Skip to Content
Smart CitiesSmart Cities
  • Review
  • Open Access

23 February 2026

The Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Public Policy in Shaping the Future of Ride-Hailing: A Review

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Computers, Electronics and Automation, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania
2
Integrated Center for Research, Development and Innovation in Advanced Materials, Nanotechnologies and Distributed Systems for Fabrication and Control, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania
3
Proptech Industry, 230104 Slatina, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • On-demand mobility and ride-hailing are developing across ten key research areas covering micro-level operations (e.g., demand forecasting, matching algorithms, pricing,) and macro-level impacts (e.g., regulation, public transport integration, and policy effects), exhibiting a multidisciplinary nature.
  • Current and future solutions are showing an increasing reliance on AI- and data-driven methods and have a strong potential for rapid evolution.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • Practitioners and transport operators should invest and benefit from AI-driven optimization of on-demand mobility.
  • Passenger safety, data privacy, and trust in platforms are issues that still need to be addressed.

Abstract

In the context in which on-demand mobility services are rapidly gaining popularity in the transportation sector, this article provides a literature review focusing on the emerging research topics related to ride-hailing. Based on a comprehensive review of the existing scientific literature, ten main research areas are identified, covering aspects ranging from operational algorithms to macro-level policy impacts enforced by local authorities. Each topic is discussed and analyzed based on available published research. This work analyzes state-of-the-art research directions such as demand forecasting, passenger–driver matching algorithms, pricing strategies, electric vehicle integration, trust and security aspects, quality of service and user satisfaction, integration with public transportation, and robotaxi integration. The solutions identified pave the way for new, evolving technologies related to on-demand mobility services and ride-hailing, a domain at the intersection of data science, artificial intelligence, and futuristic urban planning. Finally, the main results of this work are focused on the integration of AI, the optimization of the latency–security trade-off, and the development of unified global transportation standards that better address the balance between technological efficiency, sustainability, environmental protection, and social equity.

1. Introduction

It is becoming increasingly clear that today’s urban transport is undergoing major changes as a result of the proliferation of digital technology, ever-faster communications and the expansion of smart devices [1,2,3]. Over the past twenty years, major cities have expanded rapidly, and urban transport systems are looking for better, more flexible and greener solutions to meet the growing demand for travel. In this context, intelligent transport systems (ITSs) seem to represent the solution to building new smart cities [4,5]. ITSs incorporate modern technologies that collect and use traffic-related data to make transport systems work better, safer and more efficiently. New technologies can provide vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication [6,7,8], real-time data analysis and automation tools that help manage traffic, reduce congestion, improve safety and reduce pollution [9]. ITSs do not just focus on one technology. Through technological advances, they use sensors, smart grids, cloud platforms and decision-making software to help cities better organize transportation. In this environment, the digitalization of transport is becoming a central part of transforming the way people move through cities and the way businesses and services meet people’s travel needs [6,7,8,9,10].
In this context, an essential aspect arising from digitization is the emergence and expansion of shared mobility, a concept that brings together services such as car-sharing, bike-sharing, ride-hailing and ride-pooling [11,12,13]. Differing from conventional public transport, which is based on fixed timetables and predetermined routes, shared mobility offers on-demand mobility, instantly adapting to users’ needs through mobile applications and predictive algorithms. The development of the domain was accelerated by the expansion of the digital economy and the sharing economy, which changed the paradigm by transforming private property into a temporarily accessible service. Platforms such as Uber, Lyft, DiDi, Bolt and Grab have revolutionized the way people perceive urban transportation, making the transition from the idea of “possession” to that of “access”. This paradigm shift has led to the emergence of a new form of mobility: online ride-hailing, a real-time service that connects passengers with available drivers through automatic matching algorithms and spatiotemporal data. Shared mobility could be a beneficial solution for cities and users by reducing the number of private vehicles, optimizing the use of transport resources, lowering costs and, eventually, reducing the carbon footprint [14]. However, the development of these services also poses major challenges of a technological, economic and social nature. Thus, issues related to additional congestion, data protection, regulation and equity in access to transport also arise [15,16,17].
Online shared mobility services are currently one of the most dynamic segments of smart mobility [18]. As illustrated in Figure 1, they function as a complex ecosystem made up of three essential components: (i) the digital platform, which is responsible for allocation, pricing and monitoring algorithms, (ii) the vehicle fleet, represented by private vehicles or operator-managed vehicles, and (iii) end users. The interaction between these components is managed by machine learning models, multi-purpose optimization, and real-time feedback mechanisms. From a technological perspective, modern mobility platforms use complex spatiotemporal models to anticipate demand and optimize vehicle distribution. Demand prediction (DP) algorithms are based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and graph patterns, such as Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) or Graph Attention Networks (GATs), which can learn mobility patterns from historical and real-time data. In parallel, routing and passenger–driver matching become combinatorial optimization problems, addressed through techniques such as reinforcement learning (RL), auction-based allocation or multi-agent optimization. In addition to the operational dimension, recent research has also focused on assessing systems performance, user satisfaction, data security and impacts on urban infrastructure. Moreover, the development of electric vehicles (EVs) and autonomous vehicles (AVs) has amplified the interest in their integration into ride-hailing services [18,19], giving rise to the concept of the robotaxi, a vision in which transport becomes fully automated and predictive [20,21,22].
Figure 1. Architecture of an online shared-mobility service.
Significantly, current research no longer looks at ride-hailing services solely as technological tools, but as socioeconomic players influencing urban planning, environmental policies and consumption behaviors [20,21,22]. In this context, new questions related to market regulation, responsibility for platforms, equity of access to transport and the impact on the traditional car industry arise. In parallel, the trend towards electrification and automation of fleets is causing a strategic repositioning of companies, vehicle manufacturers and local authorities [23]. Therefore, the analysis of research directions in the field provides not only a technological perspective, but also an understanding of interrelated characteristics, focusing on how ride-hailing services contribute to the definition of new paradigms of sustainable, connected and autonomous urban mobility.
In this sense, the emergence of ride-hailing platforms represents a “disruptive shock” to urban governance, forcing a transition from traditional, static transport planning to dynamic, data-driven policymaking [24]. The process generally follows a non-linear cycle. Initially, the “regulatory lag” allowed ride-hailing platforms to scale rapidly. Policymaking was often triggered reactively by other factors, such as the protest of incumbent taxi industries or measurable increases in urban congestion [25]. Unlike traditional infrastructure projects, ride-hailing platform policy involves a complex intertwining of stakeholders: municipal authorities, platform operators, and labor advocates. The formulation stage is characterized by a tension between the efficiency-driven goals of the platforms and the equity-driven mandates of the state. Implementation has evolved from physical roadside inspections to “Regulation-as-Code.” Modern cities utilize Mobility Data Specifications (MDSs) to implement policy in real time. This allows for automated enforcement of vehicle caps, geo-fenced restricted zones, and dynamic licensing. The feedback loop is increasingly quantitative. Authorities monitor empty miles and surge pricing patterns to evaluate if current policies are meeting sustainability goals, leading to adaptive regulation where rules are updated frequently based on platform-provided data.
To bridge the gap between innovation and public safety, regulators utilize a policy mix categorized into three primary types of instruments: (i) regulatory, such as strict background checks for drivers, vehicle age requirements, and “caps” on the total number of TNC licenses issued, (ii) economic, such as per-trip surcharges, congestion pricing in central business districts, and tiered taxation based on vehicle emissions, and (iii) soft policy and informative instruments, such as voluntary data-sharing agreements and public–private partnerships. The implementation of these instruments varies significantly based on the political economy of the host city.
The balance between policy and technology remains the central challenge. While platforms optimize for latency and matching efficiency, policymakers optimize for safety, equity, and environmental protection. Future policy must address the algorithmic management of labor, ensuring that the “black box” of platform pricing and dispatching remains transparent to the state. As the sector moves toward autonomous vehicles (AVs), the policymaking process will likely shift from regulating human drivers to auditing software code, necessitating a new generation of technical knowledge regulators [26].
Therefore, this survey provides a comprehensive analysis of the specialized literature in the field of ride-hailing services, emphasizing major trends and emerging research directions. Ten main areas are identified, illustrating how this domain is evolving from a technological, economic and social perspective. For this purpose, representative scientific papers are selected and analyzed, with an emphasis on methodological and conceptual contributions to the development of intelligent transport and sustainable urban mobility. It should be mentioned here that this work does not aim to cover all existing articles focused on the ride-hailing domain, but aims to emphasize the importance of this topic and to highlight the main research areas which comprise this topic.
The main contributions of this study are as follows: (i) the elaboration of an integrated conceptual structure that organizes the specialized literature on online ride-hailing services in ten major research directions, providing a structure for understanding the interdependencies between the technological, operational and socioeconomic aspects of on-demand mobility; (ii) critical and comparative analysis of recent scientific contributions for each thematic direction; the study focuses on the methods used, algorithmic approaches and emerging trends, highlighting the evolution of the field from traditional statistical models to solutions based on machine learning and AI; (iii) the identification of open challenges and future research directions, with a focus on the integration of autonomous technologies, the sustainable optimization of fleets and the development of urban mobility policies adapted to the digital economy; (iv) the correlation of technical and human dimensions of ride-hailing services, through the performance analysis of systems, user satisfaction and implications on mobility behavior; (v) the identification of the evolution of research in this field, from the first operational optimization models to current approaches based on machine learning, blockchain and reinforcement learning, highlighting the directions of interdisciplinary convergence; (vi) the completion of an up-to-date documentation base that can serve as a reference point for researchers, practitioners and decision-makers interested in the design, evaluation and regulation of smart mobility services.
This variety of directions shows that the field of ride-hailing exceeds the simple problem of individual transport, becoming an interdisciplinary research field at the intersection of computer science, transport engineering, economics, behavioral sciences and public policy. Thus, the following analysis details ten thematic areas, highlighting the main scientific contributions, development trends and open challenges.
The rest of this article is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the methodology used for literature collection, selection, and categorization. Section 3 presents the integrated conceptual structure and a detailed analysis of ten thematic areas of research, followed by an in-depth review of the associated scientific contributions. Finally, Section 4 discusses open challenges and future research directions and presents the final conclusions of this article.

2. Methodology

This article presents a literature review on the current state of the art of online ride-hailing platforms. The main goal is to provide a structured and as objective as possible basis for the analysis presented in the following sections. In addition to technological and operational features, the review also considers socioeconomic aspects. The purpose of this chapter is to describe the approach used to identify and select relevant scientific literature related to these topics. To ensure the accuracy and soundness of the present work, only peer-reviewed academic research is included in the review.

2.1. Search Approach and Databases

This literature review is based on a structured search of the top digital libraries in the fields of engineering and computer science. Thus, IEEE Xplore was the main search source, given the study’s strong focus on ITS, machine learning and optimization algorithms. To capture the economic and policy impact in the field, specific searches were also performed in Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) to broaden the field of interest, especially for papers with a high number of citations published in journals on transport, sustainability and urban planning.

2.2. Study Selection Criteria

The identified papers were selected through a screening process which was divided into two parts in order to filter the final volume of literature, as shown in Table 1. Firstly, in the general selection part, the English language was considered mandatory. The second criterion was to select only peer-reviewed papers. The exclusion and inclusion of articles were based on the main subject, which was limited to online ride-hailing platforms. The following were excluded: (i) works in which the topic was not app-based ride-hailing, (ii) papers that did not address the effect of app-based ride-hailing, and (iii) qualitative studies that did not show the quantitative effects of ride-hailing platforms. The search was also limited to articles published between 2015 and 2025, to reflect the rapid acceleration of the shared digital mobility sector following the expansion of major platforms. After that, in the second part, the full-text review was based on the relevance and depth of the subject, followed by the contribution to the state of knowledge.
Table 1. The screening process of scientific articles.

2.3. Data Extraction and Study Assessment

In order to generate the survey classification structure, the final set of selected papers was analyzed. While this work follows a narrative review framework, to allow for a more integrative synthesis, the identification of the ten research themes was conducted through a multi-stage process to minimize bias.
First, we performed a preliminary content analysis of the selected literature to identify recurring technical and socioeconomic keywords. In this regard, key metadata were noted for each paper, including the publication year, research methodology (e.g., reinforcement learning, policy analysis), and main contribution. Each paper’s contribution was tagged with descriptive labels based on the research problem it addresses (e.g., “Pricing Strategies,” “Electric Vehicle Charging,” “Integration with Public Transport”).
Second, an iterative comparison of these findings was conducted, where related research directions were compared for conceptual overlap. Finally, these directions were consolidated into a thematic structure composed of ten distinct research areas. This process ensured that the themes selected represent the dominant and most influential directions within the 2015–2025 research landscape of ride-hailing. The results, depicted in Figure 2, ensure a broad coverage of both the technical and social aspects of the field.
Figure 2. Major research directions related to ride-hailing services.
We mention here that the purpose of this work is not to completely present the entire research effort engaged toward the development of the ride hailing concept, but to establish a map showing the main research domains and trends within this domain. Thus, ten main research areas have been highlighted, and for each of them, several works have been detailed. The selected works are relevant within the specific sub-area and were selected for their ability to illustrate important findings that inform the ride-hailing concept. Therefore, this survey provides a deliberate choice of illustrative studies which depict the research landscape, rather than being an exhaustive work. Thus, this work provides readers a structured perspective and a coherent map for the main research directions, and not a comprehensive presentation of all existing studies.

4. Final Conclusions and Future Research Directions

4.1. Synthesis and Conclusions of the Literature Review

This literature review explores on-demand mobility services, especially ride-pooling and ride-hailing. The field addressed is in full development and intertwines with data science, artificial intelligence, public policies, but also other essential fields in today’s society. As such, ten main lines of research have been identified, from demand prediction through advanced algorithms to social and economic impact, and from the integration of autonomous vehicles to quality of service, which provide a clear perspective on how mobility in big cities is starting to transform into the new digital age.
The first direction analyzes the best algorithms by which supply can satisfy demand with the help of the most accurate predictions. Thus, it has been shown that neural networks and deep learning models can anticipate variations in passenger flow, providing essential support in the composition of dispatching algorithms. At the same time, through advanced resource allocation and optimization techniques, these systems manage to operate more efficiently and to respond better to user needs.
Recent advances in reinforcement learning introduced in the optimization of electric car fleets have eased the transition from traditional models to adaptive systems. Thus, the new models can learn how to optimally reposition the vehicles, when to send them to charging stations, and what adjustments to make to allocate them in real time. As the field expands, a new need becomes increasingly important: addressing security and data protection. To meet this challenge, the adoption of blockchain technology, distributed privacy preservation schemes and fog computing infrastructures has been proposed.
Another important aspect refers to the quality of services, which has a decisive influence on user satisfaction and behavior. Studies have shown that factors such as their safety, cost and comfort are essential in order for platforms to remain relevant on the market. In addition, research dedicated to performance tracking and verification comes with new dedicated methodologies for assessing reliability, calculation accuracy for tariffs and system stability under operational stress conditions.
The rapid expansion of ride-hailing services has significant public policy implications for urban transport systems. The expansion of urban transport networks was analyzed, taking into account on-demand mobility services and their integration in parallel with public transport. The studies carried out highlight the potential of new modes of transport to reduce traffic congestion, pollution and the need for new investments in road infrastructure. At the same time, the new emerging trends related to the use of autonomous vehicles and robotaxis open new avenues of research in the field of macroeconomic and social impact, observing profound transformations in user behavior, in the way car possession is viewed and in the way it changes the entire transport industry.
As a synthesis, research on ride-hailing reveals that this type of transport has been studied from many different angles that cover both micro-level operations and macro-level impacts. At the micro-level, scholars focus on demand forecasting, matching algorithms, pricing strategies, and dispatch optimization, often using machine learning and data-driven methods to improve efficiency. Scientists look at how ride-hailing works in detail, assessing how to predict when and where trips are needed, how to match riders with drivers quickly, and how pricing is adjusted in real time to balance supply and demand. For example, machine learning approaches have been widely applied for demand prediction, demonstrating that advanced models such as neural networks and decision trees can enhance forecasting performance and enable precise resource allocation. This operational research is essential for reducing waiting times, balancing supply and demand, and optimizing vehicle use.
At the macro-level, ride-hailing services are being examined with regard to their integration with traditional public transport and their broader urban impacts. Many studies have found that ride-hailing can change how people travel, including decreasing the use of public buses and trains in some places, or increasing it in others. Ride-hailing can sometimes add convenience and comfort compared to traditional transport, but it can also lead to more traffic and competition with public transit if not well regulated. The impact varies by city and depends on local rules, how people behave, and the accessibility of services. Several studies highlight the relevance of combining ride-hailing with public transit planning to improve multimodal connectivity and overall mobility performance. Strategies such as tailored vehicle dispatching and ride-matching algorithms that prioritize public transport use can promote complementary transportation systems rather than competition. For example, studies propose models where ride-hailing helps people complete the first and last parts of their trip that public transit does not cover.
The literature also underscores the multidisciplinary nature of ride-hailing research. Alongside operational and algorithmic topics, scholars investigate trust, safety, user behavior, environmental effects, reflecting common ground with urban planning, data governance, and transportation policy. Systematic reviews of ride-hailing’s impacts reveal both positive (e.g., increased accessibility, comfort, and potential sustainability gains) and negative effects (e.g., competition with public transit, congestion, and labor concerns), emphasizing that outcomes depend on varied contexts, including regulation and user behavior.
Across this field of research, there is agreement that data and artificial intelligence are becoming central to both the operational and planning sides of ride-hailing, especially with regard to demand prediction, matching, and integration with other transport modes. These developments bring opportunities but also raise issues about safety, data privacy, fairness, and trust, which are still challenges that need more attention from both researchers and policymakers. Furthermore, studies on emerging mobility solutions such as robotaxi services extend this research into autonomous systems, suggesting a frontier where ride-hailing intersects with automation and user adoption behavior.
Overall, the review of the specialized literature highlights a whole universe of intelligent mobility defined by data processing, ensuring interconnectivities and collaboration with various actors of the transport system. The transition from traditional transport platforms to systems that integrate autonomous and shared mobility requires a complex adaptation effort, necessitating close collaboration between various fields, both by creating new algorithms and by changing public policies. Thus, future research in this field will need to pursue a balance between technological efficiency, urban sustainability and user trust, thus laying the foundations for a new architecture of smart cities.

4.2. Future Research Directions

Starting with the challenges identified in the ten directions analyzed, the future research agenda must focus on reducing the discrepancies between theoretical optimization, practical implementation and the impact on society. An essential aspect is given by the development of new DRL models that satisfy two contradictory conditions: to be scalable at the urban level and to offer reduced latencies even in the case of large vehicle fleets. The response of the system must occur in real time so that it does not affect the stability or safety of optimization policies. At the same time, new models must include human behavior, such as dynamic driver compliance rate η or driver self-repositioning, as variables. This is important to guarantee realistic and predictable behavior, favoring customer loyalty and long-term satisfaction of driver partners. Another high-priority direction is establishing global standards for digital pricing and distance measurement. The implementation of unitary rules would allow for rigorous verification of the accuracy of all transport platforms, ensuring the necessary transparency, regardless of the operator. At the same time, it is necessary to develop integrated models that can predict the impact of algorithmic interventions on subjective user satisfaction, such as changing waiting times or pricing policies.
From the governance point of view, policymakers must close the regulatory lag by designing adaptable frameworks that can respond to technological change and mitigate side effects such as congestion, modal shifts away from public transit, and labor market impacts, while still embracing innovation. Empirical evidence shows that regulatory measures, including driver licensing requirements, vehicle caps, price controls, and congestion surcharges, shape the behavior of platforms and influence outcomes such as public transit use and market growth. For example, implementing regulatory policy has been shown to reduce the negative impacts of ride-hailing on traditional travel modes such as bus ridership, supporting a more balanced modal mix and improving integration with public transport systems. Second, authorities should adopt data-driven policymaking and enforcement mechanisms, including open or standardized mobility data reporting, to monitor services in real time, evaluate impacts, and adjust regulations proactively. This includes tracking empty miles, pricing patterns, and accessibility metrics to ensure that regulatory interventions align with sustainability, equity, and safety goals. Finally, policy responses should be context-sensitive and comparative: there is no unique solution. Different cities and regions adopt varied mixes of regulatory, economic, and collaborative instruments based on local priorities, such as environmental goals, labor protections, or integration with existing transit. International and subnational policy analyses highlight the need for flexible, adaptive frameworks that balance innovation with public welfare objectives, including mobility equity and sustainable transport integration.
As autonomous fleets begin to be introduced in big cities, the future of EV platforms depends on algorithms that are capable of taking into account both current profitability and keeping the battery in good condition in the long term. At the macroeconomic level, the stability of the electrical network and its ability to support the load peaks that could occur with the increase in the use of EVs must be taken into account, thus preventing its overload. Strengthening security through artificial intelligence must aim to create systems that are immune to external cyber-attacks and are capable of dynamic risk management. In the context of the rise of robotaxis, priorities are starting to migrate to the legislative area: defining legal liability in the event of an accident and establishing new insurance policies to ensure the seamless integration of mobility on demand.
Last but not least, it is essential to implement unified and dynamic tariff systems that ensure a fair interface between public transport and ride-pooling services. By creating fair charging systems, users could be drawn to shared mobility options, thus optimizing the entire transport system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B., A.-M.C., E.Z., S.-A.A., A.L. and F.-M.S.; methodology, C.B. and A.-M.C.; validation, C.B., A.-M.C., E.Z. and A.L.; formal analysis, C.B. and A.-M.C.; investigation, C.B., A.-M.C., E.Z., S.-A.A., A.L. and F.-M.S.; resources, A.-M.C. and F.-M.S.; data curation, C.B. and A.-M.C.; writing—original draft preparation C.B., A.-M.C., E.Z., S.-A.A. and A.L.; writing—review and editing, C.B., A.-M.C., E.Z., S.-A.A., A.L. and F.-M.S.; visualization, A.-M.C. and S.-A.A.; supervision, A.-M.C.; project administration, A.-M.C. and F.-M.S.; funding acquisition, A.-M.C. and F.-M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded within the project “AI-based IT Platform for Innovative and Sustainable Shared Mobility Solutions” (SMIS Code: 338686), implemented by PROPTECH INDUSTRY S.R.L. as project leader. The project is funded through the North-East Regional Programme 2021–2027, Priority PRNE_P1—A more competitive and innovative region, under the call Support for strengthening the innovation capacity of SMEs through RDI projects and investments necessary for the development of innovative products and processes (PR/NE/2024/P1/RSO1.1_RSO1.3/1).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors occasionally used ChatGPT (OpenAI), GPT-5.x model and Gemini 2.5 Flash for the purposes of grammar, spelling, and sometimes to improve the clarity of the English style. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Florinel-Mădălin Stoian was employed by the company Proptech Industry. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ITSIntelligent Transport System
V2VVehicle to Vehicle
V2IVehicle to Infrastructure
AIArtificial Intelligence
IoTInternet of Things
CNNsConvolutional Neural Networks
RNNsRecurrent Neural Networks
LSTMLong Short-Term Memory
GCNsGraph Convolutional Networks
GATsGraph Attention Networks
RLReinforcement Learning
EVElectric Vehicle
QoSQuality of Service
AVAutonomous Vehicles
POIsPoints of Interest
KNNK-Nearest Neighbors
LS-SVMLeast Squares Support Vector Machine
LASSOLeast Absolute Shrinkage
MAEMean Absolute Error
RMSERoot Mean Squared Error
MAPEMean Absolute Percentage Error
T-GCNTemporal Graph Convolutional Network
GRUGated Recurrent Unit
MFGCNMultimodal Fusion Graph Convolutional Network
MODGCNMultimodal Origin–destination Graph Convolutional Network
TAS-LSTMTemporal Attention Skip-LSTM
RNN-DBSCANReverse Nearest Neighbor Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise
MRVDMaximum Revenue Vehicle Dispatching
IRGIdle Ratio-oriented Greedy
PuPsPick-up Points
GRASPGreedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure
DEMATELDecision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory
ECEdge Computing
MINLPMixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming
PAEVAPower-Aware Electric Vehicle Assignment
DTDouble Threshold
MD-UCBMulti-Delayed Upper Confidence Bound
I-EHSIntelligent E-taxi Hailing Service
DQNDeep Q-Network
MDPMarkov Decision Process
DRLDecentralized Reinforcement Learning
PPOProximal Policy Optimization
LPLinear Programming
MPCModel Predictive Control
FP-MEFine-Grained Puncturable Matchmaking Encryption
LPPMLocation Privacy Preservation Mechanism
HXTHash XOR Tree
IRDPInitial, Route, and Destination Preservation
MaaSMobility-as-a-Service
DoSDenial-of-Service
SEMsStructural Equation Models
AHPAnalytical Hierarchical Process
IPAImportance–Performance Analysis
EFAExploratory Factor Analysis
CFAConfirmatory Factor Analysis
FSMsFinite State Machines
FPFLSTFlow Prediction for Full Link-Stress Testing
DTWDynamic Time Warping
GNSSGlobal Navigation Satellite System
MoDMobility-on-Demand
SARSAState–Action–Reward–State–Action
SUMOSimulation of Urban Mobility
3D-pMFDThree-dimensional passenger-based Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram
VKTVehicle Kilometers Traveled
PVsPublic Vehicles
PVPPV Path Problem
PCIPrecedence Constrained Insertion
SAMODShared Autonomous Mobility On Demand
SAVShared Autonomous Vehicles
SUEStochastic User Equilibrium
TPBTheory of Planned Behavior
PLS-SEMPartial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling

References

  1. Turoń, K. Sustainable Urban Mobility Transitions—From Policy Uncertainty to the CalmMobility Paradigm. Smart Cities 2025, 8, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Makarova, I.; Gubacheva, L.; Gabsalikhova, L.; Mavrin, V.; Boyko, A. Developing Intelligent Integrated Solutions to Improve Pedestrian Safety for Sustainable Urban Mobility. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reis, M.J.C.S.; Branco, F.; Gupta, N.; Serôdio, C. An IoT Architecture for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Towards Energy-Aware and Low-Emission Smart Cities. Future Internet 2025, 17, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mintsaev, M.; Murtazaev, S.-A.; Saydumov, M.; Aliev, S.; Abumuslimov, A.; Murtazaev, I. Smart City Concept: Implementation Features in Various Territories. Urban Sci. 2025, 9, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bove, A.; Ghiraldelli, M. Smart but Unlivable? Rethinking Smart City Rankings Through Livability and Urban Sustainability: A Comparative Perspective Between Athens and Zurich. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Avătămăniței, S.-A.; Căilean, A.-M.; Done, A.; Dimian, M.; Popa, V.; Prelipceanu, M. Design and Intensive Experimental Evaluation of an Enhanced Visible Light Communication System for Automotive Applications. Sensors 2020, 20, 3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Căilean, A.-M.; Beguni, C.; Avătămăniței, S.-A.; Dimian, M.; Popa, V. Design, Implementation and Experimental Investigation of a Pedestrian Street Crossing Assistance System Based on Visible Light Communications. Sensors 2022, 22, 5481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Căilean, A.-M.; Avătămăniței, S.-A.; Beguni, C. Driving toward Connectivity: Vehicular Visible Light Communications Receiver with Adaptive Field of View for Enhanced Noise Resilience and Mobility. Sensors 2024, 24, 2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zadobrischi, E.; Beguni, C.-M.; Căilean, A.-M. Strengthening Road Safety and Mobility at the Urban Level with the Aim of Digitizing and Shaping Smart Cities Through Emerging Vehicular Communications C-V2X, DSRC, and VLC. Electronics 2025, 14, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zadobrischi, E.; Negru, M. Applied Study of the Fluidization Model of Logistics Transportation through the Prism of the Impact Generated on the Environment. Sensors 2022, 22, 9255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, K.; Qi, L.; Yang, S.; Wang, C.; Zhou, R.; Liu, J. Towards Sustainable Mobility: Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Ride-Sharing in the Post-Pandemic Era. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Melo, S.; Gomes, R.; Abbasi, R.; Arantes, A. Demand-Responsive Transport for Urban Mobility: Integrating Mobile Data Analytics to Enhance Public Transportation Systems. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gričar, S.; Stipanović, C.; Baldigara, T. Sustainable Daily Mobility and Bike Security. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, M.; Chi, Y.; Ding, Z.; Tian, J.; Zheng, Y. A Continuous Taxi Pickup Path Recommendation under The Carbon Neutrality Context. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gangadharaiah, R.; Brooks, J.; Boor, L.; Kolodge, K.; Su, H.; Jia, Y. Pooled Rideshare in the U.S.: An Exploratory Study of User Preferences. Vehicles 2025, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tarnovetckaia, R.; Mostofi, H. Impact of Car-Sharing and Ridesourcing on Public Transport Use: Attitudes, Preferences, and Future Intentions Regarding Sustainable Urban Mobility in the Post-Soviet City. Urban Sci. 2022, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kraus, S.; Grube, T.; Stolten, D. Mobility Trends in Transport Sector Modeling. Future Transp. 2022, 2, 184–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, Y.; Chen, K.; Xiao, Y.; Fan, R. Does Online Ride-Hailing Service Improve the Efficiency of Taxi Market? Evidence from Shanghai. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, C.; Li, X.; Du, M.; Yang, J.; Shen, Y. Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Electric Ride-Hailing Vehicles and Market-Exit Decisions Among Drivers in Underdeveloped Cities. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Chen, M.; Yu, S. Factors Influencing Consumer Willingness to Use AI-Driven Autonomous Taxis. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Du, K.; Ryu, M.H. Use of Robotaxi Services for Sustainable Transportation: Focusing on Their Perceived Benefits and Sacrifices as Well as Consumers’ Technology Readiness. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Jiang, S.; Yim, J. Why Do Users Switch from Ride-Hailing to Robotaxi? Exploring Sustainable Mobility Decisions Through a Push–Pull–Mooring Perspective. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gu, C.; Zhang, L.; Zeng, Y. How to Promote the Adoption of Electric Robotaxis: Understanding the Moderating Role of In-clusive Design on Interactive Features. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oviedo, D.; Jaramillo, D.P.; Nieto, M. Governance and Regulation of Ride-Hailing Services in Emerging Markets: Challenges, Experiences and Implications; Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boutueil, V.; Castañeda, M.; Boussauw, K.; Witlox, F. Trends in Competition among Digital Platforms for Shared Mobility. Transp. Res. Rec. 2022, 2676, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Olayode, I.O.; Severino, A.; Alex, F.J.; Macioszek, E.; Tartibu, K.L. Systematic Review on the Evaluation of the Effects of Ride-Hailing Services on Public Road Transportation. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2023, 22, 100943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, D.; Cao, W.; Li, J.; Ye, J. DeepSD: Supply-Demand Prediction for Online Car-Hailing Services Using Deep Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), San Diego, CA, USA, 19–22 April 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, Y.; Lyu, C.; Khadka, A.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Z. Spatio-Temporal Ensemble Method for Car-Hailing Demand Prediction. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 21, 5328–5333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, S.; Chen, W.; Li, Z.; Yu, H. Short-Term Demand Prediction Method for Online Car-Hailing Services Based on a Least Squares Support Vector Machine. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 11882–11891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jin, Y.; Ye, X.; Ye, Q.; Wang, T.; Cheng, J.; Yan, X. Demand Forecasting of Online Car-Hailing With Stacking Ensemble Learning Approach and Large-Scale Datasets. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 199513–199522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shuai, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; He, M.; Yang, F.; Xu, G. Online Car-Hailing Origin-Destination Forecast Based on a Temporal Graph Convolutional Network. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2023, 15, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qu, Y.; Zhang, W. Online Car-Hailing Demand Prediction with Multi-Factor Spatio-Temporal Convolutional Network. In Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, Big Data Application and Software Engineering (CBASE), Hangzhou, China, 11–13 October 2024; pp. 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liao, L.; Li, B.; Zou, F.; Huang, D. MFGCN: A Multimodal Fusion Graph Convolutional Network for Online Car-Hailing Demand Prediction. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2023, 38, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, L.; Xu, R.; Geng, X. Hot Spot Area Identification of Online Car-Hailing Based on RNN-DBSCAN. In Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Computers and Artificial Intelligence Technology (CAIT), Macau, Macao, 13–15 December 2023; pp. 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, L.; Cheng, P.; Chen, L. Auction-Based Order Dispatch and Pricing in Ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Macao, China, 8–11 April 2019; pp. 1034–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, Y.; Tong, Y.; Shi, Y.; Tao, Q.; Xu, K.; Li, W. An Efficient Insertion Operator in Dynamic Ridesharing Services. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2022, 34, 3583–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cheng, P.; Feng, C.; Chen, L.; Wang, Z. A Queueing-Theoretic Framework for Vehicle Dispatching in Dynamic Car-Hailing. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Macao, China, 8–11 April 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1622–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhong, Y.; Gao, L.; Wang, T.; Gong, S.; Zou, B.; Yu, D. Achieving Stable and Optimal Passenger-Driver Matching in Ride-Sharing System. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Chengdu, China, 9–12 October 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goel, P.; Kulik, L.; Ramamohanarao, K. Optimal Pick up Point Selection for Effective Ride Sharing. IEEE Trans. Big Data 2017, 3, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xia, X.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, R.; Li, J.; Zong, C.; Liu, X. TMATCH: A New Framework for Supporting Car-Sharing Under Carpooling Model. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conferences on Ubiquitous Computing & Communications (IUCC) and Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DSCI) and Smart Computing, Networking and Services (SmartCNS), Shenyang, China, 21–23 October 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, M. Pricing Strategy of Car-Hailing Platform with Maximizing Social Welfare. In Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Frontiers of Industrial Engineering (ICFIE), London, UK, 10–12 September 2019; pp. 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cong, H.; Miao, R. Research on Key Factors of Total Social Welfare System of Car Hailing Industry-Based on DEMATEL Method. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, 14–17 December 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, X.; Liu, R. Construction and Analysis of Evolutionary Game Model between Government and Ride-hailing Platform Based on Market Access Regulation. In Proceedings of the 2023 19th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD), Harbin, China, 29–31 July 2023; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, Y. Research on Competition of Ride-hailing from the Perspective of Two-sided Markets in China. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME), Chongqing, China, 20–22 November 2020; pp. 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Muhammad, K. Network Car Hailing Pricing Model Optimization in Edge Computing-Based Intelligent Transportation System. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 13286–13295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ni, W.; Cheng, P.; Chen, L.; Yang, S. Task Assignment Framework for Online Car-Hailing Systems With Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024, 36, 9361–9373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Silva, P.; Han, Y.J.; Kim, Y.-C.; Kang, D.-K. Ride-Hailing Service aware Electric Taxi Fleet Management using Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 Thirteenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Barcelona, Spain, 5–8 July 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lin, W.; Zhu, C.; Zhu, W.; Shen, S. Charging Scheduling Strategies of Cooperated Car-hailing Operating Business for Electric Taxis. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Smart Grid (ICWCSG), Hangzhou, China, 13–15 August 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Y.; Liao, K.; Yang, J. Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning-Based Charging Recommendation Strategy for Electric Ride-Hailing Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2025 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Technology Applications (AIITA), Xi’an, China, 28–30 March 2025; pp. 1944–1952. [Google Scholar]
  50. Feng, J.; Gluzman, M.; Dai, J.G. Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Ride-Hailing. IEEE Control Syst. Lett. 2021, 5, 2060–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, H.; Yang, Z.; Liu, X.; Qin, Z.; Tang, X.; Ying, L. A Reinforcement Learning and Prediction-Based Lookahead Policy for Vehicle Repositioning in Online Ride-Hailing Systems. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2024, 25, 1846–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, J.; Xu, G.; Zhang, T.; Alazab, M.; Deng, R.H. A Practical Fog-Based Privacy-Preserving Online Car-Hailing Service System. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2022, 17, 2862–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, M.; Wang, L. Privacy Preservation of Location Information Based on MinHash Algorithm in Online Ride-Hailing Services. In Proceedings of the 2018 Sixth International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD), Lanzhou, China, 12–15 August 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hong, Y.; Yang, L.; Xiong, Z.; Kanhere, S.S.; Jiang, H. OCHJRNChain: A Blockchain-Based Security Data Sharing Framework for Online Car-Hailing Journey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2024, 25, 5299–5311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Choi, T.-M.; Shi, X. On-Demand Ride-Hailing Service Platforms With Hired Drivers During Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak: Can Blockchain Help? IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2024, 71, 737–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, L.; Lin, S.; Wang, C.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y. IRDP Ride System: A Privacy Preservation System for Online Ride-Hailing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 9108–9121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yuan, C.; Thai, J.; Bayen, A.M. ZUbers against ZLyfts Apocalypse: An Analysis Framework for DoS Attacks on Mobility-As-A-Service Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM/IEEE 7th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), Vienna, Austria, 11–14 April 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, L.; Zheng, Q.; Huang, Q. Evaluating online Car-Hailing Quality of Service Based on the Entropy and IPA method. In Proceedings of the ISCTT 2022; 7th International Conference on Information Science, Computer Technology and Transportation, Xishuangbanna, China, 27–29 May 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu, J.; Zhao, X. Research on Passenger Satisfaction of Online Car-hailing Based on Structural Equation Model. In Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM), Harbin, China, 21–23 January 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, J.; Zhao, X. Modeling Taxi Passengers’ Satisfaction under Internet Plus: A Case of Harbin, China. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), Beijing, China, 11–13 September 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhai, G.; Yang, H.; Pan, R.; Wang, J.; Xiong, Y. Usage Characteristics and Mode Choice Transitions of Ride-hailing Users in Chengdu, China. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), Liverpool, UK, 14–17 July 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1233–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, M.; Du, Y.; Xu, X. Factors influencing online car-hailing demand: A perspective of data analysis. In Proceedings of the 2020 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), Hefei, China, 22–24 August 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 3437–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yang, Y.; Li, N. Research on Residents’ Travel Behavior Based on Multiple Logistic Regression Model. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 74759–74767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lan, S.; Yang, C.; Chen, C.-H. Online Car-Hailing System Performance Analysis Based on Bayesian Network. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 101195–101212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhou, T.; Shi, W.; Liu, X.; Tao, F.; Qian, Z.; Zhang, R. A Novel Approach for Online Car-Hailing Monitoring Using Spatiotemporal Big Data. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 128936–128947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Du, W.; Jiao, S.; Zhang, W.; Fang, T. Full Link Pressure Testing System for Car-Hailing Software System. In Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Frontiers Technology of Information and Computer (ICFTIC), Qiangdao, China, 17–19 November 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Huang, R.; Pei, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, X. Performance Test and System Uncertainty Analysis for Online Car-hailing Taxi Metering Terminal. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Communications, Information System and Computer Engineering (CISCE), Beijing, China, 14–16 May 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 570–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kang, T.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y. Development of App-based Ride-hailing Calculating Mileage and Time Detection Device. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), Nanjing, China, 29–31 October 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xie, W.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, C.J.; Zheng, L.; Cheng, P.; Yin, J.; Lin, X. Longer Pick-Up for Less Pay: Towards Discount-Based Mobility Services. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024, 36, 3992–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zwick, F.; Axhausen, K.W. Impact of Service Design on Urban Ridepooling Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rhodes, Greece, 20–23 September 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Song, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, R. Research on Travel Paths Based on Car-Hailing Services Connecting with Rail Transit. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Bilbao, Spain, 24–28 September 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1686–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hanekamp, G.; Tilg, G.; Dandl, F.; Bogenberger, K. On the Effects of Ride-Hailing and Ride-Pooling Stop Processes on Urban Network Capacities. In Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), Nice, France, 14–16 June 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhu, M.; Liu, X.-Y.; Tang, F.; Qiu, M.; Shen, R.; Shu, W.; Wu, M.-Y. Public Vehicles for Future Urban Transportation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2016, 17, 3344–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fiedler, D.; Certicky, M.; Alonso-Mora, J.; Cap, M. The Impact of Ridesharing in Mobility-on-Demand Systems: Simulation Case Study in Prague. In Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA, 4–7 November 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1173–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gueriau, M.; Cugurullo, F.; Acheampong, R.A.; Dusparic, I. Shared Autonomous Mobility on Demand: A Learning-Based Approach and Its Performance in the Presence of Traffic Congestion. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2020, 12, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lanzetti, N.; Schiffer, M.; Ostrovsky, M.; Pavone, M. On the Interplay Between Self-Driving Cars and Public Transportation. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. 2024, 11, 1478–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, T.; Ge, Y.; Fan, B.; Weng, J.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, S. Urban Mobility Redefined: Stochastic Equilibrium and Optimal Car Ownership in Cities With Ridesharing Programs. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2025, 26, 16747–16769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhou, F.; Si, D.; Tiwari, S.; Ma, P.; Lim, M.K. Does Online Ride-Hailing Affect Car Purchasing Intention Under the Sharing Economy? IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2024, 71, 11703–11717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhanga, Y. Online Car-hailing Service Based on Driverless Mode under Artificial Intelligence Technology. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications (ICPECA), Shenyang, China, 22–24 January 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 874–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.