The urbanization process impacts on the urban environment and has caused recurrent damages and losses to the population. Among the main problems are the changes in land use [1
], waterproofing of the soil surface [2
], floods [3
], and changes in the urban hydrological cycle [4
]. Consequently, these impacts increase the volume of runoff [5
], changing the quality of the water that drains superficially [6
] and the decrease in underground recharge [7
Floods are worrisome because approximately 80% of the world population [8
] is subject to financial damage, destruction of infrastructure, and deaths due to this phenomenon [9
]. In addition, the socioeconomic risks associated with floods are more evident when the phenomenon occurs in an urban area compared to rural areas [11
], these risks have led to a diversity of studies on the causes of floods [10
Climate change can increase both frequency and magnitude of floods on a global scale [14
]. The increase in emissions of gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect can contribute to reducing the period of return of extreme precipitation, making flash floods more frequent [15
Besides, the physical factors that are generally linked to the occurrence of floods are the gradient of the hydrographic basin, the use and cover of the soil, the permeability of the soil, and the physical vulnerability associated with this phenomenon [17
]. In the urban environment, floods can also be recurrent due to steep slopes, surfaces impervious to urbanization, and failures in urban drainage [18
In this sense, traditional urban drainage has been shown to be insufficient and inadequate [19
], and, therefore, new approaches have been studied to assist in flood mitigation [21
]. However, there are still uncertainties in the scientific community about the advantages of sustainable drainage systems over traditional systems [22
In urbanized areas, allocating land for major urban drainage works, such as detention basins, galleries, and infiltration basins, may not be a viable option. Thus, a strategy is to use retrofit techniques for the existing infrastructure, restoring river basins, and providing rainwater treatment in places where the practices previously did not exist or were ineffective [24
]. Retrofit techniques can be applied to built-up areas, such as parking lots, sidewalks, and roofs.
In this context, the Low Impact Development (LID) emerges as a proposal for sustainable urban drainage practice in order to aim for solutions for the management of rainwater [25
]. Examples of LID typologies include green roofs, rain gardens, bio-retention cells, ditches, permeable pavements, infiltration basins, infiltration ditches, rain cisterns, among other devices [27
]. These systems seek to mitigate the effects of urbanization by reducing runoff and increasing infiltration, thus creating permeable and rainwater retention areas [28
As a device option to aid urban drainage, permeable pavements promote infiltration and, consequently, reduce runoff [30
] and peak flow [31
]. Brown [32
] indicates the use of permeable pavements in parking lots and streets with flowing traffic, such as in residential condominiums and sidewalks. For Beaupre et al. [33
], the permeable pavement should be used in relatively flat locations to facilitate infiltration and minimize erosion, with a maximum slope of 5% for porous asphalt, 10% for permeable concrete, and 12% for permeable paving.
Rain gardens are vegetated depressions that can collect water from the surrounding impermeable surfaces, promoting infiltration and evapotranspiration [34
]. Ávila et al. [35
] indicate that rain gardens are used in soils with medium to high infiltration rates and slopes less than 12%. Christman et al. [36
] recommend that rain gardens are indicated for open spaces, with areas from 10 to 1000 m2
Green roofs help to reduce the speed of rainwater runoff, creating temporary storage and promoting evapotranspiration [36
]. For Ávila et al. [35
], the factor that limits the use of green roofs is the type of roofing in buildings, being recommended for slab roofs. The slope of the slab roof is also a limiting factor, with slopes lower than 20° (5 in 12 inclination) [33
The rainwater harvesting (RWH) serves to collect rainwater runoff from roofs and other impermeable areas for non-potable use, such as flushing toilets, washing machines, car-washing, and irrigation [38
]. The use of RWH is the simplest of methods and adaptable for the most diverse constructions, as long as it is possible to build a separate pipeline for non-potable water and, as a limitation, the need for continuous monitoring after its construction [33
]. Ávila et al. [35
] studied the implementation of LIDs in 10 urbanized hydrographic basins, using three sizes of tanks, according to the housing areas. In Japan, small RWH installations are common in individual residences [39
The Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applied in this scenario represents a support tool in the process of sustainable urban planning. In recent years, some studies have been carried out in this direction, for example, that of Risti et al. [40
], who proposed a model to assess the suitability of the soil for sustainable construction in an area of environmental protection. Christman et al. [36
], besides the analysis for the implementation of sustainable drainage systems, prioritized the areas that would receive green infrastructure through social criteria.
Shariat et al. [41
] used Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM), GIS and fuzzy set theory to consider flood risk criteria. When applying it to a case study in Tehran (Iran), they obtained risk maps indicating a high or very high flood risk for 10.5% to 26% of the total length of the stormwater channels in the study area. Inamdar et al. [42
] evaluated the analysis of the multicriteria decision for the proper selection of rainwater catchment sites (SWH), based on economic, social, and environmental objectives. Ariza et al. [43
] developed a methodology for the analysis of environmental, social, and economic aspects of the implementation of sustainable drainage systems in consolidated urban areas. The authors performed a multiscale analysis, that is, at the city, local and microscale levels.
Thus, given the problems related to recurrent flooding in urbanized areas, this work aims to identify potential areas for the application of LIDs, using the central region of the Pato Branco city as a study area. We use a methodology using GIS-based multicriteria analysis for the integration of geospatial data and technical parameters. To enable data integration, the data were normalized by fuzzy logic. The exclusion of inappropriate areas was applied using Boolean logic in map algebra. The sustainable urban drainage practices chosen (permeable pavement, green roof, rain garden, and RHW) were chosen due to easy implementation in areas with consolidated urbanization. The identification was performed using GIS combined with the analysis of the slope and the characteristics of land use.
3. Results and Discussion
Initially, to identify the areas with potential for the use of LID in the central area of Pato Branco, land use was observed and related to the selection criteria for each model (Figure 5
, Figure 6
and Figure 7
). Thus, note that the area for permeable pavements is larger in relation to the others, followed by the rain garden and, finally, the green roof.
The predominance of areas for permeable sidewalks and rain gardens is explained by the prevalence of parking lots, sidewalks, parks, and vacant lots in the area. Thus, it is interesting that these systems are adopted if there is any further modification in the areas that can be built on.
Melville-Shreeve et al. [65
], who was interested in understanding the use of LID in the United Kingdom, also identified the wide use of permeable pavement concerning other models. The authors identified that one of the reasons for the results is the fact that in this system, water can be stored or, still, be used as a way of improving water quality. Besides, Jato-Espino et al. [66
] also comment in their study that permeable pavements are the easiest systems to implement in a consolidated urban area, due to their multifunctionality, since they act in the infiltration and storage of rainwater and allow the control of runoff.
Regarding green roofs, the criterion of the existence of buildings with flat slab coverage was considered. Due to flat slabs occurrences being higher in buildings with more than four floors, green roofs provide an alternative to mitigate floods in areas with a higher rate of vertical urbanization, as well as to contribute to the reduction of heat islands [67
]. Thus, there is a predominance of single-story buildings or with less than four floors in the area, which would require major adaptations to receive a green roof.
For geomorphology (Figure 8
), the study area has a rugged relief. The slope is characterized by the predominance of slopes between 0% and 20%, with some regions reaching values close to 70%. The slope level is classified as nearly slope (<3%), gentle slope (3%–5%), sloping slope (5%–12%), moderate slope (12%–20%), moderate steep slope (20%–45%), and steep (>45%).
We observed that the central area has a predominant slope of 0% to 5% (Figure 8
). With consolidated urbanization, this area has the potential for retrofit, mainly with the transformation of paved areas into permeable pavements. Rain gardens also require land with slopes up to 12%, however, the areas identified for its implementation are located mainly on the sides of the study area, which have a higher incidence of moderate to accentuated slopes.
Considering the slope of the site (Figure 8
), it is visible that the favorable area for permeable pavements and rain gardens decreases from the area originally expected (Figure 9
and Figure 10
). This is explained by the imposed slope limitation (5% for permeable floors and 12% for rain gardens). In greater inclinations, the implementation of LID requires adaptations and studies of its own, which would demand a higher cost and may make its execution unfeasible.
Concerning the area destined for each LID, with the use of the soil as the main condition, it is noted that of the total study area (1,857,630.05 m2
), 25.87% is available or fits the selection criteria (Table 2
). After applying the conditions, the possibility of using permeable pavements and rain gardens decreases (59.59% and 51.98%, respectively), resulting in a total of 13.30% of the area.
Thus, the results (Table 2
) show that permeable pavements are recommended for 6.30% of the entire study area, green roofs can be implanted in 3.97% of the area and 3.03% of this can receive gardens of rain. In total, 13.30% of the central region of Pato Branco can receive LID.
As for rainwater harvesting, there are no restrictions on their use. In addition, a variation of tank sizes is possible, according to the demand or built area. For the analysis of the application of rainwater harvesting, a survey of the construction areas in the study area was carried out, where it was found that there are 1536 properties (Table 3
To evaluate its application, three tank sizes were defined according to the built area of each building. Thus, tanks of 3, 5, and 10 m3
will be associated with homes with less than 100 m2
, from 100 to 300 m2
and above 300 m2
, respectively. Thus, it was observed that the use of rainwater harvesting could store up to 11,145,000 L of rainwater. Steffen et al. [68
], in their study, they observed that rainwater storage tanks have a high potential for saving drinking water, especially in regions with annual rainfall above 762 mm. However, the main obstacles that may exist in the adoption of rainwater harvesting are the high capital costs, mainly in single-family houses, the maintenance costs in multi-family buildings, and the lack of knowledge of the system by the population [69
Through the data obtained, it is noticeable that rainwater harvesting is a LID method that can be widely used due to the availability of locations. However, infiltration-based typologies, such as permeable pavements, have a better performance in reducing runoff [70
shows a summary of all areas suitable for the application of LID. Observe a higher concentration of areas suitable for the implementation of green roofs and permeable pavements in regions with greater urbanization and soil drainage. The rain gardens are more notable in areas far from the central town. Besides, the central core area is characterized by slight inclination, which allows the implementation of systems that have the slope as a limiting factor.
shows the flood susceptibility map. As already mentioned, this map considers factors such as land use, rainfall, slope, and geology. Analyzing this map, note that the central region of the study area tends to receive the largest flow of runoff and, consequently, presents the highest risk of flooding. In fact, from population reports, floods occur annually in the high susceptibility area shown on the map.
Analyzing Figure 11
and Figure 12
it is noticeable that the permeable pavement is one of the types of LIDs indicated for that region. Currently, this area does not have any type of LID that allows the permeability of the surface.
The GIS-based multicriteria analysis proved to be efficient at choosing locations with potential for LIDs installation. In this investigation, we have presented a method to identify areas that meet all the established requirements, which helps companies and government officials in the decision-making process.
Moreover, observe that for the use of LIDs in environments with consolidated urbanization should be considered the land use and the slope as factors for choosing the most appropriate models to the reality of the local. In this sense, the use of LIDs, combined with the conventional urban drainage systems that already exist, contributes to the natural water cycle in the urban environment.
In this study, no distinctions were made between public and private properties. One of the biggest problems related to the implantation of sustainable urban drainage systems is that, for its effectiveness, there is a dependence on the adhesion of private owners, which makes the development of legal instruments essential to enable the adoption of these practices. Another problem, mentioned by Baptista and Nascimento [71
], is related to the search, by individuals, for the most economical solution to the detriment of the most ecological.
Although rainwater management is expensive, the costs of damage resulting from rainwater runoff can be even higher. The costs of rainwater damage, including damage from property flooding, degradation of water quality and loss of natural resources, reveal that the potential benefits outweigh the cost of rainwater management.
Urban drainage management and planning must start at the level of individual property, moving forward with linking these activities to the neighborhood level and, finally, scaling them up to the level of the hydrographic basin. Moreover, public education on the need for stormwater mitigation and the benefits of effective stormwater management can motivate the public and authorities to increase efforts and investments in stormwater programs [72
]. The effective management of urban waters must also be attentive to the projected changes to the climate, as they should lead to an increase in temperatures, frequency, and intensity of extreme rain events [74
In this context, the effective implementation of sustainable urban drainage systems must be a mutual effort between the population and urban planners. Thus, the knowledge of the retrofit techniques appropriate for each region, as well as the scale and to what extent they can be applied, helps managers and decision-makers to plan urban drainage systems sustainably and effectively. As for property owners, the adoption of sustainable techniques can cause, in addition to the aesthetic benefit, an increase in the economic value of the property.
Stimulated by the challenge of adapting cities to climate change, rainwater management is one of the priorities for sustainable development. In this sense, LIDs aim to restore the hydrological flow regime of urban areas, promoting infiltration, retention and evapotranspiration in the place. However, the effectiveness of LIDs is influenced not only by their design, but also by their location.
In a general context, the methodology used can identify areas with potential applications of LIDs to improve the management of rainwater. In this sense, the methods analyzed are alternatives for the management of urban drainage and, consequently, can minimize the impacts caused by the urbanization process and contributes to the natural water cycle in the urban environment.
Finally, we can conclude that the use of geoprocessing and multicriteria analysis tools are effective in the management of the urban territory. The proposed methodology assists individuals who may be interested in using one of the LIDs techniques in their homes, as well as companies and government agencies in aid decision-making and urban planning with a focus on sustainable urban drainage. Thus, the adoption of LID can bring numerous benefits, acting in an integrated manner with existing drainage structures. Even without the elimination of flood events, the adoption of sustainable drainage techniques contributes to the mildness of the climate, increased biodiversity, and the quality of the water that reaches the rivers.
The proposed model can be applied to other regions that are also susceptible to flooding, with adaptation to local characteristics and scenery. Besides, the model can be improved by adding criteria such as social and economic characteristics, which can be incorporated into the modeling proposed here. For practical use of the results, modeling and field studies must be considered to take into account all the complex watershed processes necessary to define the project specifications before implementation. In further investigations, the complexity of the model will be increased when an adaptive decision tree will be implemented, based on social, economic criteria, public facilities, and other dimensions that can impact the concept of the smart city.