Next Article in Journal
Joint Optimization of Task Completion Time and Energy Consumption in UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge Computing
Next Article in Special Issue
Task Allocation and Path Planning Method for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
Autonomous Task Planning of Intelligent Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Swarm Based on Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient
Previous Article in Special Issue
Task Allocation and Saturation Attack Approach for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Safe and Optimal Motion Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: A Robust Model Predictive Control Framework Integrating Fast Marching Time Objectives and Adaptive Control Barrier Functions

School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Drones 2025, 9(4), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040273
Submission received: 4 March 2025 / Revised: 23 March 2025 / Accepted: 1 April 2025 / Published: 3 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Intelligent Coordination Control for Autonomous UUVs)

Abstract

Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) have shown significant promise across various underwater applications, yet face challenges in dynamic environments due to the limitations of traditional motion planning methods while Artificial Potential Field (APF)-based control barrier functions focus solely on obstacle proximity and distance-based methods oversimplify obstacle geometries, and both fail to ensure safety and satisfy turning radius constraints for under-actuated AUVs in intricate environments. This paper proposes a robust Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework integrating an enhanced fast marching control barrier function, specifically designed for AUVs equipped with fully directional sonar systems. The framework introduces a novel improvement for moving obstacles by extending the control barrier function field propagation along the obstacle’s movement direction. This enhancement generates precise motion plans that ensure safety, satisfy kinematic constraints, and effectively handle static and dynamic obstacles. Simulation results demonstrate superior obstacle avoidance and motion planning performance in complex scenarios, with key outcomes including a minimum safety margin of 1.86 m in cluttered environments (vs. 0 m for A* and FMM) and 1.76 m in dynamic obstacle scenarios (vs. 0.13 m for MPC-APFCBF), highlighting the framework’s ability to enhance navigation safety and efficiency for real-world AUV deployments in unpredictable marine environments.
Keywords: autonomous underwater vehicle; motion planning; fast marching method; control barrier function; robust model predictive control autonomous underwater vehicle; motion planning; fast marching method; control barrier function; robust model predictive control

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, Z.; Chen, M. Safe and Optimal Motion Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: A Robust Model Predictive Control Framework Integrating Fast Marching Time Objectives and Adaptive Control Barrier Functions. Drones 2025, 9, 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040273

AMA Style

Tian Z, Chen M. Safe and Optimal Motion Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: A Robust Model Predictive Control Framework Integrating Fast Marching Time Objectives and Adaptive Control Barrier Functions. Drones. 2025; 9(4):273. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Zhonghe, and Mingzhi Chen. 2025. "Safe and Optimal Motion Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: A Robust Model Predictive Control Framework Integrating Fast Marching Time Objectives and Adaptive Control Barrier Functions" Drones 9, no. 4: 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040273

APA Style

Tian, Z., & Chen, M. (2025). Safe and Optimal Motion Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles: A Robust Model Predictive Control Framework Integrating Fast Marching Time Objectives and Adaptive Control Barrier Functions. Drones, 9(4), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040273

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop