Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Impacts of the October 2017 Portugal Wildfires on Cultural Heritage
Next Article in Special Issue
A Tale of Two Legacies: Byzantine and Egyptian Influences in the Manufacture and Supply of Glass Tesserae under the Umayyad Caliphate (661–750 AD)
Previous Article in Journal
Micro Destructive Analysis for the Characterization of Ancient Mortars: A Case Study from the Little Roman Bath of Nora (Sardinia, Italy)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Characterization of Pope Pius VII Ancient Ecclesiastical Vestment by a Multi-Analytical Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Heritage
Volume 4
Issue 3
10.3390/heritage4030145
heritage-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Scale Characterization of Unusual Green and Blue Pigments from the Pharaonic Town of Amara West, Nubia

by
Kate Fulcher
1,*,
Ruth Siddall
2,
Trevor F. Emmett
3,† and
Neal Spencer
4
1
British Museum, Great Russell St., London WC1B 3DG, UK
2
Office of the Vice-Provost for Education and Student Experience, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK
3
Department of Forensic Science, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
4
The Fitzwilliam Museum, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1RB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Retired.
Heritage 2021, 4(3), 2563-2579; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030145
Submission received: 25 August 2021 / Revised: 12 September 2021 / Accepted: 15 September 2021 / Published: 20 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemistry for Cultural Heritage)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pigments from paint palettes and a grindstone excavated from the pharaonic town of Amara West (c. 1300–1050 BCE), which lies between the Second and Third Cataracts of the Nile, were examined using polarized light microscopy, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Most of the pigments were consistent with the typical ancient Egyptian palette, but the greens and some blues were unusual. Two types of green pigment were identified, chlorite (varieties clinochlore and penninite) and copper chloride hydroxide (atacamite type). The former constitutes a type of green earth which has only rarely been identified in pharaonic Egyptian contexts and may be more widespread than is currently reported. The majority of the blue pigment samples were Egyptian blue, but some were found to be a blue earth, the main component of which being sodic amphibole riebeckite. The use of this mineral as a pigment has not previously been reported in any Nile Valley context. These results prompt questions around local and potentially indigenous practices within an ancient colonial context, and highlight avenues for future research.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The analysis of pigments can reveal the material strategies being utilized by ancient populations, including the use of locally available pigments or those supplied or traded from elsewhere, and the societal frameworks that may restrict access to certain materials. This study was undertaken on a pharaonic site situated in occupied Nubia, geographically distant from the administrative centers of Egypt, and occupied by inhabitants who expressed, as preserved in the material record, a spectrum of cultural affiliations incorporating Egyptian, indigenous Nubian (which may well comprise a number of distinct groups), and hybrid formulations drawing on both. Can pigment analyses elucidate aspects of these cultural expressions and access to materials and technologies?
Studies of pigments from ancient Egypt have focused on elite and funerary contexts, such as tombs [1,2,3,4,5] and palace walls, or from museum objects (e.g., papyri, coffins) which have almost exclusively been collected from tombs or have unknown or uncertain provenance [6,7,8]. The analysis of the pigments found at Amarna [9,10,11,12] and Elephantine [13] provide rare evidence from settlements. The Egyptian Ministry of Tourism & Antiquities does not allow the export of samples for scientific analysis, which limits the scope of scientific studies on material found in fieldwork within the country, although some in situ studies have been possible [14,15]. Samples can be exported from Sudan with the generous permission of the National Corporation for Antiquities & Museums, facilitating a wider range of analytical techniques. Recent fieldwork by the British Museum’s Amara West Research Project provided an opportunity to analyze pigments from a range of late second millennium BC urban contexts, with the potential to provide insights into the materials used beyond the high elite contexts which characterize much of our knowledge about pigments in the ancient Nile Valley.

Amara West

Amara West was founded in the reign of Seti I (c. 1306–1290 BCE) between the 2nd and 3rd cataracts of the Nile, in what is now northern Sudan. The walled town (108 × 108 m, Figure 1) contained a stone cult temple, storage facilities, housing, and a formal residential building which housed the Deputy of Kush, the foremost pharaonic official in Upper Nubia [16]. In the decades after its foundation, many of the storage facilities were co-opted for additional housing, with further dwellings being built outside the town wall from around 1180 BCE, in an area designated by excavators as the Western Suburb. Throughout, one can trace individual and/or household agency in the repeated reshaping and remodelling of the urban fabric [16,17]. Ceramic evidence suggests the town was abandoned by 1000 BCE, perhaps prompted by an increasingly challenging environment created by a retraction of Nile channels [18], though activity can be traced in the cemetery through the 8th century BCE [19].
The first systematic excavations at Amara West, by the Egypt Exploration Society, took place between 1938 and 1950 [20]. More recent fieldwork at the site was undertaken by the British Museum from 2008 to 2016 [16,21]. All of the material discussed here comes from the latter excavations. A large number of the pigment-related finds in the walled town come from building E13.14, a facility north of the Deputy’s Residence founded early in the town’s history, comprising three long storage magazines with vaulted roofs, accessed via a service corridor. This building was later modified, with the north-eastern part being transformed into a workshop (E13.31), and the remainder was integrated into a large house (E13.7). The eastern part of that house later became another workshop suite (E13.29) (Figure 2). Combined, these areas contained over 300 ceramic shards with pigment on their inner concave surfaces, likely to have been used as palettes for preparing paint ahead of application, and many small lumps of raw pigment. Workshop E13.31 also contained two large grinding stones used for pigments, small copper alloy objects, pieces of crucible, ostrich eggshells, faience beads, small flint blades, and worked stone. Immediately to the north of E13.31 was an area (E13.17) perhaps associated with metalworking which preserved further concentrations of pigments and palettes in occupational deposits, amidst a typical array of other finds (stone tools, ceramic counters etc.). Another, smaller, concentration of palettes and pigments was found in space E13.20, and the underlying area E13.22, which are contemporaneous with E13.29 and E13.31. With a limited exposure, the character of E13.20 and E13.22 is unclear, though a series of curved walls may have defined an exterior space associated with houses. In contrast to these concentrations of color-related finds in the walled town, the Western Suburb yielded less material, though clusters of pigment lumps and palettes were found in houses D11.1, D12.8, and D12.9.
A full study of the paints used at Amara West was conducted as an Arts and Humanities Research Council (UK) funded PhD [22]. White gypsum and calcite, yellow ochre, and red ochre were the most commonly used pigments, but there was also evidence for black soot and ground bitumen [23], as well as blue and green pigments. The pigments, grinding stones, and ceramic palettes are likely to have been used for the application of paint in various contexts. Firstly, the sandstone temple reliefs would have been brightly painted in this full range of colors; gilding was also noted by the EES excavators [20] (pp. 27–52). Secondly, the West Gate of the town, with reliefs depicting battle scenes, was also brightly painted [16] (p. 327). Thirdly, a restrained use of paint was deployed in the houses through whitewashed walls, framing lines in black and, in a limited number of houses, colorfully painted wall shrines evoking temple architecture [17]. Fourthly, micromorphological analysis of sedimentary deposits revealed the preparation of red slurries, mostly derived from crushed rocks available locally, to use in ritual and/or prophylactic practices within the houses [24]. Finally, a number of wooden grave goods, particularly coffins, were painted, with the notable addition of huntite as a white pigment [21,22].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling from Site

Twenty-one palettes containing blue pigment were found during the British Museum fieldwork at Amara West. Seventeen contained a bright blue pigment (Figure 3a), fourteen of which were from E13, and three of which were from the Western Suburb (Figure 2). Four palettes from the Western Suburb contained a greyish-blue pigment (Figure 3b) that appeared to be different in appearance to all the other examples of blue pigment from Amara West.
Finds of green pigments were uncommon at Amara West. A pale green pigment was found on three palettes (Figure 4), all from an early phase of the walled town E13 (Figure 2). A bright green pigment was found in minute quantities on a large grindstone from room E13.14.1, and as a pile of granules on the floor next to the grindstone. This material may originally have been held in a container made from an organic material such as leather, but organic materials are almost entirely absent in the archaeological record at Amara West. One further palette holding green pigment came from D11.7, a trench containing rubbish deposits in the Western Suburb.

2.2. Instrumentation and Analytical Techniques

All samples were examined using polarized light microscopy (PLM) [25]. Additionally, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was used to confirm identification in some cases [26]. Where elemental analysis was thought to be necessary, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) was used [27]. Powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD) was used to analyze the pale green pigment and the greyish-blue pigment [28]. Sub-samples taken from the palettes for the analyses are likely to have been heterogeneous due to the nature of the material. Multiple samples were taken for PLM and ATR-FTIR, and multiple regions were examined by SEM-EDS.

2.2.1. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

A small sample of pigment was dispersed on a microscope slide in MeltmountTM, with a refractive index of 1.662, and covered with a cover slip. Each sample was then observed in plane-polarized light and in crossed polarized light. More detail on the method is given by Easthaugh et al. [25]. One advantage of this technique is that it allows for the identification of the components in mixtures of pigments.

2.2.2. Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)

The instrument used was a Nicolet 6700, with a deuterated triglycine sulphate (DTGS) detector and a KBr beams plitter. The spectra were run over the range 4000–550 cm−1, and 32 scans were taken for each sample for both the background and the sample run. The resolution was 4 cm−1, and the optical velocity was 0.6329. Before each sample was analyzed, a background analysis was run to remove the effects on the final spectrum of atmospheric water vapor and the internal components of the instrument. The spectra were compared with the spectra available from the Infrared and Raman Users Group’s Spectral Database [29], submitted by various institutions, and with reference materials held at the British Museum.

2.2.3. Scanning Electron Microscope Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS)

The instrument used was a Hitachi S-3400N fitted with an Oxford Instruments Inca Spectrometer, calibrated with a cobalt standard. The instrument was used at 20 kV, 120 s counting time, and 10 mm working distance. Both the full vacuum and variable pressure modes were used, this is indicated in the results. To prevent charge build up, a carbon coating was used. The probe current was 80–100 micro amps.

2.2.4. Powder X-ray Diffraction (pXRD)

The samples were hand-ground to a fine powder in an agate pestle and mortar. The powdered sample was then loaded into a Bruker zero height zero background (a polished silicon wafer) sample holder for analysis. pXRD analysis was performed using a Bruker D2 Phaser compact X-ray diffractometer located in the forensic laboratories of Anglia Ruskin University (Cambridge, UK). This instrument was fitted with a water-cooled 2.2 kW Cu anode X-ray tube operated at 300 W (30 kV, 10 mA), a Ni β-filter, and a Bruker LynxEye™ silicon strip position-sensitive detector (operated in θ–2θ scan mode). The sample rotation was 15 r.p.m. and the step size (2θ) was 0.02°, with a nominal wavelength of 1.5402Å. Scan range and integration time varied and are stated in the results for each sample. Interpretation of the results used MATCH! version 3.12 (www.crystalimpact.com, accessed on 16 September 2021) with the Crystallography Open Database data set version COD-inorg 14 January 2021 (www.crystallography.net/cod/, accessed on 16 September 2021).

3. Results

3.1. Blue Pigments

The seventeen bright blue samples were identified as Egyptian blue (Figure 3a). Egyptian blue can be identified using a combination of PLM (Figure 5) [25] (p. 26) and ATR-FTIR (Figure 6). An SEM-EDS analysis of the polished sections of blue pigment gave the atomic ratio of Ca:Cu:Si:O as 1:1:4:10, indicating that the material was calcium copper silicate CaCuSi4O10, a compound structurally and chemically analogous to the rare mineral phase cuprorivaite [30] (Table 1). In some cases, the Egyptian blue pigment had been mixed with gypsum or calcite, identified using PLM and ATR-FTIR (Table 2).
The four palettes containing the greyish-blue pigment (Figure 3b) were examined by ATR-FTIR and PLM (Figure 7). The ATR-FTIR analysis was inconclusive. Under the polarizing microscope, elongate, prismatic, almost colorless low-relief particles with a refractive index slightly greater than the medium (MeltmountTM, RI = 1.662) were observed. Their appearance is corroded, a process occurring over the geological timescale. In crossed polarized light, some particles had yellow-blue anomalous interference colors. This combination of properties suggests a degraded blue amphibole; a refractive index range of 1.680 to 1.706 is typical for riebeckite [32] (p. 261). The granite accessory minerals zircon and apatite were visible in PLM, as were quartz particles. A sample of the greyish blue pigment from palette PS539 analyzed by XRD was found to contain chlorite (variety clinochlore), and the blue-colored sodic amphibole riebeckite (Figure 8). The EDS analysis (Table 3) is broadly consistent with this composition, and this material is best characterized as a naturally occurring blue earth, being a heterogeneous mixture of minerals including chlorite and riebeckite.

3.2. Green Pigments

Three different green pigments were identified from Amara West. The pale green pigment in the palettes was a mixture of calcite and chlorite, identified using PLM (Table 4). The chlorite particles displayed pale green to colorless pleochroism in polarized light and a typically anomalous blue under crossed polarized light [25] (p. 102) (Figure 9). No copper was detected by SEM-EDS (Table 5). Sample PS126 from palette F6119 (Figure 4) was analyzed by XRD and found to consist of the chlorite mineral penninite, calcite, quartz, and actinolite (Figure 10).
The bright green pigment from the grindstone and the pile beside it were identified by PLM and ATR-FTIR, and confirmed elementally by SEM-EDS as a copper trihydroxychloride (Cu2Cl(OH)3, henceforth CTHC, Figure 11 and Figure 12). Mineralogically, CTHC is reported as either atacamite or paratacamite, but the methods used here cannot distinguish between these polymorphs.
A third green pigment, from a palette in the Western Suburb (sample PS869 from palette F16767), was observed in PLM to be a mixture of yellow ochre (generically hydrous iron oxide) and Egyptian blue.

4. Discussion

Laboratory analyses of a range of pigment samples from Amara West indicated a broad alignment with contemporaneous practices in Egypt, with the use of red and yellow ochres, charcoal black, gypsum, and man-made Egyptian blue. However, a number of unusual blue and green pigments were identified. Four palettes found in the Western Suburb bore deposits of grey-blue pigments, comprising riebeckite-containing blue earths. The sodic amphibole solid-solution series glaucophane-riebeckite forms blue minerals. While the glaucophane end-member is restricted to blueschist facies metamorphic rocks, riebeckite occurs in alkaline igneous intrusive rocks, typically syenites and peralkaline granites; a granitoid origin for this pigment is thus suggested by the accessory minerals present. Riebeckite-bearing granites are known in Sudan in the Bayuda Desert just south of the 4th Cataract of the Nile, and also in Jebel Sabaloka at the 6th Cataract [34,35,36]. Archaeological remains of human activity are documented continuously in the Bayuda from the Palaeolithic to medieval times [37], and at Sabaloka from the Palaeolithic until the recent past [38]. Both areas lay outside the zone of direct control by the pharaonic state, although the trade of raw materials and worked goods from the south is well attested [39]. No examples of a blue riebeckite pigment have previously been reported from Egyptian contexts, although riebeckite granites can be found in Egypt [40]. Glaucophane pigments used alone or in combination with Egyptian blue were identified at Knossos and Thera, and may have been employed to eke out the brighter Egyptian blue pigment [41,42,43]. These results and interpretations remain tentative and require further study for confirmation, as recent pigment analyses of Minoan wall-paintings have only identified the presence of Egyptian Blue [44]. Experimental work by the authors has shown that glaucophane, which has identical properties to riebeckite once finely ground, produces a workable blue-grey colored pigment [25] (p. 105), which demonstrates that riebeckite is a reasonable choice for a pigment. We suggest that this mineral could have been collected from superficial deposits as a ‘blue earth’ associated with the erosion of these igneous rocks.
The vast majority of blues reported from Egypt, and the other 17 samples analyzed in this study, are Egyptian blue, a synthetic pigment that is known from Egypt from all Pharaonic periods [8,45]. Given the very small quantities of Egyptian blue found at Amara West, and the lack of evidence for the production of the pigment at the site, it seems likely that Egyptian blue was being imported to Amara West from Egypt. Unfortunately, the glass phase in the Egyptian blue from Amara West was too degraded to analyze for trace elements which might have indicated its geographical origin. If the manufacture of Egyptian blue was a state controlled process, as appears to be the case with glass [46,47], the people skilled in its creation would have been located at key centers for the royal court, around which production processes are likely to have nucleated, supported by the associated demand for temple and funerary decoration. When Amara West was occupied, Qantir in the northeastern Delta was one such possible production center where there is evidence for the production of Egyptian blue pigment [48]. If knowledge of the production of Egyptian blue was restricted, the availability of the pigment at sites far from the capital may have been limited. It is also possible that use of Egyptian blue was restricted to a certain segment of the population, either due to location (e.g., away from royal centers), or to societal restrictions based on status. All four instances of the blue earth pigment come from a late phase of the town, and may be a local adaptation due to a restriction on the use of Egyptian blue, perhaps due to a lack of material available, as it is possible that state supplies to pharaonic towns in Nubia waned in the later New Kingdom.
Three instances of the blue earth pigment come from the later phases of occupation (c.1180–1000 BCE), with the other from a context with no reliable dating evidence. The combination of the extramural location and relatively late date prompt consideration of the changing nature of Amara West. As has been documented through other strands of evidence, for example in funerary architecture [21], an oval building constructed in the Nubian architectural tradition [49], or the forms of female clay figurines [50], it might be that indigenous (Nubian) expressions of material culture were becoming more visible and present within the town in its 100–150 years of occupation. Liminal spaces in colonial environments have been noted as sites of innovation [51], and both the concepts of hybridity and cultural entanglement [52] have informed frameworks for understanding the interplay of ideas, aesthetics, technologies, and worldviews in constructing identity in Nubia under colonial pharaonic rule. Was the use of blue earth pigment a reflection of persistent indigenous traditions in pigment use? Further identification and consideration of blue earth pigment use in both northern Sudan and Egypt would have to be undertaken to test the validity of such hypotheses.
Turning to the greens, a mixture of Egyptian blue and yellow ochre was found on a palette in the Western Suburb. Other examples of mixing yellow ochre with Egyptian blue to create a green pigment are known from Egypt, for example on the walls of the tomb of Amenhotep III c. 1349 BCE [5], and on a cartonnage fragments from the Ptolemaic or Roman Periods [53].
The green pigments found on a grindstone and nearby it on the ground were identified as a CTHC, a pigment that has been occasionally reported from elsewhere in ancient Egypt, on Middle Kingdom tomb reliefs from Deir el Bahri [54] and Deir el Bersheh [55], and in combination with Egyptian blue on unspecified objects [6]. A study of objects in the collection at the Louvre found CTHC on 4th/5th Dynasty (c.2600–2350 BCE) stone sculptures, and upon a 22nd Dynasty (c. 943–731 BCE) coffin and mummy case [7]. Some researchers have claimed that CTHC pigments are a result of the deterioration of glassy synthetic pigments due to their interaction with chloride ions [56,57]. In the occurrences reported here, the green pigment was found in a preparatory or discard context, not applied to the wall of a tomb or building. There was no evidence of any previous co-existing glassy phase, and there are multiple examples of the glass-bearing synthetic pigment Egyptian blue from the same area of the site that have significantly degraded glassy phases but which retain their bright blue color. It seems likely, therefore, that this example of CTHC pigment from Amara West was always a green copper pigment. It is possible that the green pigment was originally malachite (copper carbonate hydroxide Cu2CO3(OH)2) that has decomposed in a saline environment [53], however, the geology of this section of the Nile Valley is very different to the situation in Egypt, and the groundwater may have a lower salinity. The rarity of the atacamite (CTHC) mineral in nature has led scholars to suggest that the green CTHC pigment was manufactured in ancient times. Several medieval recipes for the manufacture of blue-green pigments from copper are known, the best known being that of Theophilus for viride salsum, or “salt green” [58]. His instructions produce various copper corrosion products, including green atacamite-type copper chloride [59].
The three pale green pigments were identified as having clinochlore, a variety of chlorite, as a major phase. Chlorite-bearing pigments are often included in the loose group term “green earths” [60,61] (pp. 394–400). Green earths have only rarely been identified in ancient Egyptian contexts. A green earth pigment containing glauconite was identified on lime plasters at the royal palace of Amenhotep III (c. 1330 BCE) at Malqata [14]. Green earth pigments containing celadonite and glauconite were also reported on one piece of cartonnage from the Third Intermediate Period c. 850 BCE and from one piece of cartonnage from the late Ptolemaic or early Roman Period (c. 30 BCE) [62,63]. Green earth has also been identified on a 2nd century CE Roman Egyptian shrine in the Dakhleh Oasis [64]. Given how frequently green earth pigments were employed by other cultures, it seems strange how little they are apparently encountered in ancient Egypt. In situ elemental analytical methods would be at risk of under-identifying clay and related pigments since they do not have metal ions that would distinguish them from the substrate. It is possible that green and blue earths have been under-reported because they are more likely to be encountered in contexts (e.g., houses) that are less commonly studied in detail.
The analysis of pigment traces from carefully excavated urban contexts at Amara West reveals how the town’s inhabitants turned to unusual pigments to supplement the more common array of materials used in the Nile Valley at this period. Only with further laboratory analysis of samples from urban contexts across northern Sudan and Egypt will it be possible to better understand if the use of these green and blue earths was more widespread than we currently appreciate based on the elite and mostly funerary objects in museum collections. An expanded range of analyses may also elucidate the role of indigenous and/or regional traditions in prompting divergences from the typical pigment palette.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.F. and R.S.; methodology, K.F. and R.S.; software, K.F and T.F.E.; validation, K.F., R.S. and T.F.E.; formal analysis, K.F., R.S. and T.F.E.; writing—original draft preparation, K.F.; writing—review and editing, K.F., R.S., T.F.E. and N.S.; supervision, R.S. and N.S.; funding acquisition, N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research on pigments was conducted by Fulcher as part of an AHRC-funded collaborative PhD between UCL and The British Museum (Grant 1350956). The samples were excavated as part of fieldwork of the British Museum Amara West Project, funded by the Qatar-Sudan Archaeological Project, Leverhulme Trust, and British Academy.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data is provided in the paper.

Acknowledgments

This research would not have been possible without the assistance of the Sudan National Corporation for Antiquities & Museums, who generously allow the export of archaeological samples for scientific research. Particular thanks are due to Abdelrahman Ali Mohamed, Shadia Abdu Rabo, and Mohammed Saad. We also thank the reviewers, whose comments significantly improved the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ambers, J. Pigments. In The Nebamun wall paintings: Conservation, scientific analysis and display at the British Museum; Middleton, A., Uprichard, K., Eds.; Archetype in Association with the British Museum: London, UK, 2008; pp. 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  2. El Goresy, A. Polychromatic Wall Painting Decorations in Monuments of Pharaonic Egypt: Compositions, Chronology and Painting Techniques. In The Wall Paintings of Thera, Proceedings of the First International Symposium Thera, Hellas, 30 August–4 September 1997; Sherratt, S., Ed.; Thera Foundation: Athens, Greece, 2000; pp. 49–70. [Google Scholar]
  3. McCarthy, B. Technical Analysis of Reds and Yellows in the Tomb of Suemniwet, Theban Tomb 92. In Colour and Painting in Ancient Egypt; Davies, W.V., Ed.; British Museum Press: London, UK, 2001; pp. 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stulik, D.; Porta, E.; Palet, A. Analyses of Pigments, Binding Media and Varnishes. In Art and eternity: The Nefertari Wall Paintings Conservation Project 1986–1992; Corzo, M.A., Afshar, M., Eds.; Getty Conservation Institute: Santa Monica, CA, USA, 1993; pp. 55–65. [Google Scholar]
  5. Uda, M. In Situ Characterization of Ancient Plaster and Pigments on Tomb Walls in Egypt Using Energy Dispersive X-ray Diffraction and Fluorescence. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2004, 226, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Green, L. Recent Analysis of Pigments from Ancient Egyptian Artefacts. In Conservation in Ancient Egyptian Collections; Brown, C.E., Macalister, F., Wright, M.M., Eds.; Archetype: London, UK, 1995; pp. 85–91. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pagès-Camagna, S.; Guichard, H. Egyptian Colours and Pigments in French Collections: Physicochemical Analyses on 300 Objects. In Decorated Surfaces on Ancient Egyptian Objects: Technology, Deterioration and Conservation, Proceedings of a Conference held in Cambridge, UK on 7–8 September 2007; Dawson, J., Rozeik, C., Wright, M.M., Eds.; Archetype in Association with the Fitzwilliam Museum and Icon Archaeology Group: London, UK, 2010; pp. 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  8. Scott, D.A. A Review of Ancient Egyptian Pigments and Cosmetics. Stud. Conserv. 2016, 61, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. David, R.; Edwards, H.G.M.; Farwell, D.W.; De Faria, D.L.A. Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Ancient Egyptian Pigments. Archaeometry 2001, 43, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hatton, G.D.; Shortland, A.J.; Tite, M.S. The Production Technology of Egyptian Blue and Green Frits from Second Millennium BC Egypt and Mesopotamia. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2008, 35, 1591–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Weatherhead, F. Wall-Paintings from the King’s House at Amarna. J. Egypt. Archaeol. 1995, 81, 95–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Weatherhead, F.; Buckley, A. Artists’ Pigments from Amarna. In Amarna Reports V (EES Occasional Publications 9); Kemp, B.J., Ed.; Egypt Exploration Society: London, UK, 1989; pp. 202–239. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pagès-Camagna, S.; Raue, D. Coloured Materials Used in Elephantine: Evolution and Continuity from the Old Kingdom to the Roman Period. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2016, 7, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lacovara, P.; Winkels, A. Malqata–the Painted Palace. In Tracing Technoscapes: The Production of Bronze Age Wall Paintings in the Eastern Mediterranean; Becker, J., Jungfleisch, J., von Rüden, C., Eds.; Sidestone: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 149–172. [Google Scholar]
  15. Uda, M.; Sassa, S.; Taniguchi, K.; Nomura, S.; Yoshimura, S.; Kondo, J.; Iskander, N.; Zaghloul, B. Touch-Free in Situ Investigation of Ancient Egyptian Pigments. Naturwissenschaften 2000, 87, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Spencer, N. Building on New Ground: The Foundation of a Colonial Town at Amara West. In Nubia in the New Kingdom: Lived Experience, Pharaonic Control and Indigenous Traditions. British Museum Publications on Egypt and Sudan 3; Spencer, N., Stevens, A., Binder, M., Eds.; Peeters: Leuven, Belgium, 2017; pp. 323–355. [Google Scholar]
  17. Spencer, N. Creating a Neighborhood within a Changing Town: Household and Other Agencies at Amara West in Nubia. In Household Studies in Complex Societies: (Micro) Archaeological and Textual Approaches; Müller, M., Ed.; Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago: Chicago, IL, USA, 2015; pp. 169–210. [Google Scholar]
  18. Woodward, J.; Macklin, M.; Spencer, N.; Binder, M.; Dalton, M.; Hay, S.; Hardy, A. Living with a Changing River and Desert Landscape at Amara West. In Nubia in the New Kingdom: Lived Experience, Pharaonic Control and Indigenous Traditions. British Museum Publications on Egypt and Sudan 3; Spencer, N., Stevens, A., Binder, M., Eds.; Peeters: Leuven, Belgium, 2017; pp. 225–255. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gasperini, V. Amara West. Cemeteries C and D: The Ramesside and Post-New Kingdom Pottery. British Museum Publications on Egypt and Sudan; Peeters: Leuven, Belgium, forthcoming.
  20. Spencer, P. Amara West. I: The Architectural Report. EES Excavation Memoir 63; Egypt Exploration Society: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  21. Binder, M. The New Kingdom Tombs at Amara West: Funerary Perspectives on Nubian—Egyptian Interactions. In Nubia in the New Kingdom: Lived Experience, Pharaonic Control and Indigenous Traditions. British Museum Publications on Egypt and Sudan 3; Spencer, N., Stevens, A., Binder, M., Eds.; Peeters: Leuven, Belgium, 2017; pp. 591–613. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fulcher, K. Painting Amara West: The Technology and Experience of Colour in New Kingdom Nubia. British Museum Publications on Egypt and Sudan 13; Peeters: Leuven, Belgium, in press.
  23. Fulcher, K.; Stacey, R.; Spencer, N. Bitumen from the Dead Sea in Early Iron Age Nubia. Nat. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dalton, M. Reconstructing New Kingdom Egyptian Household Activity and Conceptions of Domestic Space through Time: Geoarchaeological Analyses of Living Surfaces at Amara West; University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Eastaugh, N.; Walsh, V.; Chaplin, T.; Siddall, R. Pigment. Compendium Part. 2: Optical Microscopy of Historical Pigments; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. Castro, K.; Pérez, M.; Rodriguez-Laso, M.D.; Madariaga, J.M. FTIR Spectra Database of Inorganic Art Materials. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Frahm, E. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): Applications in Archaeology. In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology; Smith, C., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 6487–6495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garrison, E. X-ray Diffraction (XRD): Applications in Archaeology. In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology; Smith, C., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Infrared & Raman Users Group. Infrared & Raman Users Group Spectral Database. Available online: http://www.irug.org/ (accessed on 10 November 2016).
  30. Tite, M.S.; Bimson, M.; Cowell, M.R. The Technology of Egyptian Blue. In Early Vitreous Materials. British Museum Occasional Paper 56; Bimson, M., Freestone, I.C., Eds.; British Museum: London, UK, 1987; pp. 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mirti, P.; Appolonia, L.; Casoli, A.; Ferrari, R.P.; Laurenti, E.; Amisano Canesi, A.; Chiari, G. Spectrochemical and Structural Studies on a Roman Sample of Egyptian Blue. Spectrochim. Acta A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 1995, 51, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deer, W.A.; Howie, R.A.; Zussman, J.A. Introduction to the Rock Forming Minerals, 2nd ed.; Longman: Harlow, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  33. Martens, W.; Frost, R.L.; Williams, P.A. Raman and Infrared Spectroscopic Study of the Basic Copper Chloride Minerals—Implications for the Study of the Copper and Brass Corrosion and “Bronze Disease”. Neues Jahrb. für Mineral. Abhandlungen 2002, 17, 197–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Almond, D.C. The Sabaloka Igneous Complex, Sudan. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1977, 287, 595–633. [Google Scholar]
  35. Delany, F.M. Observations on the Sabaloka Series of the Sudan. Trans. Geol. Soc. South. Africa 1958, 61, 111–124. [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Halloran, D.A. Structure, Petrology and Geochemistry of the Abu Dom Alkaline Ring-Complex, Bayuda Desert, Sudan. Geol. J. 1985, 20, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lohwasser, A. A Survey in the Western Bayuda: The Wadi Abu Dom Itinerary Project (W.A.D.I.). Sudan & Nubia 2012, 16, 109–117. [Google Scholar]
  38. Suková, L.; Cílek, V. The Landscape and Archaeology of Jebel Sabaloka and the Sixth Nile Cataract, Sudan. Interdiscip. Archaeol.—Nat. Sci. Archaeol. 2012, 3, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bashir, M.S.; Emberling, G. Trade in Ancient Nubia. In The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Nubia; Emberling, G., Williams, B., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 994–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abdel-Maksoud, M.A.; Sabet, A.H.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A. The Riebeckite Granites of Jabal Abu Kharif, a New Granitic Phase in the Basement Complex of Egypt. Precambrian Res. 1978, 6, A3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cameron, M.A.S.; Jones, R.E.; Philippakis, S.E. Scientific Analyses of Minoan Fresco Samples from Knossos. Annu. Br. Sch. Athens 1977, 72, 121–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Filippakis, S.E.; Perdikatsis, B.; Paradellis, T. An Analysis of Blue Pigments from the Greek Bronze Age. Stud. Conserv. 1976, 21, 143–153. [Google Scholar]
  43. Profi, S.; Perdikatsis, B.; Filippakis, S.E. X-ray Analysis of Greek Bronze Age Pigments from Thera (Santorini). Stud. Conserv. 1977, 22, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  44. Brysbaert, A.; Melessanaki, K.; Anglos, D. Pigment Analysis in Bronze Age Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean Painted Plaster by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). J. Archaeol. Sci. 2006, 33, 1095–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, L.; Quirke, S. Painting Materials. In Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology; Nicholson, P.T., Shaw, I., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 104–120. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pusch, E.B.; Rehren, T. Hochtemperatur-Technologie in Der Ramses-Stadt: Rubinglas Für Den Pharao; Gerstenberg: Hildesheim, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  47. Shortland, A.J.; Nicholson, P.T.; Jackson, C.M. Glass and Faience at Amarna: Different Methods of Both Supply for Production, and Subsequent Distribution. In The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C.; Shortland, A.J., Ed.; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 147–160. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rehren, T.; Pusch, E.B.; Herold, A. Qantir-Piramesses and the Organisation of the Egyptian Glass Industry. In The social context of Technological Change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650–1550 B.C.; Shortland, A.J., Ed.; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 223–238. [Google Scholar]
  49. Spencer, N. Nubian Architecture in an Egyptian Town? Building E12.11 at Amara West. Sudan Nubia 2010, 14, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  50. Stevens, A. Female Figurines and Folk Culture at Amara West. In Nubia in the New Kingdom: Lived Experience, Pharaonic Control and Indigenous Traditions. British Museum Publications on Egypt and Sudan 3; Spencer, N., Stevens, A., Binder, M., Eds.; Peeters: Leuven, Belgium, 2017; pp. 407–428. [Google Scholar]
  51. Stockhammer, P.W. From Hybridity to Entanglement, From Essentialism to Practice. In Archaeology and Cultural Mixture. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 28.1; van Pelt, W.P., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 11–28. [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith, S.T. The Nubian Experience of Egyptian Domination During the New Kingdom. In The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Nubia; Emberling, G., Williams, B.B., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 368–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Scott, D. Greener Shades of Pale: A Review of Advances in the Characterisation of Ancient Egyptian Green Pigments. In Decorated Surfaces on Ancient Egyptian Objects: Technology, Deterioration and Conservation. Proceedings of a Conference Held in Cambridge, UK on 7–8 September 2007; Dawson, J., Rozeik, C., Wright, M.M., Eds.; Archetype in association with the Fitzwilliam Museum and Icon Archaeology Group: London, UK, 2010; pp. 32–45. [Google Scholar]
  54. Riederer, J. Recently Identified Egyptian Pigments. Archaeometry 1974, 16, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Middleton, A. Polychromy of Some Fragments of Painted Relief from El-Bersheh. In Studies in Egyptian antiquities: A Tribute to T.G.H. James. British Museum Occasional Paper 123.; Davies, W.V., Ed.; British Museum: London, UK, 1999; pp. 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  56. Schiegl, S.; Weiner, K.L.; El Goresy, A. Discovery of Copper Chloride Cancer in Ancient Egyptian Polychromic Wall Paintings and Faience—A Developing Archaeological Disaster. Naturwissenschaften 1989, 76, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schiegl, S.; Weiner, K.L.; Goresy, A.E. The Diversity of Newly Discovered Deterioration Patterns in Ancient Egyptian Pigments: Consequences to Entirely New Restoration Strategies and to the Egyptological Colour Symbolism. MRS Proc. 1992, 267, 831–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Scott, D. Copper and Bronze in Art: Corrosion, Colorants, Conservation; Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  59. Naumova, M.M.; Pisareva, S.A. A Note on the Use of Blue and Green Copper Compounds in Paintings. Stud. Conserv. 1994, 39, 277–283. [Google Scholar]
  60. Eastaugh, N.; Walsh, V.; Chaplin, T.; Siddall, R. Pigment. Compendium Part. 1: A Dictionary of Historical Pigments; Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kerr, P.F. Optical Mineraology; McGraw-Hill: New York; NY, USA, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  62. Scott, D.; Dennis, M.; Khandekar, N.; Keeney, J.; Carson, D.; Swartz Dodd, L. An Egyptian Cartonnage of the Graeco-Roman Period: Examination and Discoveries. Stud. Conserv. 2003, 48, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Scott, D.; Warmlander, S.; Mazurek, J.; Quirke, S. Examination of Some Pigments, Grounds and Media from Egyptian Cartonnage Fragments in the Petrie Museum, University College London. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2009, 36, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Berry, M. A Study of Pigments from a Roman Egyptian Shrine. Aust. Inst. Conserv. Cult. Mater. Bull. 1999, 24, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Heritage 04 00145 g001 550
Figure 1. Location and layout of Amara West.
Figure 1. Location and layout of Amara West.
Heritage 04 00145 g001
Heritage 04 00145 g002 550
Figure 2. Locations of blue and green samples mentioned in the text in the walled town E13 (left), and the Western Suburb (right). The green pigment (PS506) from grindstone F6184 and in the pile on the floor next to the grindstone (PS118) pre-date workshop E13.31 (left). One Egyptian blue palette was excavated from room E13.6.4, which is Phase 3 and therefore not shown on this map; it overlies workshop E13.31 (left).
Figure 2. Locations of blue and green samples mentioned in the text in the walled town E13 (left), and the Western Suburb (right). The green pigment (PS506) from grindstone F6184 and in the pile on the floor next to the grindstone (PS118) pre-date workshop E13.31 (left). One Egyptian blue palette was excavated from room E13.6.4, which is Phase 3 and therefore not shown on this map; it overlies workshop E13.31 (left).
Heritage 04 00145 g002
Heritage 04 00145 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Palette F6223 (PS140) from E13.29.2 (context 5224) with bright blue pigment (b) Palette F2644 (PS539) from D12.7.6 (context 12062) with greyish-blue pigment.
Figure 3. (a) Palette F6223 (PS140) from E13.29.2 (context 5224) with bright blue pigment (b) Palette F2644 (PS539) from D12.7.6 (context 12062) with greyish-blue pigment.
Heritage 04 00145 g003
Heritage 04 00145 g004 550
Figure 4. Pale green pigment on palette F6119 (PS126) from E13.31.2 (context 5331).
Figure 4. Pale green pigment on palette F6119 (PS126) from E13.31.2 (context 5331).
Heritage 04 00145 g004
Heritage 04 00145 g005 550
Figure 5. Dispersion of paint containing Egyptian blue from palette PS538 (F12423), seen under plane-polarized light (left) and crossed polarized light (right), both at x400. Scale bar shows 30µm.
Figure 5. Dispersion of paint containing Egyptian blue from palette PS538 (F12423), seen under plane-polarized light (left) and crossed polarized light (right), both at x400. Scale bar shows 30µm.
Heritage 04 00145 g005
Heritage 04 00145 g006 550
Figure 6. ATR-FTIR spectrum for blue paint from palette PS132 (F6147). Peaks indicate Egyptian blue [31].
Figure 6. ATR-FTIR spectrum for blue paint from palette PS132 (F6147). Peaks indicate Egyptian blue [31].
Heritage 04 00145 g006
Heritage 04 00145 g007 550
Figure 7. Dispersion of greyish blue pigment sample PS539 from palette F2644 in plane-polarized light (left) and crossed-polarized light (right) x400.
Figure 7. Dispersion of greyish blue pigment sample PS539 from palette F2644 in plane-polarized light (left) and crossed-polarized light (right) x400.
Heritage 04 00145 g007
Heritage 04 00145 g008 550
Figure 8. XRD results for sample PS539 from palette F2644 (Figure 3b). PS539 is a mixture of clinochlore (a chlorite, Crystallography Open Database (COD) entry 96-900-2230) and the blue sodic clinoamphibole riebeckite (COD entry 96-900-4133). The scan was from 8°to 47°2θ‘(step size 0.2°), with an integration time of 0.50 s.
Figure 8. XRD results for sample PS539 from palette F2644 (Figure 3b). PS539 is a mixture of clinochlore (a chlorite, Crystallography Open Database (COD) entry 96-900-2230) and the blue sodic clinoamphibole riebeckite (COD entry 96-900-4133). The scan was from 8°to 47°2θ‘(step size 0.2°), with an integration time of 0.50 s.
Heritage 04 00145 g008
Heritage 04 00145 g009 550
Figure 9. Dispersion of green pigment sample PS126 from palette F6119 in plane-polarized light (left) and crossed polarized light (right) x400. Pale green particles in polarized light show the anomalous blue interference colors typical of penninite in the crossed polarized image.
Figure 9. Dispersion of green pigment sample PS126 from palette F6119 in plane-polarized light (left) and crossed polarized light (right) x400. Pale green particles in polarized light show the anomalous blue interference colors typical of penninite in the crossed polarized image.
Heritage 04 00145 g009
Heritage 04 00145 g010 550
Figure 10. XRD results for sample PS126 from palette F6119 (Figure 3). The COD entries are: penninite 96-900-0787, calcite 96-901-6180, actinolite 96-900-1937, and quartz 96-400-2434. The scan was from 9° to 45° 2θ (step size 0.02°) with an integration time of 0.50 s.
Figure 10. XRD results for sample PS126 from palette F6119 (Figure 3). The COD entries are: penninite 96-900-0787, calcite 96-901-6180, actinolite 96-900-1937, and quartz 96-400-2434. The scan was from 9° to 45° 2θ (step size 0.02°) with an integration time of 0.50 s.
Heritage 04 00145 g010
Heritage 04 00145 g011 550
Figure 11. Dispersion of green pigment from pile in sand PS118 in plane-polarized light (left) and crossed polarized light (right) x400. Translucent green crystals with high relief in plane-polarized light and moderate birefringence suggest copper trihydroxychloride [25] (p. 61).
Figure 11. Dispersion of green pigment from pile in sand PS118 in plane-polarized light (left) and crossed polarized light (right) x400. Translucent green crystals with high relief in plane-polarized light and moderate birefringence suggest copper trihydroxychloride [25] (p. 61).
Heritage 04 00145 g011
Heritage 04 00145 g012 550
Figure 12. ATR-FTIR spectra for: green pigment from grindstone (PS506) (upper part), green pigment from floor next to grindstone (PS118) (central part), and reference atacamite pigment purchased from Kremer Pigmente (www.kremer.pigmente.com, accessed on 16 September 2021) (lower part). Spectra for PS506 and PS118 are similar and accord well with peaks for the Kremer atacamite reference [33].
Figure 12. ATR-FTIR spectra for: green pigment from grindstone (PS506) (upper part), green pigment from floor next to grindstone (PS118) (central part), and reference atacamite pigment purchased from Kremer Pigmente (www.kremer.pigmente.com, accessed on 16 September 2021) (lower part). Spectra for PS506 and PS118 are similar and accord well with peaks for the Kremer atacamite reference [33].
Heritage 04 00145 g012
Table
Table 1. SEM-EDS analysis of Egyptian blue pigments from Amara West. These are the average results obtained for the samples PS317, PS304, PS305, PS394, PS316, and PS315, all mounted in polished resin blocks for analysis on full vacuum.
Table 1. SEM-EDS analysis of Egyptian blue pigments from Amara West. These are the average results obtained for the samples PS317, PS304, PS305, PS394, PS316, and PS315, all mounted in polished resin blocks for analysis on full vacuum.
ElementWt.% OxideAtomic%Relative Standard DeviationRatio to Cu Atomic %
Si67250.664
Ca1461.261
Cu1962.011
O 630.6710
Table
Table 2. Results for samples of blue pigment from palettes.
Table 2. Results for samples of blue pigment from palettes.
Find NumberSample NumberBuildingApprox. Date BCEAnalysisMineral Identification
F2644PS539House D12.7.6 (context 12062), Western Suburb1180–1000PLM, ATR-FTIR, SEM-EDS, XRDBlue earth (inc. clinochlore and riebeckite)
F15656PS860House D11.2.4 (context 2716), Western Suburb 1160–1000PLMBlue earth
F16667PS865Trench D11.7 (context 13569), Western Suburb1300–1200PLM, ATR-FTIRBlue earth
F15193PS893House D12.8.8 (context 12891), Western Suburb1160–1000PLM, ATR-FTIRBlue earth
F7569PS287Building E13.20.5 (context 10331), walled town1200–1180PLMEgyptian blue
F7569PS324Building E13.20.5 (context 10331), walled town1200–1180PLMEgyptian blue
F7684PS537Building E13.22.5 (context 10434), walled town1210–1190PLMEgyptian blue, gypsum
F2600PS540Building E13.20.1 (context 10324), walled town1200–1180PLMEgyptian blue
F6223PS140House E13.29.2 (context 5224), walled town1190–1160PLM, ATR-FTIR, SEM-EDSEgyptian blue
F6264PS417House E13.29.2 (context 5261), walled town1190–1160PLMEgyptian blue
F6223PS438House E13.7.12/E13.29.2 (context 5224), walled town1210–1180PLMEgyptian blue, gypsum
F6190PS431Area E13.31.2 (context 5332), walled town1200–1190PLMEgyptian blue
F6169PS437Area E13.31.1 (context 5352), walled townc. 1200–1180PLMEgyptian blue
F6047PS418Area E13.29.1 (context 5219), walled townc. 1180–1160PLMEgyptian blue
F6147PS132Area E13.29.4 [context 5325], walled townc. 1200–1180PLM, ATR-FTIR, SEM-EDSEgyptian blue
F6474PS443Area E13.31.1 (context 5336), walled townc. 1200–1180PLMEgyptian blue
F6147PS427Area E13.29.4 (context 5325), walled town1200–1180PLM, ATR-FTIREgyptian blue, gypsum
F6170PS127House E13.6.4 (context 5341), walled town1160–1140PLM, ATR-FTIREgyptian blue, gypsum
F15193PS893House D12.8.8 (context 12891), Western Suburb1160–1000ATR-FTIREgyptian blue
F15020PS534House D12.8.7 (context 12840), Western Suburb1160–1000PLMEgyptian blue
F12423PS538Open area D12.10 (context 12211), Western Suburb1140–1000PLMEgyptian blue, calcite
Table
Table 3. SEM-EDS analysis of blue pigment PS539 in two areas of the palette using variable pressure; sample was analyzed directly from the object. All figures in wt.% oxide. ΣFeO = total Fe as FeO. n.d. = not detected.
Table 3. SEM-EDS analysis of blue pigment PS539 in two areas of the palette using variable pressure; sample was analyzed directly from the object. All figures in wt.% oxide. ΣFeO = total Fe as FeO. n.d. = not detected.
Elementwt.% Oxide Region 1.wt.% Oxide Region 2.
SiO237.227.2
Al2O37.919.1
ΣFeO16.525.1
MgO11.414.8
CaO7.3n.d.
Na2O0.70.4
K2O0.40.1
TiO22.1n.d.
MnO0.3n.d.
Cr2O3n.d.0.4
Total as given83.887.1
Table
Table 4. Results for samples of green pigment from palettes, and pigment from grindstone and pile next to grindstone.
Table 4. Results for samples of green pigment from palettes, and pigment from grindstone and pile next to grindstone.
Find NumberSample NumberType of ObjectBuildingApprox. Date BCEAnalysisMineral Identification
F6119PS126PaletteArea E13.31.2 (context 5331), walled town1200–1180PLM, ATR-FTIR, SEM-EDS, XRDChlorite (penninite), amphibole (actinolite), quartz, calcite
F6463PS248PaletteArea E13.31.2 (context 5346), walled town 1200–1180PLM, ATR-FTIRChlorite, amphibole, quartz, calcite
F6467PS249PaletteArea E13.31.2 (context 5334), walled town1200–1180PLM, ATR-FTIRChlorite, amphibole, quartz, calcite
F16767PS869PaletteTrench D11.7 (context 13568), Western Suburb1300–1000PLM, ATR-FTIREgyptian blue, yellow ochre, calcite
F6184PS506GrindstoneMagazine E13.14.1 (context 5361), walled town1250–1210PLM, ATR-FTIR, SEM-EDSCopper trihydroxychloride
PS118Raw pigment on floor beside grindstone F6184Magazine E13.14.1 (context 5365), walled town1250–1210PLM, ATR-FTIR, SEM-EDSCopper trihydroxychloride
Table
Table 5. SEM-EDS analysis of green crystals from sample PS126 from palette F6119 (unpolished, carbon coated). All figures in wt.% oxide.
Table 5. SEM-EDS analysis of green crystals from sample PS126 from palette F6119 (unpolished, carbon coated). All figures in wt.% oxide.
Elementwt.% Oxide
SiO224.0
Al2O316.4
ΣFeO18.6
MgO13.1
CaO0.6
Na2On.d.
K2On.d.
TiO2n.d.
MnO0.3
Cr2O3n.d.
SO20.6
Total as given73.6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fulcher, K.; Siddall, R.; Emmett, T.F.; Spencer, N. Multi-Scale Characterization of Unusual Green and Blue Pigments from the Pharaonic Town of Amara West, Nubia. Heritage 2021, 4, 2563-2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030145

AMA Style

Fulcher K, Siddall R, Emmett TF, Spencer N. Multi-Scale Characterization of Unusual Green and Blue Pigments from the Pharaonic Town of Amara West, Nubia. Heritage. 2021; 4(3):2563-2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030145

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fulcher, Kate, Ruth Siddall, Trevor F. Emmett, and Neal Spencer. 2021. "Multi-Scale Characterization of Unusual Green and Blue Pigments from the Pharaonic Town of Amara West, Nubia" Heritage 4, no. 3: 2563-2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030145

APA Style

Fulcher, K., Siddall, R., Emmett, T. F., & Spencer, N. (2021). Multi-Scale Characterization of Unusual Green and Blue Pigments from the Pharaonic Town of Amara West, Nubia. Heritage, 4(3), 2563-2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030145

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop