting from the application of BBD is presented in Table 3. In this research, Equation (4) introduces the utilization of a quadratic polynomial model.
y = a 0 + i = 1 n a i x i + i = 1 n a i i x i 2 + i = 1 n j = i + 1 n a i j x i x j
The response variable in this study is Y (%), which stands for the percentage of methylene blue dye clearance. The model constant is pictured by a0, while Xi and Xj indicate the selected independent variables. The linear, quadratic, and interaction terms within the model are represented by the regression coefficients ai, aii, and aij, in that order. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was executed on the acquired outcomes to evaluate the model’s efficacy. Model significance and insignificance are common approaches for evaluating the alignment between experimental data and the expected response prediction model, as current research suggests [24,25].

2.4. Model of Experimental Data

Various models—such as pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics as well as Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms—were utilized to analyze the adsorption kinetics and isotherms (Table 4) [22,23,24,25]. The experimental data from the adsorption experiments were fitted to the nonlinear forms of each model. The aim of this analysis was to identify the most suitable model capable of accurately predicting the adsorption behavior of methylene blue on Eriobotrya Japonica seed waste.

3. Data and Interpretations

3.1. Sample Characterization

3.1.1. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Figure 2 depicts the infrared spectra of RW and EW before and after adsorption. A peak at 575 cm−1 suggests the existence of bromo-alkanes. An absorption band at 850 cm−1 indicates the valence vibration of para-disubstituted aromatic benzene. The adsorption peak at 1035 cm−1 indicates the existence of fluoroalkanes with a typical bond. The peaks at 1450 cm−1 and 1510 cm−1 indicate the C=C stretching vibration, whereas the peak at 1630 cm−1 is linked to the C≡N stretching vibration. The methylene group has a peak at 2990 cm−1, whereas secondary and primary amines show peaks at 3100 cm−1 and 3400 cm−1, respectively.

3.1.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Microscopic examination enables us to observe the physical structure of the raw material and the extract both before and after adsorption. Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the heightened porosity following the adsorption process, indicating that both materials exhibit increased porosity after participating in the adsorption phenomenon.

3.1.3. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (EDX)

X-ray analysis (EDX) (Figure 5 and Figure 6) patterns reveal the presence of major peaks corresponding to carbon (C) and oxygen (O) in both the raw Eriobotrya Japonica seeds and the extract, along with a significant peak of silica (Si) in the raw waste that disappears after adsorption. Other elements detected include aluminum (Al), sulfur (S), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg). Silicon appears as the dominant element in the sample, with oxygen and carbon in lower proportions, potentially originating from impurities, organic compounds, or oxides. Potassium is observed in trace amounts, possibly as a mineral inclusion or residual salt. The X-axis likely represents wavelength, energy (keV), or angle (2θ), depending on the technique used, while the Y-axis indicates signal intensity, reflecting the relative proportions of the detected elements.

3.2. RSM Modeling

The Box-Behnken design (BBD) model was used to evaluate the effects of adsorbent mass, initial concentration (IC), and pH—both separately and in combination—on the removal of methylene blue dye. As indicated in Table 4 and Table 5, an ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to validate the statistical analysis of the experimental data for the removal of methylene blue dye. The two models (RW (Y1), EW (Y2)) have estimated F-values of 56.85 and 82.26, respectively. The significant importance of both models was indicated by the obtained p-values, which were both less than 0.0001 [26]. Additionally, a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.97 showed that there was a strong correlation between the actual and expected values of methylene blue dye clearance. Given the selected conditions, the p-values of terms A, C, BC, A2, B2, and C2 in the BBD model were found to be less than 0.05 (Prob > F < 0.0500), indicating that they were statistically significant for the removal of methylene blue dye. Thus, it was believed that these words had a big impact. On the other hand, terms in the BBD model with p-values greater than 0.05 were taken out of the quadratic polynomial equation to achieve the best fit. The relationship between the response (RW (Y1), EW (Y2)) and the parameters under study is expressed by Equations (5) and (6).
RW
Y 1 = 87.02 + 7.33 A + 3.15 B + 31.27 C 4.73 A B 0.7725 A C 10.66 B C 5.47 A 2 + 5.04 B 2 28.23 C 2
EW
Y 2 = 83.45 + 7.53 A + 2.64 B + 32.06 C 4.75 A B 1.11 A C 10.22 B C 4.75 A 2 + 5.75 B 2 24.41 C 2
The regression Equations (5) and (6) reveal that variables (A-B-C-B2-C2) have positive effects on the response (RW (Y1), EW (Y2)), as indicated by their positive regression coefficients. Conversely, variables AB, AC, BC, and A2 have negative effects on the response (RW (Y1), EW (Y2)). In this case, a positive number denotes a beneficial impact that facilitates optimization, whereas a negative value implies that the factor and response have an inverse relationship [27]. In addition, it should be noted that variables affecting methylene blue dye removal show a similar trend for both the raw and extracted Eriobotrya Japonica seed waste, indicating their proximity.
The fit and significance of the developed model were assessed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA), as presented in Table 5 and Table 6 for the response (RW(Y1), EW (Y2)).
Based on the ANOVA displayed in Table 5 and Table 6, we can arrange the most significant effects for RW and EW for the elimination of methylene blue dye as follows:
RW: C > C2 > BC > A > A2 > B2 > AB > B > AC
EW: C > C2 > A > BC > B2 > A2 > AB > B > AC
The validation of the BBD model can also be approached graphically by examining the distribution of residuals and the correlation between actual and predicted values for methylene blue dye removal. Figure 7 presents the normal probability plot of residuals for the BBD model. As shown, the data points align closely along a straight line, suggesting a desirable residual distribution and independence [28]. Furthermore, Figure 7 indicates a strong agreement between observed and predicted values for methylene blue removal, providing additional support for the model’s validity.
Figure 7 illustrates the comparison between the predicted and actual response values. It is evident that the predicted values closely and uniformly align with the actual responses for both responses, resulting in a satisfactory agreement with R2 > 0.97. This suggests that the regression models created are successful in elucidating the connection between the variables and outcomes within the investigated range. The graph’s data points are spread along a linear trajectory in a uniform and consistent manner.

3.3. Response Surface (3D)

The three-dimensional response surfaces display the interactions between variables (Adsorbent dose*IC), (Adsorbent dose*pH), and (IC*pH) of the removal of methylene blue dye onto RW and EW, shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively.
The impact of pH on methylene blue dye removal is observed to be more significant compared to the dose and IC. These findings align with the results obtained from the ANOVA analysis, further validating their accuracy. The statistical significance of these results is noteworthy. Nonetheless, this study looked at the impact of pH, starting dye concentration, and adsorbent mass on MB elimination from an experimental perspective. As the quantity of adsorbent increases within a constant volume of known concentration, the accessibility of the adsorption sites diminishes, leading to elevated rates of MB removal. This is attributed to the aggregation of Eriobotrya Japonica waste particles or the overlapping of binding sites.
This aggregation becomes more pronounced with higher adsorbent dosages in the solution. Moreover, pH influences the distribution and speciation of cations and the surface charge of the involved molecules. Cationic dyes, when dissolved in aqueous solutions, typically carry a positive charge. At lower pH levels, H+ ions surround the adsorbent surface, impeding the interaction of MB ions with the adsorbent sites. Consequently, the formation of bonds between the MB and active regions is less likely as H+ ions and cationic dye compete for accessible adsorption sites and experience electrostatic repulsion. Conversely, at higher pH levels, an improved interaction between OH- ions and the dye enhances the binding between dye ions and surface sites [29]. Conversely, the initial dye concentration has a detrimental influence on the adsorption from Eriobotrya Japonica waste. The quantity of MB adsorbed per unit mass of Eriobotrya Japonica waste (Qe) increases quickly with rising initial MB solution concentration as the initial concentrations grow. Nevertheless, the low ratio of MB in solution to accessible active adsorption sites causes a decrease in the elimination rate [30].

3.4. RSM Optimization

As shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11, the Design Expert program was utilized to optimize the process parameters during the adsorption-based removal of methylene blue dye using RW and EW.
The goal of the optimization process was to maximize the elimination of methylene blue dye employing two classes of waste Eriobotrya Japonica grains (RW and EW) within the range of independent variables studied. The optimal solution is typically selected according to its maximal attractiveness or proximity to unity, with the red zone often serving as a guide to the region where maximum removal efficiency may be achieved [29,30]. For both waste products (RW and EW), the ideal values for the adsorption of MB was an adsorbent dose (21.21–21.75 mg), with the IC at 7.54–7.5 mg/L, and pH at 10.92–11.07. The methylene blue dye removal efficiency under these ideal circumstances of RW and EW as adsorbents was 99.48% and 99.88%, respectively.

3.5. Kinetic Study

Surface reaction kinetic models are frequently employed for predicting the adsorption kinetics of MBD over both adsorbents investigated in this study. These include the PFO and PSO models that are widely utilized for describing surface reactions. The kinetics of PFO and PSO can be quantified and expressed by the nonlinear formulas in Table 4.
Figure 12 and Figure 13 present the experimental results of MBD adsorption, along with the nonlinear kinetic models PFO and PSO, for the two types of Eriobotrya Japonica waste, RW and EW, respectively. Table 7 summarizes the kinetic parameters of MBD adsorption for these two wastes.
The data given in Table 7 prove the PSO kinetic model accurately describes the adsorption procedure.
Data reported in the table obviously demonstrate that the PSO system is the most appropriate for predicting the adsorption kinetics of MBD by Eriobotrya Japonica. This conclusion is supported by the very high correlation coefficient (greater than 99%), which indicates a high level of consistency of the experimental and approach data. In addition, the values estimated by the model closely match the actual experimental results, confirming the reliability of the PSO model [31].

3.6. Isotherm Study

As shown in Figure 14 and Figure 15, isothermal adsorption tests using Langmuir and Freundlich systems are applied to estimate the capability of adsorbents to remove MBD. The Langmuir and Freundlich models used in this study are nonlinear models, with their formulas presented in Table 4.
Table 8 illustrates the values calculated for the constants and correlation coefficients (R2).
From Table 8, the results indicate a coefficient of determination (R2) above 0.93 for both raw and treated waste. These findings suggest that the Freundlich model accurately represents the equilibrium adsorption of DBM by RW and EW. This implies that the surface of the adsorbent promotes multilayer adsorption [32]. Additionally, the high KF values reveal a strong adsorption capacity of the adsorbent [33]. The maximum adsorption capacity of DBM was compared to the values reported in the literature for various other adsorbents, as shown in Table 9. It was found that the adsorption efficiency of DBM exceeded that of many other previously studied adsorbents.

4. Conclusions

This study introduced a novel and eco-friendly approach for removing methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions using raw and chemically treated Eriobotrya Japonica seeds as low-cost lignocellulosic adsorbents. The originality of this work lies in the valorization of vegetable waste combined with a statistical optimization approach through response surface methodology (RSM) based on the Box-Behnken Design (BBD).
The experimental results confirmed that the adsorption process was significantly influenced by pH, initial dye concentration, and adsorbent dose. The model developed through RSM showed strong predictive capabilities, with correlation coefficients (R2) exceeding 0.97 for both raw (RW) and treated (EW) seed materials. Optimal removal conditions were identified as follows: adsorbent dose—21.21–21.75 mg, initial concentration—7.50–7.54 mg/L, and pH—10.92–11.07. Under these conditions, the maximum removal efficiencies reached 99.48% for RW and 99.88% for EW.
Compared to other biosorbents such as Banana peels (Qmax ≈ 40 mg/g, ~85% removal), Orange peels (Qmax ≈ 78 mg/g, ~93.5% removal), or Rice husk (Qmax ≈ 49.5 mg/g, ~80% removal), Eriobotrya Japonica seeds demonstrated excellent performance, highlighting their potential as a high-efficiency and eco-friendly alternative for dye remediation in wastewater treatment.
Beyond its technical achievements, this research contributes to broader environmental and sustainable development goals by promoting green chemistry, waste valorization, and low-cost treatment technologies. Future work should focus on testing the adsorbent’s regeneration and reuse potential, as well as validating its effectiveness in continuous-flow systems and real textile wastewater.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F., A.B. and S.E.H.; Methodology, B.B., Y.B., M.B., H.N., M.F., N.L., A.B., A.D. and S.E.H.; Software, B.B., M.B., M.F., N.L., A.B., A.D. and S.E.H.; Validation, B.B., M.B., H.N., M.F., N.L., A.B., A.D. and S.E.H.; Formal analysis, B.B., M.B., H.N., M.F., N.L., A.B., A.D. and S.E.H.; Investigation, B.B., Y.B., M.B., H.N., M.F., N.L., A.B. and S.E.H.; Resources, B.B., Y.B., M.B., H.N., M.F., N.L., A.B., A.D. and S.E.H.; Data curation, B.B., Y.B., H.N., M.F., N.L., A.D. and S.E.H.; Writing—original draft, B.B., M.B., M.F., N.L., A.B., A.D. and S.E.H.; Writing—review & editing, B.B., M.F., N.L., A.D. and S.E.H.; Visualization, B.B., M.F., N.L. and S.E.H.; Supervision, N.L. and S.E.H.; Funding acquisition, B.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Sharma, Y.C.; Uma, S.N. Upadhyay, An economically viable removal of methylene blue by adsorption on activated carbon prepared from rice husk. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 89, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ben Mansour, H.; Boughzala, O.; Dridi, D.; Barillier, D.; Chekir-Ghedira, L.; Mosrati, R. Textiles dyes as a source of wastewater contamination: Screening of the toxicity and treatment methods. J. Water Sci. 2011, 24, 209–238. [Google Scholar]
  3. Othmani, B.; Gamelas, J.A.F.; Rasteiro, M.G.; Khadhraoui, M. Characterization of Two Cactus Formulation-Based Flocculants and Investigation on Their Flocculating Ability for Cationic and Anionic Dyes Removal. Polymers 2020, 12, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Abbaz, M.; Abaaaki, R.; El Haouti, R.; Et-Taleb, S.; Ez-Zahery, M.; Lhanafi, S.; El Alem, N. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by adsorption onto the sand titaniferous. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2014, 5, 2418–2425. [Google Scholar]
  5. Khumalo, N.P.; Vilakati, G.D.; Mhlanga, S.D.; Kuvarega, A.T.; Mamba, B.B.; Li, J.; Derrick, S.; Dlamini, D.S. Dual-functional ultrafiltration nanoenabled PSf/PVA membrane for the removal of Congo red dye. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 31, 100878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Farah, M.; Addar, F.Z.; Kitanou, S.; Belfaquir, M.; Tahaikt, M.; Taky, M.; Elmidaoui, A. Leachate treatment by ceramic ultrafiltration membranes: Fouling mechanisms identification. Desalination Water Treat. 2023, 316, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Núñez, J.; Yeber, M.; Cisternas, N.; Thibaut, R.; Medina, P.; Carrasco, C. Application of electrocoagulation for the efficient pollutants removal to reuse the treated wastewater in the dyeing process of the textile industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nippatla, N.; Philip, L. Electrocoagulation-Floatation assisted pulsed power plasma technology for the complete mineralization of potentially toxic dyes and real textile wastewater. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 125, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Awad, A.M.; Jalab, R.; Benamor, A.; Nasser, M.S.; Ba-Abbad, M.M.; El Naas, M.; Mohammad, A.W. Adsorption of organic pollutants by nanomaterial-based adsorbents: An overview. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 301, 112335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kshirsagar, A.S.; Gautam, A.; Khanna, P.K. Efficient photo-catalytic oxidative degradation of organic dyes using CuInSe2/TiO2 hybrid hetero-nanostructures. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2017, 349, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Venkatesh, S.; Venkatesh, K.; Quaff, A.R. Dye decomposition by combined ozonation and anaerobic treatment: Cost effective technology. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2017, 15, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Salehi, I.; Shirani, M.; Semnani, A.; Hassani, M.; Habibollahi, S. Comparative Study Between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network for Adsorption of Crystal Violet on Magnetic Activated Carbon. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2016, 41, 2611–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Naderi, P.; Shirani, M.; Semnani, A.; Goli, A. Efficient removal of crystal violet from aqueous solutions with Centaurea stem as a novel biodegradable bioadsorbent using response surface methodology and simulated annealing: Kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Farah, M.; Addar, F.Z.; Touir, J.; Moussout, H.; Belfaquir, M.; Tahaikt, M.; Taky, M.; Elmidaoui, A. Treatment of highly saline effluents laden with organic pollutants using ceramic ultrafiltration membranes and application to leachate treatment. Desalin. Water Treat. 2024, 317, 100260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Karunakaran, A.; Chaturvedi, A.; Ali, J.; Singh, R.; Agarwal, S.; Garg, M.C. Response surface methodology-based modeling and optimization of chromium removal using spiral-wound reverse-osmosis membrane setup. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 5999–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ferreira, S.L.C.; Bruns, R.E.; Ferreira, H.S.; Matos, G.D.; David, J.M.; Brandão, G.C.; da Silva, E.G.P.; Portugal, L.A.; Reis, P.S.D.; Souza, A.S.; et al. Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 597, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bouhlal, F.; Labjar, N.; Abdoun, F.; Mazkour, A.; Serghini-Idrissi, M.; Mahi, M.E.; Lotfi, E.M.; Hajjaji, S.E. Electrochemical and Thermodynamic Investigation on Corrosion Inhibition of C38 Steel in 1 M Hydrochloric Acid Using the Hydro-Alcoholic Extract of Used Coffee Grounds. Int. J. Corros. 2020, 2020, 4045802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bouiti, K.; Al-sharabi, H.A.; Bouhlal, F.; Labjar, N.; Dahrouch, A.; El Mahi, M.; Lotfi, E.M.; El Otmani, B.; Benabdallah, G.A.; El Hajjaj, S. Use of the ethanolic extract from Eriobotrya Japonica seeds as a corrosion inhibitor of C38 in a 1 M HCl medium. Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib. 2022, 11, 1319–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bharathi, R.A.; Varthanan, P.A.; Mathew, K.M. Experimental investigation of process parameters in wire electrical discharge machining by response surface methodology on IS 2062 steel. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 550, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Doughmi, O.; Farah, M.; Addar, F.Z.; Hsini, A.; Tahaikt, M.; Shaim, A. Use of oak acorns adsorbent and response surface methodology for removal of crystal violet from aqueous solution. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2025, 105, 1354–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmadi, S.; Ahmadi, S.; Mesbah, M.; Igwegbe, C.A.; Ezeliora, C.D.; Osagie, C.; Khan, N.A.; Dotto, G.L.; Salari, M.; Dehghani, M.H. Sono electro-chemical synthesis of LaFeO3 nanoparticles for the removal of fluoride: Optimization and modeling using RSM, ANN and GA tools. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lebkiri, I.; Abbou, B.; Kadiri, L.; Ouass, A.; Essaadaoui, Y.; Habssaoui, A.; Lebkiri, A. Removal of methylene blue dye from aqueous solution using a superabsorbant hydrogel the polyacrylamide: Isotherms and kinetic studies. Mediterr. J. Chem. 2019, 9, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kadiri, L.; Lebkiri, A.; Rifi, E.H.; Ouass, A.; Essaadaoui, Y.; Lebkiri, I.; Hamad, H. Kinetic studies of adsorption of Cu (II) from aqueous solution by coriander seeds (Coriandrum sativum). In Proceedings of the EPJ Web of Conferences, Sofia, Bulgaria, 9–13 July 2018; Volume 37, p. 02005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abbou, B.; Lebkiri, I.; Ouaddari, H.; Kadiri, L.; Ouass, A.; Habssaoui, A.; Lebkiri, A.; Rifi, E.H. Removal of Cd(II), Cu(II), and Pb(II) by adsorption onto natural clay: A kinetic and thermodynamic study. Turk. J. Chem. 2021, 45, 362–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elmoubarki, R.; Mahjoubi, F.Z.; Tounsadi, H.; Moustadraf, J.; Abdennouri, M.; Zouhri, A.; El Albani, A.; Barka, N. Adsorption of textile dyes on raw and decanted Moroccan clays: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. Water Resour. Ind. 2015, 9, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Malek, N.N.A.; Jawad, A.H.; Abdulhameed, A.S.; Ismail, K.; Hameed, B.H. New magnetic Schiff’s base-chitosan-glyoxal/fly ash/Fe3O4 biocomposite for the removal of anionic azo dye: An optimized process. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 146, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. AJawad, H.; Mohammed, I.A.; Abdulhameed, A.S. Tuning of Fly Ash Loading into Chitosan-Ethylene Glycol Diglycidyl Ether Composite for Enhanced Removal of Reactive Red 120 Dye: Optimization Using the Box–Behnken Design. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 28, 2720–2733. [Google Scholar]
  28. Abdulhameed, A.S.; Mohammad, A.T.; Jawad, A.H. Application of response surface methodology for enhanced synthesis of chitosan tripolyphosphate/TiO2 nanocomposite and adsorption of reactive orange 16 dye. J. Clean Prod. 2019, 232, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, X.; Guo, C.; Hao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Long, H.; Li, M. Adsorption of heavy metal ions by sodium alginate based adsorbent-a review and new perspectives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4423–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Huang, Y.; Han, G.; Yang, S.; Su, S.; Sana, H.; Peng, W.; Cao, Y.; Liu, J. Comprehensive evaluation on a prospective precipitation-flotation process for metal-ions removal from wastewater simulants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 592–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Konicki, W.; Aleksandrzak, M.; Mijowska, E. Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies on adsorption of cationic dyes from aqueous solutions using graphene oxide. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017, 123, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alírio, E.R.; Silva, C.M. What’s wrong with Lager green pseudo first order model for adsorption kinetics? Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 306, 1138–1142. [Google Scholar]
  33. Magdy, Y.H.; Altaher, H. Kinetic analysis of the adsorption of dyes from high strength wastewater on cement kiln dust. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jawad, A.H.; Abdulhameed, A.S.; Mastuli, M.S. Acid-factionalized biomass material for methylene blue dye removal: A comprehensive adsorption and mechanism study. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2020, 14, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bayomie, O.S.; Kandeel, H.; Shoeib, T.; Yang, H.; Youssef, N.; El-Sayed, M.M.H. Novel approach for effective removal of methylene blue dye from water using fava bean peel waste. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shakoor, S.; Nasar, A. Removal of methylene blue dye from artificially contaminated water using citrus limetta peel waste as a very low cost adsorbent. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 66, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Postai, D.L.; Demarchi, C.A.; Zanatta, F.; Melo, D.C.C.; Rodrigues, C.A. Adsorption of rhodamine B and methylene blue dyes using waste of seeds of Aleurites moluccana, a low cost adsorbent. Alex. Eng. J. 2016, 55, 1713–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aldabagh, I.S.; Saad, D.N.; Ahmed, E.I. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by green Synthesized silicon dioxide Nanoparticles using Sunflower Husk. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2024, 18, 100608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alouani, M.; Alehyen, S.; Achouri, M.; Taibi, M. Removal of Cationic Dye–methylene Blue-from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption on Fly Ash-based Geopolymer. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2018, 9, 32–46. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Methylene blue structure.
Figure 1. Methylene blue structure.
Eng 06 00123 g001
Figure 2. Infrared spectra before (RW and EW) and after adsorption (RWA and EWA) of methylene blue.
Figure 2. Infrared spectra before (RW and EW) and after adsorption (RWA and EWA) of methylene blue.
Eng 06 00123 g002
Figure 3. SEM of RW (A) before adsorption and (B) after adsorption.
Figure 3. SEM of RW (A) before adsorption and (B) after adsorption.
Eng 06 00123 g003
Figure 4. SEM of EW (A) before adsorption and (B) after adsorption.
Figure 4. SEM of EW (A) before adsorption and (B) after adsorption.
Eng 06 00123 g004
Figure 5. EDX of RW (A) before adsorption and (B) after adsorption.
Figure 5. EDX of RW (A) before adsorption and (B) after adsorption.
Eng 06 00123 g005
Figure 6. EDX of EW (A) before adsorption and (B) after adsorption.
Figure 6. EDX of EW (A) before adsorption and (B) after adsorption.
Eng 06 00123 g006
Figure 7. Experimental values and predicted values for methylene blue removal using RW (A) and EW (B). Significance of the colors in the figure: The colors represent the residual values (differences between the predicted and actual values).
Figure 7. Experimental values and predicted values for methylene blue removal using RW (A) and EW (B). Significance of the colors in the figure: The colors represent the residual values (differences between the predicted and actual values).
Eng 06 00123 g007
Figure 8. Three-dimensional response surfaces of methylene blue removal using RW of three adsorption-affecting factors: adsorbent dose (A), IC (B), and pH (C). Blue points indicate the minimum values; Green points represent the average values; The red point corresponds to the maximum value.
Figure 8. Three-dimensional response surfaces of methylene blue removal using RW of three adsorption-affecting factors: adsorbent dose (A), IC (B), and pH (C). Blue points indicate the minimum values; Green points represent the average values; The red point corresponds to the maximum value.
Eng 06 00123 g008
Figure 9. Three-dimensional response surfaces of methylene blue removal using EW of three adsorption-affecting factors: adsorbent dose (A), IC (B), and pH (C). Blue points indicate the minimum values; Green points represent the average values; The red point corresponds to the maximum value.
Figure 9. Three-dimensional response surfaces of methylene blue removal using EW of three adsorption-affecting factors: adsorbent dose (A), IC (B), and pH (C). Blue points indicate the minimum values; Green points represent the average values; The red point corresponds to the maximum value.
Eng 06 00123 g009
Figure 10. Synergistic effect of three parameters on methylene blue removal rate in RW under optimal conditions. Blue points indicate the minimum values; Green points represent the average values; The red point corresponds to the maximum value.
Figure 10. Synergistic effect of three parameters on methylene blue removal rate in RW under optimal conditions. Blue points indicate the minimum values; Green points represent the average values; The red point corresponds to the maximum value.
Eng 06 00123 g010
Figure 11. Synergistic effect of three parameters on methylene blue removal rate in EW under optimal conditions. Blue points indicate the minimum values; Green points represent the average values; The red point corresponds to the maximum value.
Figure 11. Synergistic effect of three parameters on methylene blue removal rate in EW under optimal conditions. Blue points indicate the minimum values; Green points represent the average values; The red point corresponds to the maximum value.
Eng 06 00123 g011
Figure 12. PFO and PSO model for the adsorption of MBD by RW.
Figure 12. PFO and PSO model for the adsorption of MBD by RW.
Eng 06 00123 g012
Figure 13. PFO and PSO model for the adsorption of MBD by EW.
Figure 13. PFO and PSO model for the adsorption of MBD by EW.
Eng 06 00123 g013
Figure 14. Langmuir and Freundlich models for the adsorption of MBD by RW.
Figure 14. Langmuir and Freundlich models for the adsorption of MBD by RW.
Eng 06 00123 g014
Figure 15. Langmuir and Freundlich models for the adsorption of MBD by EW.
Figure 15. Langmuir and Freundlich models for the adsorption of MBD by EW.
Eng 06 00123 g015
Table 1. Methylene blue characteristics [3].
Table 1. Methylene blue characteristics [3].
The Main Characteristics of Methylene Blue
IUPAC nameBis-(dimethylamino)-3,7 phenazathionium chloride-ethanol
SynonymBasic Blue 9
Indice color52,015
Chemical formula C16H18N3SCl
Molecular mass319.85 g/mol
pKa3.8
Melting temperature180 °C
Solubility50 g/L (water) and 10 g/L (ethanol)
Table 2. Independent variables, their levels, and symbols for Box-Behnken experimental design.
Table 2. Independent variables, their levels, and symbols for Box-Behnken experimental design.
FactorNameUnitsMinMax
AAdsorbent doseMg550
BICmg/L550
CpH-212
Table 3. Variables of BBD matrix and experimental data for MB removal rate using RW and EW.
Table 3. Variables of BBD matrix and experimental data for MB removal rate using RW and EW.
RunFactor 1
A: Adsorbent Dose (mg)
Factor 2
B: IC (ppm)
Factor 3
C: pH
Eriobotrya Japonica Seed Waste
Response 1: RW (Y1)
TR (%)
Response 1: EW (Y2)
TR (%)
15027.5226.6726.67
25027.51292.9894.23
3527.5212.1212.12
427.551297.3198.34
5527.51281.5284.13
627.527.5787.0283.45
727.527.5787.0283.45
827.550251.6751.67
927.527.5787.0283.45
105050790.5187.99
1127.55218.7519.45
1255773.2171.4
13550783.6779.67
1427.527.5787.0283.45
1527.527.5787.0283.45
1627.5501287.5989.7
17505798.9898.71
Table 4. Model analysis for adsorption phenomena.
Table 4. Model analysis for adsorption phenomena.
NonLinear ModelsExpressionCharacteristic
Parameters
Kinetic modelsPseudo-first-order model q t = q e 1 e k 1 t qe (mg/g)
qt (mg/g)
k1 (min−1)
Pseudo-second-order model q t = k 2 q e 2 t 1 + k 2 q e t qe (mg/g)
qt (mg/g)
k2 (g/mg·min)
Isotherm modelsFreundlich model Q e = K f C e 1 n Qe (mg/g)
Kf (min−1)
Langmuir model Q e = Q m K L C e 1 + K L C e Qm (mg/g)
Qe (mg/g)
KL
Table 5. ANOVA and model coefficients for the adsorption process for the RW.
Table 5. ANOVA and model coefficients for the adsorption process for the RW.
SourceSum of SquaresDfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model12,481.991386.8882.26<0.0001Significant
A—adsorbent dose429.541429.5425.480.0015
B—IC79.32179.324.70.0667
C—Ph7824.3817824.38464.09<0.0001
AB89.59189.595.310.0546
AC2.3912.390.14160.7179
BC454.541454.5426.960.0013
A2125.871125.877.470.0292
B2106.951106.956.340.0399
C23355.5113355.51199.03<0.0001
Residual118.02716.86
Lack of fit118.02339.34
Pure error040
Cor total12,599.9216
Table 6. ANOVA and model coefficients for the adsorption process for the EW.
Table 6. ANOVA and model coefficients for the adsorption process for the EW.
SourceSum of SquaresDfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model11,980.3891331.1556.85<0.0001Significant
A—adsorbent dose454.211454.2119.40.0031
B—IC55.81155.812.380.1665
C—pH8223.3918223.39351.23<0.0001
AB90.16190.163.850.0905
AC4.9514.950.21140.6596
BC417.381417.3817.830.0039
A295.2195.24.070.0836
B2139.091139.095.940.0449
C22508.3212508.32107.13<0.0001
Residual163.89723.41
Lack of fit163.89354.63
Pure error040
Cor total12,144.2816
Table 7. Kinetic parameters of the MBD adsorption onto the two waste materials of Eriobotrya Japonica.
Table 7. Kinetic parameters of the MBD adsorption onto the two waste materials of Eriobotrya Japonica.
PFO
AdsorbentRWEW
Qe (mg/g)17.22817.252
K1 (min−1)0.31030.5706
RMSE0.2760.154
MSE0.0760.024
SSE0.7640.245
R20.99610.9971
PSO
Qe (mg/g)17.22817.252
K2 (g/mg·min)0.05240.208
RMSE0.3490.154
MSE0.1220.024
SSE1.2270.243
R20.99730.9991
Table 8. Isotherm parameters of MBD adsorption onto the two waste materials of Eriobotrya Japonica.
Table 8. Isotherm parameters of MBD adsorption onto the two waste materials of Eriobotrya Japonica.
Langmuir
AdsorbentRWEW
Qm (mg/g)365.04300
KL0.0140.019
RMSE2.0462.196
MSE4.1874.824
SSE41.8748.24
R20.9360.931
Freundlich
KF5.345.9
1/n0.9340.933
RMSE2.0482.135
MSE4.1974.561
SSE41.9745.61
R20.9460.945
Table 9. Comparison of the adsorption capacity of DBM with various adsorbents reported in the literature.
Table 9. Comparison of the adsorption capacity of DBM with various adsorbents reported in the literature.
AdsorbentExperimental Adsorption
Capacity Qmax (mg/g)
Reference
Sulfuric-acid-treated coconut shell (SATCS)50.6[34]
Fava bean peel waste (FBP)140[35]
Citrus limetta peel (CLP)227.3[36]
Waste seeds Aleurites moluccana (WAM)178[37]
Nanoparticles (SFH-SiO2)70.16[38]
Fly ash-based geopolymer (FAG)37.04[39]
Raw and treated Eriobotrya Japonica seed waste365.04 and 300This study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Belahrach, B.; Farah, M.; Belaoufi, Y.; Bensemlali, M.; Nasrellah, H.; Labjar, N.; Baraket, A.; Dahrouch, A.; El Hajjaji, S. Optimization of Process Parameters for Methylene Blue Dye Removal Using “Eriobotrya Japonica” Grains via Box-Behnken Design Based on Response Surface Methodology. Eng 2025, 6, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6060123

AMA Style

Belahrach B, Farah M, Belaoufi Y, Bensemlali M, Nasrellah H, Labjar N, Baraket A, Dahrouch A, El Hajjaji S. Optimization of Process Parameters for Methylene Blue Dye Removal Using “Eriobotrya Japonica” Grains via Box-Behnken Design Based on Response Surface Methodology. Eng. 2025; 6(6):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6060123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Belahrach, Bouchra, Mohamed Farah, Youssef Belaoufi, Meyem Bensemlali, Hamid Nasrellah, Najoua Labjar, Abdoullatif Baraket, Abdelouahed Dahrouch, and Souad El Hajjaji. 2025. "Optimization of Process Parameters for Methylene Blue Dye Removal Using “Eriobotrya Japonica” Grains via Box-Behnken Design Based on Response Surface Methodology" Eng 6, no. 6: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6060123

APA Style

Belahrach, B., Farah, M., Belaoufi, Y., Bensemlali, M., Nasrellah, H., Labjar, N., Baraket, A., Dahrouch, A., & El Hajjaji, S. (2025). Optimization of Process Parameters for Methylene Blue Dye Removal Using “Eriobotrya Japonica” Grains via Box-Behnken Design Based on Response Surface Methodology. Eng, 6(6), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6060123

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop