Next Article in Journal
A Multi-Parameter Flexible Smart Water Gauge for the Accurate Monitoring of Urban Water Levels and Flow Rates
Next Article in Special Issue
Smith–Watson–Topper Parameter in Partial Slip Bimodal Oscillations of Axisymmetric Elastic Contacts of Similar Materials: Influence of Load Protocol and Profile Geometry
Previous Article in Journal
Amazon Natural Fibers for Application in Engineering Composites and Sustainable Actions: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Compliance-Based Determination of Fatigue Design Curves for Elastomeric Adhesive Joints
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zirconia Enrichment of Zircon from Arikya, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, by Magnetic and Gravity Separation Processes for Use as Reinforcing Agent in Composite Formulation

by
Benneth Ifenna Okoli
1,2,*,
Olufemi A. Agboola
1,2,
Azikiwe Peter Onwualu
3,
Abdulhakeem Bello
4,
Olusegun Samuel Sholiyi
1,2,
Vitalis C. Anye
3 and
Olatunbosun T. Yusuf
1,2
1
Department of Aerospace Engineering, African University of Science and Technology, Km. 10 Airport Rd., P.M.B 681, Garki, Abuja 900107, Nigeria
2
National Space Research and Development Agency, Institute of Space Science and Engineering, Obasanjo Space Centre, Umaru Musa Yar’adua Express Way, P.M.B 437, Garki, Abuja 900108, Nigeria
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, African University of Science and Technology, Km. 10 Airport Rd., P.M.B 681, Garki, Abuja 900107, Nigeria
4
Department of Theoretical and Applied Physics, African University of Science and Technology, Km. 10 Airport Rd., P.M.B 681, Garki, Abuja 900107, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eng 2024, 5(1), 180-197; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5010010
Submission received: 27 October 2023 / Revised: 26 December 2023 / Accepted: 29 December 2023 / Published: 17 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue REPER Recent Materials Engineering Performances)

Abstract

:
Acceptable zircon for composite formulation in the aerospace industry requires that the mineral contains a minimum of 65% zirconia (ZrO2). Despite having vast deposits of zircon, Nigeria’s aerospace industry has historically relied primarily on imported mild steel tubes for solid rocket motor cases (SRMCs) construction, resulting in three major challenges: low strength-to-weight ratio, pressure, and temperature containment. In this study, the Arikya zircon deposit located in northern Nigeria was investigated with the aim of upgrading low-grade zircon ore using magnetic and gravity separation processes for use in composite formulation for SRMCs. The dry high-intensity magnetic separator (DHIMS) produced a ZrO2 grade of 52.48%, recovery of 57.99%, and an enrichment ratio of 0.78 with a separation efficiency of 0.56, while the air-floating separator (AFS) generated the highest of 65.52% ZrO2 grade with 70.81% recovery and enrichment ratio of 1.25 with a separation efficiency of 0.25. The ZrO2 content increased from 40.77 to 65.52% after beneficiation. Iron oxide and titanium dioxide contaminants at 0.73 and 0.83% were reduced to 0.66 and 0.54%, respectively, while the specific gravity increased from 4.4 to 4.6 g/cm3. The ZrO2 content and specific gravity were improved to the minimum standard specified for zirconia-reinforced composite application and competed effectively with industrially/globally accepted zircon. These results demonstrated the efficacy of combining DHIMS and AFS to upgrade the low-grade zircon ore from Arikya, Nasarawa State.

1. Introduction

Nigeria is endowed with abundant natural resources such as raw minerals [1,2]. The nationalization policy of the early 1970s caused foreign company owners to leave the Nigerian mining industry, which caused a sharp decline in mineral production. After petroleum was discovered in 1958 and the global energy crisis of the 1970s, the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) finally turned its focus from the solid mineral sector to the petroleum sector, which resulted in very poor activities in the mining sector [3]. Unfortunately, these raw minerals have been neglected and underutilized despite having a wide range of industrial applications. Zircon is one example of such a mineral that has not been adequately explored. The FGN, in a bid to diversify the economy away from the petroleum sector, subsequently recognized these potentials and eventually established legislation banning the export of deep-mining raw minerals and mandating that they be processed domestically first in the country. These legislative measures are intended to promote both domestic and foreign investment in the country’s local mineral resources [2,4]. The government’s ongoing promotion of the diversification of the mineral sector has interested numerous domestic and foreign mining entities in the exploration of Nigerian mineral deposits [5]. Although the Nigerian zircon reserve estimate has not yet been identified, its potential is significant [6].
Zircon (ZrSiO4) has a zirconia (zirconium oxide, ZrO2) theoretical composition of 67.2%, 32.8% silica, and a small percentage of hafnia (hafnium oxide, HfO2), generally between 0.4 and 2%. It has a specific gravity of between 4.2 and 4.86 g/cm3, and in terms of electrical and magnetic properties, zircon is non-conducting and non-magnetic [7,8,9,10]. Zircon can be processed to produce zirconium chemical compounds like zirconia or zirconium metal [11]. Zirconia is produced through different techniques, including reacting zircon ore with caustic soda and the sol-gel process. Zirconia has a high melting point (2700 °C) and low thermal conductivity [12,13]. These properties are essential when considering their use in the aerospace industry. Different cast materials (metals, polymers, and natural fibers) reinforced with particulates of zircon acting as reinforcing agents are being studied for various applications, especially in the aerospace industry where the material’s lightweight and the ability to withstand high temperatures and harsh environments are the basic considerations. In the aerospace industry, materials that can function in oxidizing or corrosive atmospheres at temperatures higher than 2000 °C and sometimes, for a long lifetime are needed for nozzles, rocket and hypersonic vehicle components, re-entry vehicles, engine components, and leading-edge applications [14]. Zirconia-reinforced composite is one example of such material [14,15,16]. Other applications of zircon and its concentrate include the fabrication of ceramic membranes, the development of passive energy-saving systems, fuel cells and batteries, nanomaterials, optical materials, electronics, and solid-state devices.
Zircon of low grade needs to be upgraded to have the minimum purity, composition, and specific gravity needed for aerospace and other industrial applications [6]. The combined content of zirconia and hafnia is a standard way to determine the purity of zircon. Typically, zirconia content (expressed as ZrO2+HfO2), iron oxide (Fe2O3), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and, occasionally, radioactivity (U+Th) are used to describe zircon specifications. Additionally, standard guaranteed ranges are given as follows: ZrO2+HfO2: minimum 65%, Fe2O3: maximum range from as low as 0.04 to 0.25%, TiO2: maximum range from 0.10 to 0.30% [10,17]. A high percentage of zircon implies that the mineral has a high ZrO2 content [18]. For zircon to be used efficiently, interfering impurities or contaminants must be removed because they can affect performance, reduce its value, and limit its industrial applications. The differences in specific gravity, magnetic, and conductive characteristics of heavy mineral species are frequently used to enhance the mineral [19,20,21]. The separation processes for zircon upgrade have extensively been explored and reported in the literature [19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Nevertheless, these findings do not contain much information on specific procedures for the appraisal of separation processes of zircon upgrade in Nigeria with a focus on the performance of the processes and provide a corresponding comparison of the locally obtained vis a vis the industrially/globally accepted zircon. The preceding study on zircon from Nigeria has focused on the minerals’ characterization, location database, suitability for different industrial applications, and geological age. Specifically, the beneficiation of the Arikya zircon deposit to meet the minimum industrial/global standard, performance, and separation efficiency have not been addressed, reported, and documented.
Over the years, Nigeria’s Space Agency has been constructing SRMCs (nozzle and motor components) using imported mild steel tubes [29]. This has led to several challenges, which include the cost of importing the mild steel and the overall cost of construction, launching, and performance of the sounding rockets. The issues associated with using mild steel other than composite for SRMCs include low strength-to-weight ratio, pressure, and temperature containment. These challenges have a significant influence on the lift-off mass of rockets and, by extension, reduce the targeted altitude. The SRMCs constructed with mild steel do fail during static tests and sometimes when the rocket is in flight. This could be a result of the material not being able to withstand the generated pressure and heat from propellant combustion. In the fourth quarter of 2019 alone, the FGN spent billions of Naira valued at over 1 million United States dollars on the importation of mild steel tubes [30]. These monies could have been channeled into other meaningful developmental projects. The scientific information presented in this study is an effort to discourage the wastage of resources through foreign exchange and over-dependence on importation, but rather looking inwards on the local materials or minerals that can outperform its counterpart, in this context, zirconia (synthesized from zircon) when used as a composite reinforcing agent for the construction of SRMCs as against using mild steel.
This study aimed to determine the feasibility of magnetic and gravity separation processes for upgrading the quality of the local zircon ore from the Arikya deposit by increasing the ZrO2 content to compete favorably with zircon products on the global market. The manuscript, in a nutshell, seeks to provide the value addition and prospects of upgraded zircon from Nigeria to developing aerospace industries/agencies in Africa, as well as to serve as a reference for the development of similar low-grade zircon deposits. For Nigeria, the findings from this study will encourage an increase in the utilization of local content; export of the beneficiated zircon to significantly impact the economy, increase foreign exchange, and lower dependence on oil; and reduction in the wastage of resources through the importation of materials or minerals that can be sourced and processed locally.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Feed Material

The unprocessed Arikya zircon sample reported in our previous work [6] was collected and crushed using a jaw crusher (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany, Jaw crusher BB 50 rostfrei-rostfrei); operating conditions: 0.0002 m gap width, and a speed of 89.0118 m/s, and a representative weight of 100 g was used for the study. The chemical composition analysis of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) of the unprocessed zircon, as shown in Figure 1, indicated that the sample mainly contains zirconia, ZrO2 (40.77%); quartz, SiO2 (17.61%); apatite, P2O5 (10.48%); tantalum pentoxide, Ta2O5 (7.00%); cerium (IV) oxide, CeO2 (4.54%); potassium oxide, K2O (4.00%); and other heavy minerals (15.60%), making it a relatively low-grade zircon mineral.

2.2. Study Area

Arikya, depicted in Figure 2, is a town located in the Lafia local government area (L.G.A.) in Nasarawa State of Nigeria. Lafia is the capital of Nasarawa State and the largest town. According to the 2006 census, it has a population of 330,712 inhabitants [31]. Lafia experiences two different seasons, the dry and rainy seasons, with an average temperature of 30 °C. The L.G.A. has a tropical savannah climate, with an estimated average humidity of 40% and an estimated average wind speed of 11 km/h [32,33]. Arikya lies between latitude 8°29′17.99″ N and longitude 8°30′59.99″ E.

2.3. Experimental Methods

To achieve the beneficiation and characterization operations, the flowsheet presented in Figure 3 was utilized. The upgrading of the unprocessed Arikya zircon was carried out in this order: magnetic, followed by gravity separation processes. After the separation, the processed zircon (concentrate fraction/final product) was characterized. After each separation, the fractions (magnetic, non-magnetic, concentrate, and tailings) were handpicked and weighed using a digital weighing balance (NewClassic MF, MS8001S/01, Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland), and a small portion of each was packed in zip-lock polymer bags, labeled for identification, and kept for characterization (see Figure 3). To prepare the portions for characterization, they were crushed and sieved with an Endecotts sieve (Octagon 200, Endecotts Limited, London, UK) to obtain a particle size that is <50 µm.

2.3.1. Beneficiation Testwork

Regardless of the process employed, the goal of mineral processing is always the same: to separate the minerals into two or more products, with the valuable minerals in the concentrates, the gangue in the tailings, and the “composite” particles in the middlings. The testwork aimed to upgrade the unprocessed Arikya zircon by increasing the zirconia (ZrO2) content, which was around 40.77%, to an industrial/global grade of 65.00%.

Magnetic Separation

The feed (100 g) was fed to a dry high-intensity magnetic separator (DHIMS) (Rapid Magnetic Separator 4-3-15 OG, Birmingham, UK) shown in Figure 4 to recover magnetic and non-magnetic fractions at a standard feed rate of 50 kg/h
A magnetic induction of 1.8 T was applied, with the shutter slightly opened to allow an even gradual dispersion of the feed onto the magnetic belt. The separator is made up of three magnetic discs for the lifting and pinning processes of the products, two of which are for magnetic minerals and the other for non-magnetic minerals. The magnetic minerals were lifted by the magnetic discs as they passed through the conveyor belt and discharged through discs 1 and 2 into the collection tray, while the non-magnetic minerals were pinned to the conveyor belt and collected via disc 3 into the collection tray. To enhance zirconia recovery, the produced non-magnetic fraction was re-circulated back to the magnetic circuit twice (total pass = 3). The magnetic and non-magnetic fractions were weighed, and the non-magnetic fraction was subjected to gravity separation.

Gravity Separation

To enrich the grade of the zircon concentrate, the non-magnetic fraction was fed into the hopper and the deck of a pneumatic air-floating separator (AFS) (Kip Kelly, MY-1151, Winnipeg, MB, Canada) shown in Figure 5 at a feed rate of 50 kg/h with the deck slanting at an angle of 180° and the air inlet opening at 2 cm to yield the concentrate, middling, and tailings fractions. The resulting middlings were re-circled back to the gravity circuit to produce concentrate and tailings. To enhance zirconia recovery, the produced concentrate fraction was re-circulated back to the gravity circuit twice (total pass = 3).
The metallurgical process assessment of any concentration operation can be expressed in terms of the recovery (R) achievable for any given value of concentrate grade (G) and the enrichment ratio (ER).
Recovery in the case of concentration of metallic ore is the total metal contained in the ore that is recovered from the concentrate. The percentage recovery R can be calculated using weights and grades, given by Equation (1) [34]:
R   ( % ) = C c F f × 100
where C and F are the weights of concentrate and feed, and c and f are the grades of elements (ZrO2, SiO2, and Fe2O3) in concentrate and feed, respectively.
The grade, or assay, typically refers to the content of the material’s marketable end product. Several metals are sold in their oxide form; consequently, the grade can be expressed in terms of the marketable oxide content.
The enrichment ratio ER is the ratio of the grades of minerals in concentrate c to the grades of elements in feed f. This is expressed by Equation (2) [35]:
E R = c f

2.4. Characterization of Arikya Zircon Beneficiated Fractions

2.4.1. Chemical Analysis

The chemical analyses of the magnetic, non-magnetic, concentrate, and tailings fractions (see Section 2.3) from the two separation processes were carried out using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF). A weight of 2 g was obtained for each portion and placed into the sample holder in a vacuum for 10 min before being transferred to the XRF (ARL QUANT’X EDXRF analyzer 9952120, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basel, Switzerland).

2.4.2. Specific Gravity

The specific gravity of the concentrate fraction was determined by the pycnometer method, following the American Standard Testing Method ASTM D 854-00 [36]. A portion of the concentrate fraction was poured inside the pycnometer, mixed with distilled water, and swirled with a glass rod (soaked for 10 min at an operating temperature of 25 °C). The specific gravity SG was calculated using Equation (3) [37]:
S G   ( g / cm 3 ) = m 2 m 1 ( m 4 m 1 ) ( m 3 m 2 )
where m 1 is the weight of the pycnometer, m 2 is the weight of the pycnometer + sample, m 3 is the weight of the pycnometer + sample + water, and m 4 is the weight of the pycnometer + water.

2.4.3. Mineralogical Evaluation

The mineral or crystalline phase of the concentrate fraction was identified using an X-ray diffractometer (ARL’XTRA, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basel, Switzerland) with a revolving anode at 45 kV and 40 mA and illuminated using a Cu anode material (scan speed was 2°/s from 4.99 to 77.99° with a step size of 0.026261° and dwell time of 29.07 s).

2.4.4. Functional Groups

The functional groups of the concentrate fraction were identified using an FT-IR spectrophotometer (Nicolet iS50 FT-IR, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A 1:10 particle-to-potassium bromide (KBr) ratio was observed for the mixture. A small portion of the fraction was thoroughly mixed with the KBr using a pestle and mortar and pulverized before it was transferred into the pellet-forming die. The spectra of the produced pellet were examined in the frequency range of 500–4000 cm−1.

2.4.5. Morphology

The shape of the concentrate fraction was identified using a Phenom ProX desktop SEM (ProX 800-07334 MVE01570775 PhenomWorld, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basel, Switzerland).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Beneficiation Studies

The material balance, grade, and recovery are shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1a, the magnetic separator produced magnetic and non-magnetic fractions according to the magnetic properties of minerals, and it was observed that the highest ZrO2 grade was in the non-magnetic fraction. The air-floating separator produced concentrate and tailings fractions according to the specific gravity properties of minerals. The concentrate fraction, which is the final product (processed zircon), has a zirconia grade of 65.52% with 70.81% recovery, as shown in Table 1b. It was observed that in the concentrate fraction, the grade and recovery of ZrO2 were higher than those obtained in the magnetic, non-magnetic, and tailings fractions. The reduction in the grade of zirconia observed in the later fractions can be attributed to entrapped contaminants.

3.2. Dry High-Intensity Magnetic Separator

The DHIMS generated a total of 59.95 g magnetic and 45.05 g non-magnetic fractions. The grade and recovery of zirconia in the Arikya zircon from the magnetic separation process are shown in Figure 6. In the magnetic fraction, the grades of ZrO2, SiO2, and Fe2O3 were 1.27%, 3.47%, and 0.71%, respectively (Table 1a), which corroborates the recoveries of these elements (Figure 6). Significantly, with an increase in the recoveries of ZrO2 and SiO2 (denoted by numbers 3 and 2 in red—Figure 6, respectively), their grades increased to 52.48% and 19.41% in the non-magnetic fraction. The enrichment ratios of ZrO2, SiO2, and Fe2O3 are in this order: 1.10 (SiO2) > 0.78 (ZrO2) > 0.69 (Fe2O3) in the magnetic separations.
There have been numerous attempts to define the metallurgical efficiency of separation. The most widely used is the Newton efficiency η n defined in Equation (4) by [38,39]:
η n = R v + R g 1
where Rv and Rg are recoveries of valuable (ZrO2) and gangue (SiO2 or Fe2O3) elements into the concentrate and tailings, expressed by Equations (5) and (6), respectively:
R v   ( % ) = C c z F f z = c z ( f z t z ) f z ( c z t z ) × 100
R g   ( % ) = T ( 1 t z ) F ( 1 f z ) = ( c z f z ) ( 1 t z ) ( c z t z ) ( 1 f z ) × 100
where F is the weight of feed, C is the weight of ZrO2 in concentrate, T is the weight of gangue element in tailings (SiO2 or Fe2O3), and cz, fz, and tz are the grades of ZrO2 in concentrate, feed, and tailings, respectively.
The computed separation efficiency of ZrO2 from gangue minerals in the magnetic and non-magnetic fractions is 0.56. Notwithstanding that the enrichment ratio for ZrO2 is low (0.78), the separation efficiency result showed that ZrO2 upgrading and recovery in the non-magnetic fraction of magnetic separation is more efficient when compared to the value obtained in the gravity separation, although the latter yielded higher ZrO2 grade in the concentrate fraction.

3.3. Air-Floating Separator

The recovery of zirconia in the Arikya zircon from the gravity separation process is shown in Figure 7. In the concentrate fraction, the grades of ZrO2, SiO2, and Fe2O3 were 65.52%, 20.48%, and 0.66%, respectively (Table 1b), which corroborates the recoveries of these elements (Figure 7).
Significantly, with an increase in the recoveries of ZrO2 and SiO2 (denoted by numbers 2 and 3 in magenta—Figure 7), their grades increased to 65.52% and 20.48% in the concentrate fraction. The enrichment ratios of ZrO2, SiO2, and Fe2O3 are in this order: 1.29 (Fe2O3) > 1.25 (ZrO2) > 1.06 (SiO2) in the gravity separations. Although the Fe2O3 enrichment ratio is high, the gangue mineral was not effectively separated from the processed zircon sample, as indicated in Table 1b. This could be a result of the constant magnetic induction used in the magnetic separation.
The computed separation efficiency of ZrO2 from gangue minerals in the concentrate and tailings fractions is 0.25. Although the grade of ZrO2 obtained from the gravity separation is high (Table 1b), this result showed that the efficiency of the operation is remarkably low; this could be a result of not considering the effect of particle sizes in the separation operations.

3.4. Characterization of Generated Products

3.4.1. Chemical Analysis of Magnetic Separation Products

The DHIMS generated magnetic and non-magnetic fractions (minerals), and the complete chemical analysis is given in Table 2a,b. The magnetic fraction in Table 2a shows that it contained mainly rare earth elements (REEs) as they are ferromagnetic. The wt.% of these elements increased from low values to higher values (CeO2 initially at 4.54 wt.% in the unprocessed zircon increased to 23.47 wt.% and La2O3 from 3.51 to 13.78 wt.%).
The non-magnetic fraction indicated in Table 2b shows that it contains 52.48 wt.% ZrO2, 3.60 wt.% P2O5, 2.86 wt.% Al2O3, 19.41 wt.% SiO2, 1.59 wt.% La2O3, 1.11 wt.% CeO2, and other heavy metals.

3.4.2. Chemical Analysis of Gravity Separation Products

The non-magnetic fraction of 45.05 g generated a 25.55 g concentrate fraction and 17.00 g tailings fraction, and Table 3a,b show the complete chemical analysis.
The data in Table 3a and Figure 8A reveal that the processed zircon in the concentrate fraction averages 65.52% ZrO2. This compares favorably with the 65% ZrO2 content for standard guaranteed zircon used as a reinforcing agent in the composite formulation. Hafnium oxide (HfO2) was detected, and it has a value of 0.29%; triuranium octoxide (U3O8) was not detected, or it was below the detection limits (bdl).
The presence of calcium, niobium, thorium, iron, and rare earth elements (REEs) reduces ZrO2 content [40]. Zircon often contains liquid inclusions as well as other minerals, such as cassiterite, monazite, aluminum silicates, xenotime, magnetite, rutile, spinel, feldspar, mica, silica, and especially apatite [8]. The major contaminants in the processed zircon include 20.48 wt.% quartz (SiO2), 5.55 wt.% cassiterite (SnO2), 3.45 wt.% apatite (P2O5), 2.66 wt.% aluminum oxide (Al2O3), 1.36 wt.% Cerium (IV) oxide (CeO2), and 1.00 wt.% barium oxide (BaO). Minor amounts of 0.47 wt.% calcium oxide (CaO), 0.55 wt.% niobium oxide (Nb2O5), 0.49 wt.% thorium dioxide (ThO2), 0.66 wt.% iron oxide (Fe2O3), and 0.54 wt.% titanium dioxide (TiO2), also constitute impurities in the processed zircon (concentrate fraction). These impurity components could be mineral species that precipitate in the pores and cracks of the grains, or they could be inclusion phases that exist within the zircon crystal structure. The level of titanium mineral contamination, typically leucoxene or rutile, which occurs in separate grains, mostly determines the quantity of TiO2 content. The high P2O5 value points to the presence of trace amounts of a Y-rich phase (i.e., xenotime-rich monazite), while the TiO2 values indicated the incorporation of small titanates. Additionally, the high Al2O3 concentrations are commonly an indication of kyanite or sillimanite contamination linked to aluminosilicate gangue minerals, either in the form of isolated grains or in conjunction with clay coatings or pore filler materials [10].
The generated products in the tailings fraction are presented in Table 3b. It is observed that the fraction contains 41.34 wt.% ZrO2, 26.88 wt.% SiO2, 11.19 wt.% P2O5, 5.98 wt.% Al2O3, and other heavy metals.
The weight percentages of ZrO2, Fe2O3, and TiO2 of unprocessed or crude zircon, locally processed zircon (concentrate fraction), and other zircon reported in the literature, which are the industrially/globally/standard grade accepted specifications for zircon were compared as presented in Table 4 and Figure 8. The obtained weight percentages of Fe2O3 and TiO2 (Figure 8C,D) are not within the United States Geological Survey Agency (USGS) and United States Department of Interior (USDOI) specified standards for zircon. These gangue minerals can be reduced to the minimum range using lower magnetic intensity for magnetic separation and electrostatic separation.

3.4.3. Specific Gravity

The unprocessed zircon used in this study has a specific gravity of 4.4. The specific gravity of the unprocessed zircon was successfully increased by the beneficiation process from 4.4 to 4.6 g/cm3. The specific gravities of unprocessed or crude zircon, locally processed zircon, and other zircon reported in the literature, which are the industrially/globally accepted specifications for zircon as a reinforcing agent, were compared as presented in Figure 9.
A decrease in the specific gravity can occur if some light or low-density minerals, which are impurities in the zircon ore (such as quartz and clay), are being carried away as tailings or trapped in the valuable minerals, thereby lowering the specific gravity of the processed zircon.

3.4.4. Mineralogical Evaluation

The XRD patterns of the unprocessed and locally processed zircon were compared, as shown in Figure 10. The unprocessed zircon (Figure 10a) used in this study has a zircon (Zr4Si4O16) mineral phase with traces of rodolicoite (Fe3P3O12), while the processed zircon (Figure 10b) contained a zircon mineral phase with the chemical formula of ZrSiO4 with traces of quartz (SiO2) and aluminum silicates (orthoclase (KAlSi3O8), albite (NaAlSi3O8)) as gangue minerals, which is corroborated by the EDXRF results (Table 3a).
The XRD pattern of the processed Arikya zircon in Figure 10b reveals the presence of tetragonal (at 27.23°, 3.27 Å, height of 2193 (a.u) and size of 381 Å) and monoclinic zircon phases (at 32.61° and 52.12°). The sharp peak observed at 27.23° corresponds to the (200) plane, which is an indication of the suitable crystalline nature of the processed zircon. It can be visualized that the processed zircon has the chemical formula of the industrially/globally accepted zircon, and the dissociation of zirconium (Zr4) from the unprocessed Arikya zircon to Zr in the processed zircon is an indication of the success of the beneficiation operation. Additionally, the oxygen atom initially at O16 was successfully dissociated into the processed zircon and the accompanying elements. It was observed that rodolicoite (Fe3P3O12) in the unprocessed zircon was successfully removed during the magnetic separation as a result of the iron content.

3.4.5. Functional Groups and Morphology

The FT-IR spectra of the unprocessed and processed zircon in absorbance mode are presented in Figure 11. In both samples (Figure 11a,b), the broad band at 900–1000 cm−1 can be assigned to the Zr-O bond. The band observed at 1587.80 cm−1 (Figure 11b) for the processed zircon and the unique band between 1600 and 1640 cm−1, centered at 1629.48 (Figure 11a) for the unprocessed zircon can be attributed to the absorption of nonbridging -OH groups and the bending mode region is due to the O-H bending vibration of -OH group of water molecule [41,42] due to the presence of water inside the sample or magnesium-rich chlorite. The intensity of the band is not high, and it shifted to a lower wave number (1587.80 cm−1) in the spectrum of the processed zircon (Figure 11b). This suggests a structural difference in the two samples (unprocessed and processed), as the unprocessed sample was redried before the beneficiation operation.
The bands at 2355.70 (Figure 11b) and 2359.86 cm−1 (Figure 11a) refer to the characteristic stretching vibration of the hydroxyl zirconium (Zr-OH) bond [43]. The prominent absorption bands between 3200 and 3800 cm−1 (Figure 11a,b) correspond to the stretching vibration -OH group of water molecules from the atmosphere, which was retained by the KBr pellet. The band is not significant in the processed zircon as a result of the redrying carried out on the sample before the beneficiation operation. The different variations in where the banks were observed for the unprocessed and processed zircon show the extent of the purification. Additionally, it can be deduced that the elimination of water molecules from the processed zircon sample is the cause of the absorption band’s intensity decreasing (Figure 11b).
The morphologies of the unprocessed and processed Arikya zircon are shown in Figure 12. The unprocessed zircon used for this study is wedge shaped, as indicated in Figure 12a, while the processed zircon has an angular blocky shape (Figure 12b). The processed zircon (Figure 12b) showed a composition of Zr as 61.50% and Si as 20.86%, and this gave 82.36% of the Zr-Si empirical composition.
The morphologies of both samples (unprocessed and processed Arikya zircon) are an indication of the presence of zircon, as the mineral usually has prismatic and pyramidal morphology. The factors that influence crystal shapes are mainly the crystal composition and crystallization temperature.

4. Conclusions

The possibility of using magnetic and gravity separation processes to increase the zirconia (ZrO2) content of unprocessed Arikya zircon collected from Nasarawa State, Nigeria, was taken into consideration in this study. Two fractions each were generated from the magnetic and gravity separation processes. The DHIMS generated a ZrO2 grade of 1.27% and 52.48% in the magnetic and non-magnetic fractions, respectively, with 57.99% recovery and enrichment ratio of 0.78, while the highest ZrO2 grade of 65.52% with a 70.81% recovery and enrichment ratio of 1.25 in the AFS in the concentrate fraction, while 41.34% was obtained in the tailings fraction. The ZrO2 content previously at 40.77% in the unprocessed zircon was successfully increased in the concentrate fraction of the gravity separation to 65.52% ZrO2 grade after the beneficiation. The minimum guaranteed standard range is 65%, as recommended by the USGS. The grade of ZrO2 obtained would have been higher but lost to the magnetic and tailings fractions, which are mostly as entrapped minerals that include titanium dioxide; silicates, predominantly quartz; and aluminosilicates, mostly feldspars and clays generated as contaminants. Primary contaminants initially at 0.73% iron oxide (Fe2O3) and 0.83% titanium dioxide (TiO2) in the unprocessed zircon were reduced to 0.66 and 0.54%, respectively, after the beneficiation operation. The specific gravity previously at 4.4 was successfully increased to 4.6 g/cm3; 4.2 is the minimum USGS standard. The significant improvements in the ZrO2 content and specific gravity in the processed Arikya zircon sample can be attributed to the different separation processes utilized to upgrade the crude Arikya sample. The unprocessed Arikya zircon mineral was upgraded to the minimum purity, composition, and specific gravity that is within the USGS guaranteed ranges and is thus suitable for use as a reinforcing agent in composite formulation for SRMCs construction in the aerospace industry and compares favorably with the industrially/globally accepted zircon. This study has highlighted and elaborated on some vital information that space engineers, scientists, researchers, and other industrial users need about upgrades, utilization, and the prospects of locally processed zircon. Using flotation and electrostatic separation to further upgrade the zircon concentrates from the gravity separation and studying the effect of feed rate, particle sizes, and magnetic induction is recommended.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: B.I.O.; methodology: B.I.O.; formal analysis and investigation: B.I.O.; resources: B.I.O. and A.P.O.; data curation and writing—original draft preparation: B.I.O.; writing—review and editing: A.P.O., O.S.S. and A.B.; supervision: O.A.A., A.P.O., A.B., O.S.S., O.T.Y. and V.C.A.; project administration: A.P.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance of the National Metallurgical Development Centre (NMDC), Jos, Nigeria.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. RMRDC. Non-metallic Mineral Endowments in Nigeria; Raw Materials Research and Development Council: Abuja, Nigeria, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. MMSD. Nigeria’s Mining and Metal Sector, Investment Promotion Brochure; Ministry of Mines and Steel Development: Abuja, Nigeria, 2017.
  3. FGN. Federal Republic of Nigeria. Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) NEITI Secretariat; Federal Government of Nigeria: Abuja, Nigeria, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. MMSD. Roadmap for the Growth and Development of the Nigerian Mining Industry; Ministry of Mines and Steel Development: Abuja, Nigeria, 2016.
  5. USGS. 2012 Minerals Yearbook: Nigeria [Advance Release]; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2014.
  6. Okoli, B.I.; Agboola, O.A.; Onwualu, A.P.; Bello, A.; Sholiyi, O.S.; Anye, V.C.; Yusuf, O.T. Characterization of Nigerian Zircon Sand and Its Suitability for Different Industrial Applications. Minerals 2023, 13, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. USGS. International Strategic Minerals Inventory Summary Report-Zirconium; US Geological Survey Circular: Denver, CO, USA, 1992.
  8. Elsner, H. Assessment Manual: Heavy Minerals of Economic Importance; BGR: Hanover, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Volp, K.M.; Russill, J.; Donovan, G.O. Exploration for Offshore Heavy Mineral Sands by Grupo Minero Esmeralda Colombiana, Colombia. In Proceedings of the 7th International Heavy Minerals Conference ‘What Next’, Drakensberg, South Africa, 20–23 September 2009; The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Johannesburg, South Africa, 2009; pp. 163–176. [Google Scholar]
  10. USDOI. Minerals Yearbook; United States Department of Interior (USDOI), Bureau of Mines: Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
  11. Zircon Industry Association (ZIA). Technical Handbook on Zirconium and Zirconium Compounds. 2019. Available online: https://www.zircon-association.org (accessed on 13 April 2021).
  12. USGS. Zirconium and Hafnium: Critical Mineral Resources of the United States-Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2017.
  13. Mihai, L.L.; Parlatescu, I.; Gheorghe, C.; Andeescu, C.; Bechir, A.; Pacurar, M.; Cumpata, C.N. In Vitro Study of the Effectiveness to Fractures of the Aesthetic Fixed Restorations Achieved from Zirconium and Alumina. Rev. Chim. 2014, 65, 725–729. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jankowiak, A.; Justin, J.F. Ultra High Temperature Ceramics for Aerospace Applications; HAL: Bangalore, India, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Binner, J.; Porter, M.; Baker, B.; Zou, J.; Venkatachalam, V.; Diaz, V.R.; Angio, A.D.; Ramanujam, P.; Zhang, T.; Murthy, S.R.C. Selection, Processing, Properties and Applications of Ultra-high Temperature Ceramic Matrix Composites, UHTCMCs—A Review. Taylor Fr. Online 2019, 65, 389–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Murthy, T.S.R.C.; Sonber, J.K.; Sairam, K.; Majumdar, S.; Kain, V. Boron-Based Ceramics and Composites for Nuclear and Space Applications: Synthesis and Consolidation in Handbook of Advanced Ceramics and Composites; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kogel, J.E.; Trivedi, N.C.; Barker, J.M.; Krukowski, S.T. Industrial Minerals & Rocks, 7th ed.; Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc.: Littleton, CO, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pirkle, F.L.; Podmeyer, D.A. Zircon: Origin and Uses. Trans. SME 1992, 292, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  19. Samin; Poernomo, H.; Rozana, K.; Suyanti. The Processing and Validation of Zircon Sand Concentrate Process into Zircon Opacifier. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2296, 020073. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ravishankar, S.A.; Kolla, H. Chemically Enhanced Electrostatic Separation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Heavy Minerals Conference ‘What Next’, Drakensberg, South Africa, 20–23 September 2009; The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Johannesburg, South Africa, 2009; pp. 203–206. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bulatovic, S.M. Beneficiation of Zircon Containing Ores in Handbook of Flotation Reagents: Chemistry, Theory and Practice; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. Routray, S.; Laxmi, T.; Rao, R.B. Alternate Approaches to Recover Zircon Mineral Sand from Beach Alluvial Placer Deposits and Badlands Topography for Industrial Applications. Int. J. Mater. Mech. Eng. 2013, 2, 80–90. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lundberg, M. Environmental Analysis of Zirconium Alloy Production. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:475527/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  24. Gouda, M.K.; Fattah, H.A.; Fathy, W.M.; Salman, S.A. Upgrading the Zirconium Content in the Egyptian Zircon Concentrate Using Alkaline Molten Salt and Leaching Processes. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2020, 11, 1591–1596. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tahli, L.; Wahyudi, T. Characteristic Study of Popay Zircon Sand Used for Ceramics, Refractory and Foundry Raw Materials. Indones. Min. J. 2016, 19, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuhelda; Amalia, D.; Nugraha, E.P. Processing Zirconia Through Zircon Sand Smelting with NaOH as a Flux. Indones. Min. J. 2017, 19, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  27. Routray, S.; Rao, R.B. Beneficiation and Characterization of Detrital Zircons from Beach Sand and Red Sediments in India. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 2011, 10, 1409–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abdullah, M.; Triwikantoro; Umamah, C.; Andi, H.J. The Effect of pH and Calcination Temperature on the ZrO2 Phase Formation from Natural Zircon Sand of Kereng Pangi. J. Neutrino 2021, 13, 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  29. NASRDA. Design of Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (SRM); National Space Research and Development Agency: Abuja, Nigeria, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. NBS. Foreign Trade in Goods Statistics (Q4 2019); National Bureau of Statistics: Abuja, Nigeria, 2020.
  31. NPC. Federal Republic of Nigeria 2006 Population Census, Official Gazette; Nigerian Population Commission: Abuja, Nigeria, 2006.
  32. Manpower Nigeria. Lafia Local Government Area. Available online: https://www.manpower.com.ng/places/lga/570/lafia (accessed on 21 July 2022).
  33. Akomolafe, G.F.; Rahmad, Z. Relating the Land-use Changes to the Invasion of Pneumatopteris afra in Nigeria Using Remote Sensing. Pertanika J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 28, 1345–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wills, B.A.; Finch, J.A. Introduction and Classification in Wills’ Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery, 8th ed.; Elsevier: Waltham, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wills, B.A.; Napier-Munn, T.J. Introduction in Wills’ Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery, 7th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  36. ASTM D854; Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. The American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2000; pp. 1–7.
  37. Prakash, K. Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Instruction Manual. Available online: https://sjce.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Geotechnical-Lab-Manual.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2022).
  38. Aravamudhan, S.; Premkumar, N.; Yerrapragada, S.S.; Mani, B.P.; Viswanathan, K. Separation Based on Shape Path II: Newton’s Separation Efficiency. Powder Technol. 1984, 39, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hiroaki, M.; Ko, H.; Hideto, Y. Classification in Powder Technology: Handling and Operations, Process Instrumentation, and Working Hazards; CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group: Broken Sound Parkway, NW, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sarangua, N.; Watanabe, Y.; Echigo, T.; Hoshino, M. Chemical Characteristics of Zircon from Khaldzan Burgedei Peralkaline Complex, Western Mongolia. Minerals 2019, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Perez-Maqueda, L.A.; Matijevic, E. Preparation and Characterization of Nanosized Zirconium (Hydrous) Oxide Particles. J. Mater. Res. 1997, 12, 3286–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, G.Y.; Chen, Y.L.; Ying, W.J. Thermal, Spectroscopic and X-ray Diffractional Analyses of Zirconium Hydroxides Precipitated at low pH Values. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2004, 84, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dwivedi, R.; Maurya, A.; Verma, A.; Prasad, R.; Bartwal, K.S. Microwave Assisted Sol-gel Synthesis of Tetragonal Zirconia Nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 6848–6851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Oxide chemistry of feed sample (unprocessed Arikya zircon).
Figure 1. Oxide chemistry of feed sample (unprocessed Arikya zircon).
Eng 05 00010 g001
Figure 2. The geographic location of the study area. The star indicate Lafia L.G.A., Nasarawa State, Nigeria and circled in green to show the study area (Arikya town in Lafia L.G.A.).
Figure 2. The geographic location of the study area. The star indicate Lafia L.G.A., Nasarawa State, Nigeria and circled in green to show the study area (Arikya town in Lafia L.G.A.).
Eng 05 00010 g002
Figure 3. Flowsheet for the beneficiation and characterization operations. The ‘Rejected’ in red indicated for magnetic and tailing fractions were because zircon is non-magnetic and mineral processing separates minerals into two or more products, with the valuable minerals in the concentrate fraction and the gangue in the tailing fraction. The asterisk denotes the concentrate fraction (final product) after the beneficiation.
Figure 3. Flowsheet for the beneficiation and characterization operations. The ‘Rejected’ in red indicated for magnetic and tailing fractions were because zircon is non-magnetic and mineral processing separates minerals into two or more products, with the valuable minerals in the concentrate fraction and the gangue in the tailing fraction. The asterisk denotes the concentrate fraction (final product) after the beneficiation.
Eng 05 00010 g003
Figure 4. Rapid magnetic separator (source: National Metallurgical Development Centre (NMDC), Jos, Nigeria).
Figure 4. Rapid magnetic separator (source: National Metallurgical Development Centre (NMDC), Jos, Nigeria).
Eng 05 00010 g004
Figure 5. Pneumatic air-floating separator (source: National Metallurgical Development Centre (NMDC), Jos, Nigeria).
Figure 5. Pneumatic air-floating separator (source: National Metallurgical Development Centre (NMDC), Jos, Nigeria).
Eng 05 00010 g005
Figure 6. The gangue recoveries of Fe2O3 and SiO2 from the unprocessed Arikya zircon in magnetic fraction and ZrO2 in non-magnetic fraction. The numbers denote 1—Fe2O3, 2—SiO2, and 3—ZrO2.
Figure 6. The gangue recoveries of Fe2O3 and SiO2 from the unprocessed Arikya zircon in magnetic fraction and ZrO2 in non-magnetic fraction. The numbers denote 1—Fe2O3, 2—SiO2, and 3—ZrO2.
Eng 05 00010 g006
Figure 7. The recoveries of ZrO2 from the unprocessed Arikya zircon in concentrate fraction and SiO2 and Fe2O3 gangue in tailings fraction. The numbers denote 1—Fe2O3, 2—ZrO2, and 3—SiO2.
Figure 7. The recoveries of ZrO2 from the unprocessed Arikya zircon in concentrate fraction and SiO2 and Fe2O3 gangue in tailings fraction. The numbers denote 1—Fe2O3, 2—ZrO2, and 3—SiO2.
Eng 05 00010 g007
Figure 8. Comparison studies of the unprocessed and processed Arikya zircon from Lafia L.G.A., Nasarawa State, Nigeria, and comparison studies with the industrially/globally/standard grade accepted specifications grade reported in the literature (A) ZrO2, (B) SiO2, (C) Fe2O3, and (D) TiO2 contents, Kogel et al., 2006, [17].
Figure 8. Comparison studies of the unprocessed and processed Arikya zircon from Lafia L.G.A., Nasarawa State, Nigeria, and comparison studies with the industrially/globally/standard grade accepted specifications grade reported in the literature (A) ZrO2, (B) SiO2, (C) Fe2O3, and (D) TiO2 contents, Kogel et al., 2006, [17].
Eng 05 00010 g008
Figure 9. Specific gravities of the unprocessed and processed from Arikya zircon site, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, and comparison studies with the industrially/globally accepted specifications for specific gravity reported in the literature, Elsner 2007, [8], Volp et al., 2009, [9].
Figure 9. Specific gravities of the unprocessed and processed from Arikya zircon site, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, and comparison studies with the industrially/globally accepted specifications for specific gravity reported in the literature, Elsner 2007, [8], Volp et al., 2009, [9].
Eng 05 00010 g009
Figure 10. XRD of the (a) unprocessed and (b) processed Arikya zircon.
Figure 10. XRD of the (a) unprocessed and (b) processed Arikya zircon.
Eng 05 00010 g010
Figure 11. FT-IR spectra for the (a) unprocessed and (b) processed Arikya zircon.
Figure 11. FT-IR spectra for the (a) unprocessed and (b) processed Arikya zircon.
Eng 05 00010 g011
Figure 12. (a) SEM image of unprocessed—showing wedge and (b) SEM-EDX of processed—angular blocky.
Figure 12. (a) SEM image of unprocessed—showing wedge and (b) SEM-EDX of processed—angular blocky.
Eng 05 00010 g012
Table 1. Beneficiation studies on the unprocessed Arikya zircon sample to upgrade the zirconia content.
Table 1. Beneficiation studies on the unprocessed Arikya zircon sample to upgrade the zirconia content.
(a) Feed
Eng 05 00010 i001
FractionWeight (g)Grade (%)Recovery (%)
ZrO2SiO2Fe2O3ZrO2SiO2Fe2O3
Feed FfR
10040.7717.610.73-
Magnetic fractionTt
59.951.273.470.7157.9949.6631.47
Non-magnetic fractionCc
45.0552.4819.410.51
(b) Non-Magnetic Fraction
Eng 05 00010 i002
Feed (non-magnetic fraction) --
Concentrate fractionC
25.55

65.52
c
20.48

0.66

70.81

59.84

73.39
Tailings fractionT
17.00

41.34
t
26.88

0.78
Table 2. (a) Oxide chemistry components in the magnetic fraction and (b) Oxide chemistry components in the non-magnetic fraction.
Table 2. (a) Oxide chemistry components in the magnetic fraction and (b) Oxide chemistry components in the non-magnetic fraction.
(a)
Element/OxideFe2O3SiO2Al2O3MgOP2O5SO3TiO2MnO
Content (%)0.713.471.440.8010.080.150.910.00
Element/OxideCaOK2OCuOZnOCr2O3V2O5As2O3PbO
Content (%)0.520.000.000.010.000.140.000.13
Element/OxideRb2OGa2O3NiOClZrO2Ta2O5BrSrO
Content (%)0.000.000.000.011.270.100.000.47
Element/OxideNb2O5Bi2O3Sb2O3Co3O4CdOHfO2Ag2OCeO2
Content (%)0.470.090.640.000.000.000.0023.47
Element/OxideBaOAuWO3MoO3La2O3ThO2Sn2O
Content (%)1.000.000.030.0013.781.880.92
(b)
Element/OxideFe2O3SiO2Al2O3MgOP2O5SO3TiO2MnO
Content (%)0.5119.412.860.003.600.000.670.00
Element/OxideCaOK2OCuOZnOCr2O3V2O5As2O3PbO
Content (%)0.580.000.000.000.000.020.320.09
Element/OxideRb2OGa2O3NiOClZrO2Ta2O5BrSrO
Content (%)0.000.000.000.0052.480.090.000.74
Element/OxideNb2O5Bi2O3Sb2O3Co3O4CdOHfO2Ag2OCeO2
Content (%)0.390.290.620.300.150.280.001.11
Element/OxideBaOAuWO3MoO3La2O3ThO2Sn2O
Content (%)1.000.000.000.331.590.426.44
Table 3. (a) Oxide chemistry components in the concentrate fraction and (b) Oxide chemistry components in the tailings fraction.
Table 3. (a) Oxide chemistry components in the concentrate fraction and (b) Oxide chemistry components in the tailings fraction.
(a)
Element/OxideFe2O3SiO2Al2O3MgOP2O5SO3TiO2MnO
Content (%)0.6620.482.660.403.450.000.540.00
Element/OxideCaOK2OCuOZnOCr2O3V2O5As2O3PbO
Content (%)0.470.000.020.000.000.010.370.07
Element/OxideRb2OGa2O3NiOClZrO2Ta2O5BrSrO
Content (%)0.000.000.010.0065.520.120.000.79
Element/OxideNb2O5Bi2O3Sb2O3Co3O4CdOHfO2Ag2OCeO2
Content (%)0.550.270.950.300.150.290.001.36
Element/OxideBaOAuWO3MoO3La2O3ThO2Sn2O
Content (%)1.000.000.000.330.980.495.55
(b)
Element/OxideFe2O3SiO2Al2O3MgOP2O5SO3TiO2MnO
Content (%)0.7826.885.980.0911.190.001.790.03
Element/OxideCaOK2OCuOZnOCr2O3V2O5As2O3PbO
Content (%)0.690.000.020.000.000.020.330.08
Element/OxideRb2OGa2O3NiOClZrO2Ta2O5BrSrO
Content (%)0.000.000.010.0041.340.090.000.69
Element/OxideNb2O5Bi2O3Sb2O3Co3O4CdOHfO2Ag2OCeO2
Content (%)0.670.240.790.300.140.290.000.43
Element/OxideBaOAuWO3MoO3La2O3ThO2Sn2O
Content (%)1.000.000.010.200.000.293.55
Table 4. Elemental evaluation of Arikya zircon.
Table 4. Elemental evaluation of Arikya zircon.
CompositionPercentage (%)
USGS and USDOI Specifications [7,17]Arikya Zircon
Unprocessed [6]Processed
ZrO2Minimum 65.0040.7765.52
HfO20.40 to 2.00n.d or bdl *0.29
SiO232.8017.6120.48
Fe2O30.120.730.66
TiO20.250.830.54
n.d*: not detected and bdl: below the detection limits.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okoli, B.I.; Agboola, O.A.; Onwualu, A.P.; Bello, A.; Sholiyi, O.S.; Anye, V.C.; Yusuf, O.T. Zirconia Enrichment of Zircon from Arikya, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, by Magnetic and Gravity Separation Processes for Use as Reinforcing Agent in Composite Formulation. Eng 2024, 5, 180-197. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5010010

AMA Style

Okoli BI, Agboola OA, Onwualu AP, Bello A, Sholiyi OS, Anye VC, Yusuf OT. Zirconia Enrichment of Zircon from Arikya, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, by Magnetic and Gravity Separation Processes for Use as Reinforcing Agent in Composite Formulation. Eng. 2024; 5(1):180-197. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okoli, Benneth Ifenna, Olufemi A. Agboola, Azikiwe Peter Onwualu, Abdulhakeem Bello, Olusegun Samuel Sholiyi, Vitalis C. Anye, and Olatunbosun T. Yusuf. 2024. "Zirconia Enrichment of Zircon from Arikya, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, by Magnetic and Gravity Separation Processes for Use as Reinforcing Agent in Composite Formulation" Eng 5, no. 1: 180-197. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5010010

APA Style

Okoli, B. I., Agboola, O. A., Onwualu, A. P., Bello, A., Sholiyi, O. S., Anye, V. C., & Yusuf, O. T. (2024). Zirconia Enrichment of Zircon from Arikya, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, by Magnetic and Gravity Separation Processes for Use as Reinforcing Agent in Composite Formulation. Eng, 5(1), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5010010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop