Next Article in Journal
Urban Nature: Perception and Acceptance of Alternative Green Space Management and the Change of Awareness after Provision of Environmental Information. A Chance for Biodiversity Protection
Next Article in Special Issue
Citizen Science for Urban Forest Management? Predicting the Data Density and Richness of Urban Forest Volunteered Geographic Information
Previous Article in Journal
City Sovereignty: Urban Resistance and Rebel Cities Reconsidered
Previous Article in Special Issue
Promoting Crowdsourcing for Urban Research: Cycling Safety Citizen Science in Four Cities
Article

Building a National-Longitudinal Geospatial Bicycling Data Collection from Crowdsourcing

1
City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
2
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
3
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Urban Sci. 2017, 1(3), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1030023
Received: 17 May 2017 / Revised: 16 June 2017 / Accepted: 26 June 2017 / Published: 28 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crowdsourcing Urban Data)
To realize the full potential of crowdsourced data collected by smartphone applications in urban research and planning, there is a need for parsimonious, reliable, computationally and temporally efficient data processing routines. The literature indicates that the opportunities brought by crowdsourced data in generating low-cost, bottom-up, and fine spatial and temporal scale data, are also accompanied by issues related to data quality, bias, privacy concerns and low accessibility. Using an exemplar case of RiderLog, a crowdsourced GPS tracked bicycling data, this paper describes and critiques the processes developed to transform this urban big data. Furthermore, the paper outlines the important tasks of formatting, cleaning, validating, anonymizing and publishing this data for the capital cities of each state and territory in Australia. More broadly, this research contributes to the foundational underpinnings of how to process and make available crowdsourced data for research and real world urban planning purposes. View Full-Text
Keywords: crowdsourced data; smartphone; bicycle; RiderLog; big data crowdsourced data; smartphone; bicycle; RiderLog; big data
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Leao, S.Z.; Lieske, S.N.; Conrow, L.; Doig, J.; Mann, V.; Pettit, C.J. Building a National-Longitudinal Geospatial Bicycling Data Collection from Crowdsourcing. Urban Sci. 2017, 1, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1030023

AMA Style

Leao SZ, Lieske SN, Conrow L, Doig J, Mann V, Pettit CJ. Building a National-Longitudinal Geospatial Bicycling Data Collection from Crowdsourcing. Urban Science. 2017; 1(3):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1030023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leao, Simone Z., Scott N. Lieske, Lindsey Conrow, Jonathan Doig, Vandana Mann, and Chris J. Pettit. 2017. "Building a National-Longitudinal Geospatial Bicycling Data Collection from Crowdsourcing" Urban Science 1, no. 3: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1030023

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop