Next Article in Journal
Shell Model Applications in Nuclear Astrophysics
Next Article in Special Issue
Perturbative QCD Core of Hadrons and Color Transparency Phenomena
Previous Article in Journal
Nonextensive Statistics in High Energy Collisions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Onset of Color Transparency in Holographic Light-Front QCD
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Nuclear C(e, ep) Transparencies in a Relativistic Glauber Model

1
Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
2
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, B9000 Gent, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Physics 2022, 4(2), 672-676; https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4020045
Submission received: 3 March 2022 / Revised: 12 May 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 10 June 2022

Abstract

:
In light of the recent Jefferson Laboratory (JLab) data for the nuclear 12 C ( e , e p ) transparencies, calculations, obtained in a relativistic multiple scattering Glauber approximation, are discussed. The shell-separated 12 C transparencies are shown and it is concluded that the p-shell nucleons are 75% more transparent than the s-shell ones. The presented comparisons between the calculations made here and the current 12 C ( e , e p ) data show no clear indication for the onset of color transparency when implemented within the color diffusion model with standard parameters.

Forty years after it was first predicted in high-energy QCD [1,2], we still do not have a full understanding of the color transparency (CT) phenomenon in the intermediate (few to ten GeV) energy regime; for a recent review, see [3]. In reactions with high momentum transfer, CT predicts the formation of hadrons in small-sized configurations. Due to the small transverse size, color multipoles vanish and final (or initial) state interactions of the hadron with a nuclear (A) medium get very strongly suppressed. This phenomenon can be quantified in the nuclear transparency observable,
T = d σ A d σ PWIA A ,
being the ratio of the cross sections for an exclusive nuclear knockout process in kinematic conditions approaching quasi-free production to the same process in the plane wave impulse approximation (PWIA) limit of no final-state interactions (FSI) of the knocked out particles with the nuclear medium. The PWIA denominator has theoretical assumptions for the cross section entering; see, e.g., [4] for more details. The color transparent limit in which the nuclear opacity gets fully suppressed by QCD mechanisms is reached for T 1 . At low and medium resolution scales, the opaqueness of the nuclear medium for hadron transmission results in T < 1 . A fundamental question is at what resolution scales the CT phenomenon starts to suppress the nuclear opaqueness to a sizable degree. Mapping this transition can teach us more about the transition from hadronic to partonic degrees of freedom and is of importance to the extraction of non-perturbative partonic distribution functions as CT plays a role in the QCD factorization theorems.
Nuclear transparencies for ( e , e p ) reactions have been measured by a range of experiments [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Most recently, the Jefferson Laboratory (JLab) 12 GeV Hall C measurement [4] extended the kinematic range up to four-momentum transfers squared, Q 2 = 14 GeV 2 , and observed no direct indications for the onset of CT when comparing the data to theoretical predictions. On the other hand, proton transparencies measured earlier in 12 C ( p , 2 p ) [14] show an increase for Q 2 between 5 and 10 GeV 2 , followed by a decrease of T up to 14 GeV 2 . For meson knockout reactions, signs of the onset of CT have been observed for the pion [15] and ρ 0 mesons [16] at JLab. In this brief report, results of the transparency calculations for the 12 C ( e , e p ) reaction are given. Earlier results by us of the relativistic multiple scattering Glauber approximation (RMSGA) calculations for the total nuclear transparencies are summarised, and new calculations for the shell-separated transparencies are included. The Hall C Collaboration will report data for the 12 C ( e , e p ) transparencies for separate shells in the near future. First, let us start with a short overview of the formalism.
The framework of RMSGA [17] is used. In the RMSGA, small-angle scattering of particles with momenta of a few 100 MeV and higher (so that its wavelength is small compared to the interaction range) is implemented in the eikonal approximation. In a nuclear knockout reaction, the plane wave of the hit proton with shell-model quantum numbers, α i , in the initial state, acquires a Glauber eikonal phase in the photon-nucleon collision point, ( b , z ) :
G ( b , z ) = α α i d 3 r ϕ α r 2 1 θ z z Γ b b .
Here, the z-direction is along the momentum of the ejected particle and b is the associated impact parameter. The Heaviside function, θ ( z z ) , ensures that only the nuclear medium in the forward direction contributes to the nuclear opaqueness, and the integral over the nuclear volume, d 3 r , is weighted with the single-particle densities of the remaining nucleons. The product, α α i , takes care of the full multiple scattering series. The profile function, Γ , adopts a Gaussian form:
Γ ( b ) = σ tot ( 1 i ϵ ) 4 π β 2 exp b 2 2 β 2 ,
where the total cross section, σ tot , slope parameter β , and the ratio ϵ of the imaginary to real part of the nucleon-nucleon ( N N ) scattering amplitude, depend on the momentum of the ejected hadron and are parameterized using N N scattering data. The eikonal phase encodes the effects of the FSI between the knocked out particle and the nuclear remnant (absorption, rescattering). The color transparency effect can be included in the profile function of Equation (3) by replacing the total cross section parameter with a position dependent one using the quantum diffusion model of Refs. [18,19]. In the quantum diffusion model, the cross section evolves from a reduced value (reflecting the small-sized color transparent configuration) to its normal value along a coherence length, l c :
σ tot σ eff ( z ) = σ tot z l c + < n 2 k t 2 > Q 2 1 z l c θ ( l c z ) + θ ( z l c ) .
Here, l c = 2 p / Δ M 2 , with p the momentum of the knocked-out proton and Δ M 2 the difference in mass squared between the point-like configuration and the normal-sized nucleon. For the parameters in σ eff , Δ M 2 = 1.0 GeV 2 , n = 3 reflects the elementary constituents in the proton, and k t = 0.35 GeV the average transverse momentum of a quark inside a hadron [18].
For the A ( e , e p ) reaction, the RMSGA is implemented in an unfactorized manner, with the eikonal phase entering in the amplitude. Kinematics and dynamics are treated relativistically, using mean-field nuclear wave function computed in the Serot-Walecka model [20]. The calculation of the differential cross section entering in the transparency includes a summation over the mean-field quantum numbers of the final state residual A 1 target remnant. In RMSGA, this summation corresponds to a summation over the single-particle quantum numbers of the bound nucleon in the initial nucleus before it interacts with the virtual photon. The shell-separated transparencies shown below are obtained by limiting this summation to the quantum numbers of only the s-shell or p-shell protons in 12 C; see Refs. [17,21] for more details on the formalism. The effect of short-range correlations in the FSI can be accommodated by modifying the density, appearing in Equation (2), but this does not generate appreciable differences in the final result; for details, see Ref. [22].
Figure 1 compares the RMSGA calculations for the 12 C ( e , e p ) reaction with the data from several measurements, including the recent Hall C ones [4]. This is essentially an update of Figure 1 of Ref. [22], including the calculations for the new JLab12 data, which were included in the experimental publication [4]. As reported in Ref. [4], the data up to the highest measured Q 2 are in agreement with traditional Glauber calculations, including the RMSGA. As a further test of FSI models, more differential measurements could confront theory calculations in a more limited region of phase space. For example, one could compare transparencies for proton knockout from the dense interior regions from the nucleus with those from peripheral regions. Thanks to the high-resolution spectrometers, used in the Hall C measurement, the contributions from the 12 C s-shell and p-shell proton knockout can be separated and these data are being prepared for publication. In Figure 2, new RMSGA predictions for the shell separated transparencies are shown. The calculations cover the Q 2 range of the world A ( e , e p ) transparency data, including calculations for the measured kinematics of Refs. [4,7,8]. Both shells show a similar Q 2 -dependence as the total transparency. This is not surprising as this dependence of T is largely governed by the momentum dependence of σ N N , the total nucleon-nucleon cross section. Naturally the s-shell, having a smaller rms radius than the p-shell exhibits a smaller transparency. The p-shell RMSGA transparencies excluding CT are about 75 % larger than the s-shell ones and constant over the covered Q 2 range. Given that the proton transparency aggregated over the different shells in 12 C of Figure 1 did not exhibit any CT enhancement, one anticipates a similar observation for the separated shells. For the sake of completeness we include the RMSGA transparencies with CT effects from the quantum diffusion model for proton knockout from the separated shells. One observes that the s-shell transparency receives a larger enhancement from CT effects, again reflecting the fact that (on average) the FSI get reduced over a longer path length than for a p-shell proton.
To shed further light on the CT situation for the proton, measurements at higher momentum transfers at hadron beam facilities can provide additional data. Additionally proton knockout can be measured in different kinematics; see, e.g., [23]. As a further theoretical study one can explore the parameter space of the quantum diffusion model in great detail and identify those parameter values that are compatible with the 12 C ( e , e p ) measurements of Figure 1, but still lead to an observable change in the expected FSI in quasielastic deuteron breakup. There, the kinematics can be tuned so that FSI are maximal, hence a CT signal would result in a bigger change in the transparency compared to the regular one. Experimental measurements of deuteron breakup in these kinematics could then make clear if the current ( e , e p ) at high Q 2 would already be compatible with the formation of a point-like configuration during the knockout process.
Note added in proof: The Hall C data on the shell separated transparencies appeared in Ref. [24] after completion of this paper. Note that the transparencies, contained in [24], apply the overall correlation factor, c A = 1.11 , to correct for nuclear short-range correlations. The measured p-shell transparencies are in line with the RMSGA predictions, made here, while the measured s-shell predictions are about 25% larger. This discrepancy could be attributed to the fact that the measured s-shell transparencies include data over a broad missing-energy range (20 to 80 MeV), whereby contributions from reaction channels beyond 1 s 1 / 2 knockout cannot be excluded. In addition, the results of Figure 2 are obtained for a fixed missing energy, corresponding to the energy-centroid of the single-particle strength. A more detailed comparison between the data and the model for s-shell knockout requires a model for the wide energy distribution of this shell.

Author Contributions

Both authors (W.C. and J.R.) contributed equally to all aspects. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work of W.C. is partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. 2111442.

Data Availability Statement

Calculation results and computer codes are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mueller, A.H. Topics in high-energy perturbative QCD including interactions with nuclear matter. In Proceedings of the 17th Rencontres de Moriond on Elementary Particle Physics: I. Electroweak Interactions and Grand Unified Theories, Les Arcs, France, 14–20 March 1982; pp. 13–43. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brodsky, S.J. Testing quantum chromodynamics. In Proceedings of the XIII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics, Volendam, The Netherlands, 6–11 June 1982; Kittel, W.E., Metzger, W.J., Stergiou, A., Eds.; World Scientific: Singapore, 1982; pp. 963–1002. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dutta, D.; Hafidi, K.; Strikman, M. Color Transparency: Past, present and future. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2013, 69, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bhetuwal, D.; Matter, J.; Szumila-Vance, H.; Kabir, M.L.; Dutta, D.; Ent, R.; Abrams, D.; Ahmed, Z.; Aljawrneh, B.; Alsalmi, S.; et al. Ruling out color transparency in quasielastic 12C(e, ep) up to Q2 of 14.2 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 082301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garino, G.; Saber, M.; Segel, R.E.; Geesaman, D.F.; Gilman, R.; Green, M.C.; Holt, R.J.; Schiffer, J.P.; Zeidman, B.; Beise, E.J.; et al. Proton propagation in nuclei studied in the (e, ep) reaction. Phys. Rev. C 1992, 45, 780–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. O’Neill, T.; Lorenzon, W.; Anthony, P.; Arnold, R.G.; Arrington, J.; Beise, E.J.; Belz, J.E.; Bosted, P.E.; Bulten, H.-J.; Chapman, M.S.; et al. A-dependence of nuclear transparency in quasielastic A(e, ep) at high Q2. Phys. Lett. B 1995, 351, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Makins, N.C.R.; Ent, R.; Chapman, M.S.; Hansen, J.O.; Lee, K.; Milner, R.G.; Nelson, J.; Arnold, R.G.; Bosted, P.E.; Keppel, C.E.; et al. Momentum transfer dependence of nuclear transparency from the quasielastic 12C(e, ep) reaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 72, 1986–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Garrow, K.; McKee, D.; Ahmidouch, A.; Armstrong, C.S.; Arrington, J.; Asaturyan, R.; Avery, S.; Baker, O.K.; Beck, D.H.; Blok, H.P.; et al. Nuclear transparency from quasielastic A(e, ep) reactions up to Q2 = 8.1 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. C 2002, 66, 044613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rohe, D.; Benhar, O.; Armstrong, C.S.; Asaturyan, R.; Baker, O.K.; Bueltmann, S.; Carasco, C.; Day, D.; Ent, R.; Fenker, H.C.; et al. Nuclear transparency from quasielastic 12C(e, ep). Phys. Rev. C 2005, 72, 054602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Abbott, D.; Ahmidouch, A.; Amatuni, T.A.; Armstrong, C.; Arrington, J.; Assamagan, K.A.; Bailey, K.; Baker, O.K.; Barrow, S.; Beard, K.; et al. Quasifree (e, ep) reactions and proton propagation in nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 5072–5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dutta, D.; van Westrum, D.; Abbott, D.; Ahmidouch, A.; Amatuoni, T.A.; Armstrong, C.; Arrington, J.; Assamagan, K.A.; Bailey, K.; Baker, O.K.; et al. A study of the quasi-elastic (e, ep) reaction on 12C, 56Fe and 97Au. Phys. Rev. C 2003, 68, 064603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hen, O.; Hakobyan, H.; Shneor, R.; Piasetzky, E.; Weinstein, L.B.; Brooksbam, W.K.; May-Tal Beck, S.; Gilad, S.; Korover, I.; Beck, A.; et al. [The CLAS Collaboration] Measurement of transparency ratios for protons from short-range correlated pairs. Phys. Lett. B 2013, 722, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Duer, M.; Hen, O.; Piasetzky, E.; Weinstein, L.B.; Scmidt, A.; Korover, I.; Cohen, E.O.; Hakobyan, H.; Adhikari, S.; Angelini, G.; et al. [The CLAS Collaboiration] Measurement of nuclear transparency ratios for protons and neutrons. Phys. Lett. B 2019, 797, 134792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leksanov, A.; Alster, J.; Asryan, G.; Averichev, Y.; Barton, D.; Baturin, V.; Bukhtoyarova, N.; Carroll, A.; Heppelmann, S.; Kawabata, T.; et al. Energy dependence of nuclear transparency in C(p, 2p) scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 212301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Clasie, B.; Qian, X.; Arrington, J.; Asaturyan, R.; Benmokhtar, F.; Boeglin, W.; Bosted, P.; Bruell, A.; Christy, M.E.; Chudakov, E.; et al. Measurement of nuclear transparency for the A(e, eπ+) reaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 242502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. El Fassi, L.; Zana, L.; Hafidi, K.; Holtrop, M.; Mustapha, B.; Brooks, W.; Hakobyan, H.; Zheng, X.; Adhikari, K.; Adikaram, D.; et al. Evidence for the onset of color transparency in ρ0 electroproduction off nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 712, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ryckebusch, J.; Debruyne, D.; Lava, P.; Janssen, S.; Van Overmeire, B.; Van Cauteren, T. Relativistic formulation of Glauber theory for A(e, ep) reactions. Nucl. Phys. A 2003, 728, 226–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Farrar, G.R.; Liu, H.; Frankfurt, L.L.; Strikman, M.I. Transparency in nuclear quasiexclusive processes withl large momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 61, 686–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frankfurt, L.L.; Greenberg, W.R.; Miller, G.A.; Sargsian, M.M.; Strikman, M.I. Color transparency effects in electron deuteron interactions at intermediate Q2. Z. Phys. A 1995, 352, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Furnstahl, R.J.; Serot, B.D.; Tang, H.B. A chiral effective Lagrangian for nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 1997, 615, 441–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lava, P.; Martinez, M.C.; Ryckebusch, J.; Caballero, J.A.; Udias, J.M. Nuclear transparencies in relativistic A(e, ep) models. Phys. Lett. B 2004, 595, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Cosyn, W.; Ryckebusch, J. Nuclear rho transparencies in a relativistic Glauber model. Phys. Rev. C 2013, 87, 064608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Huber, G.M.; Li, W.B.; Cosyn, W.; Pire, B. u-channel color transparency observables. Physics 2022, 4, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bhetuwal, D.; Matter, J.; Szumila-Vance, H.; Ayerbe Gayoso, C.; Kabir, M.L.; Dutta, D.; Ent, R.; Abrams, D.; Ahmed, Z.; Aljawrneh, B.; et al. Constraints on the onset of color transparency from quasi-elastic 12C(e, ep) up to Q2= 14.2 (GeV/c)2. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2205.13495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Computed 12 C ( e , e p ) nuclear transparencies versus the 4-momentum transfer squared, Q 2 , in quasielastic kinematics. The solid black line represents the relativistic multiple scatternig Glauber approximation (RMSGA) calculation that excludes color transparency (CT) effects. The dashed green line shows the RMSGA calculation including the CT effects with the prescription of Equation (4). Data are from Refs. [5] (black squares), [6,7] (red hexagons), [8] (green stars), [9] (cyan diamonds), [10,11] (blue circles), and [4] (magenta triangles). Data and calculations do not include the c A = 1.11 correlation factor, often applied in the transparency ratio [21].
Figure 1. Computed 12 C ( e , e p ) nuclear transparencies versus the 4-momentum transfer squared, Q 2 , in quasielastic kinematics. The solid black line represents the relativistic multiple scatternig Glauber approximation (RMSGA) calculation that excludes color transparency (CT) effects. The dashed green line shows the RMSGA calculation including the CT effects with the prescription of Equation (4). Data are from Refs. [5] (black squares), [6,7] (red hexagons), [8] (green stars), [9] (cyan diamonds), [10,11] (blue circles), and [4] (magenta triangles). Data and calculations do not include the c A = 1.11 correlation factor, often applied in the transparency ratio [21].
Physics 04 00045 g001
Figure 2. Nuclear ( e , e p ) transparencies for the s-shell (blue) and p-shell (orange) protons in 12 C versus Q 2 in quasielastic kinematics. Dashed curves include the CT effects.
Figure 2. Nuclear ( e , e p ) transparencies for the s-shell (blue) and p-shell (orange) protons in 12 C versus Q 2 in quasielastic kinematics. Dashed curves include the CT effects.
Physics 04 00045 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cosyn, W.; Ryckebusch, J. Nuclear C(e, ep) Transparencies in a Relativistic Glauber Model. Physics 2022, 4, 672-676. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4020045

AMA Style

Cosyn W, Ryckebusch J. Nuclear C(e, ep) Transparencies in a Relativistic Glauber Model. Physics. 2022; 4(2):672-676. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4020045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cosyn, Wim, and Jan Ryckebusch. 2022. "Nuclear C(e, ep) Transparencies in a Relativistic Glauber Model" Physics 4, no. 2: 672-676. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4020045

APA Style

Cosyn, W., & Ryckebusch, J. (2022). Nuclear C(e, ep) Transparencies in a Relativistic Glauber Model. Physics, 4(2), 672-676. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4020045

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop