Next Article in Journal
Finite-Time Stabilization Criteria of Delayed Inertial Neural Networks with Settling-Time Estimation Protocol and Reliable Control Mechanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Spectral Collocation Approach via Normalized Shifted Jacobi Polynomials for the Nonlinear Lane-Emden Equation with Fractal-Fractional Derivative
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Modeling, and Implementation of Dual Notched UWB Bandpass Filter Employing Rectangular Stubs and Embedded L-Shaped Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions to Nabla Fractional Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stability and Bifurcation Analysis of Fifth-Order Nonlinear Fractional Difference Equation

1
Department of Mathematics, Lahore Campus, Riphah International University, Punjab 54000, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences and Arts (Mahayel), King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
4
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Nairiyah College, University of Hafr Al-Batin, Hafr Al-Batin 31991, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences and Arts in Sarat Abeda, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Quassim, Buraidaf 52571, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2023, 7(2), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020113
Submission received: 23 November 2022 / Revised: 1 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 23 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Iterative Methods in Solving Nonlinear Equations)

Abstract

:
In this paper, a rational difference equation with positive parameters and non-negative conditions is used to determine the presence and direction of the Neimark–Sacker bifurcation. The neimark–Sacker bifurcation of the system is first studied using the characteristic equation. In addition, we study bifurcation invariant curves from the perspective of normal form theory. A computer simulation is used to illustrate the analytical results.

1. Introduction

1.1. Motivation and Literature Review

In many fields, including economics, biology, and physics, difference equations are essential. Therefore, this field of research is attracting an increasing number of researchers. Since rational difference equations are closed forms of nonlinear difference equations, there is a lot of research on their qualitative behavior. Camouzis et al. [1] present an analysis of the local stability of the rational difference equation at its positive equilibrium point.
c n + 1 = ς c n 2 + c n 3 p + c n 3
ς and p have positive values and the initial conditions are non-negative. In addition, the authors proved that the positive equilibrium point is locally stable if ς 3 + ς 2 ( 2 p 2 + 4 p + 2 ) ς p 3 + p 2 p 1 < 0 and unstable if ς 3 + ς 2 ( 2 p 2 + 4 p + 2 ) ς + p 3 + p 2 p 1 > 0 , additionally, if p 1 < ς p + 1 , then every positive solution of Equation (1) converges to the positive fixed point.
Zhang and Ding [2] studied the existence and direction of Neimark–Sacker bifurcation of Equation (1). The authors proved that if ς > p 1 and if ς satisfies ς 3 + ς 2 ( 2 p 2 + 4 p + 2 ) ς + p 3 + p 2 p 1 = 0 then Neimark–Sacker bifurcation occurs.
Camouzis [3] examined the global nature of the third order rational difference equation
c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 2 p + Q c n + R c n 1
where the parameters ς , , p are non-negative ς + > 0 , Q , R > 0 and the initial values c 2 , c 1 , c 0 are non-negative real numbers. Using a suitable modification in the variables,
c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 2 p + Q x n + c n 1
where p 0 , ς > 0 , Q > 0 . The author focused on examining the boundness of solutions of Equation (3). Along the same lines of research, authors in [4] examined whether the third order difference equation has a Neimark–Sacker bifurcation.
c n + 1 = ς c n + α c n 2 1 + c n 1
With parameters α , ς ϵ (0, ) and initial conditions c 2 , c 1 , c 0 that are non-negative. It has been shown in Camouzis and Ladas [5] that the unique positive equilibrium c * = α + ς 1 , α + ς > 1 is locally asymptotically stable when ς > ς * and unstable when ς < ς * where ς * = ( α 2 α ) / ( α + 1 ) . The authors in [4] proved the existence of Neimark–Sacker bifurcation for Equation (4) as ς passes through the critical value ς * .
In [6] Shareef and Aloqeili studied Neimark–Sacker bifurcation of the following rational difference equation
c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 3 p + c n 1
where the parameters and the initial conditions are non-negative.
In [7], the authors studied the global dynamics and bifurcations of the following two quadratic fractional second-order difference equations:
c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 1 + γ c n 1 p c n 2 + Q c n c n 1
In [8], rusticet et al. investigated the global dynamics and bifurcations of certain second-order rational difference equation with quadratic terms of the following form
c n + 1 = c n 1 p x n 2 + q c n 1 + r
Recently, in [9], Kulenovic et al. studied the Neimark–Sacker bifurcation of the following second-order rational difference equation with quadratic terms
c n + 1 = R p c n c n 1 + q c n 1 2 + r
Considering the rational difference equation of the fifth order is motivated by the above work
c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 4 p + c n 1
with positive parameters ς and p and non-negative initial conditions c 4 , c 3 , c 2 , c 1 , c 0 .
Camouzis and Ladas in [1] have conjectured that the difference equation
c n + 1 = ς c n + γ c n 3 p + Q c n 1
for some parameters and initial conditions, it has unbounded solutions. This paper will not prove this conjecture. Equation (9) is a special case of γ = Q = 1 in the previous equation. Numerical simulations showed that for the range of parameter p < p * in Figure 1, the solution of Equation (9) is unbounded. As a result, there is no parabolic shape near the bifurcation value. As you can see in Equation (1), c n + 1 is based solely on c n 2 and c n 3 , but in Equation (9), c n + 1 is dependent on c n , c n 1 , and c n 4 . To prove the existence of the Neimark–Sacker bifurcation, the same steps are used, including demonstrating that a complex conjugate pair of modulus one eigenvalues exists as well as studying the direction of the bifurcation. However, the calculations differ. Similar equations can be studied using the details of the calculations. A positive equilibrium c * = α + ς 1 , is formed when ς + 1 > p for Equation (9). The next section examines the local stability of this equilibrium. We then demonstrate that this equation undergoes Neimark–Sacker bifurcation when p crosses a certain critical value p * . Next, we study the direction of the bifurcation. Finally, we present some numerical simulations that support our theoretical analysis. As a discrete time population model, difference equations have a long history [10]. In most cases, these equations describe autonomous, discrete-time dynamics and assume that the only temporal change in vital rates is due to population density (thereby leading to nonlinear difference equations). Vital rates, however, are affected by a variety of other mechanisms and circumstances. In addition, the population’s physical and biological environment can fluctuate, either systematically (such as daily, monthly, or seasonal changes) or randomly (such as stochastic weather fluctuations, resource availability, etc.). For more results, we refer to [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].

1.2. Structure of the Paper

The structure of this paper will be as follows: In the following section, we will examine the fixed points along with a linearized form of Equation (11) and apply the jury conditions to evaluate the stability of the system. In Theorem 3, we examined the periodic solution of the model (11). In Section 3 we studied the existence and direction of the Neimark–Sacker bifurcation. The theoretical results are numerically verified in Section 4, whereas the conclusion of the paper is given in Section 5.

2. Main Results

Dynamics of c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 4 p + c n 1

In this section, we study stability and bifurcation analysis rational difference equation of fifth order
c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 4 p + c n 1
with positive ς and p parameters and non-negative initial condition c 0 , c 1 , c 2 , c 3 , c 4 , finding equilibrium points of (11)
g ( c ¯ , c ¯ , c ¯ , c ¯ ) = c ¯
so
c * = ( ς + 1 ) c * p + c *
c * ( p + c * ) = ( ς + 1 ) c *
c * ( p + c * ) ( ς + 1 ) c * = 0
So, it contain two fixed points,
c * ( 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) a n d c * = ( ς p + 1 , ς p + 1 , ς p + 1 , ς p + 1 )
When ς + 1 > p having a unique positive fixed points, let ς + 1 > p .
Suppose
u n v n w n z n t n = c n c n 1 c n 2 c n 3 c n 4
So its change into
u n + 1 v n + 1 w n + 1 z n + 1 t n + 1 = ς u n + t n p + u n u n v n w n z n
Theorem 1.
Positive fixed point is stable at  ς > ς * , and unstable at  ς < ς * , where
ς * = 5 p 2 + 13 p + 6 p + 1
Proof. 
(12) has a Jacobian matrix
S ( η ) = ς ς + 1 ( ς p + 1 ς + 1 ) 0 0 1 ς + 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
The characteristic equation’s Jacobean matrix is
S ( η ) = J η I
S ( η ) = ς ς + 1 η ( ς p + 1 ) ς + 1 0 0 1 ς + 1 1 η 0 0 0 0 1 η 0 0 0 0 1 η 0 0 0 0 1 η
S ( η ) = ( ς ς + 1 η ) ( η ) 4 + ( ς p + 1 ς + 1 ) ( η ) 3 + 1 ς + 1
S ( η ) = ( ς ς + 1 η ) η 4 + ( ς p + 1 ς + 1 ) ( η ) 3 + 1 ς + 1
S ( η ) = η 5 + ς ς + 1 η 4 ς p + 1 ς + 1 η 3 + 1 ς + 1
Let
S ( η ) = S ( η )
S ( η ) = η 5 ς ς + 1 η 4 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 η 1 ς + 1
The jury conditions are used to investigate the stability of c * .
(1)
necessary condition.
(2)
sufficient condition.
Theorem 2.
Polynomial which is in the form of
S ( t ) = j n t n + j n 1 t n 1 + . . . . . . . . . . . . + j 1 t + j 0
For stability necessary conditions are:
S ( 1 ) > 0 a n d ( 1 ) n S ( 1 ) > 0
By forming table sufficient condition for stability is obtained by
rows t 0 t 1 t 2 t n k t n 1 t n 1 j 0 j 1 j 2 j n k j n 1 j n 2 j n j n 1 j n 2 j k j 1 j 0 3 k 0 k 1 k 2 k n k k n 1 4 k n 1 k n 2 k n 3 k k k 0 6 l n 2 l n 3 l 0 2 n 5 m 0 m 1 m 2 m 3 2 n 4 m 3 m 2 m 1 m 0 2 n 3 n 0 n 1 n 2
Now general form of sufficient condition is, where
j k = j 0 j n k j n j k , l k = k 0 k n 1 k k n 1 k k , d k = l 0 l n 2 k l n 2 l k
For stability the sufficient conditions are given by
j 0 > j n , k 0 > k n 1 , l 0 > l n 2 . . . . . n 0 > n 2
Apply the necessary condition
(i)
S ( 1 ) = ( 1 ) 5 ς ς + 1 ( 1 ) 4 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 1 ς + 1 S ( 1 ) = 1 ς ς + 1 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 1 ς + 1 S ( 1 ) = ς p + 1 ς + 1 > 0 .
(ii)
( 1 ) 5 S ( 1 ) = ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 5 ς ς + 1 ( 1 ) 4 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 ( 1 ) 3 1 ς + 1
= 1 1 ς p + 1 ς + 1
= 2 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 > 0
Now the necessary conditions are satisfied, we now apply sufficient condition
S ( η ) = η 5 ς ς + 1 η 4 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 η 1 ς + 1
j 0 = 1 ς + 1 , j 1 = ς p + 1 ς + 1 , j 2 = 0 , j 3 = 0 , j 4 = ς ς + 1 , j 5 = 1
j 5 > | j 0 | , k 0 > k 4 , l 0 > l 3 , d 0 > d 2
k 0 = j 0 j 5 j 5 j 0 = 1 ς + 1 1 1 1 ς + 1 = 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 1 = ς 2 2 ς ( ς + 1 ) 2
k 1 = j 0 j 4 j 5 j 1 = 1 ς + 1 ς ς + 1 1 ς p + 1 ς + 1 = ς 2 + p 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2
k 2 = j 0 j 3 j 5 j 2 = 1 ς + 1 0 1 0 = 0
k 3 = j 0 j 2 j 5 j 3 = 1 ς + 1 0 1 0 = 0
k 4 = j 0 j 1 j 5 j 4 = 1 ς + 1 ς p + 1 ς + 1 1 ς ς + 1 = ς 2 + ς p + ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2
l 0 = k 0 k 4 k 4 k 0
= ς 2 + 2 ς ( ς + 1 ) 2 ( ς 2 + ς p + ς p + 1 ) ( ς + 1 ) 2 ς 2 + ς p + ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 ς 2 + 2 ς ( ς + 1 ) 2 = ς 2 + 2 ς ( 1 + ς ) 2 2 ς 2 + ς p + ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 2
l 0 = 2 ς 3 + ς 2 ς 3 p ς 2 p 2 2 ς + p 2 + 2 p 1 ( ς + 1 ) 4
l 1 = k 0 k 3 k 4 k 1 = ς 2 + 2 ς ( 1 + ς ) 2 0 ( ς 2 + ς p + ς p + 1 ) ( ς + 1 ) 2 ς 2 p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2
l 1 = ς 4 + 2 ς 3 + ς 2 ς 2 p 2 ς p + 2 ς ( 1 + ς ) 4
l 2 = k 0 k 2 k 4 k 2 = ς 2 + 2 ς ( 1 + ς ) 2 0 ς 2 + ς p + ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 0
l 2 = 0
l 3 = k 0 k 1 k 4 k 3 = ς 2 + 2 ς ( 1 + ς ) 2 ς 2 p + 1 ( 1 + ς ) 2 ς 2 + ς p + ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 0
l 3 = = ς 4 + ς 3 p + ς 3 2 ς 2 p + ς + 2 ς 2 ς p 2 p + 1 ( 1 + ς ) 4
Now check for sufficient condition
(i)
j 5 > | j 0 |
| 1 | > | 1 ς + 1 |
1 > 1 ς + 1
(ii)
k 0 > k 4
| ς 2 + 2 ς ( ς + 1 ) 2 | > | ς 2 + ς p + ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 |
3 ς + ς p + p 1 ( 1 + ς ) 2 > 0
(iii)
l 0 > l 3
2 ς 3 + ς 2 ς 3 p ς 2 p 2 2 ς + p 2 + 2 p 1 ( ς + 1 ) 4 > ς 4 + ς 3 p + ς 3 2 ς 2 p + ς + 2 ς 2 ς p 2 p + 1 ( 1 + ς ) 4
ς 4 ς 3 ς 2 + ς 3 p + ς 2 p 2 + 3 ς 3 p 2 ς 2 p ς p 2 p 2 + 2 ( 1 + ς ) 4 > 0
Theorem 3.
The difference equation  c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 4 p + c n 1  has no solution of period 2.
Proof. 
Proof on contrary suppose it is period 2 solution i.e., …… e , r , e , r ,……where e r then e = ς r + r p + e .
We have
r ( ς + 1 ) = e p + e 2
and r = ς e + e p + q so we have,
e ( ς + 1 ) = r p + r 2
solving (14) and (15) these equation we get
( e r ) ( p + e + r + ς + 1 ) = 0 .
But
( p + e + r + ς + 1 ) > 0 ,
so, ( e r ) = 0 which implies e = r . Which completes the proof. □

3. Existence of Neimark-Sacker Bifurcation of c n + 1 = ς c n + c n 4 p + c n 1

In this section, we will look at the Neimark–Sacker bifurcation of (11) which occurs at p = p * as p is bifurcation parameter. Note that Equation (11) has no positive prime period two solution. Hence, we focus our attention on Neimark–Sacker bifurcaton
Theorem 4
([13] (Viete formula)). For any general degree n
f ( t ) = j n t n + j n 1 t n 1 + . . . + j 1 t + j 0
The polynomial coefficient  a k  is related to the signed sum by the Viete formula. The following are the products of its roots   t i , i = 1 , 2 ,
t 1 + t 2 + t n 1 + t n = j n 1 j n
( t 1 t 2 + t 1 t 3 + + t 1 t n ) + ( t 2 t 2 + t 2 t 3 + + t 2 t n ) + t n 1 t n = j n 2 j n
t 1 t 2 t n = ( 1 ) n j 0 j n
Proof. 
Proof suppose that η 1 , η 2 , η 3 , η 4 , η 5 are the roots of (4.1.1) where η 1 = η 2 and η 3 = ς by viete theorem by polynomial
S ( η ) = η 5 ς ς + 1 η 4 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 η 3 1 ς + 1
where j 0 = 1 ς + 1 , j 2 = 0 , j 3 = ς p + 1 ς + 1 , j 4 = ς ς + 1 , j 5 = 1 if η 1 = η 2 = η 3 = η 4 = 1 and η 5 = ς , we obtain
η 1 + η 2 + η 3 + η 4 + η 5 = j 4 j 5
η 1 η 2 + η 1 η 3 + η 1 η 4 + η 1 η 5 + η 2 η 3 + η 2 η 4 + η 2 η 5 + η 3 η 4 + η 3 η 5 + η 4 η 5 = j 3 j 5
η 1 η 2 η 3 + η 1 η 2 η 4 + η 1 η 2 η 5 + η 1 η 3 η 4 + η 1 η 3 η 5 + η 1 η 4 η 5 + η 2 η 3 η 4 + η 2 η 3 η 5
+ η 2 η 4 η 5 + η 3 η 4 η 5 = j 2 j 5
η 1 η 2 η 3 η 4 + η 1 η 2 η 3 η 5 + η 1 η 3 η 4 η 5 + η 2 η 3 η 4 η 5 = j 1 j 5
η 1 η 2 η 3 η 4 η 5 = j 0 j 5
η 1 + η 2 + η 3 + η 4 + η 5 = ς ς + 1
η 1 η 2 + η 1 η 3 + η 1 η 4 + η 1 η 5 + η 2 η 3
+ η 2 η 4 + η 2 η 5 + η 3 η 4 + η 3 η 5 + η 4 η 5 = ς p + 1 ς + 1
η 1 η 2 η 3 + η 1 η 2 η 4 + η 1 η 2 η 5 + η 1 η 3 η 4 + η 1 η 3 η 5 + η 1 η 4 η 5 + η 2 η 3 η 4
+ η 2 η 3 η 5 + η 2 η 4 η 5 + η 3 η 4 η 5 = 0
η 1 η 2 η 3 η 4 + η 1 η 2 η 3 η 5 + η 1 η 3 η 4 η 5 + η 2 η 3 η 4 η 5 = 0
η 1 η 2 η 3 η 4 η 5 = 1 ς + 1
η 1 = η 2 = η 3 = η 4 = 1
η 5 = 1 ς + 1
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ( η 1 + η 2 + η 3 + η 4 ) η 5 = ς p + 1 ς + 1
η 1 + η 2 + η 3 + η 4 = 7 + 5 ς p
7 + 5 ς p + ( 1 ς + 1 ) = ς ς + 1
p * = 5 ς 2 + 13 ς + 6 ς + 1
ς * = 5 p 2 + 13 p + 6 p + 1
Because roots are formed in a unique way, the above change indicates the presence of a complex conjugate pair in the unit circle. Consider e i θ and e i θ are roots S ( η ) on ς * so
e 5 i θ ς ς + 1 e 4 i θ + ς p + 1 ς + 1 e 3 i θ ς ς + 1 = 0
cos 5 θ + i sin 5 θ ς ς + 1 ( cos 4 θ + i sin 4 θ ) + ς p + 1 ς + 1 ( cos 3 θ + i sin 3 θ ) ς ς + 1 = 0
Make a distinction between the real and imaginary portions.
cos 5 θ ς ς + 1 cos 4 θ + ς p + 1 ς + 1 cos 3 θ ς ς + 1 = 0
sin 5 θ ς ς + 1 sin 4 θ + ς p + 1 ς + 1 sin 3 θ = 0
Rewrite the following two equation in the form of
cos 5 θ ς ς + 1 cos 4 θ = ς p + 1 ς + 1 cos 3 θ + ς ς + 1
sin 5 θ ς ς + 1 sin 4 θ = ς p + 1 ς + 1 sin 3 θ
square (30)
cos 5 θ ς ς + 1 cos 4 θ 2 = ς p + 1 ς + 1 cos 3 θ + ς ς + 1 2
cos 2 5 θ + ς ς + 1 cos 2 4 θ 2 ς ς + 1 cos 5 θ cos 4 θ
= ς p + 1 ς + 1 cos 3 θ 2 + ς ς + 1 2 2 ς p + 1 ς + 1 ς ς + 1 cos 3 θ
square (31)
sin 5 θ ς ς + 1 sin 4 θ 2 = ς p + 1 ς + 1 sin 3 θ 2
sin 2 5 θ ς ς + 1 2 sin 2 4 θ 2 ς ς + 1 sin 5 θ sin 4 θ = ς p + 1 ς + 1 sin 2 3 θ
add (32) and (33) solve
cos 2 5 θ + ς ς + 1 cos 2 4 θ 2 ς ς + 1 cos 5 θ cos 4 θ + sin 2 5 θ ς ς + 1 2 sin 2 4 θ 2 ς ς + 1 sin 5 θ sin 4 θ
= ς p + 1 ς + 1 cos 3 θ 2 + ς ς + 1 2 2 ς p + 1 ς + 1 ς ς + 1 cos 3 θ + ς p + 1 ς + 1 sin 2 3 θ
1 + ς ς + 1 2 2 ς ς + 1 cos 5 θ cos 4 θ + sin 5 θ sin 4 θ
= 1 ς + 1 2 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 2 cos 2 3 θ 2 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 cos 3 θ + ς p + 1 ς + 1 2 sin 2 3 θ
1 + ς ς + 1 2 2 ς ς + 1 cos θ = 1 ς + 1 2 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 2 cos 2 3 θ + sin 2 3 θ 2 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 cos 3 θ
1 + ς ς + 1 2 ( 1 ς + 1 ) 2 ς p + 1 ς + 1 2 = 2 ς ς + 1 cos θ 2 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 cos 3 θ
1 + ς ς + 1 2 1 ς + 1 2 ς p + 1 ς + 1 2 = 2 ς ς + 1 cos θ 2 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 4 cos 3 θ 3 cos θ
= cos θ 2 ς ς + 1 cos θ 8 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 cos 2 θ + 6 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2
= cos θ 2 ς 2 + 8 ς 6 p + 6 ς + 1 8 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 cos 2 θ
Now consider
cos θ 2 ς 2 + 8 ς 6 p + 6 ς + 1 8 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 cos 2 θ = 0
cos θ = 0 , θ = cos 1 ( 0 ) , θ = π 2 , 3 π 2
2 ς 2 + 8 ς 6 p + 6 ς + 1 8 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 2 cos 2 θ = 0
cos 2 θ = 2 ς 2 + 8 ς 6 p + 6 8 ( ς p + 1 ) 2 cos 2 θ = ς 2 + 4 ς 3 p + 3 2 ( ς p + 1 ) 1 + cos 2 θ = ς 2 + 4 ς 3 p + 3 2 ( ς p + 1 ) cos 2 θ = ς 2 + 4 ς 3 p + 3 2 ( ς p + 1 ) 1 cos 2 θ = ς 2 + 4 ς 3 p + 3 2 ς + 2 p 2 2 ( ς p + 1 ) θ = 1 2 cos 1 [ ( ς + 1 ) 2 p 2 ( ς p + 1 ) ] θ = π 2 , 3 π 2
Note e i k θ 1 for p ϵ ( 0 , 1 ) where k = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . Next we show that
d η 2 d p | θ * p * 0
S ( η ) = η 5 ς ς + 1 η 4 + ς p + 1 ς + 1 η 1 ς + 1 d η 2 d p = d η η * d ς = η δ η * δ ς + η * δ η δ ς d η 2 d p = η ( δ p ( η * ) δ p . δ η * δ p ( η * ) ) + η * ( δ p ( η ) δ p . δ η δ p ( η ) )
= η η * 3 ς + 1 . 1 ( 5 η * 4 4 ς η * 3 ς + 1 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η * 2 ς + 1 ) + η * η 3 ς + 1 . 1 5 η 4 4 ς η 3 ς + 1 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η 2 ς + 1
= η * 2 ( ς + 1 ) ( 5 η * 4 4 ς η * 3 ς + 1 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η * 2 ς + 1 ) + η 2 ( ς + 1 ) ( 5 η 4 4 ς η 3 ς + 1 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η 2 ς + 1 )
= η * 2 ( 5 η 4 4 ς η 3 ς + 1 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η 2 ς + 1 ) η 2 ( 5 η * 4 4 ς η * 3 ς + 1 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η * 2 ς + 1 ) ( ς + 1 ) ( 5 η * 4 4 ς η * 3 ς + 1 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η * 2 ς + 1 ) ( 5 η 4 4 ς η 3 ς + 1 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η 2 ς + 1 )
= 5 ( ς + 1 ) η 2 + 4 ς η 3 ( ς p + 1 ) 5 ( ς + 1 ) η * 2 + 4 ς η * 3 ( ς p + 1 ) 5 ( ς + 1 ) η * 4 4 ς η * 3 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η * 2 5 ( ς + 1 ) η 4 4 ς η 3 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η 2
5 ( ς + 1 ) η 2 + 4 ς η 3 ( ς p + 1 ) 5 ( ς + 1 ) η * 2 + 4 ς η * 3 ( ς p + 1 ) M
where
M = 5 ( ς + 1 ) η * 4 4 ς η * 3 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η * 2 5 ( ς + 1 ) η 4 4 ς η 3 + 3 ( ς p + 1 ) η 2
M = 25 ( ς + 1 ) 2 20 ( 1 + ς ) η * + 15 ( 1 + ς ) ( ς p + 1 ) η * 2 20 ς ( 1 + ς ) η * + 16 ς 2 12 ς ( ς p + 1 η ) η * + 15 ( 1 + ς ) ( ς p + 1 ) η 2 20 ς ( 1 + ς ) η + 9 ( ς p + 1 ) 2
M = 25 ( ς + 1 ) 2 + 16 ς 2 + 9 ( ς p + 1 ) 2 + 15 ( 1 + ς ) ( ς p + 1 ) [ η * 2 + η 2 ]
20 ς ( 1 + ς ) ( η + η * ) 12 ς ( ς p + 1 ) [ η + η * ]
η * 2 + η 2 = ( cos θ i sin θ ) 2 + ( cos θ + i sin θ ) 2
η * 2 + η 2 = 2 ( 2 cos 2 θ 1 )
η + η * = cos θ i sin θ + cos θ + i sin θ
η + η * = 2 cos θ
M = 25 ( ς + 1 ) 2 + 16 ς 2 + 9 ( ς p + 1 ) 2 + 15 ( 1 + ς ) ( ς p + 1 ) [ 2 ( 2 cos 2 θ 0 1 ) ]
20 ς ( 1 + ς ) ( 2 cos θ 0 ) 12 ς ( ς p + 1 ) [ 2 cos θ 0 ]
M = 25 ( ς + 1 ) 2 + 16 ς 2 + 9 ( ς p + 1 ) 2 + 30 ( 1 + ς ) ( ς p + 1 ) [ 2 cos 2 θ 0 1 )
40 ς ( 1 + ς ) cos θ 0 24 ς ( ς p + 1 ) cos θ 0
d η 2 d p | θ * p * = 20 ( 1 + ς ) cos 2 θ 0 + 8 ς cos θ 0 + 2 ( 2 ς + 3 p * + 2 ) M
Suppose that d η 2 d p | θ * p * = 0 and suitable substitution.
Consider
2 ς + 3 p * + 2 = 2 ς + 2 + 3 ( 5 ς 2 + 13 ς + 6 ) ς + 1
= ( 2 ς + 2 ) ( ς + 1 ) + 3 ( ς + 2 ) ( 5 ς + 3 ) ς + 1
20 ( 1 + ς ) cos 2 θ 0 + 8 ς cos θ 0 + 4 ( ς + 1 ) 2 + 3 ( ς + 2 ) ( 5 ς + 3 ) ς + 1 = 0
20 ( 1 + ς ) ς 2 + 4 ς 3 p * + 3 4 ( ς p + 1 ) + 8 ς ( 0 ) + 4 ( ς + 1 ) 2 + 3 ( ς + 2 ) ( 5 ς + 3 ) ς + 1 = 0
20 ( 1 + ς ) ς 2 + 4 ς 3 p * + 3 4 ( ς p + 1 ) + 4 ( ς + 1 ) 2 + 3 ( ς + 2 ) ( 5 ς + 3 ) ς + 1 = 0
Now
p * = 5 ς 2 + 13 ς + 6 ς + 1
Put and find
20 ς 4 + 45 ς 3 + 134 ς 2 + 125 ς + 66 16 ς 2 + 44 ς + 20 + 4 ( ς + 1 ) 2 + 3 ( ς + 2 ) ( 5 ς + 3 ) ς + 1 = 0
( ς + 1 ) ( 20 ς 4 + 95 ς 3 + 134 ς 2 + 66 ) + ( 16 ς 2 + 44 ς + 20 ) 4 ( ς + 1 ) 2 + 3 ( ς + 2 ) ( 5 ς + 3 ) ( ς + 1 ) ( 16 ς 2 + 44 ς + 20 ) > 0
20 ς 5 + 553 ς 4 + 1912 ς 3 + 3294 ς 2 + 2209 ς + 506 16 ς 3 + 960 ς 2 + 64 ς + 20 > 0
Here p * contradicts, so
d η 2 d p | θ * p * 0
We have demonstrated that the system goes through a Neimark–sacker bifurcation. □

Direction of Neimark–Sacker Bifurcation

In this part, we will look at the Neimark–Sacker bifurcation of (11) and we use normal form theory to find it. In [13], the stability of invariant closed curve of bifurcation from positive fix points is investigated. Now we shift fixed point to the origin take
x n y n z n w n T n = U n U * V n V * W n W * Z n Z * T n T *
x n + 1 y n + 1 z n + 1 w n + 1 T n + 1 = ς ( x n + X * ) + t n + X * p + y n + X * X * x n y n z n w n
Can be written which as
U n + 1 = S U n + Q ( U n )
So
Q ( y ) = 1 2 L ( U , U ) + 1 6 M ( U , U , U ) + O ( | | U | | 5 )
U n = ς u n + T n p + U N x n y n z n w n
L ( U , U ) = L 1 ( U , U ) 0 0 0 0
M ( U , U , U ) = M 1 ( U , U , U ) 0 0 0 0
where
L i ( r , s ) = 2 U i ς ς j ς k | ς = 0 ( r j s k )
and
M i ( r , s , t ) = 3 U i ς ς j ς k ς l | ς = 0 ( r j s k t l )
L 1 ( μ , ν ) = ς ( ς + 1 ) 3 ( μ 2 ν 1 + ν 1 μ 2 ) + 2 ς p + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 3 μ 2 ν 2 + 1 ( ς + 1 ) 3 ( μ 3 ν 5 + μ 5 ν 3 )
M 1 ( μ , ν , τ ) = 6 ( ς p + 1 ) ( ς + 1 ) 4 ( μ 2 ν 2 τ 2 ) + 2 ς ( ς + 1 ) 4 ( μ 3 ν 3 τ 2 + μ 2 ν 3 τ 3 + μ 3 ν 2 τ 3 ) + 2 ( ς + 1 ) 4 ( μ 3 ν 3 τ 5 + μ 5 ν 3 τ 3 + μ 3 ν 5 τ 3 )
Let S h * = e i θ 0 h * , S T g = e i θ g where h * and g are eigenvectors to eigenvalues corresponding e i θ 0 and e i θ 0 solve ( S η I ) h * = ( S e i θ 0 I ) h * = 0
ς ς + 1 e i θ 0 ( ς p + 1 ς + 1 ) 0 0 1 ς + 1 1 e i θ 0 0 0 0 0 1 e i θ 0 0 0 0 0 e i θ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 e i θ 0 h 1 * h 2 * h 3 * h 4 * h 5 * = 0
taking equations by multiplying the second and third row to the first column
h 1 * e i θ 0 h 2 * = 0
h 2 * e i θ 0 h 3 * = 0
Consider h 1 * = 1 ,
now from Equation (37)
1 e i θ 0 h 2 * = 0 h 2 * = e i θ 0
now from Equation (38)
h 2 * e i θ 0 h 3 * = 0 h 3 * = e 2 i θ 0
similarly
h 4 * = e 3 i θ 0 h 5 * = e 4 i θ 0
we obtain
h * 1 e i θ 0 e 2 i θ 0 e 3 i θ 0 e 4 i θ 0 .
Note the choice of h * amuse the first equation has a non-zero solution of ( K η I ) h * = 0 . The ( K η I ) matrix must be singular so ( K η I ) = 0
| K η I | = ( ς ς + 1 e i θ 0 ) ( e 4 i θ 0 ) + ς p + 1 1 + ς e 2 i θ 0 1 ς + 1 h
Now the first equation becomes
e 4 i θ 0 ς ς + 1 e i θ 0 ς p + 1 1 + ς e 2 i θ 0 + 1 ς + 1 e 4 i θ = 0
Also solving
( K η I ) T p = ( K e i θ 0 I )
ς ς + 1 e i θ 0 1 0 0 0 ς p + 1 ς + 1 e i θ 0 0 0 0 0 1 e i θ 0 0 0 0 0 0 e i θ 0 1 1 ς + 1 0 0 0 e i θ 0 s g 1 g 2 g 3 g 4 g 5
taking equation by multiplying first row to first column
ς ς + 1 e i θ 0 g 1 + g 2 = 0
taking equation by multiplying third row to first column
e i θ 0 g 3 + g 4 = 0
taking equation by multiplying fourth row to first column
e i θ 0 g 4 + g 5 = 0
taking equation by multiplying fifth row to first column
1 ς + 1 g 1 e i θ 0 g 5 = 0
let g 1 = 1 from (39) equation
ς ς + 1 e i θ 0 + g 2 = 0 , g 2 = ς 1 + ς + e i θ 0
from (42) equation
g 5 = e i θ 0 ς + 1
put in (41) and get
g 4 = e 2 i θ 0 ς + 1
put in (40) and get
g 3 = e 3 i θ 0 ς + 1
Choice of this g satisfy the equation
g 1 ς ς + 1 + e i θ 0 e 3 i θ 0 ς + 1 e 2 i θ 0 ς + 1 e i θ 0 ς + 1
To normalize of g ana h * we must < g , h > = 1 , where < . > represents scalar product in C 3
κ = < g , h * > = 1 ς ς + 1 + e i θ 0 e 3 i θ 0 ς + 1 e 2 i θ 0 ς + 1 e i θ 0 ς + 1 1 e i θ 0 e 2 i θ 0 e 3 i θ 0 e 4 i θ 0
κ = 2 ς ς + 1 e i θ 0 + 2 1 ς + 1 e 4 i θ 0 + 3 i θ 0 ς + 1
Now consider h = κ 1 h * , where κ 1 = 1 / κ :
The critical T c corresponding η 1 , 2 is two-dimensional. Any vector u ϵ p 4 may be decomposed as
u = t h + t ¯ h ¯ + l
where t ϵ C 1 and t ¯ h ¯ ϵ T c , l ϵ T s . We have
t = < g , u > l = t < g , u > h < g ¯ , t > h ¯
In these coordinates, the map (4.26) given from
t ¯ = e i θ 0 t + < g , H ( t h + t ¯ h ¯ + l ) > l ¯ = S l + H ( t h + t ¯ h ¯ + l ) < g , H ( t h + t ¯ h ¯ + l ) > h < g ¯ , H ( t h + t ¯ h ¯ + l ) > h ¯
Previous system which can be written in the form off
t ¯ = e i θ 0 t + 1 2 H 20 t 2 + H 11 t t ¯ + 1 2 H 02 t ¯ 2 + 1 2 H 21 t 2 t ¯ + < H 10 , l > t + < H 01 , l > t ¯ l ¯ = S l + 1 2 S 20 t 2 + S 11 t t ¯ + 1 2 S 02 t ¯ 2 + 1 2 S 21 t 2 t ¯
where
H 20 = < g , L ( h , h ) > , H 11 = < g , L ( h , h ¯ ) > , H 02 = < g , L ( h ¯ , h ¯ ) > , H 21 = < g , M ( h , h , h ¯ ) >
S 20 = L ( h , h ) < g , L ( h , h ) > h < g ¯ , L ( h , h ) > h ¯ S 11 = L ( h , h ¯ ) < g , L ( h , h ¯ ) > h < g ¯ , L ( h , h ) > h ¯
< H 10 , v > = < g , L ( h , l ) > , < H 01 , l > = < g , L ( h ¯ , l ) >
And scalar multiple in C 3 is used. W c can be almost as by center manifold theorem
U = V ( t , t ¯ ) = 1 2 w 20 t 2 + w 11 t t ¯ + 1 2 w 02 t ¯ 2
so, < h , w i j > 0 . The vectors w i j ϵ C 3 find linear equation
w 20 = ( e 2 i θ 0 I 3 k ) 1 S 20 w 11 = ( I 3 S ) 1 S 11 w 02 = ( e 2 i θ 0 I 3 k ) 1 S 02
Now t can be show as
t ¯ = e i θ t ¯ + 1 2 H 20 t 2 + h 11 t t ¯ + 1 2 H 02 t ¯ 2
+ 1 2 ( H 21 + 2 < g , L ( h , ( I S ) 1 S 11 ) > + < g , L ( h ¯ , ( e 2 i θ 0 I K ) 1 S 20 ) > ) t 2 t ¯
peceived into identities
( I S ) 1 h = 1 1 e i θ 0 h , ( e 2 i θ 0 I S ) 1 h = e i θ 0 e i θ 0 1 h
and
( I S ) 1 h ¯ = 1 1 e i θ 0 h ¯ , ( e 2 i θ 0 I S ) 1 h ¯ = e i θ 0 e i θ 0 1 h ¯
We show t using map
t ¯ = e i θ 0 t + k + l 2 1 k j g k j t k t ¯ j
Direction of closed curve can be commuted via
ς ( p * ) = p e e i θ 0 g 21 2 p e ( 1 2 e i θ 0 ) 2 ( 1 e i θ 0 ) g 20 g 11 1 2 | g 11 | 2 1 4 | g 02 | 2
Theorem 5.
If  ς ( p * ) < 0  , Neimark-Sacker bifurcation at  p = p *  is supercritical and sub-critical and exist a exclusive closed curve that bifurcation is asymptotically stable from fixed points (respectively unstable).

4. Numerical Simulation

In this section, we give numerical examples which support our result in previous section. For sake of simplicity, we take c n = x n , ς = B , ς * = B * and p = A .
Example 1.
Let  B = 1  and  0.9 < A < 2 , then
x n + 1 = x n + x n 4 A + x n 1
with the initial conditions x 0 = x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 = 1 . (see Figure 2)
Example 2.
Let  B = 0.9  and  A = 1.234 , then
x n + 1 = 0.9 x n + x n 4 1.234 + x n 1
with the initial condition  x 0 = x 1 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = 50 . (see Figure 3)
Example 3.
Let  B = 0.889  and  0.9 < A < 2 , then
x n + 1 = 0.889 x n + x n 4 1.1103 + x n 1
with the initial condition  x 0 = x 1 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = 50 . (see Figure 2)
Example 4.
Let  B = 1  and  A = 0.889 , then
x n + 1 = x n + x n 4 0.899 + x n 1
with the initial conditions  x 0 = x 1 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = 1.7 . (see Figure 4)

5. Conclusions and Findings

We present some numerical simulations that support our theoretical results about the Neimark–Sacker bifurcation of model (11). We see a bifurcation diagram in Figure 1 in the (A, x n + 1 ) plane. In this figure, B = 1 , so the critical value of A at which Neimark–Sacker Bifurcation occurs is A * = 0.9 , and the initial conditions are c 4 = c 3 = c 2 = c 1 = c 0 = 1 . A > 0.9 ensures the asymptotic stability of the positive fixed point. In Figure 3, we plot phase portrait by assigning the values A = 1.234 , B = 0.9 , c 4 = c 3 = c 2 = c 1 = c 0 = 50. Note that, for this value of A, the positive equilibrium point is asymptotically stable. Figure 4 and Figure 5 illustrate phase portraits by assigning values of A near the bifurcation point. In Figure 4, A = 1.1103 , B = 0.889 , c 4 = c 3 = c 2 = c 1 = c 0 = 50 while in Figure 5, A = 0.889 , B = 1 , c 4 = c 3 = c 2 = c 1 = c 0 = 1.7 . It is noticeable that we move away from the fixed point that the closed invariant curve disappears, which means the curve is subcritical (unstable). By virtue of Theorem 1, supported by Figure 1, the unique positive equilibrium ( 1.1 , 1.1 , 1.1 , 1.1 ) in Figure 3 is unstable whereas in Figure 4, it is stable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K., I.M. and T.F.I.; methodology, A.K., T.F.I.; software, W.M.O., B.R.A.-S. and A.A.D.; validation, B.R.A.-S. and M.Y.J.; formal analysis, T.F.I.; investigation, A.K., I.M.; resources, W.M.O., B.R.A.-S. and M.Y.J.; data curation, I.M. and T.F.I.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M.; writing—review and editing, A.K. and I.M.; visualization, A.A.D.; supervision, A.K., T.F.I.; project administration, A.K. and T.F.I.; funding acquisition, T.F.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

King Khalid University, project under grant number RGP.2/47/43/1443.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used are cited within this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to anonymous referee for their valuable suggestions. The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship for Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through Larg groups (project under grant number RGP.2/47/43/1443.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Camouzis, E.; Chatterjee, E.; Ladas, G. On the dynamics of xn+1 = ∂xn−2 + xn−3/A + xn−3. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 331, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhang, R.; Ding, X. The Neimark-Sacker bifurcation of xn+1 = ∂xn−2 + xn−3/A + xn−3. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2009, 15, 775–784. [Google Scholar]
  3. Camouzis, E. Global analysis of solutions of xn+1 = ∂xn + xn−2/A + Bxn + Cxn−1. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 316, 616–627. [Google Scholar]
  4. He, Z.; Qiu, J. Neimark-Sacker bifurcation of a third order rational difference equation. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2013, 19, 1513–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Camouzis, E.; Ladas, G. Dynamics of Third-order Rational Difference Equations with Open Problems and Conjectures. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2013, 19, 1513–1522. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shareef, A.; Aloqeili, M. Neimark-Sacker bifurcation of a fourth order difference equation. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2018, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kalabušic, S.; Kulenovic, M.R.S.; Mehuljic, M. Global dynamics and bifurcations of two quadratic fractional second-order difference equations. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2016, 21, 132–143. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hrustic, S.J.; Kulenovic, M.R.S.; Nurkanovic, M. Global dynamics and bifurcations of certain second order rational difference equation with quadratic terms. Qual. Theory Dyn. 2016, 15, 283–307. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kulenovic, M.R.S.; Moranjkic, S.; Nurkanovic, Z. Naimark-Sacker bifurcation of second order rational difference equation with quadratic terms. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 3377–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Valderde, J.C. Simplest normal forms of Hopf Neimark-Sacker Bifurcations. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 2003, 13, 1831–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cushing, J.M. Difference equations as models of evolutionary population dynamics. J. Bio Dyn. 2019, 13, 103–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Connor, M.K.; Pilav, E. The Neimark-Sacker bifurcation and global stability of perturbation of sigmoid beverton-holt difference equation. Dis. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2021, 14, 2092709. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kalabuši, S.; Kulenovi, M.P.S.; Mehulji, M. Global Period-Doubling Bifurcation of Quadratic Fractional Second Order Difference Equation. Dis. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2014, 13, 10–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khaliq, A.; Alayachi, H.S.; Zubair, M.; Rohail, M.; Khan, A.Q. On stability analysis of a class of three-dimensional system of exponential difference equations. AIMS Math. 2023, 8, 5016–5035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kuznetsov, Y.A.; Kuznetsov, I.A.; Kuznetsov, Y. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 3rd ed.; Springer Applied Mathematical Science: New York, NY, USA, 2013; p. 632. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kocic, V.L.; Ladas, G. Global behaviour on non-linear difference equations of higher order with applications. Klu. Aca. Pub. 1993, 13, 10–53. [Google Scholar]
  17. Khyat, T.; Kulenovic, M.; Pilav, E. The Naimark-Sacker bifurcation and asymptotic approximation of the invariant curve of a certain difference equation. J. Comp. Anal. Appl. 2017, 19, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hou, C.; Han, L.; Cheng, S. Complete Asymptotic and Bifurcation Analysis for a Difference Equation with Piece-wise Constant Control. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2010, 13, 542073. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gari-Demirovi, M.; Moranjki, S. Neimark–Sacker Bifurcation and Approximation of the Invariant Curve of Certain Homogeneous Second-Order Fractional Difference Equation. Dis. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2020, 12, 625–4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ibrahim, T.F. Bifurcation and periodically semi-cycles for fractional difference equation of fifth order. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2018, 11, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Stubna, M.D.; Gilmour, R.F. Analysis of a Non-linear Partial Difference Equation and Its Application to Cardiac Dynamics. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2010, 12, 1147–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bifurcation diagram of Equation (9) in (A,x) plane.
Figure 1. Bifurcation diagram of Equation (9) in (A,x) plane.
Fractalfract 07 00113 g001
Figure 2. Neimark–Sacker bifurcation of the map x n + 1 = B x n + x n 4 A + x n 1 , where B = 1 and 0.9 < A < 2 , we can see that chaos shifted to stability at point A = 0.989 .
Figure 2. Neimark–Sacker bifurcation of the map x n + 1 = B x n + x n 4 A + x n 1 , where B = 1 and 0.9 < A < 2 , we can see that chaos shifted to stability at point A = 0.989 .
Fractalfract 07 00113 g002
Figure 3. Phase portraits of the map x n + 1 = 0.9 x n + x n 4 / 1.234 + x n 1 , for B = 0.9 .
Figure 3. Phase portraits of the map x n + 1 = 0.9 x n + x n 4 / 1.234 + x n 1 , for B = 0.9 .
Fractalfract 07 00113 g003
Figure 4. Phase portraits of the map x n + 1 = 0.8999 x n + x n 4 / 1.1103 + x n 1 , for B = B * .
Figure 4. Phase portraits of the map x n + 1 = 0.8999 x n + x n 4 / 1.1103 + x n 1 , for B = B * .
Fractalfract 07 00113 g004
Figure 5. Phase portraits of the map x n + 1 = x n + x n 4 / 0.889 + x n 1 for B = B * .
Figure 5. Phase portraits of the map x n + 1 = x n + x n 4 / 0.889 + x n 1 for B = B * .
Fractalfract 07 00113 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khaliq, A.; Mustafa, I.; Ibrahim, T.F.; Osman, W.M.; Al-Sinan, B.R.; Dawood, A.A.; Juma, M.Y. Stability and Bifurcation Analysis of Fifth-Order Nonlinear Fractional Difference Equation. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020113

AMA Style

Khaliq A, Mustafa I, Ibrahim TF, Osman WM, Al-Sinan BR, Dawood AA, Juma MY. Stability and Bifurcation Analysis of Fifth-Order Nonlinear Fractional Difference Equation. Fractal and Fractional. 2023; 7(2):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020113

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khaliq, Abdul, Irfan Mustafa, Tarek F. Ibrahim, Waleed M. Osman, Bushra R. Al-Sinan, Arafa Abdalrhim Dawood, and Manal Yagoub Juma. 2023. "Stability and Bifurcation Analysis of Fifth-Order Nonlinear Fractional Difference Equation" Fractal and Fractional 7, no. 2: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7020113

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop